Restless Legs SyndromePhase 3NCT00991276
Polysomnography Study Of Pregabalin And Pramipexole Versus Placebo In Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome And Associated Sleep Disturbance
A Phase 3 study testing pregabalin and pramipexole in people with Restless Legs Syndrome, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. at 41 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of pregabalin and pramipexole versus placebo in the treatment of restless legs syndrome and associated sleep disturbance. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Restless Legs Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- pregabalin and pramipexole
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 85 participants
- Where
- 41 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2009to Jun 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of restless legs syndrome with a total score of 15 or more points on the International RLS rating scale (IRLS).
- RLS symptoms interfering with sleep on 3 or more nights per week for at least 6 months.
- PSG confirmation of WASO of at least 60 min, PLMI of 10 or more, and total sleep time of at least 3 hrs and less than 6.5 hrs.
Who cannot join
- Secondary RLS.
- Daytime RLS symptoms requiring treatment.
- Primary sleep disorder.
- Sleep apnea.
- Night or shift work.
- Concurrent medical disorder that could interfere with efficacy assessment or present a safety concern.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Pregnant or lactating women.
- Women of child-bearing potential not using acceptable method of birth control.
- Use of prohibited medication.
Trial locations and contacts
41 sites in 1 country.
41 sites in 1 country
United States41 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Pfizer Investigational Site
Aurora, Colorado, 80012
Pfizer Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78731
Pfizer Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78756
Pfizer Investigational Site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809
Pfizer Investigational Site
Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135
Pfizer Investigational Site
Burlingame, California, 94010
Pfizer Investigational Site
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815
Pfizer Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45227
Pfizer Investigational Site
Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania, 18411
Pfizer Investigational Site
Columbia, South Carolina, 29201
Pfizer Investigational Site
Crestview Hills, Kentucky, 41017
Pfizer Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Pfizer Investigational Site
Dublin, Ohio, 43017
Pfizer Investigational Site
Hallandale, Florida, 33009
Pfizer Investigational Site
Hickory, North Carolina, 28601
Pfizer Investigational Site
Jasper, Alabama, 35501
Pfizer Investigational Site
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49048
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania, 19444
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40513
Pfizer Investigational Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Pfizer Investigational Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72211
Pfizer Investigational Site
Macon, Georgia, 31201
Pfizer Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33143
Pfizer Investigational Site
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130
Pfizer Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10019
Pfizer Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Pfizer Investigational Site
Overland Park, Kansas, 66212
Pfizer Investigational Site
Pasadena, California, 91106
Pfizer Investigational Site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33026
Pfizer Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85037
Pfizer Investigational Site
Portage, Michigan, 49024
Pfizer Investigational Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Pfizer Investigational Site
Redlands, California, 92373
Pfizer Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92103
Pfizer Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92121
Pfizer Investigational Site
Santa Ana, California, 92705
Pfizer Investigational Site
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Pfizer Investigational Site
Spring Hill, Florida, 34609
Pfizer Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Pfizer Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Way Crossover, Multicenter Polysomnography Study Of Pregabalin And Pramipexole In Adults With Restless Legs Syndrome
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of pregabalin and pramipexole versus placebo in the treatment of restless legs syndrome and associated sleep disturbance.
