AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Renal FailurePhase 3NICORENNCT01011699

Nicotinamide Versus Sevelamer Hydrochloride on Phosphatemia Control on Chronic Hemodialysed Patients

A Phase 3 study testing nicotinamide, sevelamer and cinacalcet in people with Chronic Renal Failure and Hemodialysis, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens at 18 sites in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The comparison between nicotinamide and sevelamer aims to demonstrate, in chronic hemodialysed patients, the non-inferiority of nicotinamide in terms of control of the phosphatemia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Renal Failure, Hemodialysis
What is being tested?
nicotinamide, sevelamer and cinacalcet
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
176 participants
Where
18 sitesFrance
Study dates
Jan 2010to Jun 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women or men over 18 years
  • Chronic hemodialysis (since more than 3 months)
  • Hyperphosphatemia controlled with only CaCO3
  • PO4 > 1,60 mmol/l, PCa < 2,37 mmol/l
  • patient able to understand and sign informed consent form

Who cannot join

  • PTH < 60 ou > 800 pg/ml (PTX)
  • Aluminium intoxication (aluminium level in blood > 0,5 µmol/l)
  • Score of aortic calcifications ≥ 20 (max 24)
  • Characterized intolerance with Renagel and/or Nicobion
  • Pregnant woman
  • Autoimmune disease
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Patient known to have a bad drug compliance
  • Blood tests abnormality (thrombopenia <150 000, serum albumin <30g)
  • Hepatic tests abnormality
  • Transplant probably within 6 months
  • Patient who will need transplantation within 6 month
  • Patients receiving chemotherapy
  • Patients having a loss of dry weight of 3 kg in 3 months or 6 kg in 6 months.

Trial locations and contacts

18 sites in 1 country.

18 sites in 1 country

France18 sites
  • Centre Hospital-Universitaire d'Amiens

    Amiens, Picardie, 80054

  • Centre Hospitalier Général

    Beauvais, Oise, 60000

  • Clinique du Bois Bernard

    Bois-Bernard, Pas de calais, 62320

  • Centre Hospitalier

    Boulogne-sur-Mer, Pas de calais, 62200

  • Centre Hospitalier

    Cambrai, Cambrai, 59407

  • Clinique Saint Côme

    Compiègne, Oise, 60200

  • Centre Hospitalier Général

    Creil, Oise, 60100

  • Association pour le Développement de l'Hémodialyse

    Hénin-Beaumont, Hauts-de-France, 62110

  • Polyclinique de la Louvière

    Lille, Nord, 59000

  • CHRU

    Lille, Nord, 59037

  • ALURAD

    Limoges, Limousin, 87042

  • Centre Hospitalier

    Lisieux, Calvados, 14100

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire

    Reims, Marne, 51092

  • Association Régionale Promotion Dialyse à domicile (ARPDD)

    Reims, Marne

  • Hôpital Victor Provo

    Roubaix, Nord, 59056

  • Clinique de l'Europe

    Rouen, Seine maritime, 76040

  • Centre Hospitalier Général

    Soissons, Aisne, 02009

  • Centre Hospitalier Général

    Valenciennes, Nord, 59322

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Nicotinamide and Sevelamer Hydrochloride on Phosphatemia Control on Chronic Hemodialysed Patients

The comparison between nicotinamide and sevelamer aims to demonstrate, in chronic hemodialysed patients, the non-inferiority of nicotinamide in terms of control of the phosphatemia. Secondary objectives is to compare the two treatments in terms of efficiency in other biological parameters, vascular calcification and bone mass loss and on the clinical and biological tolerance and finally to explore the roles of metabolites of nicotinamide.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter randomized open study with 2 treatment arms (nicotinamide / Sevelamer).

Laboratories who will dose biochemical parameters and PTH, ignore which treatment is received by patients.

The team which will measure bone density and the radiologist or rheumatologist who will appreciate centrally calcification and deformity of the vertebrae, ignore which treatment is received by patients.

