AzTrials
AzTrials

ThromboembolismPhase 3COMPARENCT01006876

Role of Coumadin in Preventing Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation

A Phase 3 study testing Coumadin in people with Thromboembolism, run by Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to explore the risk of periprocedural thromboembolic events in continuous versus interrupted Coumadin therapy in a large, randomized high-risk patient population undergoing radio-frequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Thromboembolism
What is being tested?
Coumadin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,584 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2010to Apr 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age- 18-75 years
  • Patients in paroxysmal, persistent or long-standing persistent (LSP) AF
  • patients with CHADS2 score ≥ 1
  • AF patients with INR in the range of 2.0-3.0 in the last 3-4 weeks prior to ablation

Who cannot join

  • Patients with known bleeding disorders or inherited thrombophilic disorder
  • Patients with oral contraceptives or estrogen replacement therapy
  • Patients with prosthetic heart valves
  • Patients unable or willing to give informed consent
  • Contraindications for Coumadin therapy
  • Patients with CHADS2 score zero
  • Contraindication to undergoing an MRI

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • St.David's Medical Center

    Austin, Texas, 78705

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Role of Coumadin in Preventing Periprocedural Thrombo-Embolism as a Complication of Radio Frequency Catheter Ablation in High-risk Atrial Fibrillation Patients

This study aims to explore the risk of periprocedural thromboembolic events in continuous versus interrupted Coumadin therapy in a large, randomized high-risk patient population undergoing radio-frequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Read the detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, affecting 2.3 million people in the United States (1). A major cause of stroke, AF substantially increases the risk of thromboembolism which necessitates oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) for high-risk patients. Radiofrequency percutaneous catheter ablation (RFCA) is an effective strategy for the treatment of symptomatic drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. However, periprocedural cerebrovascular accident (CVA) due to thrombus or air embolism remains one of the most serious complications of AF ablation. In spite of precautions taken before, during, and after the ablation to minimize the risk of CVA, the reported event rate remains 0.5-2.8% (2).

The incidence of thromboembolic events is dependent on the extensiveness of the ablation procedure as well as the periprocedural anticoagulation strategy (2). Some studies have described charring and soft thrombus formation when the temperature exceeds 100 degree C during RFCA, which probably is caused by blood protein denaturation and coagulation (3). Currently an open saline irrigation-tip ablation catheter (3.5 mm Thermocool catheter) is used which reduces the thermal injury by keeping the temperature under control (4), while enabling the operator to use high wattage RF energy to effectively ablate the arrhythmogenic focus.

The two most utilized periprocedural OAT strategies are; 1) discontinuation of Coumadin three to five days prior to ablation, utilization of heparin or enoxaparin before the procedures, and "bridging" low molecular weight heparin with Coumadin after ablation, and 2) RFCA with continuation of Coumadin before, during and after the procedure (2) without any change in dosage. Limited data are available regarding the risk of thromboembolism with and without periprocedural Coumadin in AF patients undergoing catheter ablation .The aim of this prospective randomized study is to evaluate the effect of the above two OAT strategies on the incidence of TE within 48 hours post-RFCA.

Patient Selection, Treatment and Follow-up Period:

Patients randomized as study group would continue Coumadin without any periprocedural change while undergoing catheter ablation. Those randomized as control group would discontinue Coumadin 3-4 days prior to ablation and replace it with heparin till the end of the procedure and bridge LMWH with Coumadin 48-72 hours after ablation.

An INR of 2-3 would be ascertained in all patients prior to procedure. Patients with subtherapeutic INR would not be included in this study.

Procedure: Coumadin therapy would be started at least two months prior to the ablation in order to achieve the therapeutic INR at least three weeks prior to the procedure.

Anticoagulation strategy I (Coumadin interrupted): Twice daily until the evening prior to ablation procedure, 0.5-1 mg/kg of enoxaparin would be administered and bridged to Coumadin. At the time of the procedure, enoxaparin would be replaced by heparin. At the end of the procedure, the sheaths would be removed during full anticoagulation. After the procedure heparin would be discontinued, and protamine 10 to 15 mg would be given. Sheaths would be pulled when activated clotting time (ACT) would be <250 seconds. Aspirin 325 mg would be given before the patient leaves the electrophysiology laboratory. Warfarin would be administered the evening of pulmonary vein isolation. Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg BID and 0.5 mg/kg BID would be routinely started and would be stopped when the INR is > 2. Patients with LSPAF, left ventricular dysfunction or history of thrombo-embolism would receive overlapping anticoagulation with enoxaparin for three days after the procedure. The remaining patients would receive a double dose of Coumadin on the night of the ablation followed by the routine pre-procedure dose from the next day.