- Conditions
- Restless Legs Syndrome
- Being tested
- pregabalin, placebo, pramipexole
- Keywords
- restless legs syndrome RLS polysomnography PSG sleep disturbance patient reported outcome
- Medical subject headings
- Restless Legs Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
pregabalinDrug
Also called Lyrica
capsules; 300 mg once-per-day; 4 weeks of treatment
placeboDrug
capsules; 0 mg once-per-day; 4 weeks of treatment
pramipexoleDrug
Also called Mirapex
capsules; 0.5 mg once-per-day; 4 weeks of treatment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| pregabalin | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: pregabalin |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: placebo |
| pramipexole | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: pramipexole |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)
WASO as determined by Polysomnography (PSG) was time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening. WASO= Wake Time During Sleep [WTDS] epochs + Wake Time After Sleep [WTAS] epochs)/2. WTDS: number of wake epochs (30 seconds of PSG recording) after onset of persistent sleep and prior to final awakening or end of 8-hour recording/2 and WTAS: number of wake epochs after final awakening until end of the 8-hour recording/2. WASO was measured on 2 consecutive days within a period. Arithmetic mean of WASO of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or Early Termination (ET)
Secondary outcomes (30)
Periodic Limb Movement Arousal Index (PLMAI)
PLMAI, as determined by PSG was number of periodic limb movements leading to arousal per hour (per hour of Total Sleep Time [TST]). Arithmetic mean of PLMAI of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Subjective Total Sleep Time (sTST)
sTST as derived from Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ), a participant reported subjective estimate of the total amount of time the participant was asleep after lights out until final awakening. Completed by the participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period is the night before. Arithmetic mean of sTST of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 3 and Week 5 of Each Intervention Period or ET
Minutes of Stage N1, N2, N3 and R Sleep
Minutes of Stage 1 Non-Rapid Eye Movement (Non-REM) sleep (Stage N1), Stage 2 Non-REM sleep (Stage N2), Stage 3 Non-REM sleep (Stage N3) or Slow Wave Sleep (SWS) and Stage REM (Stage R) sleep, as determined by PSG were calculated as total number of Stage N1 30-second (30-sec) epochs divided by 2, total number of Stage N2 30-sec epochs divided by 2, total number of Stage N3 30-sec epochs divided by 2 and total number of Stage R 30-sec epochs divided by 2 respectively. Arithmetic mean of minutes of stage N1, N2, N3 and R sleep of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Number of Awakenings of at Least 1 Epoch After Sleep Onset (NAASO1)
NAASO1, as determined by PSG, was the number of times there was a wake period of at least 1 epoch from the onset of persistent sleep to light on. Each entry to be counted must be separated by a Stage 2 Non-REM [Stage N2] 30-second (30-sec) epoch, Stage 3 Non-REM [Stage N3] 30-sec epoch, or stage rapid eye movement [stage R] 30-sec epoch. The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. Arithmetic mean of NAASO1 of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Restless Legs Syndrome-Next Day Impact (RLS-NDI)
RLS-NDI:participant-rated instrument to assess daytime performance and participant's previous night's sleep, consists of 14 items encompassing 5 domains:tiredness;emotional functioning;social functioning;cognitive functioning;activities of daily living and 1 global item for overall well-being. Each item: 0-10 scale; 0=Not at all; 10=Extremely. Total score: sum of scores from question 1-14 (question 10, 11: scores reversed). Total score range: 0-140; higher scores: more severe impact. Arithmetic mean of RLS-NDI of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 3 and Week 5 of Each Intervention Period or ET
Periodic Limb Movement Index (PLMI)
PLMI, as determined by PSG was number of periodic limb movements per hour based on time in bed (TIB). Arithmetic mean of PLMI of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Periodic Limb Movement in Sleep Index (PLMSI)
PLMSI, as determined by PSG was number of periodic limb movements in sleep per hour based on TST. Arithmetic mean of PLMSI of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Number of Awakenings of at Least 2 Epochs After Sleep Onset (NAASO2)
NAASO2, as determined by PSG, was the number of times there was a wake period of at least 2 30-sec epochs from the onset of persistent sleep to light on. Each entry to be counted must be separated by a Stage N2 30-sec epoch, Stage N3 30-sec epoch, or Stage R 30-sec epoch. The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. Arithmetic mean of NAASO2 of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Number of Arousals (NASO)
NASO, as determined by PSG, was calculated as number of times there is a shift from a stage N2 to N3 or R 30-sec epoch to a stage N1 30-sec epoch from the onset of persistent sleep to light on. The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. Arithmetic mean of NASO of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Arousal Index (NASOI)
Arousal index, as determined by PSG, was NASO per hours of sleep from the onset of persistent sleep to light on. Arithmetic mean of NASOI of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS)
IRLS: psychometrically; clinically valid; clinician-administered instrument assesses severity of RLS. RLS symptom severity and impact on daily living comprise of 10 items giving 2 subscale scores and 1 global score. Subscale scores: symptom severity(6 items) and impact on daily living(3 items), item 3 loaded equally on both subscales. Global score calculated from 10 items. Score of all items range from 0-4, total score range:0-40. Lower scores: lower severity and better quality of life. Arithmetic mean of IRLS of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Percentage of Participants With Response to Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale
CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess improvement in disease condition as compared to the start of the study medication (baseline), ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved). Higher score = more affected.
