Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 3ASPECTNCT00990327
Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Apadenoson for Detection of Myocardial Perfusion Defects Using SPECT MPI
A Phase 3 study testing Apadenoson SPECT-MPI and Adenosine SPECT-MPI in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Forest Laboratories at 122 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to see whether apadenoson is as effective as adenosine when used as a pharmacological stress agent in myocardial SPECT-Imaging to detect defects in the supply of blood to the heart muscle (myocardial perfusion defects). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Apadenoson SPECT-MPI and Adenosine SPECT-MPI
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 863 participants
- Where
- 122 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2009to Apr 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- High pretest probability of CAD based on the ACC/AHA guidelines for relative risk, or past medical h/o CAD
Who cannot join
- Ingestion of a caffeinated or methylxanthine food substance (e.g. chocolate, cocoa) within 24 hours before receiving apadenoson or adenosine
- Treatment with dipyridamole within 24 hours, or theophylline, aminophylline, or pentoxifylline within 72 hours (or 4 half-lives, whichever is longer) prior to receiving apadenoson or adenosine
- Acute MI, new onset of ischemia or PCI within 30 days prior to SPECT-MPI at either Period 1 or Period 2; or CABG within 90 days prior to SPECT-MPI at either Period 1 or Period 2
- Active severe asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) which, in the Investigator's opinion, places the subject at risk for severe bronchoconstriction
- History or evidence of clinically significant cardiac condition and rhythm disorder, in the absence of a functioning permanently implanted pacemaker
- Hemodynamically significant valvular disease, outflow tract obstruction, or uncontrolled severe hypertension
Show all 10Show fewer
- Current significant medical, surgical, psychiatric, or other illness or pathology that could potentiate any adverse pharmacological event associated with an investigational drug
- Subject with past medical history of hepatitis B or C, or recent hepatitis A
- Pretreatment hypotension (systolic BP < 90 mm Hg) or tachycardia (HR > 100 bpm)
- Known history of cerebral vascular accident or suspected transient ischemic attack within 30 days prior to signed informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
122 sites in 2 countries.
122 sites in 2 countries
United States103 sites
Forest Investigative Site 235
Akron, Ohio, 44304
Forest Investigative Site 115
Albany, New York, 12205
Forest Investigative Site 202
Alexandria, Louisiana, 71301
Forest Investigative Site 128
Amarillo, Texas, 79106
Forest Investigative Site 114
Auburn, Maine, 04210
Forest Investigative Site 155
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Forest Investigative Site 193
Baltimore, Maryland, 21208
Forest Investigative Site 190
Bend, Oregon, 97701
Forest Investigative Site 152
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Forest Investigative Site 137
Boise, Idaho, 83712
Forest Investigative Site 138
Boise, Idaho, 83712
Forest Investigative Site 212
Buffalo, New York, 14215
Forest Investigative Site 213
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, 17011
Forest Investigative Site 149
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Forest Investigative Site 210
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
Forest Investigative Site 227
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Forest Investigative Site163
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Forest Investigative Site 161
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Forest Investigative Site 257
Covington, Louisiana, 70433
Forest Investigative Site 248
Crestview Hills, Kentucky, 41017
Forest Investigative Site 199
Cumming, Georgia, 30041
Forest Investigative Site 205
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32114
Forest Investigative Site 143
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Forest Investigative Site 233
Edgewater, Florida, 32141
Forest Investigative Site 214
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Forest Investigative Site 164
Gainesville, Florida, 32605
Forest Investigative Site 252
Grapevine, Texas, 76051
Forest Investigative Site 132
Hartford, Connecticut, 06102
Forest Investigative Site 116
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Forest Investigative Site 113
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260
Forest Investigative Site 120
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
Forest Investigative Site 198
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209
Forest Investigative Site 118
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216
Forest Investigative Site 124
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216
Forest Investigative Site 125
Jacksonville, Florida, 32258
Forest Investigative Site 126
Jacksonville Beach, Florida, 32250
Forest Investigative Site 167
Johnson City, Tennessee, 37604
Forest Investigative Site 192
Johnson City, Tennessee, 37604
Forest Investigative Site 228
Joliet, Illinois, 60435
Forest Investigative Site 230
Jonesboro, Arkansas, 72401
Forest Investigative Site 176
Kansas City, Missouri, 64132
Forest Investigative Site 165
Kingston, New York, 12401
Forest Investigative Site 108
La Mesa, California, 91942
Forest Investigative Site 153
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72204
