AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornPhase 4NCT01042600

Randomized Controlled Trial of Surfactant Delivery Via Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Versus Endotracheal Intubation

A Phase 4 study testing Endotracheal tube insertion and Laryngeal mask airway insertion in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, run by Albany Medical College at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study, newborn babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), receiving oxygen via nasal CPAP, and needing surfactant treatment will be randomized to standard delivery of surfactant via and endotracheal tube airway(inserted after pre-medication for pain), or to surfactant delivery via laryngeal mask airway… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 48 hours
Conditions the study is for
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
What is being tested?
Endotracheal tube insertion and Laryngeal mask airway insertion
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
61 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2009to Nov 2012
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 48 hours
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Mild-to-moderate RDS
  • Postnatal age 4 to 48 hours
  • Gestational age 29 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks
  • Treated with nasal CPAP ≥ 5 cm H2O and FiO2 between 0.30 and 0.60 for at least 2 hours to maintain SpO2 88-95%
  • Informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Weight < 1000 g
  • Airway anomalies
  • Pulmonary air leaks
  • Craniofacial or cardiothoracic malformations

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Albany Medical Center

    Albany, New York, 12208

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Rescue Surfactant for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in Newborns: Comparing Efficacy of Delivery Via Laryngeal Mask Airway to Delivery by Endotracheal Intubation

In this study, newborn babies with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), receiving oxygen via nasal CPAP, and needing surfactant treatment will be randomized to standard delivery of surfactant via and endotracheal tube airway(inserted after pre-medication for pain), or to surfactant delivery via laryngeal mask airway (LMA). The intent is to remove the airways and return babies to nasal CPAP, after surfactant is given. The primary outcome measure is the rate of failure of initial surfactant therapy. Standardized failure criteria are reached: a) early, if the baby is unable to be placed back on CPAP (needs mechanical ventilation) or, b) late, if the baby requires retreatment with surfactant within 8 hours or more than 2 doses of surfactant.

The objective of this protocol is to reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with RDS needing rescue surfactant therapy by instilling surfactant though an LMA, while achieving comparable efficacy of surfactant treatment.

The hypothesis is that surfactant treatment through an LMA will decrease the proportion of babies with RDS who require mechanical ventilation or subsequent intubation, when compared with standard surfactant treatment following sedation and endotracheal intubation.

Read the detailed description

Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) due to deficiency of lung surfactant is common in preterm newborns. Early treatment with surfactant improves oxygenation, reduces the need for subsequent mechanical ventilation, decreases the incidence of pulmonary air leaks and chronic lung disease and it also reduces mortality in extremely premature newborns. Optimal treatment of RDS includes surfactant therapy and avoidance of invasive mechanical ventilation by using nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). The current standard method of surfactant delivery requires tracheal intubation and at least brief positive-pressure ventilation. Tracheal intubation causes pain and leads to vagal-mediated physiologic instability in neonates; therefore, premedication with morphine and atropine is routinely practiced in our setting. However, premedication with morphine often increases respiratory depression, requiring sustained mechanical ventilation. The Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) is a commercially available, less invasive artificial airway that does not need to be inserted into the trachea; it is FDA-approved for use in neonates, and preliminary data suggest that it can be used for surfactant administration.

The main objective of this study protocol is reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm neonates with mild to moderate RDS needing rescue surfactant therapy by instilling surfactant though an LMA. A second objective is to compare the efficacy of surfactant administered via LMA versus endotracheal tube (ETT) in decreasing the severity of RDS. Additionally, we will evaluate the safety of surfactant administration via LMA.

The primary hypothesis is that surfactant treatment via the LMA approach will decrease the proportion of babies with RDS who require mechanical ventilation or subsequent intubation, when compared with standard surfactant as administered to the ETT group.

This randomized controlled trial will include babies with mild-to-moderate RDS, between 4 to 48 hours of age, with gestational age 29 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks, treated with NCPAP ≥ 5 cm H2O and FiO2 between 0.30 and 0.60 for at least 2 hours to maintain SpO2 88-95%, and informed consent. Exclusion criteria are weight < 1000 g, airway anomalies, pulmonary air leaks, and craniofacial and cardiothoracic malformations.

After informed consent is obtained, babies are randomly assigned (from sealed, opaque, consecutively numbered envelopes), to the "ETT" or "LMA". The "ETT" group is managed according to our current practice of surfactant therapy (endotracheal intubation following premedication with atropine + morphine), whereas the "LMA" group will be pre-medicated with atropine before LMA insertion for surfactant administration.

