Ductal Carcinoma In SituNCT01060085
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Breast Cancer Staging
An observational study of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer, run by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) versus that of Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CEMRI) in determining the size of breast cancer preoperatively. Secondary objectives include: 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Invasive Breast Cancer
- How many people
- 51 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2009to 31 Dec 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Women who have histologically proven, non-inflammatory, breast cancer.
Who may be able to join
- Subject is female of any race and ethnicity
- Subject is at least 30 years old
- Subject has histologically proven DCIS or invasive breast carcinoma.
- Subject is able to undergo CEMRI at DHMC-Lebanon
Who cannot join
- Patients who are pregnant or think they may be pregnant
- Patients who are breast-feeding.
- Patients who have significant existing breast trauma
- Subjects unable or unwilling to undergo informed consent
- Absolute contraindication to CEMRI, including:
- presence of implanted electrical device (pacemaker or neurostimulator),aneurysm clip, or metallic foreign body in or near the eyes
Show all 13Show fewer
- life threatening allergy to gadolinium contrast
- CEMRI performed at institution other than DHMC Lebanon
- Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy
- Patients with maximum tumor diameter >5cm
- Patients presenting with Inflammatory Breast Cancer
- Patients with gross axillary lymphadenopathy on clinical exam or by imaging
- Maximum breast size limitation: i.e. breast size that exceeds the size of the large format image receptor (24cm x 29cm) on any view
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
About this study
Official title: A Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Adjunctive Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Adjunctive Contrast Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer
The primary objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) versus that of Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CEMRI) in determining the size of breast cancer preoperatively.
Secondary objectives include:
- Comparing the operating characteristics of each combined imaging protocol with respect to the reference standard, i.e. histopathologic assessment, of additional non-index lesions.
- Comparison of re-excision rates based on estimated disease extent from adjunctive CEMRI vs. adjunctive DBT.
- Evaluation of patient satisfaction with regard to the adjunctive modality (DBT vs. CEMRI).
Read the detailed description
STUDY OVERVIEW
Subjects are enrolled within 4 weeks of the date of diagnosis of biopsy proven ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) or Invasive Breast Cancer. Approximately 50 subjects will be enrolled. In addition to Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center's (DHMC)current standard imaging practice, i.e. bilateral mammography with or without sonography and bilateral CEMRI, all subjects will undergo bilateral DBT within four weeks of CEMRI and prior to surgical treatment. Usual clinical practice, i.e. interpretation of current standard imaging (Mammography, Sonography and CEMRI), and clinical assessment based on physical exam as well, as discussion with the patient and breast surgeon of record, will dictate local treatment, i.e. surgical excision only, breast conservation therapy (BCT) or mastectomy.
Any routine diagnostic examinations completed as part of the subject's standard of care imaging will be read and interpreted as part of the patient's standard of care. There will be no delays in reading or interpretation of the routine care images.
Blinded reads of the DBT and CEMRI images will be conducted, with the patient's mammography +/- sonography available for reference. The interpreting radiologists ("readers") will evaluate tumor size and extent of disease, along with the presence or absence of multi-focality or contralateral disease. The two imaging paradigms will be compared in the estimation of breast cancer extent using the gold-standard histologic result.
DBT mammography may provide new or different information about the index lesion than standard imaging, but this will not alter clinical management. However, if DBT detects an additional abnormality separate from the index lesion either in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast, it will be evaluated further with standard imaging technology (e.g. diagnostic mammography and or sonography) targeted to this site to assess the level of suspicion for malignancy and potential need for biopsy.
PROCEDURES
Tomosynthesis Acquisition
Study participants shown to have DCIS or invasive breast cancer by fine needle aspiration cytology and/or core needle biopsy, and who have signed informed consent, will undergo a bilateral DBT mammogram within 4 weeks of CEMRI (prior to surgical treatment). The DBT mammogram includes a 2D acquisition and a 3D acquisition, under the same compression in both the standard craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral (MLO) projections. In the rare instance that the index malignancy is not included on a view due to a chest wall location, a single repeat view of the involved (i.e. cancerous) breast will be performed in an attempt to image the malignancy on the combined DBT mammogram. For each view, the subject will be positioned and compressed as for standard mammographic imaging. The patient will remain under compression for no more than 15 seconds. During the compression, a 3D dataset (about a 4 second exposure) and a 2D dataset (about a 2 second exposure) will be acquired. Once the subject is positioned and compressed, the technologist will activate the motion of the x-ray tube to move to the starting position of -7.5 degrees. The technologist will then start the tomosynthesis 3D acquisition, which is completed at +7.5 degrees (an arc of 15 degrees). The x-ray tube then by design moves back to the center and automatically acquires the 2D dataset. At the conclusion of image acquisition, the compression is automatically released.
