Central Serous ChorioretinopathyNCT01019668
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Treated by Modified Photodynamic Therapy
A study testing Verteporfin PDT, half-dose and verteporfin PDT, half-fluence in people with Central Serous Chorioretinopathy, run by Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness as well as the detrimental influence of half-dose and half-fluence modification of verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of prolonged unresolved central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
- What is being tested?
- Verteporfin PDT, half-dose and verteporfin PDT, half-fluence
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- Nov 2008to Jun 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/200 or better
- Presence of subretinal fluid (SRF) and/or serous pigment epithelial detachment (PED) involving the fovea on optical coherence tomography (OCT)
- Presence of active angiographic leakage in fluorescein angiography (FA) caused by CSC but not CNV or other diseases
- Abnormal dilated choroidal vasculature and other features in ICGA consistent with the diagnosis of CSC.
Who cannot join
- Patients who received previous PDT or focal thermal laser photocoagulation for the treatment of CSC.
- Patients had evidence of CNV, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, or other maculopathy on clinical examination, FA, or ICGA
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness as well as the detrimental influence of half-dose and half-fluence modification of verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of prolonged unresolved central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).
Read the detailed description
Purpose:
to evaluate the effectiveness as well as the detrimental influence of half-dose and half-fluence modification of verteporfin PDT for the treatment of prolonged unresolved Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSCR).
Study Design and Patient Recruitment:
This study was a prospective, randomized, consecutive, open-labeled, comparative interventional case series. Patients with symptomatic acute or chronic CSC of 3 weeks or more duration were recruited. Patients were offered treatment if they had worsening of symptoms or no subjective improvement since the onset of the CSC. Inclusion criteria included 1) patients with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/400 or better; 2) presence of subretinal fluid (SRF) and/or serous pigment epithelial detachment (PED) involving the fovea on optical coherence tomography (OCT); 3) presence of active angiographic leakage in fluorescein angiography (FA) caused by CSC but not CNV or other diseases; and 4) abnormal dilated choroidal vasculature and other features in ICGA consistent with the diagnosis of CSC. Patients who received previous PDT or focal thermal laser photocoagulation for the treatment of CSC or had evidence of CNV, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, or other maculopathy on clinical examination, FA, or ICGA were excluded. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. 12 patients in each group were planned to recruit in each group.
Modified Photodynamic Therapy with Half Dosage:
The Half Dosage PDT protocol for CSC was performed using half the normal dose of verteporfin (Visudyne, Novartis AG, Bülach, Switzerland) i.e., 3 mg/m2 infusion of verteporfin with a rationale that using lower dosage has less collateral damaging effects to the retina and choroid. Verteporfin was infused over 10 minutes followed by delivery of laser at 692 nm at 15 minutes from the commencement of infusion to target the area of choroidal dilation and hyperpermeability. Earlier laser application allowed less drug accumulation at the RPE layer and less drug less toxicity at the RPE. A total light energy of 50 J/cm2 over 83 seconds was delivered to the area of choroidal hyperperfusion as observed in ICGA instead of the angiographic leakage sites shown in FA. Only the area of choroidal vascular abnormality that was supposed to cause the serous detachment involving the macula was considered to be treated. To avoid overtreatment on the choroidal vasculature in causing choroidal ischemia, the laser spot size was set at a maximum of 4,500 µm. This restriction in laser spot size is adequate, from our previous report, to reverse the serous macular detachment by reducing the choroidal extravascular leakage and sub-RPE hydrostatic pressure at the macular area. In patients with bilateral CSC, only one eye was recruited for the study, and the eye with thicker central retinal thickness on OCT was chosen. After treatment, patients were given protective spectacles and instructed to avoid strong light for 3 days.
Modified Photodynamic Therapy with Half fluence:
The Half fluence PDT protocol for CSC was performed using half the normal duration of verteporfin laser time (Visudyne, Novartis AG, Bülach, Switzerland) All patients received a bolus infusion of 6 mg/m2 body surface area over 1 minute. Patients were assigned to treatment protocols, using a fluence of 25 J/cm2. In the 25-J/cm2 group, patients received an irradiance of 600 mW. Depending on the irradiance, the time of photosensitization was 42 seconds. A total light energy of 25 J/cm2 over 42 seconds was delivered to the area of choroidal hyperperfusion as observed in ICGA instead of the angiographic leakage sites shown in FA. Only the area of choroidal vascular abnormality that was supposed to cause the serous detachment involving the macula was considered to be treated. To avoid overtreatment on the choroidal vasculature in causing choroidal ischemia, the laser spot size was set at a maximum of 4,500 µm. This restriction in laser spot size is adequate, from our previous report, to reverse the serous macular detachment by reducing the choroidal extravascular leakage and sub-RPE hydrostatic pressure at the macular area. In patients with bilateral CSC, only one eye was recruited for the study, and the eye with thicker central retinal thickness on OCT was chosen. After treatment, patients were given protective spectacles and instructed to avoid strong light for 3 days.
