AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4NCT00996203

A Study of Tocilizumab Added to DMARDs in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to DMARDs.

A Phase 4 study testing tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] and DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 28 sites in Russia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This open-label single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab added to traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to DMARDs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] and DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
201 participants
Where
28 sitesRussia
Study dates
31 Oct 2009to 14 Feb 2011
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
  • moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis of >/=6 months duration
  • inadequate clinical response to current non-biologic DMARDs
  • current DMARDs must be at stable dose for 8 weeks prior to study entry
  • oral corticosteroids (</=10mg/day prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs must be at stable dose for >/=4 weeks prior to screening

Who cannot join

  • rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA
  • history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA
  • previous treatment with any biologic DMARD
  • functional class IV as defined by the ACR classification
  • intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to screening

Trial locations and contacts

28 sites in 1 country.

28 sites in 1 country

Russia28 sites
  • Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital; Rheumatology

    Chelyabinsk, 454076

  • Republican clinical hospital of Karachai-Cherkess; Rheumatologic Department

    Cherkess, 369000

  • Irkutsk Regional Consulting and Diagnostic Clinical Center; Regional Center of Reumatolodic Deasise

    Irkutsk, 664047

  • Republican Clinicodiagnostic Center

    Izhevsk, 426009

  • Kaliningrad Regional Clinical Hospital; Rheumatologic Department

    Kaliningrad, 236016

  • War Veterans Regional Clinical Hospital;Therapy Department

    Kemerovo, 650099

  • Kirov Regional Clinical Hospital; Reumatology Department

    Kirov, 610028

  • GUZ Regional clinical hospital # 1

    Krasnodar, 350086

  • GMU Kursk regional clinical hospital

    Kursk, 305007

  • FSBI "Scientific Research Institute of Rheumatology" of russian Academy of Medical Sciences

    Moscow, 115522

  • FSBI "FSCC of particularized sorts of medical care and medical technologies of FMBA"

    Moscow, 115682

  • FGU Central Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic Administration President RF

    Moscow, 121359

  • Head Clinical Hospital of Internal Affair Ministry of Russia

    Moscow, 123060

  • Vladimirskiy Regional Scientific Research Inst.

    Moscow, 129110

  • SIH Nizhny Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. Semashko

    Nizhny Novgorod, 603126

  • Republican Hospital Named After V.A. Baranov

    Petrozavodsk, 185019

  • Rostov State Medical University; Cardiorheumatology Department

    Rostov-on-Don, 344022

  • Clinical hospital #1

    Smolensk, 214001

  • Surgut Region Clinical Hospital

    Surgut, 628408

  • Glpu Tjumen Regional Clinical Hospital #1

    Tyumen, 625023

  • Republican clinical hospital named after G.G. Kuvatov

    Ufa, 450005

  • State Institution of Healthcare Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Hospital

    Ulyanovsk, 432063

  • GUZ "Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital"; Cardioreumatological

    Velikiy Novgorod, 173008

  • Budget Institution of Healthcare of Voronezh Region "Voronezh Regional Clinical Hospital #1"

    Voronezh, 394066

  • Voronezh Regional Clinical Hospital #1

    Voronezh, 394066

  • SHI Yaroslavl Regional Clinical Hospital

    Yaroslavl, 150062

  • Municipal Autonomous Institution of Healthcare "City Clinical Hospital #40"

    Yekaterinburg, 620102

  • Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital # 1; Rheumatology Dept

    Yekaterinburg, 620102

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Official title: Local Open-label Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Quality of Life in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to DMARDs When Adding Tocilizumab (TCZ)

This open-label single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab added to traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to DMARDs. Patients will receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for 24 weeks, in addition to their current non-biologic DMARDs at stable doses. Anticipated time on study treatment is 24 weeks, and the target sample size is 200.

Being tested
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra], DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs)
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]Drug

    8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks

  • DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs)Drug

    stable doses at investigator's prescription

Study groups in NCT00996203
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]; Drug: DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score

    HAQ includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0 (equals)=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3. Withdrawal Visit is the final visit prior to the withdrawal of the subject from the study.

    Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 and Withdrawal Visit

  2. Percentage of Participants With an HAQ Score Decrease of 20 Percent (%), 50%, and 70% During Tocilizumab Treatment

    HAQ includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  3. Change in HAQ Score at Week 24

    HAQ includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Pain Score as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Participant's global assessment of pain was assessed using a 100-millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=pain absent and 100=intolerable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain.

    Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  2. European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score

    EQ-5D questionnaire assess 5 domains of quality of life including mobility, self-care, habitual daily activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each of five domains was assessed by 3 levels depending on severity of a problem and scored using the following: 1=no disturbances, 2=moderate disturbances, 3=severe disturbances. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  3. Change in EQ-5D Score at Week 24 From Baseline

    EQ-5D questionnaire assess 5 domains of quality of life including mobility, self-care, habitual daily activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each of five domains was assessed by 3 levels depending on severity of a problem and scored using the following: 1=no disturbances, 2=moderate disturbances, 3=severe disturbances. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. Minimum clinically significant change in EQ-5D corresponds to the parameter differences before and after treatment = 0.10. Graduations of assessment of the therapy efficacy by EQ-5D are: Difference (Δ) EQ-5D less than (<)0.10 points: none; 0.10 less than or equal to (≤)Δ EQ-5D ≤0.24: minimal effect; 0.24≤ Δ EQ-5D <0.31: satisfactory effect; Δ EQ-5D greater than or equal to (≥)0.31 points: pronounced effect.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  4. General Health Score as Assessed by EQ-5D VAS

    Participant-reported general health quality was assessed using an EQ-5D 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=worst health state and 100=the best health state. The participants were asked to mark the line that corresponded to assessment of general health quality.

    Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response on Health Quality Assessment of EQ-5D

    Participant-reported general health quality was assessed using an EQ-5D 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=worst health state and 100=the best health state. The participants were asked to mark the line that corresponded to assessment of general health quality. Positive response was defined as an increase of EQ-5D score by 0.1 or more i.e. it is a clinically significant increase.

    Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  6. Change in General Health Assessed by VAS

    Participant-reported general health quality was assessed using an EQ-5D 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=worst health state and 100=the best health state. The participants were asked to mark the line that corresponded to assessment of general health quality.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  7. Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)

    DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity.

    Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  8. Change in DAS28 Score From Baseline to Week 24

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  9. Percentage of Patients With Varied Disease Activity Assessed Using DAS28 During Tocilizumab Treatment

    DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR mm/hour, and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Disease activity: 0=remission (DAS28 less than [<] 2.6), I=low (DAS28 less than or equal to [≤]2.6 to <3.2), II=moderate (DAS28=3.2 to 5.1), III=high (DAS28 greater than [>]5.1).

    Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  10. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR50), and 70% (ACR70) Response

    ACR20/50/70 response: ≥20%, ≥50%, or ≥70% improvement, respectively, in swollen/tender joint count (66 joints assessed for swelling and 68 joints assessed for tenderness) and in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and acute phase response: C-reactive protein (CRP) or ESR.

    Measured: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  11. Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28

    The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as no effect, good effect, and moderate effect, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good effect: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 score ≤3.2; moderate effect: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 score 3.2 to 5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <1.2 with DAS28 score <3.2; no effect: change from baseline ≤0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 score >5.1.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  12. C-Reactive Protein

    CRP (milligrams/Liter) is a mediator of inflammation, acute phase protein.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  13. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

    ESR (mm/hr) is used to determine the acute phase response.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Oct 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study start31 Oct 2009
  3. Primary completion14 Feb 2011
  4. Study completion14 Feb 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
201 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00996203
Sponsor's protocol ID
ML22665
Status last verified
Feb 2018
First submitted
15 Oct 2009
Last updated
29 Mar 2018

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] and DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 28 sites in Russia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 28 sites in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Jul 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score (time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 and Withdrawal Visit). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in