AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseSUPERIORSVGNCT01047449

Improving the Results of Heart Bypass Surgery Using New Approaches to Surgery and Medication

A study testing No-touch SVG harvest vs conventional SVG harvest technique in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Surgery for blocked arteries in the heart (coronary artery bypass grafting) can be accomplished using veins from the leg sewn onto the heart to provide an alternate path for blood flow, i.e. 'bypassing' the blockages. These veins themselves can block over time. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
What is being tested?
No-touch SVG harvest vs conventional SVG harvest technique
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
250 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jul 2011to 21 Mar 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age > 18 years
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Isolated CABG, non-emergent, on- or off-pump (cardiopulmonary bypass)
  • Primary or re-do CABG (if re-do, all previous grafts must be occluded)
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction >20%
  • Require at least one SVG as part of revascularization strategy
  • Creatinine clearance of at least 30ml/min or higher

Who cannot join

  • Unable to use greater SV due to previous vein stripping or poor quality on mandatory preoperative Duplex study and vein mapping
  • Contraindication to receiving follow-up 64-slice cardiac CT angiography (allergy to contrast dye, renal failure with a creatinine >180 µmol/L, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation precluding proper gating of study)
  • Pregnant women, or women of child-bearing age
  • Allergy to fish oil/fish products, and non-medicinal ingredients of the study product (corn oil,soybean oil,gelatin,glycerol, or carob colouring)
  • Already taking fish oil supplements regularly (daily use in past 30 days)
  • Congenital or acquired coagulation disorders
  • Patients considered to be of excessive risk of wound infection according to the clinical judgement of the site surgical investigator.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Surgical and Pharmacological Novel Interventions to Improve Overall Results of Saphenous Vein Graft Patency in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: An International Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Surgery for blocked arteries in the heart (coronary artery bypass grafting) can be accomplished using veins from the leg sewn onto the heart to provide an alternate path for blood flow, i.e. 'bypassing' the blockages. These veins themselves can block over time. This may result in part simply from the trauma from the surgery, in other words, by removing the vein from the leg and then sewing it to the heart. Another mechanism may be the abnormal metabolic processes within the body responsible for the plaque build-up of the heart arteries in the first place - this may lead to the blockages of the veins used for bypass. In the present era of heart bypass surgery, this incidence of veins blocking remains high despite advances in blood thinners and cholesterol medications. This study is designed to determine whether two new interventions may potentially reduce the incidence of blockages in the veins used for heart bypass surgery. One is a surgical technique significantly reducing the trauma associated with removing the leg vein prior to use as a bypass graft onto the heart. The second intervention is the use of a nutritional supplement before and after surgery which is composed of fish oils. The study will recruit sufficient patients to provide strong and relevant conclusions regarding both study questions. It will be highly applicable also because it will include approximately 1,550 patients from approximately 50 hospitals across many countries. We believe these techniques will result in significantly less vein blockages in patients one year after heart bypass surgery.

Read the detailed description

Background: Saphenous vein grafts (SVG) remain the most widely used conduit for CABG. However, contemporary patency rates at one-year post CABG remain poor, despite optimal medical therapy. Recent trials (PREVENT IV) demonstrate that up to 45% of all patients have one or more SVG occluded at angiography one year post-CABG; up to 25% of all SVG are occluded at one year post-CABG angiography. Furthermore, patients with at least one SVG occluded had twice the incidence of perioperative MI, and thirteen times the composite endpoint of death, late MI or repeat revascularization at 12-18 months.

The proposed SUPERIOR SVG Trial is a prospective, international, multi-centre randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT). It utilizes a factorial design to elucidate the benefits of two interventions, one surgical and the other pharmacological, to improve saphenous vein graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG):

Surgical Arm: Does a novel atraumatic ("no touch") technique of pedicled saphenous vein graft (SVG) harvesting result in improved angiographic patency and clinical outcomes at 1 year, compared to conventional SVG harvesting techniques, in patients undergoing CABG.

Rationale: A Swedish cardiac surgical centre has published numerous studies demonstrating that harvesting the SVG with a cushion of surrounding fat and without vein graft distension, "no touch" technique, improved surrogate markers of vein preservation in operative specimens. Graft patency was superior in a single small RCT (8.5 year patency: "no touch" 90% vs. conventional 76%, p=0.01, adjusted OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.4-9.6, p=0.007).

Pharmacological Arm: Does N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (fish oil) oral supplementation result in improved angiographic patency and clinical outcomes at 1 year, compared to placebo, in patients undergoing CABG.

Rationale: In vivo studies showed levels of N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA; fish-oils) inversely correlate with the risk of coronary disease. Several large RCTs (more than 40,000 patients in aggregate) performed in diverse cardiovascular populations, have demonstrated moderate mortality benefits. A single RCT from the 90's found that that SVG patency was enhanced with fish oils.

Methods: Each patient will be randomized to a SVG harvested in the conventional fashion (open or endoscopic) or using the "no touch" technique (single-blinded). The pharmacological arm of the factorial design will have patients also randomized to fish-oil or placebo (double-blinded) starting prior to surgery and continuing for 1 year. The primary outcomes (Surgical Arm: proportion of study SVG grafts occluded; Pharmacological Arm: proportion of patients with ≥1 graft occluded) at 1 year CT angiography (window 9-15 months) will be compared between the treatment and control groups. Secondary endpoints include incidence of 50-99% study SVG stenosis at 1 year, adverse events and perioperative and 1 year clinical events (mortality, non-fatal MI, repeat revascularization).

