Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric EpendymomaPhase 2PETEYNCT01032070
Erlotinib Versus Oral Etoposide in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Ependymoma
A Phase 2 study testing erlotinib and etoposide in people with Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Ependymoma, run by OSI Pharmaceuticals at 28 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
This is a phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy of single-agent erlotinib versus oral etoposide in patients with recurrent or refractory pediatric ependymoma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 21 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Ependymoma
- What is being tested?
- erlotinib and etoposide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 28 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 27 Sep 2010to 26 Nov 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 21 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Recurrent of refractory ependymoma or subependymoma
- Performance Status (PS): Lansky ≥ 50% for patients ≤ 10 years of age or Karnofsky ≥ 50% for patients >10 years of age
- Measurable disease, defined as 1 measurable lesion that can be accurately measured in 2 planes that has not received radiation therapy within 12 weeks
- Recovered from the acute toxic effects of all prior chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy
- ≥ 1 year to ≤ 21 years
- Serum creatinine for patients ≤ 5 years in age is ≤ 0.8 mg/dL or Creatinine Clearance/Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) ≥ 70 mL/min/m^2
Show all 17Show fewer
- Serum creatinine for patients > 5 and ≤ 10 years in age is ≤ 1.0 mg/dL or Creatinine Clearance/GFR ≥ 70 mL/min/m^2
- Serum creatinine for patients > 10 and ≤ 15 years in age is ≤ 1.2 mg/dL or Creatinine Clearance/GFR ≥ 70 mL/min/m^2
- Serum creatinine for patients > 15 years in age is ≤ 1.5 mg/dL or Creatinine Clearance/GFR ≥ 70 mL/min/m^2
- Total bilirubin is ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal for age
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 3 x upper limit of normal
- Absolute neutrophil count > 1000/µL
- Platelet count > 100,000/µL
- Hemoglobin > 8 gm/dL
- Neurologically stable for at least 7 days prior to randomization
- If receiving corticosteroids, patients must be on a stable or decreasing dose for at least 7 days before randomization
- Patients of reproductive potential must agree to proactive effective contraceptive measures for the duration of the study and for at least 90 days after completion of study drug
Who cannot join
- Previously received epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy
- Previously received oral etoposide
- Received craniospinal radiotherapy within 24 weeks prior to randomization
- Received field radiotherapy to the target lesion within 12 weeks prior to randomization
- Received symptomatic metastatic disease within 14 days prior to randomization
- Received myelosuppressive chemotherapy within 21 days before randomization
Show all 14Show fewer
- Received growth factors within 7 days prior to randomization
- Participating in another investigational drug trial
- Received a biologic agent within 7 days prior to randomization
- Received a monoclonal antibody within 28 days prior to randomization
- Taking cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 or CYP1A2 inhibitors/inducers within 14 days prior to randomization
- Taking proton pump inhibitors within 14 days prior to randomization
- Smoking during treatment
- Pregnant or breast-feeding females
Trial locations and contacts
28 sites in 3 countries.
28 sites in 3 countries
United States18 sites
Emory University Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Aflac Cancer Center & Blood Disorders
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Children's Hospital Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
University of Alabama at Birmingham Dept. of Pediatric-Hematology/Oncology
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Department of Pediatric Neuro-oncology
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Children's Medical Center, Dallas Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
Dallas, Texas, 75235
Penn State Hershey Children's Hospital
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17110
University of Wisconsin Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Department
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705-2275
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136
Amplatz Children's Hospital University of Minnesota Medical Center- Pediatric Hematology Oncology
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Steven D Hassenfeld Children's Center - New York University
New York, New York, 10016
Columbia University Children's Hospital of New York Presbyterian Child & Adolescent Oncology Center
New York, New York, 10032
Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC)
Orange, California, 92868
Stanford University and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders-Phoenix Children's Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
Oregon Health & Sciences University Doembecher Children's Hospital
Portland, Oregon, 97124
Children's National Medical Center - D.C. Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
United Kingdom7 sites
Birmingham Children's Hospital
Birmingham, B4 6NH
Royal Hospital for Sick Children
Glasgow, G3 8SJ
Paediatric Oncology and Haematology Offices
Leeds, LS1 3EX
Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust Department of Oncology
Liverpool, L12 1AP
Royal Manchester Children's Hospital Ward 84
Manchester, M13 9W2
University of Nottingham Children's Brain Tumour Research Centre
Nottingham, NG7 2UH
Royal Marsden Hospital
Sutton, SM2 5PT
Canada3 sites
Strollery Children's Hospital Division of Hematology/Oncology
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7
Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8
Children's and Women's Health Center of BC Division of Hematology/ Oncology/ BMT
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3V4
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Phase 2 Study of Single-agent Erlotinib Versus Oral Etoposide in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Ependymoma
This is a phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy of single-agent erlotinib versus oral etoposide in patients with recurrent or refractory pediatric ependymoma.
Read the detailed description
This is a phase 2 study involving a 1:1 randomization of 40 patients with recurrent or refractory pediatric ependymoma who will receive either erlotinib or oral etoposide.