A Radiologic Technologist registered for radiography and mammography will perform the tomosynthesis study. The technologist performing the DBT exam has been trained in the use and operation of the DBT imaging system.
Device Description
A DBT system similar to the commercially available product ('Selenia Dimensions', Hologic, Inc., Danbury CT) will be used for the data collection. The 'Selenia Dimensions' 2D/3D digital mammography system has been approved by the FDA for screening and diagnostic breast imaging.
The breast tomosynthesis system is a digital mammography system (Hologic, Inc, Danbury, CT) that is capable of producing standard two-dimensional images and a three-dimensional tomosynthesis mammogram. The 2D and 3D tomographic datasets are acquired under the same compression. The breast tomosynthesis system employs a tungsten target anode with interchangeable rhodium, silver, and aluminum x-ray filters. The filtration material is chosen based on breast thickness and exam protocol and, along with the tungsten target, minimizes x-ray dose while maximizing image content. The three-dimensional tomosynthesis x-ray imaging technology involves acquiring images of a stationary compressed breast, at multiple angles during a short-scan. The individual images are then reconstructed into a series of thin high-resolution slices that are displayed individually or in a dynamic cine mode. When in combination mode, the system acquires both the 3D dataset and then the 2D standard mammographic image. The dose for a single combination 2D/3D acquisition for the "average breast" i.e. compressed breast thickness of 4.5 cm, 50% fat, 50% glandular composition is approximately 2.45 mGy, less than the FDA limit for a single mammogram image (3 mGy) for the same breast thickness and composition.
The DBT system will only be used for subjects who have signed the Informed Consent.
Quality Control
The Hologic Tomosynthesis Digital Mammography System (DBT) will be checked by a qualified medical physicist prior to any testing or imaging of subjects to assure the system is operating correctly with optimum image quality. A Study Technologist will review images, obtain phantom images and check system operation on a periodic basis to assure that optimum image quality is maintained. The quality control procedures described in the systems' operator manuals will be used throughout the trial. If there is any noticeable degradation in image quality, a Hologic engineer will be called immediately to recalibrate or repair the system.
CEMRI
Each subject will undergo bilateral CEMRI as part of usual clinical practice, not because of their participation in the study. Subjects who are unable to undergo contrast enhanced MRI due to contraindications to MRI or gadolinium based intravenous contrast are not eligible for study enrollment.
Image Interpretation
The DBT images will be evaluated by a Mammography Quality Standards Act certified radiologist. There will be two readers for each subject: one reader will interpret DBT (blinded to results of CEMRI), while the second reader will interpret CEMRI (blinded to results of DBT). Each reader interprets the adjunct exam (i.e. DBT or CEMRI) unblinded to conventional imaging (i.e. mammography +/- sonography) and completes the appropriate rating instrument.
Size Determination
Study Readers will estimate the maximal in plane diameter in at least two imaging planes of the index malignant lesion. For DBT, maximal diameters should be measured in the CC and MLO projections. For CEMRI, maximal diameters should be measured in axial and sagittal projections. Readers will also report on and diagram the location of additional lesions that are not considered definitely benign.
Histological Interpretation
The specimen (lumpectomy or mastectomy) is sequentially sectioned into 5 mm slices and the number of slices is recorded in the gross description. Targeted sections are taken of both lumpectomies and mastectomies by sampling lesions identified by imaging (per usual clinical protocol). Such lesions are submitted as appropriate along with 1-2 sections of a surrounding cuff of normal appearing parenchyma in each appropriate direction. The distance between multiple lesions is measured, and in such cases a single section of intervening tissue is submitted for histologic examination. Incidental lesions identified on gross exam are sampled as appropriate. The histopathologic specimen is viewed by a pathologist with 3-20 years of experience in breast pathology. Invasive disease is graded according to the Nottingham Bloom Scarff Richardson system. DCIS is graded according to a modified Van Nuys system, including the nuclear grade, the presence or absence of necrosis, and the pattern of growth. The number of consecutive slides containing DCIS will be multiplied by the approximate thickness of each tissue section (5mm) in order to determine the histopathologic size.
