Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory FailurePhase 4NCT01038791
Patients-ventilator Interaction During Sleep: Effect of Humidification System
A Phase 4 study testing heated humidification, heat and moisture exchanger and usual mechanical ventilation without humidification in people with Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
At present, little data is available in the medical literature regarding the affects of humidification on NIMV efficacy, sleep quality and upper airway symptoms in patients undergoing nocturnal NIMV. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
- What is being tested?
- heated humidification, heat and moisture exchanger and usual mechanical ventilation without humidification
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Dec 2009to Jun 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients in stable conditions (no acute exacerbations in the 4 weeks before enrolment), well adapted to ventilation and without problems with the ventilation mask.
Who cannot join
- Patients with acute respiratory failure, recent exacerbations, severe co-morbidities (i.e. hearth failure, recent stroke etc.)
- Recent upper airways surgery.
- Allergic rhinitis, severe nasal stenosis.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Patients-ventilator Interaction During Sleep: the Role of Humidification. A Pilot Short Term Study
At present, little data is available in the medical literature regarding the affects of humidification on NIMV efficacy, sleep quality and upper airway symptoms in patients undergoing nocturnal NIMV.
The aim of the present pilot study is to assess the impact of two humidification systems on sleep quality, NIMV efficacy, patient-ventilator interaction, prevalence of NIMV side effects, compliance to treatment, in a group of stable patients already enrolled in a long-term nocturnal mechanical ventilation program for chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure or sleep hypoventilation.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV), usually delivered during night time, is widely used at home in chronic hypercapnic respiratory, both in patients with COPD and restrictive thoracic diseases (RTD). The aim of chronic NIMV is to improve daytime arterial blood gases, sleep quality decreasing symptoms of hypoventilation (mainly during sleep), quality of life and mood.
Scarce data is available about the NIMV compliance at home; poor compliance may reduce the positive effects of mechanical ventilation. Previous data shows that patients enrolled to long-term home ventilation program may drop out early, mainly because of skin irritation, upper airway problems, and air leaks.
Studies performed on patients with sleep apnea, receiving CPAP therapy at home, showed that the occurrence of leaks during ventilation can cause the development of mucosal inflammation, nasal congestion and increased nasal airways resistance. On the other hand, the presence or the development of nasal obstruction makes the arise or the worsening of air leaks (the vicious cycle) more reliable.
A lack of humidification may increase nasal resistance and nasal symptoms and, therefore, contribute to reduction in compliance. Furthermore, leaks may have significant consequences on inspiratory and expiratory trigger functions, inducing poor patient-ventilator interactions. Indeed, the presence of ineffective efforts, the most common phenomenon of bad patient-ventilation interactions, is very common in patients receiving long term home ventilation and usually associated with poorer gas exchange during sleep.
At present, little data is available in the medical literature regarding the affects of humidification on NIMV efficacy, sleep quality and upper airway symptoms in patients undergoing nocturnal NIMV.
The aim of the present pilot study is to assess the impact of two humidification systems on sleep quality, NIMV efficacy, patient-ventilator interaction, prevalence of NIMV side effects, compliance to treatment, in a group of stable patients already enrolled in a long-term nocturnal mechanical ventilation program for chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure or sleep hypoventilation.
PATIENTS We plan to enrol 20 patients with chronic respiratory failure or sleep hypoventilation already included in a long-term home non-invasive ventilation program (at least 3 months).
Inclusion criteria Patients in stable conditions (no acute exacerbations in the 4 weeks before enrolment), well adapted to ventilation and without problems with the ventilation mask.
Exclusions criteria Patients with acute respiratory failure, recent exacerbations, severe co-morbidities (i.e. hearth failure, recent stroke etc.) Recent upper airways surgery. Allergic rhinitis, severe nasal stenosis.
STUDY DESIGN
Patients will undergo three consecutive nocturnal polysomnographs. Patients will have a baseline therapy of NIMV without humidification for 1 week. They will then undergo a nocturnal polysomnograph on the last evening of the baseline therapy. Patients will then be randomly assigned to use HH or HME for 1 week and undergo a nocturnal polysomnography on the last evening . The patients will then be assigned to the second method of humidification for 1 week and undergo a third nocturnal polysomnograph on the last evening. The whole evaluation will be performed with the same ventilator (ideally the patient's device) using the patient's mask and with the usual ventilator setting.
