HIV InfectionsPhase 2NCT00992836
Safety of and Immune Response to an H1N1 Influenza Virus Vaccine in HIV Infected Children and Youth
A Phase 2 study testing Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine in people with HIV Infections and H1N1 Influenza Virus, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 37 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Children and people infected with HIV are particularly susceptible to influenza infections. This study testED the safety and effectiveness of a vaccine for the new H1N1 influenza virus in children and youth infected with HIV. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 25 years
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections, H1N1 Influenza Virus
- What is being tested?
- Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 155 participants
- Where
- 37 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2009to Aug 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 25 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- HIV infected
- HIV-1 was perinatally acquired, in the opinion of the investigator
- Participants receiving antiretrovirals (ARVs) must have been receiving a stable regimen for 90 days prior to entry with no intention to modify their regimen within 60 days following study entry
- Participants not receiving ARVs at entry must not have received ARVs within 90 days prior to entry and must NOT plan to initiate ARVs within 60 days following study entry
- Ability to complete all study immunizations and evaluations, in the opinion of the investigator
- Agrees to use contraception, if necessary
Show all 11Show fewer
- Documented platelet count of more than 50,000 per mm3 and an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of more than 500 per mm3 within the 30 days prior to study entry
- Youth of legal age (from 18 to 25 years of age), parent or legal guardian, or participants who are emancipated minors must provide informed consent
- Received the first dose of Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine at least 21 days ago
- Documented platelet count of more than 50,000 per mm3 and an ANC of more than 500 per mm3 within the 30 days prior to Step II entry
- If a woman became pregnant after Dose #1, she must be at more than 14 weeks of gestation and have her obstetrician's permission to receive the vaccine
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Known allergy to egg protein (egg or egg product) or other components in the vaccines (these may include, but are not limited to: neomycin and polymyxin)
- History, in the opinion of the site investigator, of severe reactions following previous immunization with seasonal influenza vaccines that would contraindicate receipt of any influenza vaccine.
- History of probable or proven pandemic 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) infection prior to study entry
- Has received any live licensed vaccine within 4 weeks or inactivated licensed vaccine within 2 weeks prior to study entry
- Has received a nonlicensed agent (vaccine, drug, biologic, device, blood product, or medication) within 4 weeks prior to study entry or expects to receive another nonlicensed agent during the course of the study
Show all 30Show fewer
- Has an acute illness or a documented temperature greater than or equal to 100.0 degrees Fahrenheit within 24 hours prior to study entry
- Use of anti-cancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy within the 36 months preceding study entry or has immunosuppression as a result of an underlying illness or treatment (other than HIV-1 infection)
- Has an active neoplastic disease
- Long-term use of glucocorticoids, including oral or parenteral prednisone or equivalent (at least 2 mg/kg per day or at least 20 mg total dose) for more than 2 weeks in the past 6 months or high-dose inhaled steroids (more than 800 mcg/day of beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent) within the preceding 6 months. Nasal and topical steroids are allowed.
- Has received immunoglobulin or other blood products within the 3 months prior to study entry
- History of Guillain-Barre syndrome in the subject or subject's family, including parents, siblings, half-siblings, and children
- Onset of a neurological disorder including (but not limited to) absent ankle and patellar deep tendon reflexes in both legs (all four absent) within the past 6 months
- Disproportionate loss of strength in lower extremity or extremities compared to the upper extremities within the past 6 months
- Has any condition that would, in the opinion of the site investigator, place the participant at an unacceptable risk of injury or render the participant unable to meet the requirements of the protocol
- Has received a nonlicensed agent (vaccine, drug, biologic, device, blood product, or medication), other than from participation in this study, since Dose #1 or expects to receive another nonlicensed agent before the end of the study
- Use of anti-cancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy since Dose #1, new diagnosis of an active malignancy, or is immunosuppressed as a result of an underlying illness (other than HIV-1 infection) or treatment.