Therefore it's a Randomized Prospective Blinded Outcome Endpoint.

Pre-recruitment period (3 to 6 months) with basic medication

  • Repletion of vitamin D (p 25 OHD between 30 and 50 ng / ml) (if required by supplementation Dedrogyl weekly by the dialysis nurse)
  • Bath dialysis to 1.50 mmol / l calcium (1.75 mmol / l if hemodiafiltration), 32 mmol bicarbonate and 0.5 mmol / l magnesium - Support to provide a dietary protein intake with 1.2 g / kg / d and assessment of contributions of Ca and PO4
  • Use of CaCO3 taken with meals rich in phosphorus (morning, noon and evening) without
  • In case of hyperkalemia, Calcium Sorbisterit® will preferably be used instead of KAYEXALATE®. This process exposes the worsening effect of hyperphosphatemia increasing calcium malabsorption and therefore the negative calcium balance in renal failure.
  • Statin therapy, fibrate or ezetimibe if necessary, but with stable dose

This treatment will be monitored on the following parameters:

  • Biochemical weekly Predialytic (midweek): creatinine, urea, PO4, Ca, protein, Na, K, bicarbonate, glucose, uric acid
  • Additional monthly balance: PTH intact, Mg, albumin, CRP
  • Each 4 months update: lipid profile (fasting or not, but always at the same time, 25 OH D, complete blood count (CBC), AST-ALT, total alkaline phosphatase, gamma-GT, PKC, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) )

Recruitment (180 patients):

  • Obtaining informed consent
  • Perform a bone density by DXA third of the radius (cortical bone), radius ultradistal (trabecular bone), femoral neck bone (mixed), whole body and lumbar spine profile radiography.
  • Lumbar and dorsal radiography (frontal and profile) for research and vertebral measurement of aortic calcification by the Framingham score) + pelvis radiography (frontal) and 2 hands radiography (frontal) searching vascular calcification, Looser's streaks and subperiosteal resorption.
  • Freezing at -80 ° C (4 tubes of 1 ml of serum)for centralized analysis:PTH, 25 OHD, CTX, PAO. All samples will be sent for laboratory analysis of Biochemistry University Hospital of Amiens at the end of the study.

For this, 10 ml of blood will be collected with a dry tube then centrifuged 15 minutes, 4000-5000 rpm at room temperature within 30 minutes after collection. Then, aliquot 1ml into 4 polypropylene tubes being careful not to take the fibrin.

  • Freezing at -80 ° C in a tube of 2.5 ml of plasma to be assayed later the metabolites of nicotinamide. These samples will only be achieved if patients accept and mark the second part of the consent. The tubes are then stored in the biological resource center, CHU Amiens for further research and for an indefinite period.

The nicotinamide metabolites measured in this study will annex the Met2PY (N-methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide), the Met4PY (N-methyl-4-pyridone-3-carboxamide) and NAD (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide).

6 ml of EDTA whole blood will be collected, then centrifuged 15 minutes, 4000-5000 rpm at room temperature within 30 minutes after collection. Then, 2.5 ml aliquot in 1 polypropylene tube.

  • Then a heparinized blood sample of 2.5 ml will be frozen at -80 °C for determination of nicotinamide. All samples will be sent for analysis at CERBA at the end of the study.

Randomization will be done by the minimization technic with stratification factors: center, duration of dialysis and taking lipid lowering therapy. Randomization will be performed remotely via a website.

