Breast CancerEarly Phase 1NCT00991978
VEGF Early Imaging for Breast Cancer
A Early Phase 1 study testing 89Zr-bevacizumab PET in people with Breast Cancer, run by University Medical Center Groningen at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer death among women. Yearly around 12,500 Dutch women are diagnosed with breast cancer and 3,500 die of this disease. One of the problems leading to such striking effect refers to late tumor detection due to inadequate sensitivity of current imaging techniques. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- 89Zr-bevacizumab PET
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 23 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- Mar 2010to Jan 2012
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a breast tumor size < 2 cm in diameter (as determined by means of conventional imaging techniques: mammography, ultrasound or MRI) who are scheduled to receive operative intervention either by means of a mastectomy or lumpectomy.
- histologically proven breast cancer
- Age > 18 years.
- WHO performance status 0-2 (see: appendix B)
- Signed written informed consent (approved by the Institutional Review Board [IRB]/ Independent Ethics Committee [IEC]) obtained prior to any study specific screening procedures.
- Able to comply with the protocol.
Who cannot join
- Other invasive malignancy or condition which could affect compliance with the protocol or interpretation of results.
- Pregnant or lactating women. Documentation of a negative pregnancy test must be available for pre-menopausal women with intact reproductive organs and for women less than two years after menopause.
- Prior radiotherapy on the involved area.
- Major surgery within 28 days before the initiation of the study.
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease.
- Prior allergic reaction to immunoglobulins or immunoglobulin allergy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Netherlands1 site
Universitar Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, 9713GZ
About this study
Official title: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection A Feasibility Study
Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer death among women. Yearly around 12,500 Dutch women are diagnosed with breast cancer and 3,500 die of this disease. One of the problems leading to such striking effect refers to late tumor detection due to inadequate sensitivity of current imaging techniques. Current screening is performed by means of mammography, consisting of traditional film-screen mammograms of digital mammograms. These digital mammograms offer digital enhancement to aid interpretation, which is especially helpful in women with dense breast tissue. Screening mammography is nowadays the single most effective method of early breast cancer detection. For screening of high risk individuals, increasingly the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique is emerging. However, none of the above mentioned techniques has an optimal sensitivity and specificity, leading for instance to a significant portion of false positive results. The clinical consequence of this error is that additional tests and procedures are performed in women who may not have cancer. In the United States, for example, 11% mammograms require additional evaluation; the lesion turns out to be benign in more than 90% of cases [1].
False-positive readings False positive readings are more common in younger women, both because the tests are less specific and because breast cancer is less common [2,3]. As a result, more follow-up procedures, including invasive procedures such as biopsies, will be done in younger women even though fewer cancers will be found. Furthermore, because breast cancer screening occurs repeatedly, the risk of a false-positive study is likely to rise with repeated screening [4].
Emerging adjuncts to mammography include ultrasonography, which is helpful for further assessment of known areas of interest, and magnetic resonance imaging. Image-guided biopsy - directed by ultrasonography or stereotactic mammography views - plays a critical role in histological confirmation of suspected breast cancer.
Read the detailed description
Objectives of the trial
Primary objective The aim is to perform a feasibility study to show that VEGF PET imaging using 89Zr-bevacizumab as tracer can be used for early breast cancer detection.
Secondary Objectives A secondary aim is whether positive lymph nodes can be detected.
End-points
- The primary endpoint will be 89Zr-bevacizumab tracer uptake in primary breast tumors < 2 cm.
- The secondary endpoint will be 89Zr-bevacizumab tracer uptake in axillary lymph nodes.
Patient selection criteria
Inclusion
- Patients with a breast tumor size < 2 cm in diameter (as determined by means of conventional imaging techniques: mammography, ultrasound or MRI) who are scheduled to receive operative intervention either by means of a mastectomy or lumpectomy.
- histologically proven breast cancer
- Age > 18 years.
- WHO performance status 0-2 (see: appendix B)
- Signed written informed consent (approved by the Institutional Review Board [IRB]/ Independent Ethics Committee [IEC]) obtained prior to any study specific screening procedures.
- Able to comply with the protocol.
Exclusion
- Other invasive malignancy or condition which could affect compliance with the protocol or interpretation of results.
