AzTrials
AzTrials

Elective Hepatic ResectionNCT01060683

Non-invasive Measurement of Hemoglobin Concentration With Pulse Co-oximetry

An observational study of Elective Hepatic Resection, run by University Medical Center Groningen at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of continuous SpHb measurement ( Rainbow DCI, Masimo, Irvine Ca, USA) compared to the current method of monitoring (blood sampling), both during phases of hemoconcentration and hemodilution. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Elective Hepatic Resection
What is being tested?
Hemoglobin determination + NaCl 0.9% bolus and hemoglobin determination + Venofundin bolus
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
Jan 2010to Jul 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: ASA class I and II patients for elective hepatic resection

Who may be able to join

  • All patients: Age > 18 years
  • ASA class I and II patient requiring hepatic resection

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusal
  • Patients with a perioperative blood loss exceeding 5ml/kg

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • University Medical Center Groningen,University of Groningen, the Netherlands

    Groningen, 9700RB

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Liver Resection and Non-invasive Measurement of Hemoglobin Concentration With Pulse Co-oximetry

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of continuous SpHb measurement ( Rainbow DCI, Masimo, Irvine Ca, USA) compared to the current method of monitoring (blood sampling), both during phases of hemoconcentration and hemodilution.

Being tested
Hemoglobin determination + NaCl 0.9% bolus, hemoglobin determination + Venofundin bolus
Keywords
hemoglobin, Coagulation variables, blood chemistry, Blood gas analysis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hemoglobin determination + NaCl 0.9% bolusBiological

  • hemoglobin determination + Venofundin bolusBiological

Study groups in NCT01060683
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1: 15 patientsfor elective hepatic resection
Receives: Biological: Hemoglobin determination + NaCl 0.9% bolus
Group 2: 15for elective hepatic resection
Receives: Biological: hemoglobin determination + Venofundin bolus

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To evaluate the accuracy of continuous SpHb measurement during hepatic resection compared with standard (invasive) Hb measurement

    Measured: during operation

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. the effect of a bolus of crystalloid on SpHb level will be compared to the effect of a bolus of colloid on the SpHb level.

    Measured: during operation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Feb 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2010
  3. Primary completionJul 2011
  4. Study completionJul 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01060683
Sponsor's protocol ID
SpHb-001
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
1 Feb 2010
Last updated
18 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Vos JJ, Kalmar AF, Struys MM, Wietasch JK, Hendriks HG, Scheeren TW. Comparison of arterial pressure and plethysmographic waveform-based dynamic preload variables in assessing fluid responsiveness and dynamic arterial tone in patients undergoing major hepatic resection. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;110(6):940-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes508. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

    PubMed 23348202

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Elective Hepatic Resection, run by University Medical Center Groningen at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To evaluate the accuracy of continuous SpHb measurement during hepatic resection compared with standard (invasive) Hb measurement (time frame: during operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01060683, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in