- Use of glucocorticoids, including oral or parenteral steroids (at least 2 mg/kg per day or at least 20 mg total dose) for more than 2 weeks since vaccine Dose #1 or high-dose inhaled steroids (more than 800 mcg/day of beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent) since Dose #1 (nasal and topical steroids are allowed)
- Has received immunoglobulin or other blood products since Dose #1
- Any Grade 3 toxicity or adverse event (AE) experienced by a participant, unless the investigator has received protocol team approval
- Any Grade 4 toxicity or AE (other than injection site reaction or fever) that is definitely, probably or possibly related to study vaccine
- Any Grade 4 injection site reactions or fever experienced by a participant, unless the investigator has received protocol team approval
- Any Grade 4 AEs that are definitely not or probably not related to study vaccine, unless the investigator has received protocol team approval
- New occurrence or new awareness of Guillain-Barre syndrome in the participant or participant's family (parents, siblings, half-siblings, or children) since Dose #1
- New onset of a neurological disorder including (but not limited to) absent ankle and patellar deep tendon reflexes in both legs (all four absent) since Dose #1
- Disproportionate loss of strength in lower extremity or extremities compared to the upper extremities (not thought to be related to pregnancy) since Dose #1
- Documented infection with 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) since Dose #1
- Refusal of further vaccination by participant, parent, or guardian
- Development of any new disease that the investigator judges to be clinically significant or clinically significant findings since Dose #1 that, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise the safety of the subject
- Withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn at any time and for any reason, without penalty.
Trial locations and contacts
37 sites in 2 countries.
37 sites in 2 countries
United States35 sites
Usc La Nichd Crs
Alhambra, California, 91803
Univ. of Colorado Denver NICHD CRS
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Univ. of Maryland Baltimore NICHD CRS
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Johns Hopkins Univ. Baltimore NICHD CRS
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
UAB Pediatric Infectious Diseases CRS
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Children's Hosp. of Boston NICHD CRS
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Boston Medical Center Ped. HIV Program NICHD CRS
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Rush Univ. Cook County Hosp. Chicago NICHD CRS
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago (LCH) CRS
Chicago, Illinois, 60614-3393
Children's Hospital of Michigan NICHD CRS
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
DUMC Ped. CRS
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
South Florida CDTC Ft Lauderdale NICHD CRS
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316
Texas Children's Hospital CRS
Houston, Texas, 77030-2399
Univ. of Florida Jacksonville NICHD CRS
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209
University of California, UC San Diego CRS
La Jolla, California, 92093-0672
Miller Children's Hosp. Long Beach CA NICHD CRS
Long Beach, California, 90806
UCLA-Los Angeles/Brazil AIDS Consortium (LABAC) CRS
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1752
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital CRS
Memphis, Tennessee, 38105-3678
Pediatric Perinatal HIV Clinical Trials Unit CRS
Miami, Florida, 33136
Nyu Ny Nichd Crs
New York, New York, 10016
Metropolitan Hosp. NICHD CRS
New York, New York, 10029
Columbia IMPAACT CRS
New York, New York, 10032
Rutgers - New Jersey Medical School CRS
Newark, New Jersey, 01703
The Children's Hosp. of Philadelphia IMPAACT CRS
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Strong Memorial Hospital Rochester NY NICHD CRS
Rochester, New York, 14642
Univ. of California San Francisco NICHD CRS
San Francisco, California, 94143
Seattle Children's Research Institute CRS
Seattle, Washington, 98101
SUNY Stony Brook NICHD CRS
Stony Brook, New York, 11794-8111
USF - Tampa NICHD CRS
Tampa, Florida, 33606
Bronx-Lebanon CRS
The Bronx, New York, 10457
Jacobi Med. Ctr. Bronx NICHD CRS
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Harbor UCLA Medical Ctr. NICHD CRS
Torrance, California, 90502
Children's National Med. Ctr. Washington DC NICHD CRS
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Howard Univ. Washington DC NICHD CRS
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20060
WNE Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS CRS
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
Puerto Rico2 sites
University of Puerto Rico Pediatric HIV/AIDS Research Program CRS
San Juan, 00935
San Juan City Hosp. PR NICHD CRS
San Juan, 00936
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Study to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Swine-Origin H1N1 Influenza Vaccine in HIV-1 Perinatally Infected Children and Youth
Children and people infected with HIV are particularly susceptible to influenza infections. This study testED the safety and effectiveness of a vaccine for the new H1N1 influenza virus in children and youth infected with HIV.