Documentation:
Patients were seen for regular follow-up visits within 1 week before and at day 1, week 1, week 4, and month 3 after treatment. A standardized evaluation was performed at each visit including best corrected visual acuity according to the guidelines of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), confocal scanning laser fluorescein angiography (FA), ICGA (Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany), fundus photography, and a complete eye examination. Selected patients were imaged with optical coherence tomography (OCT).
The main outcome measures were choroidal perfusion changes, as documented by early and late ICGA. A PDT-induced increase in collateral leakage area seen by late FA 1 day after PDT was defined as a secondary outcome, as was primary CNV closure documented by early FA. Best-corrected visual acuity was documented for safety evaluation. Data were statistically analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Statistical significance was defined as P <0.05.
Procedures for Evaluation:
The Image J, (software ; NIH, USA), an imaging software developed for analysis and visualization of images obtained with grayscale photograph, was used forplanimetric evaluation of the area of hypofluorescence detected by ICGA and the area of PDT-induced leakage seen on FA. Choriocapillary hypoperfusion and nonperfusion were graded according to a scale. Angiographies were evaluated by two masked readers, and planimetricand grading results of both readers were averaged.
Follow-Up Examinations:
Patients were assessed at baseline and followed at day 1, 7, 30, 90 and 180 after PDT. At the baseline and post-PDT visits, BCVA was measured by certified optometrists with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) chart at 4 m or Snellen chart at 6 m being converted to logMAR equivalent for analysis. OCT recordings were performed using an OCT 3 machine (StratusOCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA). Both vertical and horizontal scans of 6.0 mm centered on the fovea were obtained for measurement of central foveal thickness. OCT central foveal thickness was measured manually using the retinal thickness mode and is defined as the distance between the inner surface of the RPE and the inner surface of the neurosensory retina at the fovea. FA and ICGA were performed in all patients at baseline, month 1, and 3 after PDT. Additional FA and ICGA were carried out in patients with persistence or recurrence of CSC during the follow-up period. CSC was classified according to FA findings into two groups: 1) chronic CSC with serous retinal detachment and focal leakage (Group 1); or 2) chronic CSC with diffuse leakage that had an RPE transmission defect in early phase and diffuse angiographic leakage in mid to late phases (Group 2). Features of CSC in ICGA were delineated according to the original descriptions.
Data Analysis:
The main outcome measures of the study included the serial changes in logMAR BCVA and OCT central foveal thickness. Other outcome measures included complications and FA and ICGA changes during the follow-up period. Serial comparisons of mean logMAR BCVA and OCT central foveal thickness were performed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon-signed rank test and two-tailed t-test, respectively. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test and Fisher exact test. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS and a P value of <=0.05 was considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
- Being tested
- Verteporfin PDT, half-dose, verteporfin PDT, half-fluence
- Keywords
- chorioretinopathy, photodynamic therapy, reduced fluence, reduced dose
- Medical subject headings
- Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Verteporfin PDT, half-doseDrug
Also called visudyne
half the regular dose or half the regular laser fluence to treat prolonged unresolved CSCR
verteporfin PDT, half-fluenceDrug
Also called visudyne
half the regular dose or half the regular laser fluence to treat prolonged unresolved CSCR
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| verteporfin PDT, half-dose | Active comparator | use different modification of verteporfin PDT to treat prolonged unresolved central serous chorioretinopathy Receives: Drug: Verteporfin PDT, half-dose; Drug: verteporfin PDT, half-fluence |
| verteporfin PDT, half-fluence | Active comparator | use different modification of verteporfin PDT to treat prolonged unresolved central serous chorioretinopathy Receives: Drug: Verteporfin PDT, half-dose; Drug: verteporfin PDT, half-fluence |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Effectiveness of both modification for the treatment of chronic CSCR Fluorescent leakage as regards to BCVA OCT changes
Measured: within 6 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Detrimental influence on choroidal perfusion Represented by the decrease of fluorescent intensity In ICGA
Measured: within 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2008
- Primary completionDec 2009
- Study completionJun 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Central Serous ChorioretinopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Cheng-Kuo Cheng, MD, Principal investigator, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01019668
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SKH-8302-98-DR-27
- Status last verified
- Jul 2011
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2009
- Last updated
- 25 Jul 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Lange CA, Qureshi R, Pauleikhoff L. Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
PubMed 40522203
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jul 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Treated by Modified Photodynamic Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01019668
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SKH-8302-98-DR-27
- Conditions
- Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
- Keywords
- chorioretinopathy, photodynamic therapy, reduced fluence, reduced dose
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2008
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness as well as the detrimental influence of half-dose and half-fluence modification of verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of prolonged unresolved central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).