Both groups will receive Infasurf (3mL/kg) instilled in 2 aliquots via their respective airway, followed by PPV for at least 5 minutes. The artificial airway will be removed and the patient returned to NCPAP by 15 minutes, if spontaneous respirations are adequate. Indications for surfactant re-dosing and mechanical ventilation will be equivalent for both groups.

Babies will continue or initiate assisted ventilation via ETT if any of the following occurs:

  • Persistent apnea;
  • Severe retractions;
  • Inability to wean FiO2 < 60%

Criteria for re-dosing with surfactant:

  1. Within 8 hours after first dose of surfactant (early re-dosing):
  • FiO2 20% higher than the baseline FiO2, after excluding other obvious causes of respiratory insufficiency such as pneumothorax. If early re-dosing of surfactant is needed in patients of either group, the dose will be administered via ETT (i.e., LMA patients will be intubated, and will receive the dose of surfactant via ETT)
  1. Beyond 8 hours of the first dose of surfactant (late re-dosing):
  • FiO2 is ≥ 60%, or;
  • FiO2is ≥ 30% associated with worsening clinical signs of RDS.

If late re-dosing is needed in patients of the LMA group, use of the LMA is permitted for the second dose. In the ETT group, all doses are given via the ETT.

Primary Outcome Measures:

Rate of failure of early surfactant rescue therapy in the 2 groups, using the following criteria to differentiate early from late failure:

  • Criteria for early failure (within 1 hour):
  1. The need of mechanical ventilation within 1 hour of surfactant therapy.
  2. Use of Narcan to avoid mechanical ventilation after surfactant therapy.
  • Criteria for late failure (beyond 1 hour):
  1. Sustained FiO2 > 0.60 to maintain target SpO2
  2. Second dose of surfactant within 8 hours after the first dose.
  3. More than 2 doses of surfactant.

Babies will have FiO2 adjusted to maintain SpO2 88-95%, per current practice. Other aspects of weaning ventilatory support will be managed by clinicians' preference.

Being tested
Endotracheal tube insertion, Laryngeal mask airway insertion
Keywords
Respiratory distress syndrome, Surfactant, Tracheal intubation, Laryngeal mask airway, Newborn
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Respiratory Distress Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endotracheal tube insertionDevice

    Endotracheal tube insertion after premedication with atropine (0.02 mg/kg) and morphine (0.1 mg/kg)

  • Laryngeal mask airway insertionDevice

    Also called LMA North America

    Laryngeal mask airway insertion after premedication with atropine (0.02 mg/kg)

Study groups in NCT01042600
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Endotracheal intubationActive comparatorEndotracheal tube insertion for surfactant administration, following morphine and atropine pre-medication
Receives: Device: Endotracheal tube insertion
Laryngeal mask airwayExperimentalLaryngeal mask airway insertion for surfactant administration, following atropine pre-medication
Receives: Device: Laryngeal mask airway insertion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of Failure of Surfactant Therapy, Either Early (Need for Mechanical Ventilation Within 1 Hour), or Late (FiO2 > 0.60 to Maintain Target SpO2, or Second Dose of Surfactant Within 8 Hours, or Needing More Than 2 Doses of Surfactant).

    Measured: 96 hours

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Number of Surfactant Doses

    Mean number of surfactant doses

    Measured: 96 hr

  2. Days on Assisted Ventilation

    Days on any respiratory support

    Measured: 2 months

  3. Days on Supplemental Oxygen

    Measured: 2 months

  4. Rate of Pneumothorax

    Measured: 96 hrs

  5. Rate of BPD (O2 Dependence at the Later of 28 Days of Age or 36 Weeks Postmenstrual Age)

    Measured: 2 months

  6. Complications During Insertion of LMA

    LMA insertion complications (e.g. trauma, failure of insertion)

    Measured: 96 hrs

  7. Mortality Rate

    Measured: 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jan 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2009
  3. Primary completionSep 2012
  4. Study completionNov 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
61 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01042600
Sponsor's protocol ID
2599
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
4 Jan 2010
Last updated
26 Jul 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Endotracheal tube insertion and Laryngeal mask airway insertion in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, run by Albany Medical College at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jul 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of Failure of Surfactant Therapy, Either Early (Need for Mechanical Ventilation Within 1 Hour), or Late (FiO2 > 0.60 to Maintain Target SpO2, or Second Dose of Surfactant Within 8 Hours, or Needing More Than 2 Doses of Surfactant). (time frame: 96 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in