Read the detailed description
The new H1N1 influenza virus seen in 2009 has been designated a pandemic by the World Health Organization, due to the sustained community outbreaks seen in the United States and Mexico. Based on preliminary data, it appears children and young adults were particularly at risk of the H1N1 virus. People infected with HIV were also more susceptible to severe influenza infections than those who are uninfected. Children with HIV infection, then, have a compounded risk of H1N1 infection. Higher doses of influenza vaccines are associated with the development of higher levels of serum antibodies, which are needed to resist infection. Higher vaccine doses can be used to improve vaccine effectiveness in at-risk populations. This study tested the safety and immune response of HIV infected children and youth to a high dose of a vaccine for the new H1N1 influenza virus.
Participation in this study lasted 7 months and had two steps. The first step involved receiving the first dose of H1N1 virus vaccine, and the second step, occurring 21 days later, involved receiving the second dose of vaccine. Each dose of vaccine was delivered via two intramuscular shots (four total injections). After receiving each dose of the vaccine, participants were given a diary to record any symptoms or reactions. Participants were stratified into three groups by age, including 4 to 9 years, 9 to 18 years, and 18 to 25 years.
Participants completed five scheduled visits, taking place at screening, study entry, Days 21 and 31, and after 7 months. Measurements taken on these visits included a medical history, physical and neurological exams, a blood draw, and, when applicable, a pregnancy test. In addition to these visits, participants received up to three additional phone calls or visits occurring 2 and 10 days after the first dose of vaccine and 2 days after the second dose of vaccine to check for reactions to the vaccine.
- Conditions
- HIV Infections, H1N1 Influenza Virus
- Being tested
- Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine
- Keywords
- Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Vaccine, Children, Adolescents, HIV-Infected, Perinatal HIV Infection, Treatment experienced
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccineBiological
Two doses of vaccine, delivered 21 days apart, with each dose consisting of two 15-microgram intramuscular injections
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine | Experimental | All participants received two doses of the H1N1 influenza virus vaccine, administered 21 days apart. Receives: Biological: Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Number of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event (AE)
Shows the number of participants who had at least one adverse event (AE) in each category. The AEs include: abnormal laboratory values, signs and symptoms, or diagnoses; solicited local AEs; and solicited systemic AEs.
Adverse Events were graded using the DAIDS Grading Severity of AEs (see Link under More Information), as follows: grade 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=life threatening/disabling, 5=death.
Measured: Measured up to 7 months after vaccination
The Number of Participants Who Had at Least One AE Attributed to the Study Vaccine
Shows the number of participants who experienced any events that were thought to be at least possibly related to study treatment. Adverse Events were graded using the DAIDS Grading Severity of AEs (see Link under More Information), as follows: grade 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=life threatening/disabling, 5=death.
Measured: Measured up to 7 months after vaccination
Withholding of Second Vaccine Dose Due to Adverse Reactions Attributed to First Dose
Measured: Measured at Day 21
Percent of Participants With a Hemagglutinin Inhibition (HAI) Titer of >=40
Antibodies to Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 were measured using an HAI assay. The potential titer read-outs from the assay used were <10 (considered undetectable), 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 160, 320, 640 and >=1280. Seroprotection was defined as having a titer of >=40 following vaccination.
Measured: Measured at 21 days after first dose and 10 days after second dose
Secondary outcomes (5)
Percent of Participants With an HAI Titer >=40 at Long-term Follow-up
Measured: Measured at 6 months after second dose
Geometric Mean Antibody Titers (GMT) HAI
Presents the value of the geometric mean titer at each time point.
Measured: Measured after first and second doses and 6 months after second dose
Cell-mediated Immune Responses, Measured by B-cell and T-cell Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Spot (ELISPOT) Assay Values
The median and interquartile range (IQR) of B-Cell ELISPOT-measured IgG antibody-secreting cells (ASC)/10^6 peripheral blood mononucleated cell (PBMC) and the median and interquartile range (IQR) of T-Cell ELISPOT-measured pH1N1 IFNgamma spot-forming cells (SFC)/10^6 PBMC.