Follow-up of one year:

  • Period titration nicotinamide or sevelamer to control serum phosphorus in 4 weeks, with stable doses of CaCO3
  • Increased nicotinamide 500 mg up to 4 tablets: 0-1-0, 0-1-1, 1-1-1, 1-2-1
  • Increased sevelamer 800 mg up to 12 tablets: 0-2-2 ; 2-4-4 ; 4-4-4 ; 2-5-5
  • Maintenance period of 5 months with assessment of maintenance doses of Renagel (sevelamer) or Nicobion (nicotinamide) or during the last 3 months.
  • After these 6 months:
  • Freezing -80 ° C, 4 tubes of 1 ml of serum centralized reviews PTH, 25 OHD, CTX, PAO (as mentioned above).
  • Freezing -80 ° C in a tube of 2.5 ml of plasma to be assayed later the metabolites of nicotinamide (as mentioned above).
  • Freezing -80 ° C with a heparinized blood sample of 2.5 ml for determination of nicotinamide (as mentioned above).
  • Second randomization via a website, patients with intact PTH> 300 pg / ml after 6 months of Nicobion ® and Renagel ®. Randomization 75-150 pg / ml or 150-300 mg / ml will be made by the minimization technic with stratification factors: the center and the type of Hypophosphatemia PTH will be reduced by introducing cinacalcet ® by increments of 30 mg every 3 weeks to 180 mg / day (given with meals 24 hours before the next dialysis). Increase of Cinacalcet ® will be stopped when PTH is <250 pg / ml for arm 150-300pg/ml or <125 per arm 75-150 pg / ml.

Once corrected calcemia <2.25 mmol / l, doses of CaCO3 will be increased; if the maximum tolerable of CaCO3 on the tract map does not prevent hypocalcemia (<2.10 mmol / l), the calcium bath will be increased to 1.75 mmol / l CaCO3 decreased and, if necessary adjustment of nicotinamide / Sevelamer to maintain PO4 between 1.30 and 1.60 mmol / l.

  • During the first 6 months of administration of sevelamer, weekly, monthly and quarterly reports will be done. Regarding PTH assay will be performed, every 3 weeks during the titration of cinacalcet.
  • A lumbar and dorsal radiography (frontal and profile), a pelvis radiography (face) and 2 hands radiography (front) will be conducted at the end of follow-up period.
  • Bone densitometry will be performed at the end of the study (same camera - same site).
  • Case report form: tolerance, serious adverse events, compliance, cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, PAO, stroke, arteritis, vascular intervention),deaths and fractures during the follow-up study.
  • Freezing -80 ° C to 4 tubes of 1 ml of serum centralized reviews PTH, 25 OHD, CTX, PAO at the end of the study (as mentioned above).
  • Freezing -80 ° C in a tube of 2.5 ml of plasma to be assayed later the metabolites of nicotinamide at the end of the study (as mentioned above).
  • Freezing at -80 ° C with a heparinized blood sample of 2.5 ml for determination of nicotinamide at the end of the study (as mentioned above).

Analytical Methodology

Being tested
nicotinamide, sevelamer, cinacalcet
Keywords
nicotinamide, sevelamer hydrochloride, phosphatemia, cinacalcet, dyslipidemia, vascular calcification, bone mass loss
Medical subject headings
Kidney Failure, Chronic, Dyslipidemias, Vascular Calcification

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • nicotinamideDrug

    Also called Nicobion, ATC class A11HA01

    Titration phase of nicotinamide (Nicobion) with the aim of phosphatemia control in 4 weeks with stable dose of calcic carbonate;

    Increase of nicotinamide dose of Nicobion 500mg (nicotinamide 500mg), up to 4 tablets daily, as follows:

    0 morning, 1 noon, 0 evening (first week), then, 0 morning, 1 noon, 1 evening (second week), then, 1 morning, 1 noon, 1 evening (third week), then, 1 morning, 2 noon, 1 evening (fourth week).

  • sevelamerDrug

    Also called Renagel, ATC class V03AE02

    Titration phase with sevelamer (Renagel) with the aim of phosphatemia control before 4 weeks of treatment, with stable dose of calcic carbonate.

    Increase of sevelamer dose up to 12 tablets, as follows:

    0 morning, 2 noon, 2 evening (first week), then, 0 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (second week), then, 2 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (third week), then, 4 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (fourth week).

