Non-small Cell Lung CancerPhase 2NCT00995761
Biweekly Schedule of Docetaxel and Cisplatin in High Risk Patients With Unresectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
A Phase 2 study testing Docetaxel and Cisplatin in people with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Gyeongsang National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The rationale of phase II study of biweekly docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with unresectable NSCLC are follows: First, the optimal dose and schedule of combination with docetaxel and cisplatin are still controversial (3 weekly versus weekly). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Docetaxel and Cisplatin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Oct 2009to Aug 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients who were≥ 65 years of age and they had an Easten Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0-2, or the patients who were < 65 years of age and they had an ECOG PS 2
- histologically confirmed non-small cell carcinoma
- stages IIIB-IV disease
- adequate hematologic parameters (hemoglobin concentration of at least 9.0 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count ≥1,500/mm3, and platelet count ≥100,000/mm3), renal function (serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL), and liver function (total bilirubin ≤1.5 mg/dL and serum transaminase level less than twice the upper limit of normal)
- at least one bi-dimensionally measurable lesion, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1
Who cannot join
- Active infection
- Prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery for their disease,
- A history of myocardial infarction in the last 3 months before entry to the study
- Uncontrolled congestive heart failure or hypertension
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, pregnancy, lactation or a prior second primary cancer except for cervix cancer in situ or skin cancer
- All the patients provided written informed consent before they entered the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site
Gyeongsang National University Hospital
Jinju, Gyeongsang-Nam-Do, 660-702
About this study
Official title: Phase II Study of Biweekly Schedule of Docetaxel and Cisplatin in High Risk Patients With Unresectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
The rationale of phase II study of biweekly docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with unresectable NSCLC are follows:
First, the optimal dose and schedule of combination with docetaxel and cisplatin are still controversial (3 weekly versus weekly).
Read more
Platinum-based combination chemotherapy improves the survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the first-line setting.
Combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin is one of the standard platinum-based regimens for treating NSCLC. However, usual standard 3 weekly regimen with docetaxel and cisplatin have consistently produced frequent Grade 3-4 neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia.
Although weekly docetaxel and cisplatin is better tolerated than chemotherapy every 3 weeks, especially in the first line setting in terms of myelosuppression, the optimal dose and schedule for administration of the two drugs has not yet been determined.
Both 3-weekly docetaxel plus cisplatin and weekly schedule showed similar response rates but had different toxicity profiles. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia in the 3 weekly schedule and fatigue or asthenia in the weekly schedule.
Second, docetaxel and cisplatin have different action and mechanism. Docetaxel showed characteristic early bone marrow suppression 5-7 days after infusion compared with usual 14 days after infusion of cisplatin. Thus, nadir period is not overlapped when the investigators administered both drugs concomittantly.
Third, there are many feasible reports of biweekly administration of docetaxel in patients with NSCLC, breast cancer, stomach cancer, and ovarian cancer with better safety profiles.
Therefore,the investigators designed this phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of biweekly schedule of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with unresectable NSCLC and test the hypothesis that biweekly schedule of docetaxel and cisplatin is better tolerated than both standard 3 week and weekly schedule in terms of hematologic (neutropenia) and non-hematologic toxicities (asthenia, interstitial pneumonitis. Additionally the investigators will evaluate polymorphism associated with this study.
Read the detailed description
Study design is followings: The sample size was calculated according to Simon's two stage optimal design. Assuming a response rate of 40%, a probability of error of 5% and a power of 80%, a total of 48 patients (43 patients plus 5 patients to compensate a 10% drop-out rate) were enrolled. In the initial stage, 13 evaluable patients were to be entered into the study and evaluated for their response. If ≥ 3 responses were observed during the first stage, then 30 additional patients were to be entered in the second stage. The statistical evaluation was performed based on the intention to-treat analysis.
