Gastric CancerPhase 3NCT01041404
ToGA Study - A Study of Herceptin (Trastuzumab) in Combination With Chemotherapy Compared With Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With HER2-Positive Advanced Gastric Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Trastuzumab, Fluorouracil and Cisplatin in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 142 sites in 24 countries.
Trial summary
This parallel, randomized, open-label, multi-centre study will evaluate the effect on overall survival of trastuzumab (Herceptin) in combination with a chemotherapy compared to the chemotherapy alone in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastric Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Trastuzumab, Fluorouracil and Cisplatin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 584 participants
- Where
- 142 sitesin 24 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2005to Jun 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients >=18 years of age
- Inoperable locally advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic cancer of the stomach or gastro-esophageal junction
- Adenocarcinoma
- HER2-positive tumors
Who cannot join
- Previous chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic disease
- Lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or malabsorption syndrome
- History of cardiac disease
- Dyspnoea at rest, due to complications of advanced malignancy or other disease, or patients who require supportive oxygen therapy
Trial locations and contacts
142 sites in 24 countries.
142 sites in 24 countries
China16 sites
Study site
Beijing, 100021
Study site
Beijing, 100036
Study site
Beijing, 100071
Study site
Beijing, 100853
Study site
Guangdong, 510515
Study site
Guangzhou, 510060
Study site
Jiangsu, 210009
Study site
Nanjing, 210002
Study site
Shanghai, 200003
Study site
Shanghai, 200025
Study site
Shanghai, 200032
Study site
Shanghai, 200080
Study site
Shanghai, 200092
Study site
Shanghai, 200433
Study site
Suzhou, 215006
Study site
Wuhan, 430030
Japan16 sites
Study site
Aichi, 464-8681
Study site
Chiba, 277-8577
Study site
Ehime, 791-0280
Study site
Fukuoka, 812-8582
Study site
Hyōgo, 650-0017
Study site
Nagano, 384-0392
Study site
Osaka, 569-8686
Study site
Osaka, 589-8511
Study site
Saitama, 350-1298
Study site
Saitama, 362-0806
Study site
Shizuoka, 411-8777
Study site
Tochigi, 320-0834
Study site
Tokyo, 113-8677
Study site
Tokyo, 135-8550
Study site
Tokyo, 135-8577
Study site
Yamagata, 990-8520
Russia15 sites
Study site
Chelyabinsk, 454 087
Study site
Ivanovo, 153040
Study site
Kazan', 420029
Study site
Moscow, 115478
Study site
Moscow, 117837
Study site
Moscow, 125284
Study site
Moscow, 129128
Study site
Ryazan, 390011
Study site
Saint Petersburg, 195067
Study site
Saint Petersburg, 197022
Study site
Saint Petersburg, 197758
Study site
Samara, 443031
Study site
Ufa, 450054
Study site
Yaroslavl, 150054
Study site
Yekaterinburg, 620905
South Korea11 sites
Study site
Buchun, 420-021
Study site
Bundang City, 463-802
Study site
Daegu, 702-210
Study site
Goyang-si, 410-769
Study site
Pusan, 602-715
Study site
Seoul, 110-744
Study site
Seoul, 120-752
Study site
Seoul, 135-170
Study site
Seoul, 135-720
Study site
Seoul, 138-736
Study site
Seoul
Portugal9 sites
Study site
Braga, 4700
Study site
Coimbra, 3000-075
Study site
Faro, 8000
Study site
Guimarães, 4810-055
Study site
Lisbon, 1099-023
Study site
Lisbon, 1649-035
Study site
Porto, 4099-001
Study site
Porto, 4200-072
Study site
Porto, 4200-319
France8 sites
Study site
Brest, 29609
Study site
Caen, 14076
Study site
Colmar, 68024
Study site
Lille, 59020
Study site
Marseille, 13273
Study site
Reims, 51092
Study site
Rouen, 76031
Study site
Strasbourg, 67098
United Kingdom8 sites
Study site
Birmingham, B9 5SS
Study site
Denbigh, LL18 5UJ
Study site
Dundee, DD1 9SY
Study site
Glasgow, G12 0YN
Study site
Manchester, M2O 4BX
Study site
Metropolitan Borough of Wirral, CH63 4JY
Study site
Weston-super-Mare, BS23 4TQ
Study site
Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP
Spain7 sites
Study site
Barcelona, 08036
Study site
Barcelona, 08041
Study site
Barcelona, 08907
Study site
Girona, 17007
Study site
Madrid, 28041
Study site
Valencia, 41014
Study site
Valencia, 46009
Australia6 sites
Study site
Adelaide, 5011
Study site
Kurralta Park, 5037
Study site
Melbourne, 3128
Study site
Milton, 4064
Study site
Perth, 6008
Study site
Sydney, 2217
Italy6 sites
Study site
Ancona, 60121
Study site
Florence, 50139
Study site
Naples, 80131
Study site
Parma, 43100
Study site
Roma, 00168
Study site
Udine, 33100
Germany5 sites
Study site
Heidelberg, 69120
Study site
Mainz, 55101
Study site
München, 81675
Study site
Trier, 54290
Study site
Witten, 58455
Mexico5 sites
Study site
Guadalajara, 44280
Study site
Mérida, 97500
Study site
