AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Hepatitis BPhase 3NCT01063036

Efficacy and Safety Study of Entecavir Plus Tenofovir in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Who Failed Previous Treatment

A Phase 3 study testing Entecavir and Tenofovir in people with Chronic Hepatitis B, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 28 sites in 7 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to show that the combination of entecavir and tenofovir, is effective and well tolerated in chronic hepatitis B patients who have failed previous treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Hepatitis B
What is being tested?
Entecavir and Tenofovir
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
144 participants
Where
28 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
May 2010to Feb 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection; either hepatitis B-e antigen(HBeAg)-negative or HBeAg-positive
  • Subjects must have a treatment failure to their current nucleoside/ nucleotide treatment regimen
  • Prior entecavir and/or tenofovir monotherapy is allowed
  • Subjects must have compensated liver function

Who cannot join

  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Evidence of decompensated cirrhosis
  • Co-infection with HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), or hepatitis D virus (HDV)
  • Moderate or severe renal impairment
  • Recent history of pancreatitis
  • Therapy with interferon, thymosin alpha or other immuno-stimulators within 24 weeks of being assigned to study drug into this study
  • Prior entecavir/tenofovir combination therapy

Trial locations and contacts

28 sites in 7 countries.

28 sites in 7 countries

Germany8 sites
  • Local Institution

    Berlin, 10969

  • Local Institution

    Berlin, 13353

  • Local Institution

    Hamburg, 20099

  • Local Institution

    Hamburg, 20246

  • Local Institution

    Hanover, 30625

  • Local Institution

    Heindelberg, 69120

  • Local Institution

    München, 81675

  • Local Institution

    Tübingen, 72076

Other trials in Germany

France4 sites
  • Local Institution

    Clichy, 92110

  • Local Institution

    Lyon, 69317

  • Local Institution

    Orléans, 45067

  • Local Institution

    Strasbourg, 67000

Other trials in France

Italy4 sites
  • Local Institution

    Bagno A Ripoli (Fi), 50012

  • Local Institution

    Bari, 70124

  • Local Institution

    Foggia, 71100

  • Local Institution

    Milan, 20122

Other trials in Italy

Poland4 sites
  • Local Institution

    Kielce, 25-317

  • Local Institution

    Krakow, 31-531

  • Local Institution

    Lodz, 91-347

  • Local Institution

    Wroclaw, 50-349

Other trials in Poland

Netherlands3 sites
  • Local Institution

    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ

  • Local Institution

    Arnhem, 6815 AD

  • Local Institution

    Rotterdam, 3015 CE

Other trials in Netherlands

Romania3 sites
  • Local Institution

    Bucharest, 021105

  • Local Institution

    Burcuresti, 022328

  • Local Institution

    Timișoara, 300 002

Other trials in Romania

Spain2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Barcelona, 08025

  • Local Institution

    Valencia, 46014

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Entecavir Plus Tenofovir in Adults With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection With Previous Nucleoside/Nucleotide Treatment Failure

The purpose of this study is to show that the combination of entecavir and tenofovir, is effective and well tolerated in chronic hepatitis B patients who have failed previous treatment.

Being tested
Entecavir, Tenofovir
Medical subject headings
Hepatitis B, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EntecavirDrug

    Also called Baraclude®, BMS-200475

    Tablets, Oral, 1 mg, once daily, 96 weeks

  • TenofovirDrug

    Also called Viread®

    Tablets, Oral, 300 mg, once daily, 96 weeks

Study groups in NCT01063036
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Entecavir + TenofovirExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Entecavir; Drug: Tenofovir

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Virologic Response at Week 48 - Treated Population

    Virologic response was defined as Hepatitis B virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) less than 50 international units per milliliter (IU/mL); approximately 300 copies/mL. Percentage was calculated as number of participants with virologic response at Week 48 divided by the number of treated participants. Treated participants were evaluated using non-completer (NC) = failure (F). The HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was measured using the Roche COBAS(REGISTERED) TaqMan - High Pure System (HPS) assay, in a central laboratory. The results were reported in IU/mL, with the limit of quantification (LOQ) = 29 IU/mL and lower limit of detection (LLD) = 6 IU/mL. HBV DNA measurements were transformed by the log10 scale when analyzed as a continuous variable, using log10(LOQ-1) for values below LOQ.