Measured: Measured at entry, 21 days after first dose, and 10 days after second dose
HAI Titers Against Seasonal Influenza Viruses Containing Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (TIV)
Presents the value of the median titer as well as the interquartile range at study entry. Antibodies to seasonal Influenza vaccine were measured using an HAI assay. The potential titer read-outs from the assay used were <10 (considered undetectable), 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 160, 320, 640, and >=1280.
Measured: Measured at entry, 21 days after first dose, and 10 days and 6 months after second dose
Cell-mediated Immune Responses to Influenza Viruses Contained in TIV and Other Antigens
The TIV assay was not performed due to lack of available cells after completion of other planned assays.
The median and interquartile range (IQR) of T-Cell ELISPOT-measured pH1N1 Granzyme B spot-forming cells (SFC)/10^6 peripheral blood mononucleated cell (PBMC).
The median and interquartile range (IQR) of T-Cell ELISPOT-measured PHA INFgamma spot-forming cells (SFC)/10^6 PBMC.
The median and interquartile range (IQR) of T-Cell ELISPOT-measured PHA Granzyme B spot-forming cells (SFC)/10^6 PBMC.
Measured: Measured at entry, 21 days after first dose, and 10 days after second dose
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2009
- Primary completionAug 2010
- Study completionAug 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 155 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pat Flynn, MD, Study chair, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00992836
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P1088
- Other IDs
- 10840, IMPAACT P1088
- Status last verified
- Dec 2014
- First submitted
- 8 Oct 2009
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation Team; Dawood FS, Jain S, Finelli L, Shaw MW, Lindstrom S, Garten RJ, Gubareva LV, Xu X, Bridges CB, Uyeki TM. Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 18;360(25):2605-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903810. Epub 2009 May 7.
PubMed 19423869Gelinck LB, van den Bemt BJ, Marijt WA, van der Bijl AE, Visser LG, Cats HA, Rimmelzwaan GF, Kroon FP. Intradermal influenza vaccination in immunocompromized patients is immunogenic and feasible. Vaccine. 2009 Apr 21;27(18):2469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.02.053. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
PubMed 19368788Flynn P, Nachman S, Spector SA, Cunningham CK, Weinberg A, Pass R, Muresan P, Levy W, Siberry G, Handelsman E for the IMPAACT P1088 and P1089 Teams: Safety and Immunogenicity of 2009 H1N1 Influenza Immunization in HIV-1 Perinatally Infected Children and Youth. Presented at the IDSA conference, October 2010.
Flynn PM, Nachman S, Spector SA, Cunningham CK, Weinberg A, Pass R, Muresan P, Levy W, Petzold E, Heckman B, Siberry G, Handelsman E for the IMPAACT P1088 and P1089 Teams. 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Immunization in HIV-1 Perinatally Infected Children and Youth. Presented at the Retroviruses Conference, Feb 2010.
Curtis DJ, Muresan P, Nachman S, Fenton T, Richardson KM, Dominguez T, Flynn PM, Spector SA, Cunningham CK, Bloom A, Weinberg A. Characterization of functional antibody and memory B-cell responses to pH1N1 monovalent vaccine in HIV-infected children and youth. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0118567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118567. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 25785995Flynn PM, Nachman S, Muresan P, Fenton T, Spector SA, Cunningham CK, Pass R, Yogev R, Burchett S, Heckman B, Bloom A, Utech LJ, Anthony P, Petzold E, Levy W, Siberry GK, Ebiasah R, Miller J, Handelsman E, Weinberg A; IMPAACT P1088 Team. Safety and immunogenicity of 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccination in perinatally HIV-1-infected children, adolescents, and young adults. J Infect Dis. 2012 Aug 1;206(3):421-30. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis360. Epub 2012 May 21.