- Pregnant or lactating women. Documentation of a negative pregnancy test must be available for pre-menopausal women with intact reproductive organs and for women less than two years after menopause.
- Prior radiotherapy on the involved area.
- Major surgery within 28 days before the initiation of the study.
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease.
- Prior allergic reaction to immunoglobulins or immunoglobulin allergy.
Trial Design All patients will undergo a 89Zr-bevacizumab PET scan preoperatively at day 4 following tracer injection (see: section 16 for timetable). The uptake of 89Zr-bevacizumab in the tumor will be quantified. Results will be fused and compared with standard imaging techniques and with standard tumor histology as well as specific tumor stainings for angiogenesis including VEGF staining. Sensitivity and specificity will be compared with conventional imaging.
Study assessments
89Zr-bevacizumab PET imaging
Radiolabelling of bevacizumab Conjugation and radiolabeling of the monoclonal antibody is essentially performed as has been described by Verel et al (15), with only minor adjustments with regard to purification. In short: FTP-N-sucDf-Fe (kindly provided by the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was conjugated to the mAb at a 10:1 molar ratio. Fe(III) is subsequently removed by an excess of EDTA (Calbiochem, San Diego, California, USA) for 30 min at 35°C and the antibody is purified by ultrafiltration (Vivaspin-2 Centrifugal Concentrator, filter 30 kDa, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany). This purified antibody is either stored at -80°C or immediately used for radiolabelling. The conjugated antibody is added to 89Zr-oxalate (100-1000 MBq/mg mAb, kindly provided by the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), 0.9% NaCl (Braun Melsungen AG, Oss, The Netherlands), 2M Na2CO3 (OPG Farma, Utrecht, The Netherlands) and 0.5M HEPES buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands). After 60 minutes, the radiolabeled antibody is purified by ultrafiltration Vivaspin-2 Centrifugal Concentrator, filter 30 kDa, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) and diluted in 0.9% NaCl/gentisic acid (5 mg/ml, Merck Schuchardt OHG, Hohenbrunn, Germany). The 89Zr isotope has a physical t ½ of 78 hours. 89Zr-bevacizumab has radiochemical purity >95% and excellent long term stability in human serum (> 1 week). Conjugation and radiolabeling is performed in the radiopharmacy facilities of the department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging under GMP-conditions, under responsibility of a hospital pharmacist. More detailed information regarding 89Zr-bevacizumab is found in the investigational medicinal medicinal product dossier (IMPD; appendix C).
PET imaging Patients will be injected intravenously with 37 MBq 89Zr-bevacizumab (protein dose 5 mg) at day 0. Subsequently, images will be made 4 days after the injection of 89Zr-bevacizumab (see section 16 for timetable). For imaging a Siemens PET/CT camera will be used. Recording will be performed in 3D mode from lower thorax to neck, in approximately 2 bedpositions. The Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging is certified according to the ISO-NEN-9001 standard. Standard operating procedures for dynamic scanning will be used for all PET scans. Actual operation of the PET camera and scan acquisition will be performed by a nuclear medicine technologist. Final image analysis will be performed by a nuclear medicine specialist. 89Zr-bevacizumab distribution will be scored visually and quantitatively.
The majority of patients will also undergo sentinel node detection for staging of the axilla during the surgical treatment of the primary tumor. For the sentinel node procedure, 99mTechnetium labeled nanocolloid is used. The anticipated time between 89Zr-bevacizumab and 99mTc-nanocolloid administration will be approximately 2 weeks. By then, 7 half-life episodes of the 89Zr radiolabel will have passed and its signal will be negligible. Therefore, no interference of the radiolabel signals is expected.
Radiation dose/safety Use of positron emitting isotopes means exposure to ionizing radiation. Because of the potential hazards of radiation, guidelines for the exposure of healthy volunteers are specified in "Besluit Stralingsbescherming (BS 2000), artikel 64 - en Nota van Toelichting (Staatsblad 2001, 397)", which refers to the guidelines of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). As the kinetics of the antibody bevacizumab are almost comparable to those of trastuzumab, the radiation dose of 89Zr labelled bevacizumab is expected to be in the same range as that of 89Zr-trastuzumab.