Tumor size will be determined by gross examination of the pathology specimen when visible on gross examination. Tumor size estimate in this case will reflect an aggregate of invasive and non-invasive, i.e. DCIS, components.
If no gross lesion is seen, the measurement of tumor size will be determined by the microscopic measurement of the lesion. Since the 2 components are intermingled, the size reported represents an aggregate size.
In addition to the gross exam measurement, if a lesion is substantially composed of DCIS, (i.e. extensive intraductal component present) by microscopic examination, we will specify the size of both the invasive component (by microscopic exam) as well as a measurement of the DCIS component (by microscopic exam) and provide an aggregate size of both invasive and DCIS components).
In cases of invasive cancer with an extensive component of DCIS treated with mastectomy or a very wide local excision, standard pathologic sampling of the lesion may not allow for accurate microscopic size estimate of the lesion. In these select cases the pathologist will indicate the type of growth pattern of the DCIS component as either "mass-like" or "non mass-like".
- Conditions
- Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Invasive Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Breast Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Breast Cancer | Women shown to have DCIS or invasive breast cancer by fine needle aspiration cytology and/or core needle biopsy. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparison between the accuracy of DBT vs. CEMRI using two measurements: 1. Maximal diameter estimate by imaging modality and 2. Maximal diameter based on histopathology gold standard.
Measured: surgical pathology results completed
Secondary outcomes (3)
True positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives for: 1. Multi-focality defined as additional discrete discontinuous tumor foci that are at least 2.5 cm separate from the index lesion. 2. Contralateral disease: presence/absence
Measured: surgical pathology results completed
Predicted re-excision rates based on size estimates from each imaging paradigm
Measured: surgical pathology results completed
Patient satisfaction survey for DBT and CEMRI imaging
Measured: patient completion of DBT and CEMRI imaging
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2009
- Primary completion31 Dec 2016
- Study completion31 Dec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ductal Carcinoma In SituStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hologic, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Steven P Poplack, MD, Principal investigator, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01060085
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D0842
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 29 Jan 2010
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Adjunctive Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Adjunctive Contrast Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01060085
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- D0842
- Conditions
- Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Invasive Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Breast Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hologic, Inc.
- Study start
- Feb 2009
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) versus that of Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CEMRI) in determining the size of breast cancer preoperatively.
Secondary objectives include:
- Comparing the operating characteristics of each combined imaging protocol with respect to the reference standard, i.e. histopathologic assessment, of additional non-index lesions.
- Comparison of re-excision rates based on estimated disease extent from adjunctive CEMRI vs. adjunctive DBT.
- Evaluation of patient satisfaction with regard to the adjunctive modality (DBT vs. CEMRI).
Detailed description
STUDY OVERVIEW
Subjects are enrolled within 4 weeks of the date of diagnosis of biopsy proven ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) or Invasive Breast Cancer. Approximately 50 subjects will be enrolled. In addition to Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center's (DHMC)current standard imaging practice, i.e. bilateral mammography with or without sonography and bilateral CEMRI, all subjects will undergo bilateral DBT within four weeks of CEMRI and prior to surgical treatment. Usual clinical practice, i.e. interpretation of current standard imaging (Mammography, Sonography and CEMRI), and clinical assessment based on physical exam as well, as discussion with the patient and breast surgeon of record, will dictate local treatment, i.e. surgical excision only, breast conservation therapy (BCT) or mastectomy.
Any routine diagnostic examinations completed as part of the subject's standard of care imaging will be read and interpreted as part of the patient's standard of care. There will be no delays in reading or interpretation of the routine care images.
Blinded reads of the DBT and CEMRI images will be conducted, with the patient's mammography +/- sonography available for reference. The interpreting radiologists ("readers") will evaluate tumor size and extent of disease, along with the presence or absence of multi-focality or contralateral disease. The two imaging paradigms will be compared in the estimation of breast cancer extent using the gold-standard histologic result.
DBT mammography may provide new or different information about the index lesion than standard imaging, but this will not alter clinical management. However, if DBT detects an additional abnormality separate from the index lesion either in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast, it will be evaluated further with standard imaging technology (e.g. diagnostic mammography and or sonography) targeted to this site to assess the level of suspicion for malignancy and potential need for biopsy.
