Skin CancerNCT01010321
Confocal Microscopy of Benign and Malignant Skin Tumors
An observational study of Skin Cancer, run by Sheba Medical Center.
Trial summary
The investigators speculate that this tool may be used as an alternative and convenient non-invasive diagnostic of skin cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Skin Cancer
- What is being tested?
- confocal microscopy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Nov 2009to Nov 2010
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Men and women over the age of 18 - Skin lesion suspected to either BCC,SCC etc
Who may be able to join
- Men and women over the age of 18
- Skin lesion suspected to either BCC or SCC etc
- Patient was referred for biopsy diagnostic/therapeutic before hand, and regardless of confocal microscope examination, according to the clinical consideration of physician
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women
- Children
About this study
The investigators speculate that this tool may be used as an alternative and convenient non-invasive diagnostic of skin cancer.
- Conditions
- Skin Cancer
- Being tested
- confocal microscopy
- Keywords
- skin lesion suspect as BCC or SCC or others
- Medical subject headings
- Skin Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
confocal microscopyDevice
non-invasive imaging
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| all study Population | all Receives: Device: confocal microscopy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
efficacy of a confocal microscope as a diagnostic tool
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2009
- Primary completionNov 2010 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2010 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Skin CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sheba Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sheba Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Investigators
- Aviv Barzilai, Dr., Principal investigator, Sheba Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01010321
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SHEBA-09-7295-AB-CTIL
- Status last verified
- Jun 2010
- First submitted
- 2 Nov 2009
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jun 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Confocal Microscopy of Benign and Malignant Skin Tumors
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01010321
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SHEBA-09-7295-AB-CTIL
- Conditions
- Skin Cancer
- Keywords
- skin lesion suspect as BCC or SCC or others
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Suspended
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sheba Medical CenterOther government
- Study start
- Nov 2009
- Primary completion
- Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2010 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Nov 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators speculate that this tool may be used as an alternative and convenient non-invasive diagnostic of skin cancer.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| all study Population | – | Device: confocal microscopyall |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Men and women over the age of 18 - Skin lesion suspected to either BCC,SCC etc
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Men and women over the age of 18
- Skin lesion suspected to either BCC or SCC etc
- Patient was referred for biopsy diagnostic/therapeutic before hand, and regardless of confocal microscope examination, according to the clinical consideration of physician
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnant women
- Children
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| confocal microscopynon-invasive imaging | Device | all study Population |
Primary outcome
efficacy of a confocal microscope as a diagnostic tool
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jun 2010.
Related trials for Skin Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aviv Barzilai, Dr. principal investigator
Sheba Medical Center
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Skin Cancer, run by Sheba Medical Center.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
efficacy of a confocal microscope as a diagnostic tool (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2010.