SpondylolisthesisNCT01024699
XLIF® vs. MAS®TLIF for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With or Without Central Stenosis.
An observational study of Spondylolisthesis, run by NuVasive at 9 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine differences in the XLIF and TLIF procedures with respect to perioperative variables in adult patients with low-grade symptomatic spondylolisthesis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Spondylolisthesis
- How many people
- 55 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2009to Feb 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Study population will consist of patients from participating site locations.
Who may be able to join
- Male and female patients who are at least 18 years of age;
- Patients who present with symptomatic Grade I or II degenerative spondylolisthesis at 1 or 2 contiguous lumbar levels between L1 and L5 and are surgical candidates for interbody lumbar fusion surgery; symptoms should include radiculopathy and/or neurogenic claudication with or without back pain;
- Patients who have been unresponsive to at least 6 months of conservative treatments or exhibit progressive neurological symptoms in the face of conservative treatment;
- Patients who understand the conditions of enrollment and are willing to sign an informed consent to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- Patients with lumbar pathologies requiring treatment at more than 2 levels;
- Patients who have had previous lumbar fusion surgery;
- Patients with lytic spondylolisthesis or a defect of the pars interarticularis;
- Patients with radiographic confirmation of Grade IV facet joint disease or degeneration;
- Patients with non-contained or extruded herniated nucleus pulposus
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
United States9 sites
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
The Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
St. Vincent-Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32204
Celebration Florida Hospital
Kissimmee, Florida, 34747
Orthopaedic Clinic-Riverside Campus, University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55454
Northwest Orthopaedic Specialists, P.S.
Paducah, Kentucky, 42003
Spine and Sports Institute
Richland, Washington, 99352
St. Joseph's/Candler Health System
Savannah, Georgia, 31405
Northwest Orthopaedic Specialists, P.S.
Spokane, Washington, 99208
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Multi-Center Randomized Evaluation of the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of XLIF® Compared With MAS® TLIF for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With or Without Central Stenosis
The purpose of this study is to determine differences in the XLIF and TLIF procedures with respect to perioperative variables in adult patients with low-grade symptomatic spondylolisthesis.
Read the detailed description
The study is a prospective multi-center randomized evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcomes of two commonly used lumbar interbody fusion procedures (XLIF and TLIF) in adult patients with low-grade symptomatic spondylolisthesis. The study seeks to identify differences between the procedures with respect to perioperative variables.
- Conditions
- Spondylolisthesis
- Medical subject headings
- Spondylolisthesis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| XLIF | This group will have the XLIF procedure done. | |
| MAS TLIF | This group will have the MAS TLIF procedure done. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The average improvement in clinical function (ODI) at 24 months compared with baseline, for each procedure.
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
The average improvement in pain (VAS) at 24 months compared with baseline, for each procedure.
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2009
- Primary completionFeb 2015
- Study completionFeb 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SpondylolisthesisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NuVasive
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01024699
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NUVA.X0901
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 1 Dec 2009
- Last updated
- 24 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Multi-Center Randomized Evaluation of the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of XLIF® Compared With MAS® TLIF for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With or Without Central Stenosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01024699
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NUVA.X0901
- Conditions
- Spondylolisthesis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NuVasiveIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2009
- Primary completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine differences in the XLIF and TLIF procedures with respect to perioperative variables in adult patients with low-grade symptomatic spondylolisthesis.
Detailed description
The study is a prospective multi-center randomized evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcomes of two commonly used lumbar interbody fusion procedures (XLIF and TLIF) in adult patients with low-grade symptomatic spondylolisthesis. The study seeks to identify differences between the procedures with respect to perioperative variables.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| XLIF | – | –This group will have the XLIF procedure done. |
| MAS TLIF | – | –This group will have the MAS TLIF procedure done. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Study population will consist of patients from participating site locations.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male and female patients who are at least 18 years of age;
- Patients who present with symptomatic Grade I or II degenerative spondylolisthesis at 1 or 2 contiguous lumbar levels between L1 and L5 and are surgical candidates for interbody lumbar fusion surgery; symptoms should include radiculopathy and/or neurogenic claudication with or without back pain;
- Patients who have been unresponsive to at least 6 months of conservative treatments or exhibit progressive neurological symptoms in the face of conservative treatment;
- Patients who understand the conditions of enrollment and are willing to sign an informed consent to participate in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with lumbar pathologies requiring treatment at more than 2 levels;
- Patients who have had previous lumbar fusion surgery;
- Patients with lytic spondylolisthesis or a defect of the pars interarticularis;
- Patients with radiographic confirmation of Grade IV facet joint disease or degeneration;
- Patients with non-contained or extruded herniated nucleus pulposus
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
The average improvement in clinical function (ODI) at 24 months compared with baseline, for each procedure.
Time frame: 24 months
1 secondary outcome
The average improvement in pain (VAS) at 24 months compared with baseline, for each procedure.
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Dec 2025.
Related trials for Spondylolisthesis
Recruiting
Post-Market Clinical Study of Functional Motion Outcomes in Subjects Treated With the Minuteman Device
Degenerative Conditions of the Lumbar Spine, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
RecruitingObservational study
Thoracic-Lumbar Arthrodesis- Implanet Jazz
Spondylolisthesis, Spinal Stenosis
Recruiting
Studying Melatonin and Recovery in Teens
Juvenile; Scoliosis, Scoliosis Idiopathic
Not yet recruiting
Kore Fiber PLF Study
Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases, Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
Active, not recruiting
SLIP II Registry: Spinal Laminectomy Versus Instrumented Pedicle Screw Fusion
Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Spondylolisthesis, run by NuVasive at 9 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The average improvement in clinical function (ODI) at 24 months compared with baseline, for each procedure. (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2025.