Measured: Baseline, Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Latency to Stage R Sleep (LREM)
LREM, as determined by PSG, was number of non-wake epochs from the beginning of the recording to the first occurrence of Stage R sleep divided by 2. Arithmetic mean of LREM of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS)
LPS, as determined by PSG, was number of epochs from the beginning of the recording ("lights-out") to the start of the first 20 consecutive non-wake epochs (10 minutes of persistent sleep) divided by 2. Arithmetic mean of LPS of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Wake Time During Sleep (WTDS)
WTDS, as determined by PSG, was the number of wake (30-sec) epochs after the onset of persistent sleep and prior to the final awakening or at the end of 8-hour recording. WTDS was the sum of 2 consecutive days of recordings divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. Arithmetic mean of WTDS of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Wake Time After Sleep (WTAS)
WTAS, as determined by PSG, was the number of wake (30-sec) epochs after the final awakening until the end of the 8-hour recording. WTAS was the sum of 2 consecutive days of recordings divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. Arithmetic mean of WTAS of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Total Sleep Time (TST)
TST, as determined by PSG, was the number of non-wake (30-sec) epochs from the beginning of recording to the end of the recording. TST was the sum of 2 consecutive days of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. Arithmetic mean of TST of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Sleep Efficiency (SE)
SE, as determined by PSG, was the TST divided by the time in bed (TIB)(both in minutes), multiplied by 100. Sum of 2 consecutive days of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. Arithmetic mean of SE of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)
WASO, as determined by PSG was time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening. WASO = (sum of WTDS 30-sec epochs and WTAS 30-sec epochs)/2, measured on 2 consecutive days at end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of night (eight hours in 2 hour increments). Arithmetic mean of WASO of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Number of Awakenings of at Least 1 Epoch After Sleep Onset (NAASO1)
NAASO1, as determined by PSG, was the number of times there was a wake period of at least 1 30-sec epoch from the onset of persistent sleep to light on. Each entry to be counted must be separated by a Stage N2 30-sec epoch, Stage N3 30-sec epoch, or Stage R 30-sec epoch. The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments). Arithmetic mean of NAASO1 of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Number of Awakenings of at Least 2 Epoch After Sleep Onset (NAASO2)
NAASO2, as determined by PSG, was the number of times there was a wake period of at least 2 30-sec epochs from the onset of persistent sleep to light on. Each entry to be counted must be separated by a Stage N2 30-sec epoch, Stage N3 30-sec epoch, or Stage R 30-sec epoch. The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments). Arithmetic mean of NAASO2 of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Number of Arousals (NASO)
NASO, as determined by PSG was the number of times there is a shift from a stage N2 to N3 or R 30-sec epoch to a stage N1 30-sec epoch from the onset of persistent sleep to light on. The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments). Arithmetic mean of NASO for each participant at each period was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Periodic Limb Movement (PLM)
PLM, as determined by PSG was number of periodic limb movements based on time in bed (TIB). Calculated at each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments). Arithmetic mean of PLM of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Sleep Efficiency (SE)
SE, as determined by PSG, was the TST divided by the time in bed (TIB)(both in minutes), multiplied by 100. Sum of 2 consecutive days of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments). Arithmetic mean for SE of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Number of Awakenings Subscale
SSQ: participant-rated instrument to assess sleep behavior; measures sleep quantity, quality. Comprised of 5 items giving 5 subscale scores: latency, hours of sleep, number of awakenings, total wake time after sleep onset, quality of sleep. This (1 item) subscale: numerical rating completed by participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period: night before. Range: 0 awakenings to 30 awakenings. Lower value indicates better quality of sleep. Arithmetic mean of this subscale score of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. Results of hours of sleep subscale reported as sTST.