Measures
At enrolment:
Lung function test Standard questionnaire about the use and tolerability of NIMV at home Measure of NIMV compliance at home Blood gas analysis during wakefulness (during spontaneous breathing - SB - and during NIMV) The breathing pattern during wakefulness (during SB and NIMV)
Polysomnographic evaluation
Full standard assisted polysomnography with simultaneous recordings of Tidal Volume, Leaks, pressure in mask, respiratory rate, instantaneous minute ventilation.
Analysis of sleep data will be performed according to standard criteria (AASM 2007).
Analysis of breathing pattern and patients-ventilator interaction will be made according to previous published methods (Fanfulla, Tuggey, Techsler etc..).
At the end of the each PSG recording, patients will be asked about their humidification and NIMV tolerance as well as the presence of upper airway symptoms (Nava et al).
- Conditions
- Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
- Being tested
- heated humidification, heat and moisture exchanger, usual mechanical ventilation without humidification
- Keywords
- chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, COPD, RTD, sleep architecture, humidification
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
heated humidificationDevice
Also called HH
temperature 35°
heat and moisture exchangerDevice
Also called HME
single patient device
usual mechanical ventilation without humidificationDevice
Also called control
mechanical ventilation with usual parameters
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| usual ventilation | Active comparator | application of usual mechanical ventilation without humidification system Receives: Device: usual mechanical ventilation without humidification |
| heated humidifier | Experimental | mechanical ventilation with heated humidifier Receives: Device: heated humidification |
| heat and moisture exchanger | Experimental | mechanical ventilation with heat and moisture exchanger Receives: Device: heat and moisture exchanger |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
sleep quality and asynchrony index
Measured: 8 hrs
Secondary outcomes (1)
tolerance assessed using an ad-hoc designed scale (1 t0 5 scale), and the effective hours of sleep
Measured: 8 hrs
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2009
- Primary completionJun 2014
- Study completionJun 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, dr. Stefano Nava, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
- Investigators
- Francesco Fanfulla, MD, Principal investigator, Fondazione S.Maugeri
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01038791
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 593
- Status last verified
- Jan 2013
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2009
- Last updated
- 9 Oct 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Nava S, Cirio S, Fanfulla F, Carlucci A, Navarra A, Negri A, Ceriana P. Comparison of two humidification systems for long-term noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2008 Aug;32(2):460-4. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00000208.
PubMed 18669787
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Oct 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Patients-ventilator Interaction During Sleep: the Role of Humidification. A Pilot Short Term Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01038791
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 593
- Conditions
- Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
- Keywords
- chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, COPD, RTD, sleep architecture, humidification
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2009
- Primary completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
At present, little data is available in the medical literature regarding the affects of humidification on NIMV efficacy, sleep quality and upper airway symptoms in patients undergoing nocturnal NIMV.
The aim of the present pilot study is to assess the impact of two humidification systems on sleep quality, NIMV efficacy, patient-ventilator interaction, prevalence of NIMV side effects, compliance to treatment, in a group of stable patients already enrolled in a long-term nocturnal mechanical ventilation program for chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure or sleep hypoventilation.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV), usually delivered during night time, is widely used at home in chronic hypercapnic respiratory, both in patients with COPD and restrictive thoracic diseases (RTD). The aim of chronic NIMV is to improve daytime arterial blood gases, sleep quality decreasing symptoms of hypoventilation (mainly during sleep), quality of life and mood.
Scarce data is available about the NIMV compliance at home; poor compliance may reduce the positive effects of mechanical ventilation. Previous data shows that patients enrolled to long-term home ventilation program may drop out early, mainly because of skin irritation, upper airway problems, and air leaks.
Studies performed on patients with sleep apnea, receiving CPAP therapy at home, showed that the occurrence of leaks during ventilation can cause the development of mucosal inflammation, nasal congestion and increased nasal airways resistance. On the other hand, the presence or the development of nasal obstruction makes the arise or the worsening of air leaks (the vicious cycle) more reliable.
A lack of humidification may increase nasal resistance and nasal symptoms and, therefore, contribute to reduction in compliance. Furthermore, leaks may have significant consequences on inspiratory and expiratory trigger functions, inducing poor patient-ventilator interactions. Indeed, the presence of ineffective efforts, the most common phenomenon of bad patient-ventilation interactions, is very common in patients receiving long term home ventilation and usually associated with poorer gas exchange during sleep.
At present, little data is available in the medical literature regarding the affects of humidification on NIMV efficacy, sleep quality and upper airway symptoms in patients undergoing nocturnal NIMV.
The aim of the present pilot study is to assess the impact of two humidification systems on sleep quality, NIMV efficacy, patient-ventilator interaction, prevalence of NIMV side effects, compliance to treatment, in a group of stable patients already enrolled in a long-term nocturnal mechanical ventilation program for chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure or sleep hypoventilation.