Forest Investigative Site 156
Lorain, Ohio, 44053
Forest Investigative Site 144
Madison, Wisconsin, 53715
Forest Investigative Site 224
Manhasset, New York, 11030
Forest Investigative Site 139
Massapequa, New York, 11758
Forest Investigative Site 200
McKinney, Texas, 75069
Forest Investigative Site 180
Melbourne, Florida, 32901
Forest Investigative Site 183
Miami, Florida, 33136
Forest Investigative Site 106
Miami, Florida, 33173
Forest Investigative Site 111
Mission Viejo, California, 92691
Forest Investigative Site 188
Missoula, Montana, 59802
Forest Investigative Site 250
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Forest Investigative Site 234
Murrieta, California, 92562
Forest Investigative Site 201
Naples, Florida, 34119
Forest Investigative Site 102
Newark, Delaware, 19713
Forest Investigative Site 182
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73109
Forest Investigative Site 133
Overland Park, Kansas, 66209
Forest Investigative Site 241
Owensboro, Kentucky, 42303
Forest Investigative Site 207
Petoskey, Michigan, 49770
Forest Investigative Site 154
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102
Forest Investigative Site 134
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
Forest Investigative Site 218
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19141
Forest Investigative Site 223
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Forest Investigative Site 191
Phoenix, Arizona, 85020
Forest Investigative Site 160
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Forest Investigative Site 181
Plano, Texas, 75024
Forest Investigative Site 217
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Forest Investigative Site 236
Provo, Utah, 84604
Forest Investigative Site 208
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27610
Forest Investigative Site 110
Roanoke, Virginia, 24014
Forest Investigative Site 146
Roseville, California, 95661
Forest Investigative Site 225
Sacramento, California, 95816
Forest Investigative Site 122
Sacramento, California, 95825
Forest Investigative Site 177
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
Forest Investigative Site 253
San Antonio, Texas, 78215
Forest Investigative Site 185
Sandusky, Ohio, 44870
Forest Investigative Site 249
Sanford, North Carolina, 27330
Forest Investigative Site 105
Santa Rosa, California, 95405
Forest Investigative Site 107
Scarborough, Maine, 04074
Forest Investigative Site 151
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Forest Investigative Site 187
Sellersville, Pennsylvania, 18960
Forest Investigative Site 172
Simpsonville, South Carolina, 29681
Forest Investigative Site 109
South Portland, Maine, 04106
Forest Investigative Site 229
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29302
Forest Investigative Site 142
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Forest Investigative Site 159
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Forest Investigative Site 186
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479
Forest Investigative Site 240
Tampa, Florida, 33609
Forest Investigative Site 231
Tomball, Texas, 77375
Forest Investigative Site 232
Tomball, Texas, 77375
Forest Investigative Site 204
Tucker, Georgia, 30084
Forest Investigative Site 131
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
Forest Investigative Site 168
Valparaiso, Indiana, 46383
Forest Investigative Site 196
Walnut Creek, California, 94598
Forest Investigative Site 238
Wellington, Florida, 33449
Forest Investigative Site 171
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266
Forest Investigative Site 101
Westlake, Ohio, 44145
Forest investigative Site 197
Westminster, Maryland, 21157
Forest Investigative Site 173
Winfield, Illinois, 60190
Forest Investigative Site 117
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610
Brazil19 sites
Forest Investigative Site 308
Belo Horizonte - MG, 30150-221
Forest Investigative Site 317
Brasília - DF, 70390-700
Forest Investigative Site 311
Campinas, 13060-803
Forest Investigative Site 307
Curitiba, Paraná, 80010-030
Forest Investigative Site 313
Curitiba, 80050-010
Forest Investigative Site 305
Curitiba, 83430-000
Forest Investigative Site 314
Curitiba - PR, 80320-320
Forest Investigative Site 316
Niterói, 24020-350
Forest Investigative Site 309
Passo Fundo - RS, 99010-080
Forest Investigative Site 318
Porto Alegre - RS, 90020-090
Forest Investigative Site 310
Porto Alegre - RS, 90035-903
Forest Investigative Site 315
Rio de Janeiro, 22251-030
Forest Investigative Site 319
Rio de Janeiro - RJ, 22240-006
Forest Investigative Site 304
Rio de Janeiro - RJ, 22280-020
Forest Investigative Site 306
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 41148-900
Forest Investigative Site 301
Salvador - BA, 41810-010
Forest Investigative Site 303
São José, 88103-460
Forest Investigative Site 302
São Paulo - SP, 04012-180
Forest Investigative Site 312
São Paulo - SP, 05403-000
About this study
Official title: The ASPECT Trial: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Crossover Trial of Apadenoson for the Detection of Myocardial Perfusion Defects Using Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI)
The purpose of this study is to see whether apadenoson is as effective as adenosine when used as a pharmacological stress agent in myocardial SPECT-Imaging to detect defects in the supply of blood to the heart muscle (myocardial perfusion defects). The study will also look at whether apadenoson is better tolerated than adenosine when used in SPECT-MPI.
