HIV InfectionsPhase 2NCT00992017
Safety of and Immune Response to an H1N1 Influenza Vaccine in HIV Infected Pregnant Women
A Phase 2 study testing Influenza A (H1N1) monovalent vaccine in people with HIV Infections and H1N1 Influenza Virus, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 31 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Both pregnant women and people infected with HIV are at increased risk of viral infection, including influenza infection. Pregnant women infected with HIV may be at particular risk of infection from the new H1N1 influenza virus. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 39 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Infections, H1N1 Influenza Virus
- What is being tested?
- Influenza A (H1N1) monovalent vaccine
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 130 participants
- Where
- 31 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2009to Nov 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 39 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Confirmed diagnosis of HIV-1 infection
- Pregnant
- Between 14 and 35 weeks of gestation
- Documented platelet count of greater than 50,000 mm3 and an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of greater than 500 mm3 within 28 days prior to study entry
- Able to understand and comply with planned study procedures
- On antiretroviral therapy (ART) as outlined in the treatment guidelines for pregnant HIV-1 infected women. Women must be currently taking ART or should initiate ART either prior to or concomitantly with the first dose of the vaccine.
- Received the first dose of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine
- Has a documented platelet count of greater than 50,000 mm3 and an ANC of greater than 500 mm3 within the 28 days prior to Step II entry
Who cannot join
- Has a known allergy to eggs, egg products, neomycin, or polymyxin
- Has a history, in the opinion of the site investigator, of severe reactions following previous immunization with seasonal TIV
- Participation in a novel H1N1 influenza vaccine study in the past 2 years
- Proven history, by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), of novel influenza H1N1 infection or positive influenza diagnostic test since June 2009 (specificity to H1N1 not required) prior to study entry
- Received any other live licensed vaccine within 4 weeks or inactivated licensed vaccine within 2 weeks prior to study entry
- Received a nonlicensed agent (vaccine, drug, biologic, device, blood product, or medication) within 4 weeks prior to vaccination in this study or expects to receive another nonlicensed agent before delivery
Show all 31Show fewer
- Acute illness and/or an oral temperature greater than or equal to 100.0 degrees F within 24 hours prior to study entry
- Use of anti-cancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy within the preceding 36 months of study enrollment or has immunosuppression as a result of an underlying illness or treatment (other than HIV-1 infection)
- Active neoplastic disease (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer, human papillomavirus [HPV]-related cervical dysplasia, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] Grades 1, 2, or 3)
- Long-term use of glucocorticoids, including oral or parenteral prednisone or equivalent (at least 2.0 mg/kg per day or at least 20 mg total dose) for more than 2 consecutive weeks (or 2 weeks total) in the past 3 months or high-dose inhaled steroids (more than 800 mcg/day of beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent) within the past 3 months. Nasal and topical steroids are allowed.
- Received immunoglobulin or other blood products (with exception of Rho D immune globulin) within the 3 months prior to enrollment in this study
- Current diagnosis of uncontrolled major psychiatric disorder
- History of Guillain-Barre syndrome in the subject or subject's family (including parents, siblings, half-siblings, or children)
- Onset of a neurological disorder including (but not limited to) absent ankle and patellar deep tendon reflexes (DTRs) in both legs (all four absent) within the past 6 months
- Disproportionate loss of strength in lower extremity or extremities compared to the upper extremities (not thought to be related to pregnancy) within the past 6 months
- Any condition that would, in the opinion of the site investigator, place the subject at an unacceptable risk of injury or render the subject unable to meet the requirements of the protocol. Pregnancy complications such as preterm labor, hypertension and pre-eclampsia are not exclusion criteria for this study.
- Received a nonlicensed agent (vaccine, drug, biologic, device, blood product, or medication), other than from participation in this study, since the study vaccine dose #1 or expects to receive another nonlicensed agent before delivery
- Use of anti-cancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy since study vaccine dose #1, new diagnosis of an active malignancy, or is immunosuppressed as a result of an underlying illness (other than HIV-1 infection) or treatment
- Use of glucocorticoids, including oral or parenteral prednisone or equivalent (at least 2.0 mg/kg per day or at least 20 mg total dose) or high-dose inhaled steroids (more than 800 mcg/day of beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent) for more than 2 consecutive weeks (or 2 weeks total) since study vaccine dose #1. Nasal and topical steroids are allowed.