For estimating the radiation dose to a 'standard female' during 89Zr-trastuzumab scanning, use was made of available kinetic data from previous 111In-trastuzumab planar imaging. This is possible as the halftime of 111In is in the same order of magnitude as that of 89Zr and therefore it enables us to track tracer kinetics over a time period that is also relevant for 89Zr dosimetry. Using scan-series consisting of 4 consecutive planar scans over a period of 168 hours, residence times of the main source organs and the whole-body were calculated, adjusting for the difference in nuclide half-lives. These residence times were fed into the OLINDA program, which calculates the effective radiation dose using the MIRD scheme. The final estimate was found from averaging the results from 5 different patients, yielding 18 mSv for an injected dose of 37 MBq. In the current protocol, this would result in a radiation dose (including the attenuation correction for low dose CT) of 19.5 mSv for women (and 16.5 mSv for men). According to ICRP 62 this radiation dose falls in category III (moderate risk).
Tumor staining In addition to the standard evaluation of the postoperative tumor specimen, specific staining for VEGF pathway related proteins will be performed including VEGF, CD34 staining for mean vascular density (MVD), SMA for vascular maturation, HIF-1alpha for hypoxia, VEGF receptors, Ki 67 for proliferation or other relevant staining according to the most up to date scientific insights.
Clinical evaluation, laboratory tests, follow- up
Before start
- Physical examination
- WHO performance score (see appendix B)
- Conventional imaging of the breast (mammography, ultrasound or MRI)
- Histological confirmation of malignant breast lesion
- Evaluation of in- and exclusion criteria
- Signed written informed consent
Criteria of evaluation
PET scan PET scans will be evaluated by a nuclear medicine physician blinded for clinical information and location of the tumor. The PET data will be correlated to the conventional imaging data. The final postoperative pathological evaluation will be related to the PET data.
Tumor staining Evaluation of VEGF related tumor staining will be performed in collaboration with a pathologist, blinded for clinical information.
Statistical considerations
In this feasibility study we will postulate high demands to prove the sensitivity of 89Zr-bevacizumab-PET scan to detect breast cancer lesions in order to justify our final future aim to obtain a good discrimination between benign versus pre-malignant/malignant lesions with VEGF imaging. Demands for very high sensitivity to detect the tumor with 89Zr-bevacizumab-PET scanning requires a sensitivity no worse than 99%.
We will use a stopping rule with a type 1 error of 5% (one-sided alpha of 5%) and a beta of 10% (~a power of 90%), and external reference values for false negative rates of 0.01 and as alternative 0.10. An extensive description of the stopping rule with two boundaries, is included in appendix C.
In the present study, the requirements are p0=0.01, p1=0.10, alpha(rule)=0.05, beta(rule)=0.10 and alpha(futile)=0.05. After exact calculation, this results in alpha(n)=0.1364, beta(N)=0.055 and alpha(futile,n)=0.6431, with 47 as the maximum number of patients. With a true failure rate of 0.01, the probability of passing the upper boundary is 0.049; with a true failure rate of 0.10 this probability is 0.903. The upper boundary, representing the maximum of acceptable failures, is 1 within the first 35 patients and 2 up to the total number of 47 patients. Monitoring with the stopping rule can be stopped (because of futile testing) when no failures are observed within the first 31 patients.
Investigator authorization procedure
The specialist who will treat the patient or his/her research nurse can sign up a patient for registration.
Patient registration
To enter patients in this study, during working hours, the data manager should be contacted at:
University Medical Centre Groningen Department of Medical Oncology Phone: 050-3612053 or page nr 77045 Eligibility will be checked at the time of registration.
To determine eligibility the following information should be provided:
- Initials
- Date of birth
- WHO performance score
- Signed written informed consent
- Date of intended surgery (if known)
Forms and procedures for collecting data
Data will be collected on paper case record forms (CRF). CRFs will be collected and data will be entered anonymously in an Access data base.
Subject identification Patient data are stored under a code without name, that will ensure anonimity.
Informed consent All patients will be informed of the aims of the study, the possible adverse events, the procedures and possible hazards to which he/she will be exposed, and the mechanism of treatment allocation. They will be informed as to the strict confidentiality of their patient data, but that their medical records may be reviewed for trial purposes by authorized individuals other than their treating physician. An example of a patient informed consent statement is given as an appendix to this protocol.