PubMed 22615311
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Study to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Swine-Origin H1N1 Influenza Vaccine in HIV-1 Perinatally Infected Children and Youth
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00992836
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P1088
- Conditions
- HIV Infections, H1N1 Influenza Virus
- Keywords
- Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Vaccine, Children, Adolescents, HIV-Infected, Perinatal HIV Infection, Treatment experienced
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 155 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- Oct 2009
- Primary completion
- Aug 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Feb 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Children and people infected with HIV are particularly susceptible to influenza infections. This study testED the safety and effectiveness of a vaccine for the new H1N1 influenza virus in children and youth infected with HIV.
Detailed description
The new H1N1 influenza virus seen in 2009 has been designated a pandemic by the World Health Organization, due to the sustained community outbreaks seen in the United States and Mexico. Based on preliminary data, it appears children and young adults were particularly at risk of the H1N1 virus. People infected with HIV were also more susceptible to severe influenza infections than those who are uninfected. Children with HIV infection, then, have a compounded risk of H1N1 infection. Higher doses of influenza vaccines are associated with the development of higher levels of serum antibodies, which are needed to resist infection. Higher vaccine doses can be used to improve vaccine effectiveness in at-risk populations. This study tested the safety and immune response of HIV infected children and youth to a high dose of a vaccine for the new H1N1 influenza virus.
Participation in this study lasted 7 months and had two steps. The first step involved receiving the first dose of H1N1 virus vaccine, and the second step, occurring 21 days later, involved receiving the second dose of vaccine. Each dose of vaccine was delivered via two intramuscular shots (four total injections). After receiving each dose of the vaccine, participants were given a diary to record any symptoms or reactions. Participants were stratified into three groups by age, including 4 to 9 years, 9 to 18 years, and 18 to 25 years.
Participants completed five scheduled visits, taking place at screening, study entry, Days 21 and 31, and after 7 months. Measurements taken on these visits included a medical history, physical and neurological exams, a blood draw, and, when applicable, a pregnancy test. In addition to these visits, participants received up to three additional phone calls or visits occurring 2 and 10 days after the first dose of vaccine and 2 days after the second dose of vaccine to check for reactions to the vaccine.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine | Experimental | Biological: Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccineAll participants received two doses of the H1N1 influenza virus vaccine, administered 21 days apart. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 25 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- HIV infected
- HIV-1 was perinatally acquired, in the opinion of the investigator
- Participants receiving antiretrovirals (ARVs) must have been receiving a stable regimen for 90 days prior to entry with no intention to modify their regimen within 60 days following study entry
- Participants not receiving ARVs at entry must not have received ARVs within 90 days prior to entry and must NOT plan to initiate ARVs within 60 days following study entry
- Ability to complete all study immunizations and evaluations, in the opinion of the investigator
Key exclusion criteria (30 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Known allergy to egg protein (egg or egg product) or other components in the vaccines (these may include, but are not limited to: neomycin and polymyxin)
- History, in the opinion of the site investigator, of severe reactions following previous immunization with seasonal influenza vaccines that would contraindicate receipt of any influenza vaccine.
- History of probable or proven pandemic 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) infection prior to study entry
- Has received any live licensed vaccine within 4 weeks or inactivated licensed vaccine within 2 weeks prior to study entry
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccineTwo doses of vaccine, delivered 21 days apart, with each dose consisting of two 15-microgram intramuscular injections | Biological | Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine |
Primary outcome
The Number of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event (AE)
Time frame: Measured up to 7 months after vaccination
Shows the number of participants who had at least one adverse event (AE) in each category. The AEs include: abnormal laboratory values, signs and symptoms, or diagnoses; solicited local AEs; and solicited systemic AEs. Adverse Events were graded using the DAIDS Grading Severity of AEs (see Link under More Information), as follows: grade 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=life threatening/disabling, 5=death.
The Number of Participants Who Had at Least One AE Attributed to the Study Vaccine
Time frame: Measured up to 7 months after vaccination
Shows the number of participants who experienced any events that were thought to be at least possibly related to study treatment. Adverse Events were graded using the DAIDS Grading Severity of AEs (see Link under More Information), as follows: grade 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=life threatening/disabling, 5=death.
