AzTrials
AzTrials

Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric EpendymomaPhase 2PETEYNCT01032070

Erlotinib Versus Oral Etoposide in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Ependymoma

A Phase 2 study testing erlotinib and etoposide in people with Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Ependymoma, run by OSI Pharmaceuticals at 28 sites in 3 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy of single-agent erlotinib versus oral etoposide in patients with recurrent or refractory pediatric ependymoma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 21 years
What is being tested?
erlotinib and etoposide
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
25 participants
Where
28 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
27 Sep 2010to 26 Nov 2012
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 21 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Recurrent of refractory ependymoma or subependymoma
  • Performance Status (PS): Lansky ≥ 50% for patients ≤ 10 years of age or Karnofsky ≥ 50% for patients >10 years of age
  • Measurable disease, defined as 1 measurable lesion that can be accurately measured in 2 planes that has not received radiation therapy within 12 weeks
  • Recovered from the acute toxic effects of all prior chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy
  • ≥ 1 year to ≤ 21 years
  • Serum creatinine for patients ≤ 5 years in age is ≤ 0.8 mg/dL or Creatinine Clearance/Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) ≥ 70 mL/min/m^2
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Serum creatinine for patients > 5 and ≤ 10 years in age is ≤ 1.0 mg/dL or Creatinine Clearance/GFR ≥ 70 mL/min/m^2
  • Serum creatinine for patients > 10 and ≤ 15 years in age is ≤ 1.2 mg/dL or Creatinine Clearance/GFR ≥ 70 mL/min/m^2
  • Serum creatinine for patients > 15 years in age is ≤ 1.5 mg/dL or Creatinine Clearance/GFR ≥ 70 mL/min/m^2
  • Total bilirubin is ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal for age
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 3 x upper limit of normal
  • Absolute neutrophil count > 1000/µL
  • Platelet count > 100,000/µL
  • Hemoglobin > 8 gm/dL
  • Neurologically stable for at least 7 days prior to randomization
  • If receiving corticosteroids, patients must be on a stable or decreasing dose for at least 7 days before randomization
  • Patients of reproductive potential must agree to proactive effective contraceptive measures for the duration of the study and for at least 90 days after completion of study drug

Who cannot join

  • Previously received epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy
  • Previously received oral etoposide
  • Received craniospinal radiotherapy within 24 weeks prior to randomization
  • Received field radiotherapy to the target lesion within 12 weeks prior to randomization
  • Received symptomatic metastatic disease within 14 days prior to randomization
  • Received myelosuppressive chemotherapy within 21 days before randomization
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Received growth factors within 7 days prior to randomization
  • Participating in another investigational drug trial
  • Received a biologic agent within 7 days prior to randomization
  • Received a monoclonal antibody within 28 days prior to randomization
  • Taking cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 or CYP1A2 inhibitors/inducers within 14 days prior to randomization
  • Taking proton pump inhibitors within 14 days prior to randomization
  • Smoking during treatment
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding females

Trial locations and contacts

28 sites in 3 countries.

28 sites in 3 countries

United States18 sites
  • Emory University Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Aflac Cancer Center & Blood Disorders

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Children's Hospital Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham Dept. of Pediatric-Hematology/Oncology

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Department of Pediatric Neuro-oncology

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Children's Medical Center, Dallas Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders

    Dallas, Texas, 75235

  • Penn State Hershey Children's Hospital

    Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17110

  • University of Wisconsin Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Department

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53705-2275

  • University of Miami

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Amplatz Children's Hospital University of Minnesota Medical Center- Pediatric Hematology Oncology

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

  • Steven D Hassenfeld Children's Center - New York University

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Columbia University Children's Hospital of New York Presbyterian Child & Adolescent Oncology Center

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC)

    Orange, California, 92868

  • Stanford University and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

  • Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders-Phoenix Children's Hospital

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85016

  • Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224

  • Oregon Health & Sciences University Doembecher Children's Hospital

    Portland, Oregon, 97124

  • Children's National Medical Center - D.C. Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010

Other trials in United States

United Kingdom7 sites
  • Birmingham Children's Hospital

    Birmingham, B4 6NH

  • Royal Hospital for Sick Children

    Glasgow, G3 8SJ

  • Paediatric Oncology and Haematology Offices

    Leeds, LS1 3EX

  • Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust Department of Oncology

    Liverpool, L12 1AP

  • Royal Manchester Children's Hospital Ward 84

    Manchester, M13 9W2

  • University of Nottingham Children's Brain Tumour Research Centre

    Nottingham, NG7 2UH

  • Royal Marsden Hospital

    Sutton, SM2 5PT

Other trials in United Kingdom

Canada3 sites
  • Strollery Children's Hospital Division of Hematology/Oncology

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7

  • Hospital for Sick Children

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8

  • Children's and Women's Health Center of BC Division of Hematology/ Oncology/ BMT

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3V4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Phase 2 Study of Single-agent Erlotinib Versus Oral Etoposide in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Ependymoma

This is a phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy of single-agent erlotinib versus oral etoposide in patients with recurrent or refractory pediatric ependymoma.

Read the detailed description

This is a phase 2 study involving a 1:1 randomization of 40 patients with recurrent or refractory pediatric ependymoma who will receive either erlotinib or oral etoposide.