- Received immunoglobulin or other blood products (with exception of Rho D immune globulin) since study vaccine dose #1
- A new diagnosis of uncontrolled major psychiatric disorder since study vaccine dose #1
- New occurrence or new awareness of Guillain-Barre syndrome in the subject or subject's family (including parents, siblings, half-siblings, or children) since study vaccine dose #1
- A new onset of a neurological disorder including (but not limited to) absent ankle and patellar DTRs in both legs (all four absent) since study vaccine dose #1
- Disproportionate loss of strength in lower extremity or extremities compared to the upper extremities (not thought to be related to pregnancy) since study vaccine dose #1
- Any Grade 3 toxicity or AE experienced by a participant unless the investigator has received protocol team approval
- Any Grade 4 toxicity or AE (other than injection site reaction or fever) that is definitely, probably, or possibly related to the study vaccine dose #1
- Any Grade 4 injection site reactions or fever experienced by a subject, unless the investigator has received protocol team approval
- Any Grade 4 AEs that are definitely not or probably not related to study vaccine, unless the investigator has received protocol team approval
- Any new clinical findings since the study vaccine dose #1, that, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise the safety of the participant
- Participant refuses further vaccination. The subject will still be asked to complete safety visits and be followed in the study.
- Participant withdraws consent. Participants may withdraw their consent for study participation at any time and for any reason, without penalty.
Trial locations and contacts
31 sites in 2 countries.
31 sites in 2 countries
United States29 sites
Usc La Nichd Crs
Alhambra, California, 91803
Univ. of Colorado Denver NICHD CRS
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Johns Hopkins Univ. Baltimore NICHD CRS
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Children's Hosp. of Boston NICHD CRS
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Boston Medical Center Ped. HIV Program NICHD CRS
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Rush Univ. Cook County Hosp. Chicago NICHD CRS
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago (LCH) CRS
Chicago, Illinois, 60614-3393
DUMC Ped. CRS
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
South Florida CDTC Ft Lauderdale NICHD CRS
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316
Texas Children's Hospital CRS
Houston, Texas, 77030-2399
Univ. of Florida Jacksonville NICHD CRS
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209
University of California, UC San Diego CRS
La Jolla, California, 92093-0672
Miller Children's Hosp. Long Beach CA NICHD CRS
Long Beach, California, 90806
UCLA-Los Angeles/Brazil AIDS Consortium (LABAC) CRS
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1752
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital CRS
Memphis, Tennessee, 38105-3678
Pediatric Perinatal HIV Clinical Trials Unit CRS
Miami, Florida, 33136
Tulane Univ. New Orleans NICHD CRS
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Metropolitan Hosp. NICHD CRS
New York, New York, 10029
Columbia IMPAACT CRS
New York, New York, 10032
Rutgers - New Jersey Medical School CRS
Newark, New Jersey, 07103
The Children's Hosp. of Philadelphia IMPAACT CRS
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Univ. of California San Francisco NICHD CRS
San Francisco, California, 94143
Seattle Children's Research Institute CRS
Seattle, Washington, 98101
SUNY Stony Brook NICHD CRS
Stony Brook, New York, 11794-8111
USF - Tampa NICHD CRS
Tampa, Florida, 33606
Bronx-Lebanon CRS
The Bronx, New York, 10457
Jacobi Med. Ctr. Bronx NICHD CRS
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Washington Hosp. Ctr. NICHD CRS
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
WNE Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS CRS
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
Puerto Rico2 sites
University of Puerto Rico Pediatric HIV/AIDS Research Program CRS
San Juan, 00935
San Juan City Hosp. PR NICHD CRS
San Juan, 00936
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Study to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Monovalent Influenza A (H1N1) Vaccine in HIV-1 Infected Pregnant Women
Both pregnant women and people infected with HIV are at increased risk of viral infection, including influenza infection. Pregnant women infected with HIV may be at particular risk of infection from the new H1N1 influenza virus. This study tested the safety and immunogenicity of an H1N1 influenza vaccine in pregnant women infected with HIV.