  • cinacalcetDrug

    Also called Mimpara, ATC class H05BX01

    After 6 months of treatment, patient screening on PTH level:

    For patients with PTH > 300pg/ml, introduction of cinacalcet by level of 30 mg every 3 weeks, up to 180mg daily (administered during the meal and before next dialysis) Cinacalcet increase will be stopped once PTH < 250 pg/ml. Calcic carbonate dose will be increase once calcemia will be < 2.25 mmol/l. If maximum tolerated dose is not sufficient to prevent hypocalcemia < 2.10 mmol/l calcium of dialysis bath wille be increased up to 1.75 mmol/l and calcic carbonate will be decreased.

    A dose adjustment is possible with nicotinamide to obtain a phosphatemia between 1.10 and 1.60 mmol/l.

Study groups in NCT01011699
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
sevelamerActive comparatorTitration phase with sevelamer (Renagel) with the aim of phosphatemia control in 4 weeks of treatment, with stable dose of calcic carbonate. Increase of sevelamer dose up to 12 tablets, as follows: 0 morning, 2 noon, 2 evening (first week), then, 0 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (second week), then, 2 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (third week), then, 4 morning, 4 noon, 4 evening (fourth week).
Receives: Drug: sevelamer; Drug: cinacalcet
nicotinamideActive comparatorTitration phase with nicotinamide (Nicobion) with the aim of phosphatemia control in 4 weeks of treatment, with stable dose of calcic carbonate. Increase of nicotinamide dose up to 4 tablets, as follows: 0 morning, 1 noon, 0 evening (first week), then, 0 morning, 1 noon, 1 evening (second week), then, 1 morning, 1 noon, 1 evening (third week), then, 1 morning, 2 noon, 1 evening (fourth week).
Receives: Drug: nicotinamide; Drug: cinacalcet

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The comparison between nicotinamide and Sevelamer was primarily to demonstrate the noninferiority of nicotinamide in terms of control of the phosphatemia observed during the 4th, 5th and 6th months before to introduce Cinacalcet ®.

    Measured: 6th months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. To demonstrate noninferiority of nicotinamide in terms of effect on dyslipidemia (evaluated by the ratio LDL / HDL cholesterol), the risk of hypercalcemia (PCa> 2.37 mmol / l) and increase of phospho-calcic product (> 3 , 79 mmol/l).

    Measured: 6 th months and one year

  2. To evaluate the difference between nicotinamide and sevelamer on vascular calcification

    Measured: one year

  3. To evaluate the difference between nicotinamide and sevelamer on bone mass loss and fracture risk

    Measured: one year

  4. Evaluate the percentage of population requiring use of cinacalcet® to control PTH (75-300 pg/ml). Evaluate his benefit on phosphatemia and calcemia control. Prevent the need for surgical PTX, and evaluate the additional cost of treatment by cinacalcet

    Measured: 6th months

  5. Evaluate roles of metabolites of nicotinamide (efficacy and side effects) through another study

    Measured: 6th months and one year

  6. Compare the cost-effectiveness ratio of these two treatments

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Nov 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2010
  3. Primary completionJun 2013
  4. Study completionJun 2013

Why it stopped: Financial problem

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
176 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01011699
Sponsor's protocol ID
PHRCIR08-PR-FOURNIER
Other IDs
Eudract N°2008-004673-17
Acronym
NICOREN
Status last verified
May 2016
First submitted
10 Nov 2009
Last updated
16 May 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Goldsmith D, Ritz E, Covic A. Vascular calcification: a stiff challenge for the nephrologist: does preventing bone disease cause arterial disease? Kidney Int. 2004 Oct;66(4):1315-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00895.x.

    PubMed 15458425
  • Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998 Dec;9(12 Suppl):S16-23.

    PubMed 11443763
  • K/DOQI: (Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative) of the National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis suppl 3, october 2003.