Measured: Week 3 and Week 5 of Each Intervention Period or ET
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Total Wake Time After Sleep Onset Subscale
SSQ: participant-rated instrument to assess sleep behavior; measures sleep quantity, quality. Comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency, hours of sleep, number of awakenings, total wake time after sleep onset, quality of sleep. This 1 item subscale (in minutes): numerical rating completed by participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period: night before. Range: 0-1440 minutes. Lower value: better sleep. Arithmetic mean of this subscale score of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. Results of hours of sleep subscale reported as sTST.
Measured: Week 3 and Week 5 of each intervention period or ET
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Quality of Sleep Subscale
SSQ: participant-rated instrument to assess sleep behavior; measures sleep quantity, quality. Comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency, hours of sleep, number of awakenings, total wake time after sleep onset, quality of sleep. This 1 item subscale: numerical rating completed by participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period: night before, Range: 0 to 100, higher score: better quality of sleep. Arithmetic mean of this subscale score of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. Results of hours of sleep subscale reported as sTST.
Measured: Week 3 and Week 5 of each intervention period or ET
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Latency Subscale
SSQ: participant-rated instrument assesses sleep behavior; measures sleep quantity, quality. Comprised of 5 items giving 5 subscale scores: latency, hours of sleep, number of awakenings, total wake time after sleep onset, quality of sleep. Latency (time to fall asleep [in minutes]): numerical rating completed by participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period: night before. Range: 0 - 840 minutes, lower value: better sleep. Arithmetic mean of subscale score of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. Hours of sleep subscale results reported as sTST.
Measured: Week 3 and Week 5 of each intervention period or ET
Medical Outcomes Study - Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)
MOS-SS:Participant rated instrument, assesses sleep quantity, quality;with 12 items(7 subscale scores:sleep disturbance, snoring, awakening short of breath/with headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep;2 composite index scores:sleep problems Index I, II). Subscale scores total range:0-100(except sleep quantity[range 0-24 hours], optimal sleep[range 0-1: 0= <7 or >8 hours;1=7/8 hours]). Higher scores=poorer sleep outcomes(except sleep quantity, adequacy). Arithmetic mean of MOS-SS scores of each participant for all periods was taken before linear mixed model analysis.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Restless Leg Syndrome - Quality of Life Scale (RLS-QoL)
RLS-QoL: psychometrically and clinically valid and reliable participant-rated instrument, assesses impact of RLS on participant quality of life. Specifically, it assessed effects of RLS on health status function (symptom severity, daily activity, social functioning, sleep, concentrating and decision making, travelling, sexual activity, and work) giving a summary score ranging from 0-100. Higher scores reflect better quality of life. Recall period: 1 week prior to assessment. Arithmetic mean of RLS-QoL score of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
Measured: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2009
- Primary completionJun 2011
- Study completionJun 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Restless Legs SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00991276
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A0081185
- Status last verified
- Sep 2012
- First submitted
- 6 Oct 2009
- Last updated
- 15 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Garcia-Borreguero D, Patrick J, DuBrava S, Becker PM, Lankford A, Chen C, Miceli J, Knapp L, Allen RP. Pregabalin versus pramipexole: effects on sleep disturbance in restless legs syndrome. Sleep. 2014 Apr 1;37(4):635-43. doi: 10.5665/sleep.3558.
PubMed 24899755
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Way Crossover, Multicenter Polysomnography Study Of Pregabalin And Pramipexole In Adults With Restless Legs Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00991276
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A0081185
- Conditions
- Restless Legs Syndrome
- Keywords
- restless legs syndrome RLS polysomnography PSG sleep disturbance patient reported outcome
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2009
- Primary completion
- Jun 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Oct 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of pregabalin and pramipexole versus placebo in the treatment of restless legs syndrome and associated sleep disturbance.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| pregabalin | Experimental | Drug: pregabalin |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: placebo |
| pramipexole | Active comparator | Drug: pramipexole |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosis of restless legs syndrome with a total score of 15 or more points on the International RLS rating scale (IRLS).
- RLS symptoms interfering with sleep on 3 or more nights per week for at least 6 months.