Mexico City, 06760
Study site
Mexico City, 14000
Study site
Monterrey, 64020
Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
Study site
Istanbul, 34300
Study site
Istanbul
Study site
Izmir, 35100
Study site
Izmir, 35340
Study site
Shhiye, Ankara, 06100
Brazil4 sites
Study site
Barretos, 14784-400
Study site
Rio de Janeiro, 20231-050
Study site
São Paulo, 04023-900
Study site
São Paulo, 05403-010
India4 sites
Study site
Hyderabad, 500 033
Study site
Kochi, 682304
Study site
Mumbai, 400026
Study site
New Delhi, 110 029
South Africa3 sites
Study site
Cape Town, 1925
Study site
Cape Town, 7506
Study site
Durban, 4091
Taiwan3 sites
Study site
Changhua, 500
Study site
Kaohsiung City, 807
Study site
Taipei, 00112
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Open-label Study of the Effect of First-line Herceptin in Combination With a Fluoropyrimidine and Cisplatin Versus Chemotherapy Alone on Overall Survival in Patients With HER2-positive Advanced Gastric Cancer
This parallel, randomized, open-label, multi-centre study will evaluate the effect on overall survival of trastuzumab (Herceptin) in combination with a chemotherapy compared to the chemotherapy alone in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. Trastuzumab (Herceptin) will be administered as intravenous infusion of 6 mg/kg (loading dose 8 mg/kg) every 3 weeks. The chemotherapy consists of a combination of 6 cycles of fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/day intravenous infusion every 3 weeks) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 3 weeks), or capecitabine (Xeloda, 1000 mg/m2 po twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 3 weeks). Treatment with trastuzumab (Herceptin) will continue until disease progression. The target sample size is 300-600 patients.
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer
- Being tested
- Trastuzumab, Fluorouracil, Cisplatin, Capecitabine
- Medical subject headings
- Stomach Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TrastuzumabDrug
Also called Herceptin
Initial loading dose 8 mg/kg i.v. infusion on Day 1 of cycle, followed by 6 mg/kg i.v. infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression
FluorouracilDrug
Also called 5-FU
800 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
CisplatinDrug
80 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
CapecitabineDrug
Also called Xeloda
1000 mg/m2 p.o. twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Trastuzumab, Fluoropyrimidine, Cisplatin | Experimental | Participants received an initial loading dose of 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) trastuzumab i.v. on Day 1 of cycle, followed by 6 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks until disease progression; 800 mg/m2 fluorouracil i.v. on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; 80 mg/m2 cisplatin i.v. on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; and 1000 mg/m2 capecitabine p.o. twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. Receives: Drug: Trastuzumab; Drug: Fluorouracil; Drug: Cisplatin; Drug: Capecitabine |
| Fluoropyrimidine, Cisplatin | Active comparator | Participants received 800 milligrams per square meter (mg/m2) fluorouracil intravenous (i.v.) on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; 80 mg/m2 cisplatin i.v. on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; and 1000 mg/m2 capecitabine orally (p.o.) twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. Receives: Drug: Fluorouracil; Drug: Cisplatin; Drug: Capecitabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
Measured: Baseline (BL), Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Overall Survival - Time to Event
The median time, in months, from the date of randomization to the date of an OS event. Participants were censored at the last date tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
Measured: BL, Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Secondary outcomes (17)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or date of death, whichever occurs first. For target lesions (TL), PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as a reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of one or more lesions. For non-target lesions (NTL), PD was defined as an unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Progression-Free Survival - Time to Event
The median time, in months, from the date of randomization to the date of a PFS event. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Time to Progression (TTP) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization and the date of the first occurrence of PD. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor assessment, the last date in the study drug log, or the last date of follow-up.
Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Time to Progression - Time to Event
The median time, in months, from the date of randomized to the date of a TTP event. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor assessment, the last date in the study drug log, or the last date of follow-up.
Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) Determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
For TLs, a CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs and a PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD. For NTLs, a CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels.
Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Duration of Response - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Duration of response was defined for responders as the time from the date on which the CR or PR was first recorded to the date on which PD is first noted. Participants were censored on the date of death, the date of last tumor measurement, the last date in study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Duration of Response
The median time, in months, of the duration of response. Participants were censored at the date of death, the date of last tumor measurement, the last date in study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit
Clinical benefit was defined as stable disease (SD), CR, or PR for 6 weeks or longer as determined by RECIST. For TLs, SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as a reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment had started. For NTLs, SD was defined as a persistence of one or more NTLs and/or maintenance of tumor marker levels above the normal limits.
Measured: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
European Organisation For the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ C-30) Questionnaire Scores
EORTC QLQ-C30: included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score equals (=) better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.
Measured: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Stomach Cancer Specific (QLQ STO22) Questionnaire Scores
The QLQ-STO22 is a gastric cancer quality of life questionnaire. There are 22 questions concerning disease, treatment related symptoms, side effects, dysphagia, nutritional aspects, and questions about the emotional problems of gastric cancer (dysphagia, pain, reflux, eating restrictions, anxiety, dry mouth, body image, and hair loss). The questions are grouped into five scales and 4 single items which are related to the symptoms of the disease. Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 1 question was a yes or no answer). A linear transformation was used to standardize all scores and single-items to a scale of 0 to 100; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.
Measured: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Pain Intensity Scores as Assessed By Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The participant assessed their pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change indicated improvement.
Measured: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Percentage of Participants With a Change in Analgesic Medication During the Study
Analgesic medications were recorded throughout the study until disease progression.
Measured: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Body Weight (Kilograms [kg]) at BL
Measured: BL
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Body Weight by Percentage Change in Weight
Change in body weight was categorized as an increase of greater than (>)5 percent (%), no change (plus or minus [±]5%), decrease of >5-10%, or a decrease of >10% from BL to the end of study. Time windows were applied in order to assign visits to weight measurements, and the lowest post-screening value recorded was used for the analysis. The percentage change in weight from screening was summarized over time.
Measured: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Steady State Trastuzumab Area Under the Concentration (AUC)
Individual steady state predicted exposure, as assessed by median AUC (measured as mg multiplied by [*] day per liter [L]) calculated for all treated participants using the nominal dosage schedule administered as an IV infusion. Individual steady state AUC was calculated using all available PK samples from all timepoints.
Measured: Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
Trastuzumab Minimum Serum Concentration (Cmin)
Median Cmin (measured as milligrams per liter [mg/L]) calculated for all treated participants using the nominal dosage schedule administered as an IV infusion.
Measured: Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
Trastuzumab Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax)
Median Cmax (measured as mg/L) calculated for all treated participants using the nominal dosage schedule administered as an IV infusion.
