Acute Renal FailurePhase 2/3SPARKNCT00978354
Furosemide in Early Acute Kidney Injury
A Phase 2/3 study testing Furosemide and Normal Saline in people with Acute Renal Failure, run by University of Alberta at 4 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Acute renal failure, now referred to as acute kidney injury, is common in intensive care unit patients, contributes to high morbidity and mortality, and has no proven interventions with benefit once established. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Renal Failure
- What is being tested?
- Furosemide and Normal Saline
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2009to Jul 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Informed and written consent by patient or surrogate
- Peripheral or central intravenous catheter
- The presence of early AKI
- 2 or more criteria for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) within 24 hours
- Achieved immediate resuscitation goals
Who cannot join
- Confirmed or suspected pregnancy
- Age <18 years
- Stage 4 or greater chronic kidney disease or kidney transplantation
- Acute pulmonary edema requiring urgent use of furosemide or RRT
- Patient is moribund with expected death within 24 hours
- Known or suspected drug allergy to furosemide
- Enrolled in concomitant randomized trial
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 2 countries.
4 sites in 2 countries
Australia2 sites
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, 4012
Austin Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria, 3084
Canada2 sites
General Systems Intensive Care Unit, University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G2B7
University of Laval
Québec, Quebec, G1V 0A6
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Randomized Blinded Controlled Trial of the Effect of furoSemide in Critically Ill Patients With eARly Acute Kidney Injury (The SPARK Study)
Acute renal failure, now referred to as acute kidney injury, is common in intensive care unit patients, contributes to high morbidity and mortality, and has no proven interventions with benefit once established. In addition to supportive care, these patients frequently receive diuretic therapy, most commonly furosemide.
Prior trials showed no impact of furosemide on clinical outcomes and perhaps harm, however, these trials suffered from numerous limitations and lack applicability to modern intensive care unit patients. As a result, there appears a disconnect between clinical practice and available evidence. Survey data supports the view of clinical equipoise for use of furosemide in intensive care unit patients with early acute kidney injury. Moreover, these data also confirm there is an urgent need for higher quality and more definitive evidence from randomized trial on furosemide use in early acute kidney injury.
Read more
Accordingly, the investigators propose to conduct a pilot phase II randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing furosemide to placebo in ICU patients with early acute kidney injury.
The specific aims of this study are:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of a continuous infusion of furosemide versus placebo titrated to the physiology parameter of urine output in early acute kidney injury on the primary outcome of progression in severity of kidney injury in intensive care unit patients with early AKI and stratified by the presence of sepsis.
- To evaluate selected secondary endpoints on the impact of furosemide versus placebo, specifically: fluid balance goals; electrolyte and acid-base balance; the need for renal replacement therapy (i.e. dialysis); total duration of acute kidney injury; the rate of renal recovery; and mortality.
- To compare the impact of furosemide versus placebo on the trajectory of serum and urinary biomarkers (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL], interleukin-18 [IL-18]) and evaluate whether these biomarkers perform superior to conventional measures (creatinine, urea) for monitoring the progression of kidney injury and the prediction of outcome.
This trial represents part of a larger initiative aimed towards expanding our understanding of the treatment of acute kidney injury in intensive care unit patients and evaluating interventions that may potentially reduce kidney injury and improve clinical outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Study Design, Setting and Patient Population
This is a phase II multi-centre, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of ICU patients with early AKI with randomization stratified by sepsis. All critically ill patients admitted to the participating ICUs will be screened for eligibility.
Operational Definitions
- Acute kidney injury (AKI) - The operational definition for early AKI will be defined and classified according to the RIFLE criteria (and modified AKIN). The presence of early AKI will be defined by the RIFLE class - RISK: an abrupt (within 48hr) reduction in kidney function characterized by an relative increase in serum creatinine of >50% (1.5 fold) or >26.5 mcmol/L from baseline or a reduction in urine output of ≤0.5 mL/kg/hr for >6 hours.
Trial Protocol
Description of Study Flow
Patients will be identified in the ICU by daily surveillance of admitted patients by the PI and/or research coordinator or when identified by the treating ICU physician. Each patient's eligibility will be verified by use of a one-page checklist that summarizes the inclusion and exclusion criteria. This checklist will be included in the standardized case-report form (CRF).