- Keywords
- pediatric, etoposide, erlotinib, phase 2, ependymoma
- Medical subject headings
- Recurrence, Familial ependymoma, Ependymoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Erlotinib | Experimental | Erlotinib was administered orally at a dose of 85 mg/m^2 per day continuously until either progression, death, patient request or investigator decision to discontinue study drug or intolerable toxicity. Receives: Drug: erlotinib |
| Etoposide | Active comparator | Etoposide 50 mg/m^2 per day was administered orally for 21 days followed by a 7-day rest period until either progression, death, patient request or investigator decision to discontinue study drug or intolerable toxicity. Receives: Drug: etoposide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response
Objective response is defined as a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), evaluated using modified International Society of Pediatric Oncology Brain, Tumor Subcommittee for the Reporting of Trials criteria. Response was confirmed at least 28 days after the first assessment where the response criteria were met. Response was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 8 weeks. CR: • Complete disappearance of all enhancing tumor and mass effect • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids (or receiving only adrenal replacement doses) • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks • If cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) evaluation was positive, it must become negative (confirmed at least 2 times at consecutive samplings). PR: • ≥ 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks.
Measured: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Secondary outcomes (13)
Duration of Response
Duration of response (complete or partial response [CR/PR]) was defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (CR/PR) to the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a participant had not progressed or died, the duration of overall response was censored at the date of last adequate disease assessment. Duration of response was only defined for participants whose best overall response was CR or PR. Progression was defined as a worsening of neurologic status that could not be explained by other causes, a > 25% increase in tumor size, the appearance of new lesions or CSF positivity, or increasing doses of corticosteroids required to maintain stable status.
Measured: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Percentage of Participants With a Minor Response
Participants with a best overall response of minor response (MR), defined as: • ≥ 25% to < 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks.
Measured: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control
Disease control is a best overall response of CR or PR or MR or Stable disease (SD). CR: • Complete disappearance of all enhancing tumor and mass effect • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks • If CSF evaluation was positive, it must become negative (confirmed at least 2 times consecutively). PR: • ≥ 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks. MR: • ≥ 25% to < 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks. SD: • Neurologic examination is at least stable • Maintenance corticosteroid dose is not increased • MRI meets neither the criteria for minor response nor for progressive disease • Sustained for ≥ 8 weeks.
Measured: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression based on central nervous system (CNS)-specific evaluation criteria as assessed by the investigator or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Participants did not progress or die before the data cutoff date for analysis were censored at the date of last disease assessment (including both radiologic assessment and neurologic assessment) where non-progression was documented. If a participant received any further anticancer therapy without prior documentation of disease progression, the participant was censored at the date of last disease assessment before starting new anti-cancer treatment. Participants were also censored at the date of last disease assessment with no documented progression if patients discontinued treatment for undocumented progression, toxicity or other reason before the data cutoff date for analysis.
Measured: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Percentage of Participants With Prolonged Stable Disease
Prolonged stable disease (SD) was defined as SD with a duration of at least 16 weeks. The percentage of participants with prolonged SD was defined as participants who achieved a best overall response of CR or PR or MR or SD, and did not progress within 16 weeks from randomization. Progression was defined as a worsening of neurologic status that could not be explained by other causes, a > 25% increase in tumor size, the appearance of new lesions or CSF positivity, or increasing doses of corticosteroids required to maintain stable status.
Measured: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Duration of Stable Disease
Duration of stable disease (SD; defined as participants with an overall best response of complete, partial or minor response or stable disease) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a participant had not progressed or died, the duration of SD was censored at the date of last adequate disease assessment. Duration of SD was only defined for participants whose best overall response was CR or PR or MR or SD. Progression was defined as a worsening of neurologic status that could not be explained by other causes, a > 25% increase in tumor size, the appearance of new lesions or CSF positivity, or increasing doses of corticosteroids required to maintain stable status.
Measured: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the documented date of death. Participants who were still alive by the data cutoff date for analysis were censored on the last day the participant was known to be alive.
Measured: From randomization up to 12 months after the last dose. Median duration of follow-up was 12.9 months for erlotinib and 14.4 months for etoposide.
Safety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant and did not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. Clinically significant vital sign assessments, findings on physical or neurological examination, and laboratory findings associated with signs and/or symptoms requiring withdrawal, dose modification or medical intervention were recorded as AEs. An AE was considered serious if it resulted in death, a life-threatening situation, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a patient who received study drug or other important medical events. The relationship of each AE to study drug was assessed as either related or not related.
Measured: From the date of first dose of study drug until 30 days after the last dose. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Area Under the Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Erlotinib
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours (the dosing interval) measured at steady state using sparse sampling.
Measured: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Erlotinib (Cmax)
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Maximum observed plasma concentration of erlotinib (Cmax) was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.
Measured: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.
Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Erlotinib (Tmax)
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Time to the maximum observed plasma concentration of erlotinib (Tmax) was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.
Measured: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.
Apparent Body Clearance (CL/F) of Erlotinib
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Apparent body clearance (CL/F) of erlotinib was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.