Detailed description
Purpose:
to evaluate the effectiveness as well as the detrimental influence of half-dose and half-fluence modification of verteporfin PDT for the treatment of prolonged unresolved Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSCR).
Study Design and Patient Recruitment:
This study was a prospective, randomized, consecutive, open-labeled, comparative interventional case series. Patients with symptomatic acute or chronic CSC of 3 weeks or more duration were recruited. Patients were offered treatment if they had worsening of symptoms or no subjective improvement since the onset of the CSC. Inclusion criteria included 1) patients with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/400 or better; 2) presence of subretinal fluid (SRF) and/or serous pigment epithelial detachment (PED) involving the fovea on optical coherence tomography (OCT); 3) presence of active angiographic leakage in fluorescein angiography (FA) caused by CSC but not CNV or other diseases; and 4) abnormal dilated choroidal vasculature and other features in ICGA consistent with the diagnosis of CSC. Patients who received previous PDT or focal thermal laser photocoagulation for the treatment of CSC or had evidence of CNV, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, or other maculopathy on clinical examination, FA, or ICGA were excluded. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. 12 patients in each group were planned to recruit in each group.
Modified Photodynamic Therapy with Half Dosage:
The Half Dosage PDT protocol for CSC was performed using half the normal dose of verteporfin (Visudyne, Novartis AG, Bülach, Switzerland) i.e., 3 mg/m2 infusion of verteporfin with a rationale that using lower dosage has less collateral damaging effects to the retina and choroid. Verteporfin was infused over 10 minutes followed by delivery of laser at 692 nm at 15 minutes from the commencement of infusion to target the area of choroidal dilation and hyperpermeability. Earlier laser application allowed less drug accumulation at the RPE layer and less drug less toxicity at the RPE. A total light energy of 50 J/cm2 over 83 seconds was delivered to the area of choroidal hyperperfusion as observed in ICGA instead of the angiographic leakage sites shown in FA. Only the area of choroidal vascular abnormality that was supposed to cause the serous detachment involving the macula was considered to be treated. To avoid overtreatment on the choroidal vasculature in causing choroidal ischemia, the laser spot size was set at a maximum of 4,500 µm. This restriction in laser spot size is adequate, from our previous report, to reverse the serous macular detachment by reducing the choroidal extravascular leakage and sub-RPE hydrostatic pressure at the macular area. In patients with bilateral CSC, only one eye was recruited for the study, and the eye with thicker central retinal thickness on OCT was chosen. After treatment, patients were given protective spectacles and instructed to avoid strong light for 3 days.
Modified Photodynamic Therapy with Half fluence:
The Half fluence PDT protocol for CSC was performed using half the normal duration of verteporfin laser time (Visudyne, Novartis AG, Bülach, Switzerland) All patients received a bolus infusion of 6 mg/m2 body surface area over 1 minute. Patients were assigned to treatment protocols, using a fluence of 25 J/cm2. In the 25-J/cm2 group, patients received an irradiance of 600 mW. Depending on the irradiance, the time of photosensitization was 42 seconds. A total light energy of 25 J/cm2 over 42 seconds was delivered to the area of choroidal hyperperfusion as observed in ICGA instead of the angiographic leakage sites shown in FA. Only the area of choroidal vascular abnormality that was supposed to cause the serous detachment involving the macula was considered to be treated. To avoid overtreatment on the choroidal vasculature in causing choroidal ischemia, the laser spot size was set at a maximum of 4,500 µm. This restriction in laser spot size is adequate, from our previous report, to reverse the serous macular detachment by reducing the choroidal extravascular leakage and sub-RPE hydrostatic pressure at the macular area. In patients with bilateral CSC, only one eye was recruited for the study, and the eye with thicker central retinal thickness on OCT was chosen. After treatment, patients were given protective spectacles and instructed to avoid strong light for 3 days.
Documentation:
Patients were seen for regular follow-up visits within 1 week before and at day 1, week 1, week 4, and month 3 after treatment. A standardized evaluation was performed at each visit including best corrected visual acuity according to the guidelines of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), confocal scanning laser fluorescein angiography (FA), ICGA (Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany), fundus photography, and a complete eye examination. Selected patients were imaged with optical coherence tomography (OCT).
The main outcome measures were choroidal perfusion changes, as documented by early and late ICGA. A PDT-induced increase in collateral leakage area seen by late FA 1 day after PDT was defined as a secondary outcome, as was primary CNV closure documented by early FA. Best-corrected visual acuity was documented for safety evaluation. Data were statistically analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Statistical significance was defined as P <0.05.