The ethics committee of the UMCG will validate local informed consent documents before start of the study.
It will be emphasized that the participation is voluntary and that the patient is allowed to refuse further participation in the protocol whenever he/she wants. This will not prejudice the patient's subsequent care. Documented informed consent must be obtained for all patients included in the study before they are registered or randomized in the study. This must be done in accordance with the national and local regulatory requirements.
The informed consent procedure must conform to the ICH guidelines on Good Clinical Practice. This implies that "the written informed consent form should be signed and personally dated by the patient or by the patient's legally acceptable representative".
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- 89Zr-bevacizumab PET
- Keywords
- breast cancer, VEGF, Screening
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
89Zr-bevacizumab PETOther
Also called 89Zr-bevacizumab
PET-scan with 89Zr-bevacizumab
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 89Zr-bevacizumab PET | Experimental | 89Zr-bevacizumab PET Receives: Other: 89Zr-bevacizumab PET |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
SUV in tumour and lymph nodes
Measured: 4 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2010
- Primary completionJan 2012
- Study completionJan 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Medical Center GroningenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Center Groningen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, C.P. Schroder, University Medical Center Groningen
- Investigators
- Caroline Schröder, MD PhD, Principal investigator, University Medical Center Groningen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00991978
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VEGF early imaging
- Status last verified
- Mar 2012
- First submitted
- 7 Oct 2009
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Brown ML, Houn F, Sickles EA, Kessler LG. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Dec;165(6):1373-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.6.7484568.
PubMed 7484568Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Eaton A, Ernster V. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. JAMA. 1993 Nov 24;270(20):2444-50.
PubMed 8230621Lidbrink E, Elfving J, Frisell J, Jonsson E. Neglected aspects of false positive findings of mammography in breast cancer screening: analysis of false positive cases from the Stockholm trial. BMJ. 1996 Feb 3;312(7026):273-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7026.273.
PubMed 8611781Eddy DM. Screening for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Sep 1;111(5):389-99. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-5-389.
PubMed 2504094Sledge GW Jr. VEGF-targeting therapy for breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2005 Oct;10(4):319-23. doi: 10.1007/s10911-006-9005-5.
PubMed 16924373Kataoka N, Cai Q, Wen W, Shu XO, Jin F, Gao YT, Zheng W. Population-based case-control study of VEGF gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk among Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jun;15(6):1148-52. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0871.
PubMed 16775174
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Imaging for Early Breast Cancer Detection A Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00991978
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VEGF early imaging
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- breast cancer, VEGF, Screening
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Center GroningenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2010
- Primary completion
- Jan 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer death among women. Yearly around 12,500 Dutch women are diagnosed with breast cancer and 3,500 die of this disease. One of the problems leading to such striking effect refers to late tumor detection due to inadequate sensitivity of current imaging techniques. Current screening is performed by means of mammography, consisting of traditional film-screen mammograms of digital mammograms. These digital mammograms offer digital enhancement to aid interpretation, which is especially helpful in women with dense breast tissue. Screening mammography is nowadays the single most effective method of early breast cancer detection. For screening of high risk individuals, increasingly the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique is emerging. However, none of the above mentioned techniques has an optimal sensitivity and specificity, leading for instance to a significant portion of false positive results. The clinical consequence of this error is that additional tests and procedures are performed in women who may not have cancer. In the United States, for example, 11% mammograms require additional evaluation; the lesion turns out to be benign in more than 90% of cases [1].
False-positive readings False positive readings are more common in younger women, both because the tests are less specific and because breast cancer is less common [2,3]. As a result, more follow-up procedures, including invasive procedures such as biopsies, will be done in younger women even though fewer cancers will be found. Furthermore, because breast cancer screening occurs repeatedly, the risk of a false-positive study is likely to rise with repeated screening [4].
Emerging adjuncts to mammography include ultrasonography, which is helpful for further assessment of known areas of interest, and magnetic resonance imaging. Image-guided biopsy - directed by ultrasonography or stereotactic mammography views - plays a critical role in histological confirmation of suspected breast cancer.
Detailed description
Objectives of the trial
Primary objective The aim is to perform a feasibility study to show that VEGF PET imaging using 89Zr-bevacizumab as tracer can be used for early breast cancer detection.