PROCEDURES
Tomosynthesis Acquisition
Study participants shown to have DCIS or invasive breast cancer by fine needle aspiration cytology and/or core needle biopsy, and who have signed informed consent, will undergo a bilateral DBT mammogram within 4 weeks of CEMRI (prior to surgical treatment). The DBT mammogram includes a 2D acquisition and a 3D acquisition, under the same compression in both the standard craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral (MLO) projections. In the rare instance that the index malignancy is not included on a view due to a chest wall location, a single repeat view of the involved (i.e. cancerous) breast will be performed in an attempt to image the malignancy on the combined DBT mammogram. For each view, the subject will be positioned and compressed as for standard mammographic imaging. The patient will remain under compression for no more than 15 seconds. During the compression, a 3D dataset (about a 4 second exposure) and a 2D dataset (about a 2 second exposure) will be acquired. Once the subject is positioned and compressed, the technologist will activate the motion of the x-ray tube to move to the starting position of -7.5 degrees. The technologist will then start the tomosynthesis 3D acquisition, which is completed at +7.5 degrees (an arc of 15 degrees). The x-ray tube then by design moves back to the center and automatically acquires the 2D dataset. At the conclusion of image acquisition, the compression is automatically released.
A Radiologic Technologist registered for radiography and mammography will perform the tomosynthesis study. The technologist performing the DBT exam has been trained in the use and operation of the DBT imaging system.
Device Description
A DBT system similar to the commercially available product ('Selenia Dimensions', Hologic, Inc., Danbury CT) will be used for the data collection. The 'Selenia Dimensions' 2D/3D digital mammography system has been approved by the FDA for screening and diagnostic breast imaging.
The breast tomosynthesis system is a digital mammography system (Hologic, Inc, Danbury, CT) that is capable of producing standard two-dimensional images and a three-dimensional tomosynthesis mammogram. The 2D and 3D tomographic datasets are acquired under the same compression. The breast tomosynthesis system employs a tungsten target anode with interchangeable rhodium, silver, and aluminum x-ray filters. The filtration material is chosen based on breast thickness and exam protocol and, along with the tungsten target, minimizes x-ray dose while maximizing image content. The three-dimensional tomosynthesis x-ray imaging technology involves acquiring images of a stationary compressed breast, at multiple angles during a short-scan. The individual images are then reconstructed into a series of thin high-resolution slices that are displayed individually or in a dynamic cine mode. When in combination mode, the system acquires both the 3D dataset and then the 2D standard mammographic image. The dose for a single combination 2D/3D acquisition for the "average breast" i.e. compressed breast thickness of 4.5 cm, 50% fat, 50% glandular composition is approximately 2.45 mGy, less than the FDA limit for a single mammogram image (3 mGy) for the same breast thickness and composition.
The DBT system will only be used for subjects who have signed the Informed Consent.
Quality Control
The Hologic Tomosynthesis Digital Mammography System (DBT) will be checked by a qualified medical physicist prior to any testing or imaging of subjects to assure the system is operating correctly with optimum image quality. A Study Technologist will review images, obtain phantom images and check system operation on a periodic basis to assure that optimum image quality is maintained. The quality control procedures described in the systems' operator manuals will be used throughout the trial. If there is any noticeable degradation in image quality, a Hologic engineer will be called immediately to recalibrate or repair the system.
CEMRI
Each subject will undergo bilateral CEMRI as part of usual clinical practice, not because of their participation in the study. Subjects who are unable to undergo contrast enhanced MRI due to contraindications to MRI or gadolinium based intravenous contrast are not eligible for study enrollment.
Image Interpretation
The DBT images will be evaluated by a Mammography Quality Standards Act certified radiologist. There will be two readers for each subject: one reader will interpret DBT (blinded to results of CEMRI), while the second reader will interpret CEMRI (blinded to results of DBT). Each reader interprets the adjunct exam (i.e. DBT or CEMRI) unblinded to conventional imaging (i.e. mammography +/- sonography) and completes the appropriate rating instrument.
Size Determination
Study Readers will estimate the maximal in plane diameter in at least two imaging planes of the index malignant lesion. For DBT, maximal diameters should be measured in the CC and MLO projections. For CEMRI, maximal diameters should be measured in axial and sagittal projections. Readers will also report on and diagram the location of additional lesions that are not considered definitely benign.