    Measured: Week 48

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Percentage of Participants With a Virologic Response at Week 24 and at Week 96 - Treated Population

    Virologic response was defined as Hepatitis B virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) less than 50 international units per milliliter (IU/mL); approximately 300 copies/mL. Percentage was calculated as number of participants with virologic response at Week 24, Week 96 divided by the number of treated participants. Treated participants were evaluated using non-completer (NC) = failure (F). The HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was measured using the Roche COBAS(REGISTERED) TaqMan - High Pure System (HPS) assay. The results were reported in IU/mL, with the limit of quantification (LOQ) = 29 IU/mL and lower limit of detection (LLD) = 6 IU/mL. HBV DNA measurements were transformed by the log10 scale when analyzed as a continuous variable, using log10(LOQ-1) for values below LOQ.

    Measured: Week 24, Week 96

  2. Change From Baseline in Mean log10 HBV DNA at Weeks 12, 24, 48, and 96 - Treated Evaluable Population

    HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was measured using the Roche COBAS(REGISTERED) TaqMan - High Pure System (HPS) assay. The results were reported in log 10 IU/mL, with the limit of quantification (LOQ) = 29 IU/mL and lower limit of detection (LLD) = 6 IU/mL. HBV DNA measurements were transformed by the log10 scale when analyzed as a continuous variable, using log10(LOQ-1) for values below LOQ. Baseline was Day 1, prior to study drug administration.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 12, 24, 48, 96

  3. Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA Less Than the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 - Treated Population

    HBV DNA less than (<) LLD (6 IU/mL) was defined/measured by the COBAS(REGISTERED) TaqMan HPS assay at Weeks 24, 48, and 96. Percentage was calculated as number of participants with HBV DNA < LLD at Weeks 24, 48, 96 divided by the number of treated participants. Treated participants were evaluated using non-completer (NC) = failure (F).

    Measured: Weeks 24, 48, 96

  4. Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Loss at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 - Treated Population Who Were HBeAg Positive at Baseline

    Loss of HBeAg was defined as being HBeAg-negative at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 in those participants who had been HBeAg-positive at baseline. Method used for HBeAg was DiaSorin - Anti HBe enzyme immunoassay kit - procedure for qualitative determination of antibodies to HBeAg in human serum or plasma samples. Percentage was calculated as number of participants with HBeAg loss at Weeks 24 and 48 divided by the number of treated participants who were HBeAg-positive at baseline. Treated participants (HBeAg-positive at baseline) were evaluated using NC = F. Baseline was Day 1, before start of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 24, 48, and 96

  5. Percentage of Participants With HBe Seroconversion at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 - Treated Population Who Were HBeAg-positive at Baseline

    HBe seroconversion was defined as being both HBeAg-negative and HBeAb-positive at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 in those participants who had been HBeAg-positive at baseline. Method used was DiaSorin - Anti HBe enzyme immunoassay kit - procedure for qualitative determination of antibodies to HBeAg in human serum or plasma samples. Percentage was calculated as number of participants with HBe seroconversion at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 divided by the number of treated participants who were HBeAg-positive at baseline. Treated participants (HBeAg-positive at baseline) were evaluated using NC = F. Baseline was Day 1, before start of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, and 96

  6. Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 24, 48, 96 - Treated Population Who Were HBsAg-Positive at Baseline