  • Jungers P, Choukroun G, Robino C, Massy ZA, Taupin P, Labrunie M, Man NK, Landais P. Epidemiology of end-stage renal disease in the Ile-de-France area: a prospective study in 1998. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000 Dec;15(12):2000-6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/15.12.2000.

    PubMed 11096146
  • Kalantar-Zadeh K, Block G, Humphreys MH, Kopple JD. Reverse epidemiology of cardiovascular risk factors in maintenance dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2003 Mar;63(3):793-808. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00803.x.

    PubMed 12631061
  • Collins R, Armitage J, Parish S, Sleigh P, Peto R; Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2003 Jun 14;361(9374):2005-16. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13636-7.

    PubMed 12814710
  • London GM, Guerin AP, Marchais SJ, Metivier F, Pannier B, Adda H. Arterial media calcification in end-stage renal disease: impact on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003 Sep;18(9):1731-40. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfg414.

    PubMed 12937218
  • Block GA, Klassen PS, Lazarus JM, Ofsthun N, Lowrie EG, Chertow GM. Mineral metabolism, mortality, and morbidity in maintenance hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Aug;15(8):2208-18. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000133041.27682.A2.

    PubMed 15284307
  • Shahapuni I, Mansour J, Harbouche L, Maouad B, Benyahia M, Rahmouni K, Oprisiu R, Bonne JF, Monge M, El Esper N, Presne C, Moriniere P, Choukroun G, Fournier A. How do calcimimetics fit into the management of parathyroid hormone, calcium, and phosphate disturbances in dialysis patients? Semin Dial. 2005 May-Jun;18(3):226-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2005.18318.x.

    PubMed 15934970
  • Ghazali A, Fardellone P, Pruna A, Atik A, Achard JM, Oprisiu R, Brazier M, Remond A, Moriniere P, Garabedian M, Eastwood J, Fournier A. Is low plasma 25-(OH)vitamin D a major risk factor for hyperparathyroidism and Looser's zones independent of calcitriol? Kidney Int. 1999 Jun;55(6):2169-77. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00480.x.

    PubMed 10354266
  • Goldsmith DJ, Covic A, Sambrook PA, Ackrill P. Vascular calcification in long-term haemodialysis patients in a single unit: a retrospective analysis. Nephron. 1997;77(1):37-43. doi: 10.1159/000190244.

    PubMed 9380236
  • Teng M, Wolf M, Lowrie E, Ofsthun N, Lazarus JM, Thadhani R. Survival of patients undergoing hemodialysis with paricalcitol or calcitriol therapy. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jul 31;349(5):446-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022536.

    PubMed 12890843
  • Fournier AE, Johnson WJ, Taves DR, Beabout JW, Arnaud CD, Goldsmith RS. Etiology of hyperparathyroidism and bone disease during chronic hemodialysis. I. Association of bone disease with potentially etiologic factors. J Clin Invest. 1971 Mar;50(3):592-8. doi: 10.1172/JCI106529.

    PubMed 5101783
  • Argiles A, Kerr PG, Canaud B, Flavier JL, Mion C. Calcium kinetics and the long-term effects of lowering dialysate calcium concentration. Kidney Int. 1993 Mar;43(3):630-40. doi: 10.1038/ki.1993.92.

    PubMed 8455362
  • Indridason OS, Quarles LD. Comparison of treatments for mild secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis patients. Durham Renal Osteodystrophy Study Group. Kidney Int. 2000 Jan;57(1):282-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00819.x.

    PubMed 10620210

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing nicotinamide, sevelamer and cinacalcet in people with Chronic Renal Failure and Hemodialysis, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens at 18 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 18 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Financial problem). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The comparison between nicotinamide and Sevelamer was primarily to demonstrate the noninferiority of nicotinamide in terms of control of the phosphatemia observed during the 4th, 5th and 6th months before to introduce Cinacalcet ®. (time frame: 6th months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01011699, which also lists 48 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in