The combination chemotherapy consisted of docetaxel of 40mg/m2 as a 1-hour infusion followed by cisplatin 40mg/m2 as a 30-minutes intravenous infusion and both drugs were given on days 1, and 15 in an outpatient setting. Patients also received adequate hydration with at least 1,500ml of half saline or normal saline before cisplatin administration. All the patients received antiemetic therapy that consisted of intravenous 5-HT3 antagonist and dexamethasone before docetaxel administration. The treatment cycles were repeated every 4 weeks until the maximum six cycles.
The patients whose absolute neutrophil count and platelet count were greater than or equal to 1.500 and 100,000/mm3, respectively, and who had lower than or equal to grade 1 non-hematologic toxicity (excluding alopecia) received chemotherapy on day 1 of each cycle.
On days 15 of each cycle, the minimum requirements to receive chemotherapy were an absolute neutrophil count between 1000 and 1,500/mm3, a platelet count ≥75,000/mm3 and no grade ≥2 nonhematologic toxicity (excluding alopecia).
If these conditions were not met on days 1, or 15, then chemotherapy was postponed for 1 week. A delay of more than 3 weeks resulted in withdrawal from the study.
If there were any grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities at the nadir of the previous cycle, or febrile neutropenia with or without documented infection, then administration of both drugs in the subsequent cycles was reduced by 25% from the planned dose.
The Administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was allowed in the presence of febrile neutropenia, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia.
In the presence of grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity (except nausea, vomiting and alopecia), the treatment was postponed until resolution of the toxicity and then both drug doses were reduced by 25% for the next cycle. Treatment was stopped at any time for documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or according to the patient's own refusal.
The pretreatment baseline evaluation included a complete medical history and physical examination, a complete blood cell count (CBC) with the differentials, chemistry profiles and performance status. Chest X-rays, chest and upper abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans, brain CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging, a radionuclide bone scan and other diagnostic procedures were performed as clinically indicated.
During treatment, a limited history taking, physical examination, assessment of toxicity, a complete blood cell count with the differentials and blood chemistry tests were repeated weekly. A chest X-ray was performed every 4 weeks before each cycle.
Appropriate imaging studies, including CT scans of the chest and upper abdomen, were performed every two cycles to assess the treatment response, and sooner if needed for documenting disease progression. The objective tumor responses were assessed according to the RECIST criteria. The response rate was calculated as the ratio of the number of patients who achieved a complete or partial response to the number of enrolled patients. Overall survival (OS) and Time to progression (TTP) were calculated from the start of therapy until death and progression, respectively, or until the last follow-up. Toxicities were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) scale version 3.0.
- Conditions
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Docetaxel and Cisplatin
- Keywords
- biweekly, docetaxel, cisplatin, non-small cell lung cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Docetaxel and CisplatinDrug
Also called Docetaxel (Sanofi-Aventis), Cisplatin
splitted administration of docetaxel and cisplatin.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| biweekly schedule | No intervention | docetaxel 40mg/m2 on day 1,15 every 4weeks cisplatin 40mg/m2 on day 1,15 every 4weeks Receives: Drug: Docetaxel and Cisplatin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Response Rates Confirmed With CT or MRI
Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
During treatment, a limited history, physical examination, assessment of toxicity, CBC with differentials, and blood chemistry tests were repeated weekly. A chest X-ray was performed every 2 weeks before each cycle. Appropriate imaging studies, including CT scans of the chest and upper abdomen, were performed every two cycles to assess the treatment response, and sooner, if required, to document disease progression. Objective tumor responses were assessed according to the RECIST criteria V 1.0.
Measured: after every 2 cycles of docetaxel and cisplatin
We Conducted the Present Phase II Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of a Biweekly Schedule of Docetaxel and Cisplatin in Patients With Unresectable NSCLC.