Read the detailed description
On June 11, 2009, the World Health Organization declared a pandemic of the new H1N1 influenza virus, after the virus had caused significant fevers and respiratory illnesses in Mexico and the United States. Pregnant women are at an increased risk of complications from influenza. HIV infected people tend to have lower than normal antibody responses to seasonal influenza vaccines. Data suggest that larger than average doses of a vaccine counteract a weak antibody response. Preliminary results from ongoing studies of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccines indicate that the vaccine may increase immune activation. This study tested the safety and antibody response of high doses of the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine in pregnant women infected with HIV.
Participation in this study lasted until 6 months after participants had delivered their babies or up to 52 weeks. Participants received two doses of the H1N1 vaccine at study entry and after 21 days. Each dose consisted of two intramuscular injections (four total injections). On the days of the injections, participants had their babies' heart rates checked before and after vaccination. At these visits, and at follow-up visits on Days 21, 31, and 42, participants completed a review of symptoms, physical and neurological exams, and a blood draw. For 10 days after receiving each dose of the vaccine, participants were asked to keep track of their temperatures and symptoms or reactions in a journal. Participants were contacted on Day 2 and Day 10 after the first dose of vaccine was given and on Day 2 after the second dose of vaccine was given. Some participants also received a phone call after 6 months.
At delivery of each participant's baby, blood was drawn from both the mother and umbilical cord (or from the baby if the cord blood could not be obtained). At 3 and 6 months after delivery, participants came in for follow-up visits involving, for both mother and child, a review of symptoms, brief physical exams, and blood draws (at 6 months only some women had a clinic visit, the rest received a phone call).
- Conditions
- HIV Infections, H1N1 Influenza Virus
- Being tested
- Influenza A (H1N1) monovalent vaccine
- Keywords
- Vaccine, Pregnant, Perinatal
- Medical subject headings
- HIV Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Influenza A (H1N1) monovalent vaccineBiological
Two 15-microgram intramuscular vaccine injections given together form one dose; two doses (four total injections) are given 21 days apart
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| H1N1 vaccine | Experimental | Pregnant women enrolled received two doses of H1N1 vaccine, administered 21 days apart. Receives: Biological: Influenza A (H1N1) monovalent vaccine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Number of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event (AE)
Shows the number of participants who had at least one adverse event (AE) in each category. These include: abnormal laboratory values, signs and symptoms, or diagnoses; solicited local AEs; and solicited systemic AEs. Adverse Events were graded using the DAIDS Grading Severity of AEs (see Link under More Information), as follows: grade 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=life threatening/disabling, 5=death.
Measured: Measured up to 6 months after delivery
The Number of Participants Who Had at Least One AE Attributed to the Study Vaccine
Shows the number of participants who experienced any events that were thought to be at least possibly related to study treatment. Adverse Events were graded using the DAIDS Grading Severity of AEs (see Link under More Information), as follows: grade 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=life threatening/disabling, 5=death.
Measured: Measured up to 6 months after delivery
Withholding of Second Vaccine Dose Due to Adverse Reactions Attributed to First Dose
Measured: Measured at Day 21
Percent of Pregnant Women With a Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Titer of >= 40
Antibodies to Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 were measured using an HAI assay. The potential titer read-outs from the assay used were <10 (considered undetectable), 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 160, 320, 640, and >=1280. Seroprotection was defined as having a titer of >=40 following vaccination.
Measured: Measured at 21 days after first dose and at 10 days after second dose of study vaccine
Secondary outcomes (6)
Percent of Pregnant Women With an HAI Titer of >= 40 at Delivery, 3 Months and 6 Months After Delivery
Antibodies to Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 were measured using an HAI assay. The potential titer read-outs from the assay used were <10 (considered undetectable), 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 160, 320, 640, and >=1280. Seroprotection was defined as having a titer of >=40 following vaccination.