Being tested
erlotinib, etoposide
Keywords
pediatric, etoposide, erlotinib, phase 2, ependymoma
Medical subject headings
Recurrence, Familial ependymoma, Ependymoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01032070
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ErlotinibExperimentalErlotinib was administered orally at a dose of 85 mg/m^2 per day continuously until either progression, death, patient request or investigator decision to discontinue study drug or intolerable toxicity.
Receives: Drug: erlotinib
EtoposideActive comparatorEtoposide 50 mg/m^2 per day was administered orally for 21 days followed by a 7-day rest period until either progression, death, patient request or investigator decision to discontinue study drug or intolerable toxicity.
Receives: Drug: etoposide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response

    Objective response is defined as a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), evaluated using modified International Society of Pediatric Oncology Brain, Tumor Subcommittee for the Reporting of Trials criteria. Response was confirmed at least 28 days after the first assessment where the response criteria were met. Response was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 8 weeks. CR: • Complete disappearance of all enhancing tumor and mass effect • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids (or receiving only adrenal replacement doses) • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks • If cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) evaluation was positive, it must become negative (confirmed at least 2 times at consecutive samplings). PR: • ≥ 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks.

    Measured: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Duration of Response

    Duration of response (complete or partial response [CR/PR]) was defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (CR/PR) to the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a participant had not progressed or died, the duration of overall response was censored at the date of last adequate disease assessment. Duration of response was only defined for participants whose best overall response was CR or PR. Progression was defined as a worsening of neurologic status that could not be explained by other causes, a > 25% increase in tumor size, the appearance of new lesions or CSF positivity, or increasing doses of corticosteroids required to maintain stable status.

    Measured: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

  2. Percentage of Participants With a Minor Response

    Participants with a best overall response of minor response (MR), defined as: • ≥ 25% to < 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks.

    Measured: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Disease Control

    Disease control is a best overall response of CR or PR or MR or Stable disease (SD). CR: • Complete disappearance of all enhancing tumor and mass effect • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks • If CSF evaluation was positive, it must become negative (confirmed at least 2 times consecutively). PR: • ≥ 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks. MR: • ≥ 25% to < 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks. SD: • Neurologic examination is at least stable • Maintenance corticosteroid dose is not increased • MRI meets neither the criteria for minor response nor for progressive disease • Sustained for ≥ 8 weeks.

    Measured: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

  4. Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression based on central nervous system (CNS)-specific evaluation criteria as assessed by the investigator or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Participants did not progress or die before the data cutoff date for analysis were censored at the date of last disease assessment (including both radiologic assessment and neurologic assessment) where non-progression was documented. If a participant received any further anticancer therapy without prior documentation of disease progression, the participant was censored at the date of last disease assessment before starting new anti-cancer treatment. Participants were also censored at the date of last disease assessment with no documented progression if patients discontinued treatment for undocumented progression, toxicity or other reason before the data cutoff date for analysis.

    Measured: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Prolonged Stable Disease

    Prolonged stable disease (SD) was defined as SD with a duration of at least 16 weeks. The percentage of participants with prolonged SD was defined as participants who achieved a best overall response of CR or PR or MR or SD, and did not progress within 16 weeks from randomization. Progression was defined as a worsening of neurologic status that could not be explained by other causes, a > 25% increase in tumor size, the appearance of new lesions or CSF positivity, or increasing doses of corticosteroids required to maintain stable status.

    Measured: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

  6. Duration of Stable Disease

    Duration of stable disease (SD; defined as participants with an overall best response of complete, partial or minor response or stable disease) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a participant had not progressed or died, the duration of SD was censored at the date of last adequate disease assessment. Duration of SD was only defined for participants whose best overall response was CR or PR or MR or SD. Progression was defined as a worsening of neurologic status that could not be explained by other causes, a > 25% increase in tumor size, the appearance of new lesions or CSF positivity, or increasing doses of corticosteroids required to maintain stable status.

    Measured: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

  7. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the documented date of death. Participants who were still alive by the data cutoff date for analysis were censored on the last day the participant was known to be alive.

    Measured: From randomization up to 12 months after the last dose. Median duration of follow-up was 12.9 months for erlotinib and 14.4 months for etoposide.

  8. Safety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant and did not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. Clinically significant vital sign assessments, findings on physical or neurological examination, and laboratory findings associated with signs and/or symptoms requiring withdrawal, dose modification or medical intervention were recorded as AEs. An AE was considered serious if it resulted in death, a life-threatening situation, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a patient who received study drug or other important medical events. The relationship of each AE to study drug was assessed as either related or not related.

    Measured: From the date of first dose of study drug until 30 days after the last dose. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

  9. Area Under the Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Erlotinib

    Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours (the dosing interval) measured at steady state using sparse sampling.

    Measured: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.

  10. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Erlotinib (Cmax)

    Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Maximum observed plasma concentration of erlotinib (Cmax) was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.

    Measured: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.

  11. Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Erlotinib (Tmax)

    Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Time to the maximum observed plasma concentration of erlotinib (Tmax) was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.

    Measured: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.

  12. Apparent Body Clearance (CL/F) of Erlotinib

    Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Apparent body clearance (CL/F) of erlotinib was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.

    Measured: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.

  13. Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Erlotinib

    Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. The apparent volume of distribution (Vz/F) of erlotinib was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.

    Measured: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Dec 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study start27 Sep 2010
  3. Primary completion26 Nov 2012
  4. Study completion26 Nov 2012

Why it stopped: In a pre-planned interim analysis, OSI-774-205 met futility for efficacy with no safety concerns. As a result, it has been stopped.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01032070
Sponsor's protocol ID
OSI-774-205
Other IDs
2009-016836-11, 2009
Acronym
PETEY
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
10 Dec 2009
Last updated
12 Dec 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: Access to anonymized individual participant level data will not be provided for this trial. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing erlotinib and etoposide in people with Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Ependymoma, run by OSI Pharmaceuticals at 28 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 28 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jan 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response (time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in