PATIENTS We plan to enrol 20 patients with chronic respiratory failure or sleep hypoventilation already included in a long-term home non-invasive ventilation program (at least 3 months).
Inclusion criteria Patients in stable conditions (no acute exacerbations in the 4 weeks before enrolment), well adapted to ventilation and without problems with the ventilation mask.
Exclusions criteria Patients with acute respiratory failure, recent exacerbations, severe co-morbidities (i.e. hearth failure, recent stroke etc.) Recent upper airways surgery. Allergic rhinitis, severe nasal stenosis.
STUDY DESIGN
Patients will undergo three consecutive nocturnal polysomnographs. Patients will have a baseline therapy of NIMV without humidification for 1 week. They will then undergo a nocturnal polysomnograph on the last evening of the baseline therapy. Patients will then be randomly assigned to use HH or HME for 1 week and undergo a nocturnal polysomnography on the last evening . The patients will then be assigned to the second method of humidification for 1 week and undergo a third nocturnal polysomnograph on the last evening. The whole evaluation will be performed with the same ventilator (ideally the patient's device) using the patient's mask and with the usual ventilator setting.
Measures
At enrolment:
Lung function test Standard questionnaire about the use and tolerability of NIMV at home Measure of NIMV compliance at home Blood gas analysis during wakefulness (during spontaneous breathing - SB - and during NIMV) The breathing pattern during wakefulness (during SB and NIMV)
Polysomnographic evaluation
Full standard assisted polysomnography with simultaneous recordings of Tidal Volume, Leaks, pressure in mask, respiratory rate, instantaneous minute ventilation.
Analysis of sleep data will be performed according to standard criteria (AASM 2007).
Analysis of breathing pattern and patients-ventilator interaction will be made according to previous published methods (Fanfulla, Tuggey, Techsler etc..).
At the end of the each PSG recording, patients will be asked about their humidification and NIMV tolerance as well as the presence of upper airway symptoms (Nava et al).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| usual ventilation | Active comparator | Device: usual mechanical ventilation without humidificationapplication of usual mechanical ventilation without humidification system |
| heated humidifier | Experimental | Device: heated humidificationmechanical ventilation with heated humidifier |
| heat and moisture exchanger | Experimental | Device: heat and moisture exchangermechanical ventilation with heat and moisture exchanger |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients in stable conditions (no acute exacerbations in the 4 weeks before enrolment), well adapted to ventilation and without problems with the ventilation mask.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with acute respiratory failure, recent exacerbations, severe co-morbidities (i.e. hearth failure, recent stroke etc.)
- Recent upper airways surgery.
- Allergic rhinitis, severe nasal stenosis.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| heated humidificationAlso: HHtemperature 35° | Device | heated humidifier |
| heat and moisture exchangerAlso: HMEsingle patient device | Device | heat and moisture exchanger |
| usual mechanical ventilation without humidificationAlso: controlmechanical ventilation with usual parameters | Device | usual ventilation |
Primary outcome
sleep quality and asynchrony index
Time frame: 8 hrs
1 secondary outcome
tolerance assessed using an ad-hoc designed scale (1 t0 5 scale), and the effective hours of sleep
Time frame: 8 hrs
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Oct 2014.
- Background: PubMed 18669787Nava S, Cirio S, Fanfulla F, Carlucci A, Navarra A, Negri A, Ceriana P. Comparison of two humidification systems for long-term noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2008 Aug;32(2):460-4. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00000208.
Related trials for Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Efficiency of Home Telemonitoring and Non-invasive Ventilation in Patients With COPD and Hypercapnia (EVALECO)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive (COPD), Hypercapnia
RecruitingObservational study
RESET-COPD Cohort: Real-Time Monitoring and Early Warning in COPD Patients Receiving Home NPPV
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive (COPD), Chronic Respiratory Failure With Hypercapnia
Recruiting
HFNC Versus NIV in Hypercapneic COPD Patients
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
Not yet recruiting
Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal Plus Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With COPD Not Eligible for Intubation
Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Recruiting
Nasal High Flow Versus Non-invasive Ventilation for Early Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Hypercapnic Acidosis
Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hypercapnic Acidosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Francesco Fanfulla, MD principal investigator
Fondazione S.Maugeri
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing heated humidification, heat and moisture exchanger and usual mechanical ventilation without humidification in people with Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
sleep quality and asynchrony index (time frame: 8 hrs). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01038791, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2014.