Read the detailed description
Adenosine is an effective vasodilator used in SPECT-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (SPECT-MPI). However, it produces transient symptoms that are poorly tolerated by most subjects. PGxHealth has designed a multi-center, randomized crossover, double-blind study to compare the safety and effectiveness of apadenoson to adenosine (Adenoscan®) in SPECT-MPI. Subjects who are clinical candidates for SPECT-MPI will be enrolled to undergo two sequential SPECT-MPI studies. The first study will use adenosine as the stress agent in approximately 1300 subjects. Eligible subjects will then be randomized in a 1:2 assignment ratio to receive a second SPECT-MPI using either adenosine or apadenoson as the pharmacologic stress agent, with the goal of obtaining a total of 753 subjects who complete both studies. The similarity of the results from the two adenosine:adenosine stress tests will be compared to those from the adenosine:apadenoson tests to assess efficacy. The incidence and intensity of commonly reported side effects will be compared to evaluate improved tolerability.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Apadenoson SPECT-MPI, Adenosine SPECT-MPI
- Keywords
- Coronary artery disease, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Apadenoson SPECT-MPIDrug
Also called DPC-A78445-00, DPH-068645-01, ATL146e, DWH 146e
Apadenoson single bolus IV injection 100 or 150 ug
Adenosine SPECT-MPIDrug
Also called Adenoscan
Single IV infusion for 6 minutes at a rate of 140 µg/kg body weight per minute.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Apadenoson | Experimental | In period 1, subjects will receive a clinically-indicated rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with adenosine. In period 2, subjects will receive a rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with apadenoson or the active comparator: adenosine. Receives: Drug: Apadenoson SPECT-MPI; Drug: Adenosine SPECT-MPI |
| Adenosine | Active comparator | In period 1, subjects will receive a clinically-indicated rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with adenosine. In period 2, subjects will receive a rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with apadenoson or the active comparator: adenosine. Receives: Drug: Apadenoson SPECT-MPI; Drug: Adenosine SPECT-MPI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Presence of myocardial perfusion defect as based on SPECT-MPI
Measured: Up to 2 hours after study drug administration in Period 1 and 2
Secondary outcomes (1)
Incidence and patient rated intensity of most commonly reported side effects (e.g. dyspnea, flushing, chest pain, headache) associated with use of adenosine compared to apadenoson in SPECT-MPI
Measured: 1 hour after Period 2 study drug administration
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2009
- Primary completionApr 2012
- Study completionApr 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 863 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Forest Laboratories
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- PPD Development, LP
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David B Bharucha, MD, PhD, FACC, Study director, Forest Laboratories
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00990327
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PGX-III-AP-001
- Acronym
- ASPECT
- Status last verified
- Apr 2012
- First submitted
- 2 Oct 2009
- Last updated
- 1 May 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 May 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The ASPECT Trial: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Crossover Trial of Apadenoson for the Detection of Myocardial Perfusion Defects Using Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00990327
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ASPECT / PGX-III-AP-001
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- Coronary artery disease, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 863 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Forest LaboratoriesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- PPD Development, LP
- Study start
- Nov 2009
- Primary completion
- Apr 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Oct 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to see whether apadenoson is as effective as adenosine when used as a pharmacological stress agent in myocardial SPECT-Imaging to detect defects in the supply of blood to the heart muscle (myocardial perfusion defects). The study will also look at whether apadenoson is better tolerated than adenosine when used in SPECT-MPI.