    Loss of HBsAg was defined as being HBsAg-negative at Weeks 24, 48, 96 in those participants who had been HBsAg-positive at baseline. The method used: Immunoassay - ADVIA CENTAUR from SIEMENS: in vitro diagnostic immunoassay for the qualitative and quantitative determination of HBsAg in human serum and plasma (potassium ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid, lithium or sodium heparinized). Percentage calculated as number of participants with a HBsAg loss at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 divided by the number of treated participants who were HBsAg-positive at baseline (participants were not enrolled into the study unless they were positive for HBsAg). Treated participants (HBsAg-positive at baseline) were evaluated using NC=F. Baseline was Day 1, before start of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, 96

  7. Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Seroconversion at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 - Treated Population Who Were HBsAg-Positive at Baseline

    HBsAg seroconversion was defined as being both HBsAg-negative and HBsAb-positive at Weeks 24, 48, and 96 in those participants who had been HBsAg-positive at baseline. Percentage was calculated as number of participants with HBs seroconversion at Weeks 24 and 48 divided by the number of treated participants who were HBsAg-positive at baseline. Positive result for HBsAg was one of the inclusion criteria. Treated participants (HBsAg positive at baseline) were evaluated using NC=F. The method used was an Immunoassay testing - ADVIA CENTAUR from SIEMENS: in vitro diagnostic immunoassay for the qualitative and quantitative determination of HBsAg in human serum and plasma [potassium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), lithium or sodium heparinized]. Baseline was Day 1, before start of study drug.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48, and 96

  8. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) on Treatment, and Discontinuation of Study Drug Due to Adverse Events (AE) - Treated Population

    AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug. Grade (Gr) 1=Mild, Gr 2=Moderate, Gr 3=Severe, Gr 4=Life-threatening or disabling, Gr 5=Death. On-treatment = on Day 1 through last dose of study therapy + 5 days.

    Measured: Day 1 to last dose of study drug plus 5 days; up to Week 96

  9. Number of Participants With Emergence of Genotypic Resistance to Study Drugs at Weeks 48 and 96- Treated Population

    Testing of HBV genotype was performed at baseline for all treated patients and for participants at Weeks 48 and 96 with primary non-response or virologic breakthrough. Emergent genotypic resistance to study drugs was defined as follows: Emergent = not detected at baseline; entecavir (ETV) resistance (ETVr): participant's sample was to have rtM204V/I/S and any substitution at rtT184, rtS202, or rtM250; tenofovir (TDF) resistance (TDFr) which was based on adefovir (ADV)-mutations: participant's sample was to have rtA181T/V, rtN236T, or (rtA194T and rtM204V/I/S). Primary non-response was defined as < 1 log10 decrease in HBV DNA from baseline on treatment at or after Week 12. Virologic breakthrough was defined as ≥ 1 log10 increase in HBV DNA over nadir on treatment, either confirmed or last on-treatment followed by discontinuation of study therapy.

    Measured: Baseline to Weeks 48, 96

  10. Number of Participants on Treatment With Study Drug With Laboratory Test Abnormalities Meeting Selected Criteria on Treatment - Treated Population

    Selected criteria presented in each category. Upper limit of normal among all laboratory ranges (ULN); Baseline (BL); alanine transaminase (ALT); milligram per deciliter (mg/dL); milliliters per minute (mL/min); greater than (>);greater than, equal to (>=); less than (<). Creatinine data presented below were confirmed, ie, at least 2 consecutive values. On-treatment = after Day 1 through last dose of study therapy + 5 days.

    Measured: Day 1 to last dose of study drug plus 5 days; up to Week 96

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Feb 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2010
  3. Primary completionNov 2012
  4. Study completionFeb 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
144 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01063036
Sponsor's protocol ID
AI463-203
Other IDs
2009-015705-40, 2009
Status last verified
Nov 2014
First submitted
3 Feb 2010
Last updated
15 Dec 2014
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Entecavir and Tenofovir in people with Chronic Hepatitis B, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 28 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 28 sites in Germany, France, Italy, Poland, Netherlands and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Feb 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With a Virologic Response at Week 48 - Treated Population (time frame: Week 48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Dec 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in