Measured: Measured at delivery of the baby, and at 3 months and 6 months after delivery
Percent of Infants With an HAI Titer of >= 40
Antibodies to Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 were measured using an HAI assay. The potential titer read-outs from the assay used were <10 (considered undetectable), 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 160, 320, 640, and >=1280. Seroprotection was defined as having a titer of >=40 following vaccination.
Measured: Measured at birth (via cord blood) and at 3 months and 6 months of age
Maternal Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Antibodies HAI
Presents the value of the geometric mean titer at each time point. Antibodies to Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 were measured using an HAI assay. The potential titer read-outs from the assay used were <10 (considered undetectable), 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 160, 320, 640, and >=1280.
Measured: Measured after the first and second doses of the vaccine, at delivery, and at 3 and 6 months after delivery
Infant GMT of Antibodies HAI
Presents the value of the geometric mean titer at each time point. Antibodies to Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 were measured using an HAI assay. The potential titer read-outs from the assay used were <10 (considered undetectable), 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 160, 320, 640, and >=1280.
Measured: Measured at birth and at 3 and 6 months of age
Maternal Cell-mediated Immunity (CMI) Responses, as Measured by B-cell and T-cell Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Spot (ELISPOT) Assay Values
The median and interquartile range (IQR) of B-Cell ELISPOT-measured IgG antibody-secreting cells (ASC)/10^6 PBMC and the median and interquartile range (IQR) of T-Cell ELISPOT-measured pH1N1 IFNgamma spot-forming cells (SFC)/10^6 PBMC.
Measured: Measured at entry, at 21 days after first dose of vaccine, at 10 days after second dose
Response to Seasonal Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (TIV)
Presents the value of the median titer as well as the interquartile range at study entry. Antibodies to seasonal Influenza vaccine were measured using an HAI assay. The potential titer read-outs from the assay used were <10 (considered undetectable), 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 160, 320, 640, and >=1280.
Measured: Measured at entry
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2009
- Primary completionNov 2010
- Study completionNov 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sharon Nachman, MD, Study chair, State University of New York at Stony Brook
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00992017
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P1086
- Other IDs
- 10835, IMPAACT P1086
- Status last verified
- Dec 2014
- First submitted
- 7 Oct 2009
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation Team; Dawood FS, Jain S, Finelli L, Shaw MW, Lindstrom S, Garten RJ, Gubareva LV, Xu X, Bridges CB, Uyeki TM. Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 18;360(25):2605-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903810. Epub 2009 May 7.
PubMed 19423869Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, Rasmussen SA, Williams JL, Swerdlow DL, Biggerstaff MS, Lindstrom S, Louie JK, Christ CM, Bohm SR, Fonseca VP, Ritger KA, Kuhles DJ, Eggers P, Bruce H, Davidson HA, Lutterloh E, Harris ML, Burke C, Cocoros N, Finelli L, MacFarlane KF, Shu B, Olsen SJ; Novel Influenza A (H1N1) Pregnancy Working Group. H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection during pregnancy in the USA. Lancet. 2009 Aug 8;374(9688):451-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61304-0. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
PubMed 19643469S. Nachman, A. Weinberg, P. Muresan, M. Abzug, R. Ebiasah, E. Petzold, B. Heckman, H. Watts, J. Miller and M. Levin Safety of an Inactivated Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine (H1N1 vaccine) in HIV-1 Infected Pregnant Women, P1086. Presented at the Retroviruses Conference, Feb 2010
Weinberg A, Muresan P, Fenton T, Handelsman E, Watts H, Miller J, Heckman B, Bloom A, Ebiasah R, Petzold E, Levy W, Abzug M, Levin M and Nachman S for IMPAACT P1086 Team: Safety and Immunogenicity of Two Doses of Monovalent Pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1) Influenza Vaccine in HIV-Infected Pregnant Women. Presented at the IDSA conference, October 2010.