Procedures for Evaluation:
The Image J, (software ; NIH, USA), an imaging software developed for analysis and visualization of images obtained with grayscale photograph, was used forplanimetric evaluation of the area of hypofluorescence detected by ICGA and the area of PDT-induced leakage seen on FA. Choriocapillary hypoperfusion and nonperfusion were graded according to a scale. Angiographies were evaluated by two masked readers, and planimetricand grading results of both readers were averaged.
Follow-Up Examinations:
Patients were assessed at baseline and followed at day 1, 7, 30, 90 and 180 after PDT. At the baseline and post-PDT visits, BCVA was measured by certified optometrists with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) chart at 4 m or Snellen chart at 6 m being converted to logMAR equivalent for analysis. OCT recordings were performed using an OCT 3 machine (StratusOCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA). Both vertical and horizontal scans of 6.0 mm centered on the fovea were obtained for measurement of central foveal thickness. OCT central foveal thickness was measured manually using the retinal thickness mode and is defined as the distance between the inner surface of the RPE and the inner surface of the neurosensory retina at the fovea. FA and ICGA were performed in all patients at baseline, month 1, and 3 after PDT. Additional FA and ICGA were carried out in patients with persistence or recurrence of CSC during the follow-up period. CSC was classified according to FA findings into two groups: 1) chronic CSC with serous retinal detachment and focal leakage (Group 1); or 2) chronic CSC with diffuse leakage that had an RPE transmission defect in early phase and diffuse angiographic leakage in mid to late phases (Group 2). Features of CSC in ICGA were delineated according to the original descriptions.
Data Analysis:
The main outcome measures of the study included the serial changes in logMAR BCVA and OCT central foveal thickness. Other outcome measures included complications and FA and ICGA changes during the follow-up period. Serial comparisons of mean logMAR BCVA and OCT central foveal thickness were performed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon-signed rank test and two-tailed t-test, respectively. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test and Fisher exact test. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS and a P value of <=0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| verteporfin PDT, half-dose | Active comparator | Drug: Verteporfin PDT, half-dose, Drug: verteporfin PDT, half-fluenceuse different modification of verteporfin PDT to treat prolonged unresolved central serous chorioretinopathy |
| verteporfin PDT, half-fluence | Active comparator | Drug: Verteporfin PDT, half-dose, Drug: verteporfin PDT, half-fluenceuse different modification of verteporfin PDT to treat prolonged unresolved central serous chorioretinopathy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/200 or better
- Presence of subretinal fluid (SRF) and/or serous pigment epithelial detachment (PED) involving the fovea on optical coherence tomography (OCT)
- Presence of active angiographic leakage in fluorescein angiography (FA) caused by CSC but not CNV or other diseases
- Abnormal dilated choroidal vasculature and other features in ICGA consistent with the diagnosis of CSC.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients who received previous PDT or focal thermal laser photocoagulation for the treatment of CSC.
- Patients had evidence of CNV, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, or other maculopathy on clinical examination, FA, or ICGA
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Verteporfin PDT, half-doseAlso: visudynehalf the regular dose or half the regular laser fluence to treat prolonged unresolved CSCR | Drug | verteporfin PDT, half-dose, verteporfin PDT, half-fluence |
| verteporfin PDT, half-fluenceAlso: visudynehalf the regular dose or half the regular laser fluence to treat prolonged unresolved CSCR | Drug | verteporfin PDT, half-dose, verteporfin PDT, half-fluence |
Primary outcome
Effectiveness of both modification for the treatment of chronic CSCR Fluorescent leakage as regards to BCVA OCT changes
Time frame: within 6 months
1 secondary outcome
Detrimental influence on choroidal perfusion Represented by the decrease of fluorescent intensity In ICGA
Time frame: within 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jul 2011.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40522203Lange CA, Qureshi R, Pauleikhoff L. Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
Related trials for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Case-Control Study Revealing Intraocular Microenvironment Characteristics in Patients With Ocular Diseases Based on Multi-Omics Analysis
Age- Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Retinopathy
Not yet recruiting
Mindfulness for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
RecruitingObservational study
Biomarkers and Choroidal Neovascularization
Choroidal Neovascularization, Mineralocorticoid Excess
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Faricimab for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSC)
Recruiting
the Study of the Association Between the Gut Microbiota and Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cheng-Kuo Cheng, MD principal investigator
Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, School of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Verteporfin PDT, half-dose and verteporfin PDT, half-fluence in people with Central Serous Chorioretinopathy, run by Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Effectiveness of both modification for the treatment of chronic CSCR Fluorescent leakage as regards to BCVA OCT changes (time frame: within 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01019668, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2011.