Measured: Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2005
- Primary completionJun 2010
- Study completionJun 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 584 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Chugai Pharmaceutical
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01041404
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BO18255
- Status last verified
- Oct 2014
- First submitted
- 29 Dec 2009
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Van Cutsem E, Bang YJ, Feng-Yi F, Xu JM, Lee KW, Jiao SC, Chong JL, Lopez-Sanchez RI, Price T, Gladkov O, Stoss O, Hill J, Ng V, Lehle M, Thomas M, Kiermaier A, Ruschoff J. HER2 screening data from ToGA: targeting HER2 in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2015 Jul;18(3):476-84. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0402-y. Epub 2014 Jul 20.
PubMed 25038874Satoh T, Bang YJ, Gotovkin EA, Hamamoto Y, Kang YK, Moiseyenko VM, Ohtsu A, Van Cutsem E, Al-Sakaff N, Urspruch A, Hill J, Weber HA, Chung HC; ToGA Trial Investigators. Quality of life in the trastuzumab for gastric cancer trial. Oncologist. 2014 Jul;19(7):712-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0058. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
PubMed 24951609Satoh T, Omuro Y, Sasaki Y, Hamamoto Y, Boku N, Tamura T, Ohtsu A. Pharmacokinetic analysis of capecitabine and cisplatin in combination with trastuzumab in Japanese patients with advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 Apr;69(4):949-55. doi: 10.1007/s00280-011-1783-9. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
PubMed 22116464Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, Lordick F, Ohtsu A, Omuro Y, Satoh T, Aprile G, Kulikov E, Hill J, Lehle M, Ruschoff J, Kang YK; ToGA Trial Investigators. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):687-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
PubMed 20728210
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Nov 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Open-label Study of the Effect of First-line Herceptin in Combination With a Fluoropyrimidine and Cisplatin Versus Chemotherapy Alone on Overall Survival in Patients With HER2-positive Advanced Gastric Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01041404
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BO18255
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 584 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Chugai Pharmaceutical
- Study start
- Sep 2005
- Primary completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Nov 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This parallel, randomized, open-label, multi-centre study will evaluate the effect on overall survival of trastuzumab (Herceptin) in combination with a chemotherapy compared to the chemotherapy alone in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. Trastuzumab (Herceptin) will be administered as intravenous infusion of 6 mg/kg (loading dose 8 mg/kg) every 3 weeks. The chemotherapy consists of a combination of 6 cycles of fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/day intravenous infusion every 3 weeks) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 3 weeks), or capecitabine (Xeloda, 1000 mg/m2 po twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenous infusion every 3 weeks). Treatment with trastuzumab (Herceptin) will continue until disease progression. The target sample size is 300-600 patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Trastuzumab, Fluoropyrimidine, Cisplatin | Experimental | Drug: Trastuzumab, Drug: Fluorouracil, Drug: Cisplatin, Drug: CapecitabineParticipants received an initial loading dose of 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) trastuzumab i.v. on Day 1 of cycle, followed by 6 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks until disease progression; 800 mg/m2 fluorouracil i.v. on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; 80 mg/m2 cisplatin i.v. on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; and 1000 mg/m2 capecitabine p.o. twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. |
| Fluoropyrimidine, Cisplatin | Active comparator | Drug: Fluorouracil, Drug: Cisplatin, Drug: CapecitabineParticipants received 800 milligrams per square meter (mg/m2) fluorouracil intravenous (i.v.) on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; 80 mg/m2 cisplatin i.v. on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles; and 1000 mg/m2 capecitabine orally (p.o.) twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adult patients >=18 years of age
- Inoperable locally advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic cancer of the stomach or gastro-esophageal junction
- Adenocarcinoma
- HER2-positive tumors
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Previous chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic disease
- Lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or malabsorption syndrome
- History of cardiac disease
- Dyspnoea at rest, due to complications of advanced malignancy or other disease, or patients who require supportive oxygen therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TrastuzumabAlso: HerceptinInitial loading dose 8 mg/kg i.v. infusion on Day 1 of cycle, followed by 6 mg/kg i.v. infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression | Drug | Trastuzumab, Fluoropyrimidine, Cisplatin |
| FluorouracilAlso: 5-FU800 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on Days 1 through 5 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles | Drug | Fluoropyrimidine, Cisplatin, Trastuzumab, Fluoropyrimidine, Cisplatin |
| Cisplatin80 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on Day 1 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles | Drug | Fluoropyrimidine, Cisplatin, Trastuzumab, Fluoropyrimidine, Cisplatin |
| CapecitabineAlso: Xeloda1000 mg/m2 p.o. twice daily on Days 1 through 15 of cycle every 3 weeks for 6 cycles | Drug | Fluoropyrimidine, Cisplatin, Trastuzumab, Fluoropyrimidine, Cisplatin |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Time frame: Baseline (BL), Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants were censored at the last date of tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
Overall Survival - Time to Event
Time frame: BL, Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
The median time, in months, from the date of randomization to the date of an OS event. Participants were censored at the last date tumor measurement, the last date in the study drug log, or the date of last follow-up.