Anticoagulation strategy II (continuous Coumadin): Coumadin would not be discontinued in this group of patients. The INR would be monitored every week for four weeks preceding the ablation and it should be above 2.0. All patients in AF on the day of the procedure where an INR above 2 is not demonstrable for four consecutive weeks preceding the procedure would undergo TEE.

PVAI would be done while on Coumadin treatment. No heparin or enoxaparin would be administered to any patient prior to the procedure. Before transseptal punctures, a heparin bolus (100 to 150 U/Kg) would be administered to all patients. During the procedure, the infusion rate would be adjusted to keep the activated clotting time in the range of 350 to 450 sec.

After the procedures, heparin infusion would be stopped and anticoagulation would be reversed with 10 to 15 mg of Protamine, and sheaths would be pulled when the activated clotting time is less than 250 sec. Patients would receive 325 mg of Aspirin before leaving the EP lab. They would continue their Coumadin dosage regimens with no changes before or after the procedure aiming to an INR of 2 to 3.

Following randomization, patients are considered to be in the treatment period 2 months before the procedure to 48-72 hours after the procedure.

Ablation Procedure: Standard radiofrequency catheter ablation procedure based on physician's discretion would be followed.

All patients will undergo baseline and post-procedure MRI within 24-hours of the procedure.

Follow-up period is 48 hours post-procedure; during which all patients would have neurologic evaluation; at the end of the procedure and every four hours for the next 48 hours. Clinical neurologic evaluation would include assessment of mental status such as ability to pay attention, memory, judgment and orientation to self, place and time; maneuvers to test the cranial nerves, assessment of motor functions by testing strength in different muscle groups and assessment of sensory functions by evaluating touch, pain, vibration and positional awareness as well as the deep tendon reflexes.

Patients with questionable neurologic impairment would undergo neuroimaging evaluations like head CT or MRI.

Conditions
Thromboembolism
Being tested
Coumadin
Keywords
coumadin, peri-procedural thromboembolism, RFCA, high risk atrial fibrillation
Medical subject headings
Thromboembolism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CoumadinDrug

    Also called warfarin

    Continuous oral Coumadin therapy through the catheter ablation procedure

  • CoumadinDrug

    Also called Warfarin

    Patients discontinue Coumadin 3-4 days prior to ablation and replace it with heparin until the end of the procedure and bridge low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with Coumadin 48-72 hours after ablation.

  • CoumadinDrug

    Also called Warfarin

    Oral tablets, daily dose, till the therapeutic INR of 2-3 is achieved

Study groups in NCT01006876
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Study ArmActive comparatorPatients receive continuous Coumadin therapy throughout the study.
Receives: Drug: Coumadin
Control ArmActive comparatorPatients discontinue Coumadin 3-4 days prior to ablation and replace it with heparin until the end of the procedure and bridge low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with Coumadin 48-72 hours after ablation.
Receives: Drug: Coumadin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Absence of thromboembolic events 48 hours post-ablation

    Measured: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Recurrence of AF and late thromboembolic events

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Nov 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2010
  3. Primary completionMar 2013
  4. Study completionApr 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,584 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01006876
Sponsor's protocol ID
TCAI-COMPARE
Acronym
COMPARE
Status last verified
May 2015
First submitted
2 Nov 2009
Last updated
20 May 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Bawazeer GA, Alkofide HA, Alsharafi AA, Babakr NO, Altorkistani AM, Kashour TS, Miligkos M, AlFaleh KM, Al-Ansary LA. Interrupted versus uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy for catheter ablation in adults with arrhythmias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 21;10(10):CD013504. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013504.pub2.

    PubMed 34674223
  • Di Biase L, Burkhardt JD, Santangeli P, Mohanty P, Sanchez JE, Horton R, Gallinghouse GJ, Themistoclakis S, Rossillo A, Lakkireddy D, Reddy M, Hao S, Hongo R, Beheiry S, Zagrodzky J, Rong B, Mohanty S, Elayi CS, Forleo G, Pelargonio G, Narducci ML, Dello Russo A, Casella M, Fassini G, Tondo C, Schweikert RA, Natale A. Periprocedural stroke and bleeding complications in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with different anticoagulation management: results from the Role of Coumadin in Preventing Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation (COMPARE) randomized trial. Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25):2638-44. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006426. Epub 2014 Apr 17.

    PubMed 24744272

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Coumadin in people with Thromboembolism, run by Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Absence of thromboembolic events 48 hours post-ablation (time frame: 48 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01006876, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in