Measured: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Erlotinib
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. The apparent volume of distribution (Vz/F) of erlotinib was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.
Measured: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study start27 Sep 2010
- Primary completion26 Nov 2012
- Study completion26 Nov 2012
Why it stopped: In a pre-planned interim analysis, OSI-774-205 met futility for efficacy with no safety concerns. As a result, it has been stopped.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric EpendymomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- OSI Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Monitor, Study director, Astellas Pharma Global Development
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01032070
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OSI-774-205
- Other IDs
- 2009-016836-11, 2009
- Acronym
- PETEY
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 10 Dec 2009
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: Access to anonymized individual participant level data will not be provided for this trial. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Phase 2 Study of Single-agent Erlotinib Versus Oral Etoposide in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Ependymoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01032070
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PETEY / OSI-774-205
- Keywords
- pediatric, etoposide, erlotinib, phase 2, ependymoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: In a pre-planned interim analysis, OSI-774-205 met futility for efficacy with no safety concerns. As a result, it has been stopped.
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- OSI PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 27 Sep 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Nov 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Jan 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy of single-agent erlotinib versus oral etoposide in patients with recurrent or refractory pediatric ependymoma.
Detailed description
This is a phase 2 study involving a 1:1 randomization of 40 patients with recurrent or refractory pediatric ependymoma who will receive either erlotinib or oral etoposide.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Erlotinib | Experimental | Drug: erlotinibErlotinib was administered orally at a dose of 85 mg/m^2 per day continuously until either progression, death, patient request or investigator decision to discontinue study drug or intolerable toxicity. |
| Etoposide | Active comparator | Drug: etoposideEtoposide 50 mg/m^2 per day was administered orally for 21 days followed by a 7-day rest period until either progression, death, patient request or investigator decision to discontinue study drug or intolerable toxicity. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 21 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Recurrent of refractory ependymoma or subependymoma
- Performance Status (PS): Lansky ≥ 50% for patients ≤ 10 years of age or Karnofsky ≥ 50% for patients >10 years of age
- Measurable disease, defined as 1 measurable lesion that can be accurately measured in 2 planes that has not received radiation therapy within 12 weeks
- Recovered from the acute toxic effects of all prior chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy
- ≥ 1 year to ≤ 21 years
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Previously received epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy
- Previously received oral etoposide
- Received craniospinal radiotherapy within 24 weeks prior to randomization
- Received field radiotherapy to the target lesion within 12 weeks prior to randomization
- Received symptomatic metastatic disease within 14 days prior to randomization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| erlotinibAlso: OSI-774, Tarcevaoral | Drug | Erlotinib |
| etoposideAlso: VP-16oral | Drug | Etoposide |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response
Time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Objective response is defined as a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), evaluated using modified International Society of Pediatric Oncology Brain, Tumor Subcommittee for the Reporting of Trials criteria. Response was confirmed at least 28 days after the first assessment where the response criteria were met. Response was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 8 weeks. CR: • Complete disappearance of all enhancing tumor and mass effect • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids (or receiving only adrenal replacement doses) • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks • If cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) evaluation was positive, it must become negative (confirmed at least 2 times at consecutive samplings). PR: • ≥ 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks.
13 secondary outcomes
Duration of Response
Time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Percentage of Participants With a Minor Response
Time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control
Time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Percentage of Participants With Prolonged Stable Disease
Time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Duration of Stable Disease
Time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From randomization up to 12 months after the last dose. Median duration of follow-up was 12.9 months for erlotinib and 14.4 months for etoposide.
Safety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: From the date of first dose of study drug until 30 days after the last dose. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.
Area Under the Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Erlotinib
Time frame: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Erlotinib (Cmax)
Time frame: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.
Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Erlotinib (Tmax)
Time frame: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.
Apparent Body Clearance (CL/F) of Erlotinib
Time frame: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Erlotinib
Time frame: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Access to anonymized individual participant level data will not be provided for this trial. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
Related trials for Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Ependymoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Ensartinib in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Advanced Solid Tumors, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, or Histiocytic Disorders With ALK or ROS1 Genomic Alterations (A Pediatric MATCH Treatment Trial)
Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Tipifarnib for the Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors, Lymphoma, or Histiocytic Disorders With HRAS Gene Alterations, a Pediatric MATCH Treatment Trial
Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Recurrent Adrenal Gland Pheochromocytoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Erdafitinib in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Advanced Solid Tumors, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, or Histiocytic Disorders With FGFR Mutations (A Pediatric MATCH Treatment Trial)
Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Recurrent Childhood Ependymoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Selpercatinib for the Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors, Lymphomas, or Histiocytic Disorders With Activating RET Gene Alterations, a Pediatric MATCH Treatment Trial
Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm, Recurrent Ependymoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Ulixertinib in Treating Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, or Histiocytic Disorders With MAPK Pathway Mutations (A Pediatric MATCH Treatment Trial)
Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Recurrent Ependymal Tumor
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Monitor study director
Astellas Pharma Global Development
28 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing erlotinib and etoposide in people with Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Ependymoma, run by OSI Pharmaceuticals at 28 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 28 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jan 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2024.