A sample size of 615 patients/arm will provide adequate statistical power (Surgical Arm, Primary Outcome: study SVG graft occlusion, control event rate = 20%, no-touch event rate = 14%, RRR = 0.30, β = 0.2; Pharmacological Arm, Primary Outcome: patients with at least 1 graft occlusion, control event rate = 30%, fish oils event rate 22.5%, RRR = 0.25, β= 0.15). The total sample size has been increased 25% to 1550 patients as approximately 20% of recruited patients in angiographic trials fail to undergo follow-up angiography. Study patients will be enrolled over 39 months at 50 centers. Pilot funding has been secured from CIHR-CANNeCTIN to assess feasibility in 50 patients from 15 sites. A single interim analysis will be performed following completion of 50% of the CT angiograms, p<0.001.

Being tested
No-touch SVG harvest vs conventional SVG harvest technique, Fish oil supplementation vs placebo
Keywords
saphenous vein graft patency, fish oil supplementation, coronary artery bypass surgery, coronary artery disease
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • No-touch SVG harvest vs conventional SVG harvest techniqueProcedure or surgery

    Saphenous vein harvested using the pedicled (no-touch) technique or using the conventional technique. Fish oil supplements/placebo (1g taken orally twice daily for 1 year post-op)

  • Fish oil supplementation vs placeboDietary supplement

    Also called Ocean Nutrition Omega Pure fish oil capsules

    Fish oil supplementation [1g tablets (55% fish oils - EPA:DHA 33%:22%)] taken twice daily for 1 year post-op

Study groups in NCT01047449
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SVG harvest - conventional, placeboActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: No-touch SVG harvest vs conventional SVG harvest technique; Dietary Supplement: Fish oil supplementation vs placebo
SVG harvest - no-touch, fish oilsExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: No-touch SVG harvest vs conventional SVG harvest technique; Dietary Supplement: Fish oil supplementation vs placebo
SVG harvest - no-touch, placeboPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: No-touch SVG harvest vs conventional SVG harvest technique; Dietary Supplement: Fish oil supplementation vs placebo
SVG harvest - conventional, fish oilsActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: No-touch SVG harvest vs conventional SVG harvest technique; Dietary Supplement: Fish oil supplementation vs placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Surgical Arm: Proportion of study SVGs which are totally occluded on cardiac CT angiography at 1-year post-CABG and death due to CV or unknown causes.

    Measured: 1 year post-operative

  2. Pharmacological Arm: Proportion of patients with ≥1 graft (saphenous or arterial) totally (100%) occluded on cardiac CT angiography at 1-year post-CABG and death due to CV or unknown causes, comparing the fish-oil to placebo groups.

    Measured: 1-year post-operative

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Surgical Arm: i. To determine whether the "no touch" technique of SVG harvesting results in a lower proportion of study SVGs that have a significant stenosis (50-99%) on 1-year post-CABG angiography compared to conventional SVG harvesting techniques.

    Measured: 1 year post-operavtive

  2. Surgical Arm: ii. To determine whether the incidence and severity of adverse SVG harvesting events at 1-yr post-CABG (infection, haematoma, swelling, neuropathy, quality of life measures) are similar between the "no touch" and conventional groups.

    Measured: 1-year post-operative

  3. Surgical Arm: iii. The incidence of the composite of non-fatal MI (new definition), all-cause mortality, and repeat revascularization (redo CABG or PCI) perioperatively ( major adverse cardiac events ,MACE ) and stroke at 1 yr is lowe

    Measured: 1-year post-operative

  4. Pharmacological Arm: i. To determine whether fish oil supplementation results in a lower proportion of patients with ≥1 graft with a significant (50-99%) stenosis at 1-year post-CABG angiography, compared to those who received placebo.

    Measured: 1-year post-operative

  5. Pharmacological Arm: ii. The incidence of the composite of n-fatal MI (new definition), all-cause mortality, and repeat revascularization (redo CABG or PCI) perioperatively ( major adverse cardiac events ,MACE ) and stroke at 1 yr i

    Measured: 1-year post-operative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jan 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2011
  3. Primary completionAug 2015
  4. Study completion21 Mar 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
250 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01047449
Sponsor's protocol ID
CANNeCTIN09-11
Acronym
SUPERIORSVG
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
12 Jan 2010
Last updated
5 Oct 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Deb S, Singh SK, de Souza D, Chu MWA, Whitlock R, Meyer SR, Verma S, Jeppsson A, Al-Saleh A, Brady K, Rao-Melacini P, Belley-Cote EP, Tam DY, Devereaux PJ, Novick RJ, Fremes SE; SUPERIOR SVG Study Investigators. SUPERIOR SVG: no touch saphenous harvesting to improve patency following coronary bypass grafting (a multi-Centre randomized control trial, NCT01047449). J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 May 2;14(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-0887-x.

    PubMed 31046806

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing No-touch SVG harvest vs conventional SVG harvest technique in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Surgical Arm: Proportion of study SVGs which are totally occluded on cardiac CT angiography at 1-year post-CABG and death due to CV or unknown causes. (time frame: 1 year post-operative). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01047449, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in