Secondary Objectives A secondary aim is whether positive lymph nodes can be detected.
End-points
- The primary endpoint will be 89Zr-bevacizumab tracer uptake in primary breast tumors < 2 cm.
- The secondary endpoint will be 89Zr-bevacizumab tracer uptake in axillary lymph nodes.
Patient selection criteria
Inclusion
- Patients with a breast tumor size < 2 cm in diameter (as determined by means of conventional imaging techniques: mammography, ultrasound or MRI) who are scheduled to receive operative intervention either by means of a mastectomy or lumpectomy.
- histologically proven breast cancer
- Age > 18 years.
- WHO performance status 0-2 (see: appendix B)
- Signed written informed consent (approved by the Institutional Review Board [IRB]/ Independent Ethics Committee [IEC]) obtained prior to any study specific screening procedures.
- Able to comply with the protocol.
Exclusion
- Other invasive malignancy or condition which could affect compliance with the protocol or interpretation of results.
- Pregnant or lactating women. Documentation of a negative pregnancy test must be available for pre-menopausal women with intact reproductive organs and for women less than two years after menopause.
- Prior radiotherapy on the involved area.
- Major surgery within 28 days before the initiation of the study.
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease.
- Prior allergic reaction to immunoglobulins or immunoglobulin allergy.
Trial Design All patients will undergo a 89Zr-bevacizumab PET scan preoperatively at day 4 following tracer injection (see: section 16 for timetable). The uptake of 89Zr-bevacizumab in the tumor will be quantified. Results will be fused and compared with standard imaging techniques and with standard tumor histology as well as specific tumor stainings for angiogenesis including VEGF staining. Sensitivity and specificity will be compared with conventional imaging.
Study assessments
89Zr-bevacizumab PET imaging
Radiolabelling of bevacizumab Conjugation and radiolabeling of the monoclonal antibody is essentially performed as has been described by Verel et al (15), with only minor adjustments with regard to purification. In short: FTP-N-sucDf-Fe (kindly provided by the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was conjugated to the mAb at a 10:1 molar ratio. Fe(III) is subsequently removed by an excess of EDTA (Calbiochem, San Diego, California, USA) for 30 min at 35°C and the antibody is purified by ultrafiltration (Vivaspin-2 Centrifugal Concentrator, filter 30 kDa, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany). This purified antibody is either stored at -80°C or immediately used for radiolabelling. The conjugated antibody is added to 89Zr-oxalate (100-1000 MBq/mg mAb, kindly provided by the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), 0.9% NaCl (Braun Melsungen AG, Oss, The Netherlands), 2M Na2CO3 (OPG Farma, Utrecht, The Netherlands) and 0.5M HEPES buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands). After 60 minutes, the radiolabeled antibody is purified by ultrafiltration Vivaspin-2 Centrifugal Concentrator, filter 30 kDa, Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) and diluted in 0.9% NaCl/gentisic acid (5 mg/ml, Merck Schuchardt OHG, Hohenbrunn, Germany). The 89Zr isotope has a physical t ½ of 78 hours. 89Zr-bevacizumab has radiochemical purity >95% and excellent long term stability in human serum (> 1 week). Conjugation and radiolabeling is performed in the radiopharmacy facilities of the department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging under GMP-conditions, under responsibility of a hospital pharmacist. More detailed information regarding 89Zr-bevacizumab is found in the investigational medicinal medicinal product dossier (IMPD; appendix C).
PET imaging Patients will be injected intravenously with 37 MBq 89Zr-bevacizumab (protein dose 5 mg) at day 0. Subsequently, images will be made 4 days after the injection of 89Zr-bevacizumab (see section 16 for timetable). For imaging a Siemens PET/CT camera will be used. Recording will be performed in 3D mode from lower thorax to neck, in approximately 2 bedpositions. The Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging is certified according to the ISO-NEN-9001 standard. Standard operating procedures for dynamic scanning will be used for all PET scans. Actual operation of the PET camera and scan acquisition will be performed by a nuclear medicine technologist. Final image analysis will be performed by a nuclear medicine specialist. 89Zr-bevacizumab distribution will be scored visually and quantitatively.