Detailed description
Adenosine is an effective vasodilator used in SPECT-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (SPECT-MPI). However, it produces transient symptoms that are poorly tolerated by most subjects. PGxHealth has designed a multi-center, randomized crossover, double-blind study to compare the safety and effectiveness of apadenoson to adenosine (Adenoscan®) in SPECT-MPI. Subjects who are clinical candidates for SPECT-MPI will be enrolled to undergo two sequential SPECT-MPI studies. The first study will use adenosine as the stress agent in approximately 1300 subjects. Eligible subjects will then be randomized in a 1:2 assignment ratio to receive a second SPECT-MPI using either adenosine or apadenoson as the pharmacologic stress agent, with the goal of obtaining a total of 753 subjects who complete both studies. The similarity of the results from the two adenosine:adenosine stress tests will be compared to those from the adenosine:apadenoson tests to assess efficacy. The incidence and intensity of commonly reported side effects will be compared to evaluate improved tolerability.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Apadenoson | Experimental | Drug: Apadenoson SPECT-MPI, Drug: Adenosine SPECT-MPIIn period 1, subjects will receive a clinically-indicated rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with adenosine. In period 2, subjects will receive a rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with apadenoson or the active comparator: adenosine. |
| Adenosine | Active comparator | Drug: Apadenoson SPECT-MPI, Drug: Adenosine SPECT-MPIIn period 1, subjects will receive a clinically-indicated rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with adenosine. In period 2, subjects will receive a rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with apadenoson or the active comparator: adenosine. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- High pretest probability of CAD based on the ACC/AHA guidelines for relative risk, or past medical h/o CAD
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Ingestion of a caffeinated or methylxanthine food substance (e.g. chocolate, cocoa) within 24 hours before receiving apadenoson or adenosine
- Treatment with dipyridamole within 24 hours, or theophylline, aminophylline, or pentoxifylline within 72 hours (or 4 half-lives, whichever is longer) prior to receiving apadenoson or adenosine
- Acute MI, new onset of ischemia or PCI within 30 days prior to SPECT-MPI at either Period 1 or Period 2; or CABG within 90 days prior to SPECT-MPI at either Period 1 or Period 2
- Active severe asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) which, in the Investigator's opinion, places the subject at risk for severe bronchoconstriction
- History or evidence of clinically significant cardiac condition and rhythm disorder, in the absence of a functioning permanently implanted pacemaker
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Apadenoson SPECT-MPIAlso: DPC-A78445-00, DPH-068645-01, ATL146e, DWH 146eApadenoson single bolus IV injection 100 or 150 ug | Drug | Adenosine, Apadenoson |
| Adenosine SPECT-MPIAlso: AdenoscanSingle IV infusion for 6 minutes at a rate of 140 µg/kg body weight per minute. | Drug | Adenosine, Apadenoson |
Primary outcome
Presence of myocardial perfusion defect as based on SPECT-MPI
Time frame: Up to 2 hours after study drug administration in Period 1 and 2
1 secondary outcome
Incidence and patient rated intensity of most commonly reported side effects (e.g. dyspnea, flushing, chest pain, headache) associated with use of adenosine compared to apadenoson in SPECT-MPI
Time frame: 1 hour after Period 2 study drug administration
Results and safety
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 May 2012.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David B Bharucha, MD, PhD, FACC study director
Forest Laboratories
122 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Apadenoson SPECT-MPI and Adenosine SPECT-MPI in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Forest Laboratories at 122 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 122 sites in United States, Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Presence of myocardial perfusion defect as based on SPECT-MPI (time frame: Up to 2 hours after study drug administration in Period 1 and 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2012.