we conducted the present phase II study to investigate the efficacy and safety of a biweekly schedule of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with unresectable NSCLC (OS, TTP, and Others)
Measured: after every 2 cycles of docetaxel and cisplatin
Secondary outcomes (1)
Time to Progression and Overall Survival Confirmed Through Follow-up and Observation Following Treatment
Measured: From date of enrollment in this study until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, after every 2 cycles of docetaxel and cisplatin
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2009
- Primary completionAug 2012
- Study completionAug 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Non-small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gyeongsang National University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gyeong-Won Lee, Gyeongsang National University Hospital
- Investigators
- Gyeong-Won Lee, M.D.Ph.D., Principal investigator, Gyeongsang National University Hospital IRB
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00995761
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GNUHIRB-2009-30
- Status last verified
- Feb 2014
- First submitted
- 14 Oct 2009
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Mar 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II Study of Biweekly Schedule of Docetaxel and Cisplatin in High Risk Patients With Unresectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00995761
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GNUHIRB-2009-30
- Conditions
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- biweekly, docetaxel, cisplatin, non-small cell lung cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Gyeongsang National University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2009
- Primary completion
- Aug 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 Mar 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The rationale of phase II study of biweekly docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with unresectable NSCLC are follows:
First, the optimal dose and schedule of combination with docetaxel and cisplatin are still controversial (3 weekly versus weekly).
Platinum-based combination chemotherapy improves the survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the first-line setting.
Combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin is one of the standard platinum-based regimens for treating NSCLC. However, usual standard 3 weekly regimen with docetaxel and cisplatin have consistently produced frequent Grade 3-4 neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia.
Although weekly docetaxel and cisplatin is better tolerated than chemotherapy every 3 weeks, especially in the first line setting in terms of myelosuppression, the optimal dose and schedule for administration of the two drugs has not yet been determined.
Both 3-weekly docetaxel plus cisplatin and weekly schedule showed similar response rates but had different toxicity profiles. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia in the 3 weekly schedule and fatigue or asthenia in the weekly schedule.
Second, docetaxel and cisplatin have different action and mechanism. Docetaxel showed characteristic early bone marrow suppression 5-7 days after infusion compared with usual 14 days after infusion of cisplatin. Thus, nadir period is not overlapped when the investigators administered both drugs concomittantly.
Third, there are many feasible reports of biweekly administration of docetaxel in patients with NSCLC, breast cancer, stomach cancer, and ovarian cancer with better safety profiles.
Therefore,the investigators designed this phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of biweekly schedule of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with unresectable NSCLC and test the hypothesis that biweekly schedule of docetaxel and cisplatin is better tolerated than both standard 3 week and weekly schedule in terms of hematologic (neutropenia) and non-hematologic toxicities (asthenia, interstitial pneumonitis. Additionally the investigators will evaluate polymorphism associated with this study.
Detailed description
Study design is followings: The sample size was calculated according to Simon's two stage optimal design. Assuming a response rate of 40%, a probability of error of 5% and a power of 80%, a total of 48 patients (43 patients plus 5 patients to compensate a 10% drop-out rate) were enrolled. In the initial stage, 13 evaluable patients were to be entered into the study and evaluated for their response. If ≥ 3 responses were observed during the first stage, then 30 additional patients were to be entered in the second stage. The statistical evaluation was performed based on the intention to-treat analysis.
The combination chemotherapy consisted of docetaxel of 40mg/m2 as a 1-hour infusion followed by cisplatin 40mg/m2 as a 30-minutes intravenous infusion and both drugs were given on days 1, and 15 in an outpatient setting. Patients also received adequate hydration with at least 1,500ml of half saline or normal saline before cisplatin administration. All the patients received antiemetic therapy that consisted of intravenous 5-HT3 antagonist and dexamethasone before docetaxel administration. The treatment cycles were repeated every 4 weeks until the maximum six cycles.
The patients whose absolute neutrophil count and platelet count were greater than or equal to 1.500 and 100,000/mm3, respectively, and who had lower than or equal to grade 1 non-hematologic toxicity (excluding alopecia) received chemotherapy on day 1 of each cycle.
On days 15 of each cycle, the minimum requirements to receive chemotherapy were an absolute neutrophil count between 1000 and 1,500/mm3, a platelet count ≥75,000/mm3 and no grade ≥2 nonhematologic toxicity (excluding alopecia).
If these conditions were not met on days 1, or 15, then chemotherapy was postponed for 1 week. A delay of more than 3 weeks resulted in withdrawal from the study.