Abzug MJ, Nachman SA, Muresan P, Handelsman E, Watts DH, Fenton T, Heckman B, Petzold E, Weinberg A, Levin MJ; International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group P1086 Protocol Team. Safety and immunogenicity of 2009 pH1N1 vaccination in HIV-infected pregnant women. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 May;56(10):1488-97. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit057. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
PubMed 23378284
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Study to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Monovalent Influenza A (H1N1) Vaccine in HIV-1 Infected Pregnant Women
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00992017
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P1086
- Conditions
- HIV Infections, H1N1 Influenza Virus
- Keywords
- Vaccine, Pregnant, Perinatal
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)US National Institutes of Health
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- Oct 2009
- Primary completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Mar 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Both pregnant women and people infected with HIV are at increased risk of viral infection, including influenza infection. Pregnant women infected with HIV may be at particular risk of infection from the new H1N1 influenza virus. This study tested the safety and immunogenicity of an H1N1 influenza vaccine in pregnant women infected with HIV.
Detailed description
On June 11, 2009, the World Health Organization declared a pandemic of the new H1N1 influenza virus, after the virus had caused significant fevers and respiratory illnesses in Mexico and the United States. Pregnant women are at an increased risk of complications from influenza. HIV infected people tend to have lower than normal antibody responses to seasonal influenza vaccines. Data suggest that larger than average doses of a vaccine counteract a weak antibody response. Preliminary results from ongoing studies of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccines indicate that the vaccine may increase immune activation. This study tested the safety and antibody response of high doses of the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine in pregnant women infected with HIV.
Participation in this study lasted until 6 months after participants had delivered their babies or up to 52 weeks. Participants received two doses of the H1N1 vaccine at study entry and after 21 days. Each dose consisted of two intramuscular injections (four total injections). On the days of the injections, participants had their babies' heart rates checked before and after vaccination. At these visits, and at follow-up visits on Days 21, 31, and 42, participants completed a review of symptoms, physical and neurological exams, and a blood draw. For 10 days after receiving each dose of the vaccine, participants were asked to keep track of their temperatures and symptoms or reactions in a journal. Participants were contacted on Day 2 and Day 10 after the first dose of vaccine was given and on Day 2 after the second dose of vaccine was given. Some participants also received a phone call after 6 months.
At delivery of each participant's baby, blood was drawn from both the mother and umbilical cord (or from the baby if the cord blood could not be obtained). At 3 and 6 months after delivery, participants came in for follow-up visits involving, for both mother and child, a review of symptoms, brief physical exams, and blood draws (at 6 months only some women had a clinic visit, the rest received a phone call).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| H1N1 vaccine | Experimental | Biological: Influenza A (H1N1) monovalent vaccinePregnant women enrolled received two doses of H1N1 vaccine, administered 21 days apart. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 39 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Confirmed diagnosis of HIV-1 infection
- Pregnant
- Between 14 and 35 weeks of gestation
- Documented platelet count of greater than 50,000 mm3 and an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of greater than 500 mm3 within 28 days prior to study entry
- Able to understand and comply with planned study procedures
Key exclusion criteria (31 listed)
- Has a known allergy to eggs, egg products, neomycin, or polymyxin
- Has a history, in the opinion of the site investigator, of severe reactions following previous immunization with seasonal TIV
- Participation in a novel H1N1 influenza vaccine study in the past 2 years
- Proven history, by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), of novel influenza H1N1 infection or positive influenza diagnostic test since June 2009 (specificity to H1N1 not required) prior to study entry
- Received any other live licensed vaccine within 4 weeks or inactivated licensed vaccine within 2 weeks prior to study entry
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Influenza A (H1N1) monovalent vaccineTwo 15-microgram intramuscular vaccine injections given together form one dose; two doses (four total injections) are given 21 days apart | Biological | H1N1 vaccine |
Primary outcome
The Number of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event (AE)
Time frame: Measured up to 6 months after delivery
Shows the number of participants who had at least one adverse event (AE) in each category. These include: abnormal laboratory values, signs and symptoms, or diagnoses; solicited local AEs; and solicited systemic AEs. Adverse Events were graded using the DAIDS Grading Severity of AEs (see Link under More Information), as follows: grade 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=life threatening/disabling, 5=death.
The Number of Participants Who Had at Least One AE Attributed to the Study Vaccine
Time frame: Measured up to 6 months after delivery
Shows the number of participants who experienced any events that were thought to be at least possibly related to study treatment. Adverse Events were graded using the DAIDS Grading Severity of AEs (see Link under More Information), as follows: grade 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=life threatening/disabling, 5=death.