Histological Interpretation
The specimen (lumpectomy or mastectomy) is sequentially sectioned into 5 mm slices and the number of slices is recorded in the gross description. Targeted sections are taken of both lumpectomies and mastectomies by sampling lesions identified by imaging (per usual clinical protocol). Such lesions are submitted as appropriate along with 1-2 sections of a surrounding cuff of normal appearing parenchyma in each appropriate direction. The distance between multiple lesions is measured, and in such cases a single section of intervening tissue is submitted for histologic examination. Incidental lesions identified on gross exam are sampled as appropriate. The histopathologic specimen is viewed by a pathologist with 3-20 years of experience in breast pathology. Invasive disease is graded according to the Nottingham Bloom Scarff Richardson system. DCIS is graded according to a modified Van Nuys system, including the nuclear grade, the presence or absence of necrosis, and the pattern of growth. The number of consecutive slides containing DCIS will be multiplied by the approximate thickness of each tissue section (5mm) in order to determine the histopathologic size.
Tumor size will be determined by gross examination of the pathology specimen when visible on gross examination. Tumor size estimate in this case will reflect an aggregate of invasive and non-invasive, i.e. DCIS, components.
If no gross lesion is seen, the measurement of tumor size will be determined by the microscopic measurement of the lesion. Since the 2 components are intermingled, the size reported represents an aggregate size.
In addition to the gross exam measurement, if a lesion is substantially composed of DCIS, (i.e. extensive intraductal component present) by microscopic examination, we will specify the size of both the invasive component (by microscopic exam) as well as a measurement of the DCIS component (by microscopic exam) and provide an aggregate size of both invasive and DCIS components).
In cases of invasive cancer with an extensive component of DCIS treated with mastectomy or a very wide local excision, standard pathologic sampling of the lesion may not allow for accurate microscopic size estimate of the lesion. In these select cases the pathologist will indicate the type of growth pattern of the DCIS component as either "mass-like" or "non mass-like".
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Breast Cancer | – | –Women shown to have DCIS or invasive breast cancer by fine needle aspiration cytology and/or core needle biopsy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Women who have histologically proven, non-inflammatory, breast cancer.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subject is female of any race and ethnicity
- Subject is at least 30 years old
- Subject has histologically proven DCIS or invasive breast carcinoma.
- Subject is able to undergo CEMRI at DHMC-Lebanon
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patients who are pregnant or think they may be pregnant
- Patients who are breast-feeding.
- Patients who have significant existing breast trauma
- Subjects unable or unwilling to undergo informed consent
- Absolute contraindication to CEMRI, including:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Comparison between the accuracy of DBT vs. CEMRI using two measurements: 1. Maximal diameter estimate by imaging modality and 2. Maximal diameter based on histopathology gold standard.
Time frame: surgical pathology results completed
3 secondary outcomes
True positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives for: 1. Multi-focality defined as additional discrete discontinuous tumor foci that are at least 2.5 cm separate from the index lesion. 2. Contralateral disease: presence/absence
Time frame: surgical pathology results completed
Predicted re-excision rates based on size estimates from each imaging paradigm
Time frame: surgical pathology results completed
Patient satisfaction survey for DBT and CEMRI imaging
Time frame: patient completion of DBT and CEMRI imaging
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative vs. Pathologic Size in Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study
Mastectomy, Breast Neoplasm Malignant Primary
Not yet recruiting
Agentic AI App and Home Bioimpedance Monitoring for Endocrine Therapy Adherence and Lymphedema in Breast Cancer Survivors
Breast Neoplasm Malignant Primary, Lymphedema Arm
Not yet recruiting
Addressing Financial Hardship in AYA Cancer Survivors Through the Use of the New LIFT UP Intervention
Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 2
DCIS: RECAST Trial Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Re-Evaluating Conditions for Active Surveillance Suitability as Treatment
Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Tamoxifen Citrate, Letrozole, Anastrozole, or Exemestane With or Without Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Invasive RxPONDER Breast Cancer
Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Invasive Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Steven P Poplack, MD principal investigator
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer, run by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparison between the accuracy of DBT vs. CEMRI using two measurements: 1. Maximal diameter estimate by imaging modality and 2. Maximal diameter based on histopathology gold standard. (time frame: surgical pathology results completed). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2017.