- PSG confirmation of WASO of at least 60 min, PLMI of 10 or more, and total sleep time of at least 3 hrs and less than 6.5 hrs.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Secondary RLS.
- Daytime RLS symptoms requiring treatment.
- Primary sleep disorder.
- Sleep apnea.
- Night or shift work.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| pregabalinAlso: Lyricacapsules; 300 mg once-per-day; 4 weeks of treatment | Drug | pregabalin |
| placebocapsules; 0 mg once-per-day; 4 weeks of treatment | Drug | placebo |
| pramipexoleAlso: Mirapexcapsules; 0.5 mg once-per-day; 4 weeks of treatment | Drug | pramipexole |
Primary outcome
Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or Early Termination (ET)
WASO as determined by Polysomnography (PSG) was time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening. WASO= Wake Time During Sleep [WTDS] epochs + Wake Time After Sleep [WTAS] epochs)/2. WTDS: number of wake epochs (30 seconds of PSG recording) after onset of persistent sleep and prior to final awakening or end of 8-hour recording/2 and WTAS: number of wake epochs after final awakening until end of the 8-hour recording/2. WASO was measured on 2 consecutive days within a period. Arithmetic mean of WASO of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model.
30 secondary outcomes
Periodic Limb Movement Arousal Index (PLMAI)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Subjective Total Sleep Time (sTST)
Time frame: Week 3 and Week 5 of Each Intervention Period or ET
Minutes of Stage N1, N2, N3 and R Sleep
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Number of Awakenings of at Least 1 Epoch After Sleep Onset (NAASO1)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Restless Legs Syndrome-Next Day Impact (RLS-NDI)
Time frame: Week 3 and Week 5 of Each Intervention Period or ET
Periodic Limb Movement Index (PLMI)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Periodic Limb Movement in Sleep Index (PLMSI)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Number of Awakenings of at Least 2 Epochs After Sleep Onset (NAASO2)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Number of Arousals (NASO)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Arousal Index (NASOI)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Percentage of Participants With Response to Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale
Time frame: Baseline, Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Latency to Stage R Sleep (LREM)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Wake Time During Sleep (WTDS)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Wake Time After Sleep (WTAS)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Total Sleep Time (TST)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Sleep Efficiency (SE)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Number of Awakenings of at Least 1 Epoch After Sleep Onset (NAASO1)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Number of Awakenings of at Least 2 Epoch After Sleep Onset (NAASO2)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Number of Arousals (NASO)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Periodic Limb Movement (PLM)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Sleep Efficiency (SE)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Number of Awakenings Subscale
Time frame: Week 3 and Week 5 of Each Intervention Period or ET
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Total Wake Time After Sleep Onset Subscale
Time frame: Week 3 and Week 5 of each intervention period or ET
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Quality of Sleep Subscale
Time frame: Week 3 and Week 5 of each intervention period or ET
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Latency Subscale
Time frame: Week 3 and Week 5 of each intervention period or ET
Medical Outcomes Study - Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Restless Leg Syndrome - Quality of Life Scale (RLS-QoL)
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Feb 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24899755Garcia-Borreguero D, Patrick J, DuBrava S, Becker PM, Lankford A, Chen C, Miceli J, Knapp L, Allen RP. Pregabalin versus pramipexole: effects on sleep disturbance in restless legs syndrome. Sleep. 2014 Apr 1;37(4):635-43. doi: 10.5665/sleep.3558.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Restless Legs Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Lemborexant vs Clonidine vs Sedatives to Treat Insomnia in Chronic Pain Patients
Chronic Insomnia, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Neuromodulation to Overcome Severe Restless Legs Syndrome
Restless Leg Syndrome (RLS), Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Tolerability and Efficacy of CBD Extract for RLS Treatment
Restless Leg Syndrome
Recruiting
Functional Connectivity of the Interoceptive Network in RLS
Restless Legs Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Intravenous Iron in the Management of Drug-resistant Restless Legs syndromeI
Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
41 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing pregabalin and pramipexole in people with Restless Legs Syndrome, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. at 41 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 41 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) (time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or Early Termination (ET)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00991276, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2021.