Withholding of Second Vaccine Dose Due to Adverse Reactions Attributed to First Dose
Time frame: Measured at Day 21
Percent of Pregnant Women With a Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Titer of >= 40
Time frame: Measured at 21 days after first dose and at 10 days after second dose of study vaccine
Antibodies to Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 were measured using an HAI assay. The potential titer read-outs from the assay used were <10 (considered undetectable), 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 160, 320, 640, and >=1280. Seroprotection was defined as having a titer of >=40 following vaccination.
6 secondary outcomes
Percent of Pregnant Women With an HAI Titer of >= 40 at Delivery, 3 Months and 6 Months After Delivery
Time frame: Measured at delivery of the baby, and at 3 months and 6 months after delivery
Percent of Infants With an HAI Titer of >= 40
Time frame: Measured at birth (via cord blood) and at 3 months and 6 months of age
Maternal Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Antibodies HAI
Time frame: Measured after the first and second doses of the vaccine, at delivery, and at 3 and 6 months after delivery
Infant GMT of Antibodies HAI
Time frame: Measured at birth and at 3 and 6 months of age
Maternal Cell-mediated Immunity (CMI) Responses, as Measured by B-cell and T-cell Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Spot (ELISPOT) Assay Values
Time frame: Measured at entry, at 21 days after first dose of vaccine, at 10 days after second dose
Response to Seasonal Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (TIV)
Time frame: Measured at entry
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Nov 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19423869Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation Team; Dawood FS, Jain S, Finelli L, Shaw MW, Lindstrom S, Garten RJ, Gubareva LV, Xu X, Bridges CB, Uyeki TM. Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 18;360(25):2605-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903810. Epub 2009 May 7.
- Background: PubMed 19643469Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, Rasmussen SA, Williams JL, Swerdlow DL, Biggerstaff MS, Lindstrom S, Louie JK, Christ CM, Bohm SR, Fonseca VP, Ritger KA, Kuhles DJ, Eggers P, Bruce H, Davidson HA, Lutterloh E, Harris ML, Burke C, Cocoros N, Finelli L, MacFarlane KF, Shu B, Olsen SJ; Novel Influenza A (H1N1) Pregnancy Working Group. H1N1 2009 influenza virus infection during pregnancy in the USA. Lancet. 2009 Aug 8;374(9688):451-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61304-0. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
- Results publicationS. Nachman, A. Weinberg, P. Muresan, M. Abzug, R. Ebiasah, E. Petzold, B. Heckman, H. Watts, J. Miller and M. Levin Safety of an Inactivated Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine (H1N1 vaccine) in HIV-1 Infected Pregnant Women, P1086. Presented at the Retroviruses Conference, Feb 2010
- Results publicationWeinberg A, Muresan P, Fenton T, Handelsman E, Watts H, Miller J, Heckman B, Bloom A, Ebiasah R, Petzold E, Levy W, Abzug M, Levin M and Nachman S for IMPAACT P1086 Team: Safety and Immunogenicity of Two Doses of Monovalent Pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1) Influenza Vaccine in HIV-Infected Pregnant Women. Presented at the IDSA conference, October 2010.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23378284Abzug MJ, Nachman SA, Muresan P, Handelsman E, Watts DH, Fenton T, Heckman B, Petzold E, Weinberg A, Levin MJ; International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group P1086 Protocol Team. Safety and immunogenicity of 2009 pH1N1 vaccination in HIV-infected pregnant women. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 May;56(10):1488-97. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit057. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
- Click here for information on the IMPAACT group and for the package insert on the H1N1 vaccine.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Click here for the table used for grading toxicities: DAIDS Grading Severity of AEs, V1.0, Dec04Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for HIV Infections
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sharon Nachman, MD study chair
State University of New York at Stony Brook
31 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Influenza A (H1N1) monovalent vaccine in people with HIV Infections and H1N1 Influenza Virus, run by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at 31 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 31 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 31 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Mar 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Number of Participants Who Had at Least One Adverse Event (AE) (time frame: Measured up to 6 months after delivery). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00992017, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2021.