17 secondary outcomes
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Time frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Progression-Free Survival - Time to Event
Time frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Time to Progression (TTP) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Time frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Time to Progression - Time to Event
Time frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) Determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
Time frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Duration of Response - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Time frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Duration of Response
Time frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit
Time frame: BL, Days 43, 85, and 127, and every 21 days thereafter until disease progression or the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
European Organisation For the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ C-30) Questionnaire Scores
Time frame: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Stomach Cancer Specific (QLQ STO22) Questionnaire Scores
Time frame: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Pain Intensity Scores as Assessed By Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Percentage of Participants With a Change in Analgesic Medication During the Study
Time frame: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Body Weight (Kilograms [kg]) at BL
Time frame: BL
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Body Weight by Percentage Change in Weight
Time frame: BL, Days 1, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until disease progression of the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis
Steady State Trastuzumab Area Under the Concentration (AUC)
Time frame: Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
Trastuzumab Minimum Serum Concentration (Cmin)
Time frame: Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
Trastuzumab Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax)
Time frame: Predose and end of infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 64, and predose on Days 22 and 106
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Nov 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25038874Van Cutsem E, Bang YJ, Feng-Yi F, Xu JM, Lee KW, Jiao SC, Chong JL, Lopez-Sanchez RI, Price T, Gladkov O, Stoss O, Hill J, Ng V, Lehle M, Thomas M, Kiermaier A, Ruschoff J. HER2 screening data from ToGA: targeting HER2 in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2015 Jul;18(3):476-84. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0402-y. Epub 2014 Jul 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24951609Satoh T, Bang YJ, Gotovkin EA, Hamamoto Y, Kang YK, Moiseyenko VM, Ohtsu A, Van Cutsem E, Al-Sakaff N, Urspruch A, Hill J, Weber HA, Chung HC; ToGA Trial Investigators. Quality of life in the trastuzumab for gastric cancer trial. Oncologist. 2014 Jul;19(7):712-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0058. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22116464Satoh T, Omuro Y, Sasaki Y, Hamamoto Y, Boku N, Tamura T, Ohtsu A. Pharmacokinetic analysis of capecitabine and cisplatin in combination with trastuzumab in Japanese patients with advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 Apr;69(4):949-55. doi: 10.1007/s00280-011-1783-9. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20728210Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, Lordick F, Ohtsu A, Omuro Y, Satoh T, Aprile G, Kulikov E, Hill J, Lehle M, Ruschoff J, Kang YK; ToGA Trial Investigators. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):687-97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
Related trials for Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
GK01 Cell Therapy in Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis
Gastric Cancer (GC)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Neoadjuvant-adjuvant Durvalumab and FLOT Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Durvalumab in Chinese Patients With Resectable GC/GEJC.
Gastric, Esophagogastric Junction
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
142 sites in 24 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Trastuzumab, Fluorouracil and Cisplatin in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 142 sites in 24 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 142 sites in China, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Portugal and 19 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Nov 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event (time frame: Baseline (BL), Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, and every 21 days until the end of study, 1 year after the cut-off date for the 2nd interim efficacy analysis). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01041404, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2014.