The majority of patients will also undergo sentinel node detection for staging of the axilla during the surgical treatment of the primary tumor. For the sentinel node procedure, 99mTechnetium labeled nanocolloid is used. The anticipated time between 89Zr-bevacizumab and 99mTc-nanocolloid administration will be approximately 2 weeks. By then, 7 half-life episodes of the 89Zr radiolabel will have passed and its signal will be negligible. Therefore, no interference of the radiolabel signals is expected.
Radiation dose/safety Use of positron emitting isotopes means exposure to ionizing radiation. Because of the potential hazards of radiation, guidelines for the exposure of healthy volunteers are specified in "Besluit Stralingsbescherming (BS 2000), artikel 64 - en Nota van Toelichting (Staatsblad 2001, 397)", which refers to the guidelines of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). As the kinetics of the antibody bevacizumab are almost comparable to those of trastuzumab, the radiation dose of 89Zr labelled bevacizumab is expected to be in the same range as that of 89Zr-trastuzumab.
For estimating the radiation dose to a 'standard female' during 89Zr-trastuzumab scanning, use was made of available kinetic data from previous 111In-trastuzumab planar imaging. This is possible as the halftime of 111In is in the same order of magnitude as that of 89Zr and therefore it enables us to track tracer kinetics over a time period that is also relevant for 89Zr dosimetry. Using scan-series consisting of 4 consecutive planar scans over a period of 168 hours, residence times of the main source organs and the whole-body were calculated, adjusting for the difference in nuclide half-lives. These residence times were fed into the OLINDA program, which calculates the effective radiation dose using the MIRD scheme. The final estimate was found from averaging the results from 5 different patients, yielding 18 mSv for an injected dose of 37 MBq. In the current protocol, this would result in a radiation dose (including the attenuation correction for low dose CT) of 19.5 mSv for women (and 16.5 mSv for men). According to ICRP 62 this radiation dose falls in category III (moderate risk).
Tumor staining In addition to the standard evaluation of the postoperative tumor specimen, specific staining for VEGF pathway related proteins will be performed including VEGF, CD34 staining for mean vascular density (MVD), SMA for vascular maturation, HIF-1alpha for hypoxia, VEGF receptors, Ki 67 for proliferation or other relevant staining according to the most up to date scientific insights.
Clinical evaluation, laboratory tests, follow- up
Before start
- Physical examination
- WHO performance score (see appendix B)
- Conventional imaging of the breast (mammography, ultrasound or MRI)
- Histological confirmation of malignant breast lesion
- Evaluation of in- and exclusion criteria
- Signed written informed consent
Criteria of evaluation
PET scan PET scans will be evaluated by a nuclear medicine physician blinded for clinical information and location of the tumor. The PET data will be correlated to the conventional imaging data. The final postoperative pathological evaluation will be related to the PET data.
Tumor staining Evaluation of VEGF related tumor staining will be performed in collaboration with a pathologist, blinded for clinical information.
Statistical considerations
In this feasibility study we will postulate high demands to prove the sensitivity of 89Zr-bevacizumab-PET scan to detect breast cancer lesions in order to justify our final future aim to obtain a good discrimination between benign versus pre-malignant/malignant lesions with VEGF imaging. Demands for very high sensitivity to detect the tumor with 89Zr-bevacizumab-PET scanning requires a sensitivity no worse than 99%.
We will use a stopping rule with a type 1 error of 5% (one-sided alpha of 5%) and a beta of 10% (~a power of 90%), and external reference values for false negative rates of 0.01 and as alternative 0.10. An extensive description of the stopping rule with two boundaries, is included in appendix C.
In the present study, the requirements are p0=0.01, p1=0.10, alpha(rule)=0.05, beta(rule)=0.10 and alpha(futile)=0.05. After exact calculation, this results in alpha(n)=0.1364, beta(N)=0.055 and alpha(futile,n)=0.6431, with 47 as the maximum number of patients. With a true failure rate of 0.01, the probability of passing the upper boundary is 0.049; with a true failure rate of 0.10 this probability is 0.903. The upper boundary, representing the maximum of acceptable failures, is 1 within the first 35 patients and 2 up to the total number of 47 patients. Monitoring with the stopping rule can be stopped (because of futile testing) when no failures are observed within the first 31 patients.