If there were any grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities at the nadir of the previous cycle, or febrile neutropenia with or without documented infection, then administration of both drugs in the subsequent cycles was reduced by 25% from the planned dose.
The Administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was allowed in the presence of febrile neutropenia, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia.
In the presence of grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity (except nausea, vomiting and alopecia), the treatment was postponed until resolution of the toxicity and then both drug doses were reduced by 25% for the next cycle. Treatment was stopped at any time for documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or according to the patient's own refusal.
The pretreatment baseline evaluation included a complete medical history and physical examination, a complete blood cell count (CBC) with the differentials, chemistry profiles and performance status. Chest X-rays, chest and upper abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans, brain CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging, a radionuclide bone scan and other diagnostic procedures were performed as clinically indicated.
During treatment, a limited history taking, physical examination, assessment of toxicity, a complete blood cell count with the differentials and blood chemistry tests were repeated weekly. A chest X-ray was performed every 4 weeks before each cycle.
Appropriate imaging studies, including CT scans of the chest and upper abdomen, were performed every two cycles to assess the treatment response, and sooner if needed for documenting disease progression. The objective tumor responses were assessed according to the RECIST criteria. The response rate was calculated as the ratio of the number of patients who achieved a complete or partial response to the number of enrolled patients. Overall survival (OS) and Time to progression (TTP) were calculated from the start of therapy until death and progression, respectively, or until the last follow-up. Toxicities were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) scale version 3.0.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| biweekly schedule | No intervention | Drug: Docetaxel and Cisplatindocetaxel 40mg/m2 on day 1,15 every 4weeks cisplatin 40mg/m2 on day 1,15 every 4weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- patients who were≥ 65 years of age and they had an Easten Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0-2, or the patients who were < 65 years of age and they had an ECOG PS 2
- histologically confirmed non-small cell carcinoma
- stages IIIB-IV disease
- adequate hematologic parameters (hemoglobin concentration of at least 9.0 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count ≥1,500/mm3, and platelet count ≥100,000/mm3), renal function (serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL), and liver function (total bilirubin ≤1.5 mg/dL and serum transaminase level less than twice the upper limit of normal)
- at least one bi-dimensionally measurable lesion, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Active infection
- Prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery for their disease,
- A history of myocardial infarction in the last 3 months before entry to the study
- Uncontrolled congestive heart failure or hypertension
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, pregnancy, lactation or a prior second primary cancer except for cervix cancer in situ or skin cancer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Docetaxel and CisplatinAlso: Docetaxel (Sanofi-Aventis), Cisplatinsplitted administration of docetaxel and cisplatin. | Drug | biweekly schedule |
Primary outcome
Response Rates Confirmed With CT or MRI
Time frame: after every 2 cycles of docetaxel and cisplatin
Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. During treatment, a limited history, physical examination, assessment of toxicity, CBC with differentials, and blood chemistry tests were repeated weekly. A chest X-ray was performed every 2 weeks before each cycle. Appropriate imaging studies, including CT scans of the chest and upper abdomen, were performed every two cycles to assess the treatment response, and sooner, if required, to document disease progression. Objective tumor responses were assessed according to the RECIST criteria V 1.0.
We Conducted the Present Phase II Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of a Biweekly Schedule of Docetaxel and Cisplatin in Patients With Unresectable NSCLC.
Time frame: after every 2 cycles of docetaxel and cisplatin
we conducted the present phase II study to investigate the efficacy and safety of a biweekly schedule of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with unresectable NSCLC (OS, TTP, and Others)
1 secondary outcome
Time to Progression and Overall Survival Confirmed Through Follow-up and Observation Following Treatment
Time frame: From date of enrollment in this study until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, after every 2 cycles of docetaxel and cisplatin
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Mar 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gyeong-Won Lee, M.D.Ph.D. principal investigator
Gyeongsang National University Hospital IRB
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Docetaxel and Cisplatin in people with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Gyeongsang National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Mar 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Response Rates Confirmed With CT or MRI (time frame: after every 2 cycles of docetaxel and cisplatin). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2014.