Withholding of Second Vaccine Dose Due to Adverse Reactions Attributed to First Dose
Time frame: Measured at Day 21
Percent of Participants With a Hemagglutinin Inhibition (HAI) Titer of >=40
Time frame: Measured at 21 days after first dose and 10 days after second dose
Antibodies to Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 were measured using an HAI assay. The potential titer read-outs from the assay used were <10 (considered undetectable), 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 160, 320, 640 and >=1280. Seroprotection was defined as having a titer of >=40 following vaccination.
5 secondary outcomes
Percent of Participants With an HAI Titer >=40 at Long-term Follow-up
Time frame: Measured at 6 months after second dose
Geometric Mean Antibody Titers (GMT) HAI
Time frame: Measured after first and second doses and 6 months after second dose
Cell-mediated Immune Responses, Measured by B-cell and T-cell Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Spot (ELISPOT) Assay Values
Time frame: Measured at entry, 21 days after first dose, and 10 days after second dose
HAI Titers Against Seasonal Influenza Viruses Containing Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (TIV)
Time frame: Measured at entry, 21 days after first dose, and 10 days and 6 months after second dose
Cell-mediated Immune Responses to Influenza Viruses Contained in TIV and Other Antigens
Time frame: Measured at entry, 21 days after first dose, and 10 days after second dose
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Nov 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19423869Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation Team; Dawood FS, Jain S, Finelli L, Shaw MW, Lindstrom S, Garten RJ, Gubareva LV, Xu X, Bridges CB, Uyeki TM. Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 18;360(25):2605-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903810. Epub 2009 May 7.
- Background: PubMed 19368788Gelinck LB, van den Bemt BJ, Marijt WA, van der Bijl AE, Visser LG, Cats HA, Rimmelzwaan GF, Kroon FP. Intradermal influenza vaccination in immunocompromized patients is immunogenic and feasible. Vaccine. 2009 Apr 21;27(18):2469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.02.053. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
- Results publicationFlynn P, Nachman S, Spector SA, Cunningham CK, Weinberg A, Pass R, Muresan P, Levy W, Siberry G, Handelsman E for the IMPAACT P1088 and P1089 Teams: Safety and Immunogenicity of 2009 H1N1 Influenza Immunization in HIV-1 Perinatally Infected Children and Youth. Presented at the IDSA conference, October 2010.
- Results publicationFlynn PM, Nachman S, Spector SA, Cunningham CK, Weinberg A, Pass R, Muresan P, Levy W, Petzold E, Heckman B, Siberry G, Handelsman E for the IMPAACT P1088 and P1089 Teams. 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Immunization in HIV-1 Perinatally Infected Children and Youth. Presented at the Retroviruses Conference, Feb 2010.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25785995Curtis DJ, Muresan P, Nachman S, Fenton T, Richardson KM, Dominguez T, Flynn PM, Spector SA, Cunningham CK, Bloom A, Weinberg A. Characterization of functional antibody and memory B-cell responses to pH1N1 monovalent vaccine in HIV-infected children and youth. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0118567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118567. eCollection 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22615311Flynn PM, Nachman S, Muresan P, Fenton T, Spector SA, Cunningham CK, Pass R, Yogev R, Burchett S, Heckman B, Bloom A, Utech LJ, Anthony P, Petzold E, Levy W, Siberry GK, Ebiasah R, Miller J, Handelsman E, Weinberg A; IMPAACT P1088 Team. Safety and immunogenicity of 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccination in perinatally HIV-1-infected children, adolescents, and young adults. J Infect Dis. 2012 Aug 1;206(3):421-30. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis360. Epub 2012 May 21.
- Click here for information on the IMPAACT group and for the package insert on the H1N1 vaccine.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Click here for the table used for grading toxicities: DAIDS Grading Severity of AEs, V1.0, Dec04.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pat Flynn, MD study chair
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
37 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine in people with HIV Infections and H1N1 Influenza Virus, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 37 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 30 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 37 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Feb 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Number of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event (AE) (time frame: Measured up to 7 months after vaccination). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00992836, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2021.