Investigator authorization procedure
The specialist who will treat the patient or his/her research nurse can sign up a patient for registration.
Patient registration
To enter patients in this study, during working hours, the data manager should be contacted at:
University Medical Centre Groningen Department of Medical Oncology Phone: 050-3612053 or page nr 77045 Eligibility will be checked at the time of registration.
To determine eligibility the following information should be provided:
- Initials
- Date of birth
- WHO performance score
- Signed written informed consent
- Date of intended surgery (if known)
Forms and procedures for collecting data
Data will be collected on paper case record forms (CRF). CRFs will be collected and data will be entered anonymously in an Access data base.
Subject identification Patient data are stored under a code without name, that will ensure anonimity.
Informed consent All patients will be informed of the aims of the study, the possible adverse events, the procedures and possible hazards to which he/she will be exposed, and the mechanism of treatment allocation. They will be informed as to the strict confidentiality of their patient data, but that their medical records may be reviewed for trial purposes by authorized individuals other than their treating physician. An example of a patient informed consent statement is given as an appendix to this protocol.
The ethics committee of the UMCG will validate local informed consent documents before start of the study.
It will be emphasized that the participation is voluntary and that the patient is allowed to refuse further participation in the protocol whenever he/she wants. This will not prejudice the patient's subsequent care. Documented informed consent must be obtained for all patients included in the study before they are registered or randomized in the study. This must be done in accordance with the national and local regulatory requirements.
The informed consent procedure must conform to the ICH guidelines on Good Clinical Practice. This implies that "the written informed consent form should be signed and personally dated by the patient or by the patient's legally acceptable representative".
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 89Zr-bevacizumab PET | Experimental | Other: 89Zr-bevacizumab PET89Zr-bevacizumab PET |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with a breast tumor size < 2 cm in diameter (as determined by means of conventional imaging techniques: mammography, ultrasound or MRI) who are scheduled to receive operative intervention either by means of a mastectomy or lumpectomy.
- histologically proven breast cancer
- Age > 18 years.
- WHO performance status 0-2 (see: appendix B)
- Signed written informed consent (approved by the Institutional Review Board [IRB]/ Independent Ethics Committee [IEC]) obtained prior to any study specific screening procedures.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Other invasive malignancy or condition which could affect compliance with the protocol or interpretation of results.
- Pregnant or lactating women. Documentation of a negative pregnancy test must be available for pre-menopausal women with intact reproductive organs and for women less than two years after menopause.
- Prior radiotherapy on the involved area.
- Major surgery within 28 days before the initiation of the study.
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 89Zr-bevacizumab PETAlso: 89Zr-bevacizumabPET-scan with 89Zr-bevacizumab | Other | 89Zr-bevacizumab PET |
Primary outcome
SUV in tumour and lymph nodes
Time frame: 4 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2012.
- Background: PubMed 7484568Brown ML, Houn F, Sickles EA, Kessler LG. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Dec;165(6):1373-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.6.7484568.
- Background: PubMed 8230621Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Eaton A, Ernster V. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. JAMA. 1993 Nov 24;270(20):2444-50.
- Background: PubMed 8611781Lidbrink E, Elfving J, Frisell J, Jonsson E. Neglected aspects of false positive findings of mammography in breast cancer screening: analysis of false positive cases from the Stockholm trial. BMJ. 1996 Feb 3;312(7026):273-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7026.273.
- Background: PubMed 2504094Eddy DM. Screening for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Sep 1;111(5):389-99. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-5-389.
- Background: PubMed 16924373Sledge GW Jr. VEGF-targeting therapy for breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2005 Oct;10(4):319-23. doi: 10.1007/s10911-006-9005-5.
- Background: PubMed 16775174Kataoka N, Cai Q, Wen W, Shu XO, Jin F, Gao YT, Zheng W. Population-based case-control study of VEGF gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk among Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jun;15(6):1148-52. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0871.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Caroline Schröder, MD PhD principal investigator
University Medical Center Groningen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing 89Zr-bevacizumab PET in people with Breast Cancer, run by University Medical Center Groningen at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
SUV in tumour and lymph nodes (time frame: 4 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00991978, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2012.