Study Intervention
Following obtainment of consent, patients will be commenced on a continuous infusion of either the intervention (furosemide) or identical placebo (0.9% NaCl). The study protocol for administration of furosemide by continuous infusion is adapted from the phase I study by Ostermann et al. The study infusion bag will contain 2000mg of furosemide in 500mL of 0.9%NaCl for a final concentration of 4mg/mL. The continuous infusion will be titrated to achieve a target urine output in the range of 1.0-2.0 mL/kg/hr. Each patient will be administered a loading dose of 0.4 mg/kg as a separate infusion bag followed by a continuous infusion commenced at a dose of 0.0125 ml/kg/hr. The maximum infusion rate will be 0.125ml/kg/hr. The urine output will be assessed hourly. If the target urine output has been achieved, then the current infusion rate will be continued. If the target urine output has not been achieved, the dose will be increased to the next infusion rate in the algorithm. If the urine output is too brisk (>2mL/kg/hr), the dose will be maintained unless any of the following criteria are fulfilled: decrease in mean arterial pressure <65 AND/OR addition of or an increase in vasoactive requirements of ≥20% to achieve goal mean arterial pressure OR central venous pressure <8 cmH2O OR central venous oxygen saturation <60% OR a cardiac index <2.0L/min/1.73m2 (if measured). If any of these criteria are achieved, the dose will be decreased to the next lower infusion rate in the algorithm. If any of the aforementioned criteria have been fulfilled AND urine output remains >2mL/kg/hr for 2 consecutive hours despite the lowest infusion rate, the treatment will be discontinued for 1 hour then resumed at the lowest infusion rate. The fulfillment of these criteria will be brought to the attention of the consultant ICU physician for review. At any time during the trial, if the responsible ICU physician believes that diuretics are urgently indicated (pulmonary edema), diuretics can be administered and this event will be documented.
All other aspects of patient management within the parameters outlined (methods of fluid resuscitation, choice of fluids, vasoactive therapy, choice of vasoactive therapy, adjuvant therapies such as hrAPC, intensive insulin therapy, will be at the discretion of the consultant ICU physician.
The study drug infusion will be continued until any one of the following events occur:
- the patient is initiated on RRT;
- the patient dies;
- the patient is discharged from the ICU;
- the patient recovers kidney function; or
- the patient develops a recognized adverse reaction potentially related to the study infusion.
Methods of Randomization
The randomization sequence will be created at a single central location at the University of Alberta Hospital (EPICORE Centre). The sequence will be stratified by the presence of a diagnosis of sepsis.
Data Collection
Detailed clinical, physiologic, laboratory and outcome data will be collected. Data will be collected each day on whether the primary endpoint (progression of AKI) has occurred, for evidence of any secondary endpoints and criteria for trial discontinuation. Plasma and urine will be collected for biomarkers studies. Any study protocol violations will be recorded. The adjudication of protocol violations will be determined by a study investigator blinded to the treatment allocation.
Proposed Follow-up
The investigators plan to follow all patients to determine the duration of AKI, continued need for RRT, renal recovery and mortality until death or discharge from hospital and at 30, 60 and 90-days after randomization.
- Conditions
- Acute Renal Failure
- Being tested
- Furosemide, Normal Saline
- Keywords
- acute kidney injury, acute renal failure, loop diuretic, critical illness, sepsis, renal replacement therapy, dialysis, renal recovery, survival
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Kidney Injury, Critical Illness, Sepsis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FurosemideDrug
Also called Lasix
Continuous intravenous infusion of furosemide titrated to urine output
Normal SalineDrug
Also called 0.9% saline
Continuous intravenous infusion 0.9% normal saline placebo control
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Furosemide | Active comparator | Furosemide intravenous continuous infusion Receives: Drug: Furosemide |
| Normal Saline | Placebo comparator | Normal saline titrated continuous intravenous infusion Receives: Drug: Normal Saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Worsening AKI
Measured: 7 days
Secondary outcomes (4)
Fluid balance
Measured: 7 days
Renal replacement therapy (RRT)
Measured: 7 days
Renal Recovery
Measured: 90-days
Survival
Measured: 90-days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2009 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2009
- Primary completionJul 2014
- Study completionJul 2014
Why it stopped: Feasibility of target enrollment within the context of available funding resources.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Renal FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AlbertaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Austin Hospital, Melbourne Australia, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sean M Bagshaw, University of Alberta
- Investigators
- Sean M Bagshaw, MD MSc, Principal investigator, University of Alberta
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00978354
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AHFMR-0920
- Acronym
- SPARK
- Status last verified
- Sep 2015
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2009
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Hashimoto H, Yamada H, Murata M, Watanabe N. Diuretics for preventing and treating acute kidney injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD014937. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014937.pub2.
PubMed 39878152Bagshaw SM, Gibney RTN, Kruger P, Hassan I, McAlister FA, Bellomo R. The effect of low-dose furosemide in critically ill patients with early acute kidney injury: A pilot randomized blinded controlled trial (the SPARK study). J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:138-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.07.030. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
PubMed 28732314Bagshaw SM, Gibney RT, McAlister FA, Bellomo R. The SPARK Study: a phase II randomized blinded controlled trial of the effect of furosemide in critically ill patients with early acute kidney injury. Trials. 2010 May 11;11:50. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-50.
PubMed 20459801
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Randomized Blinded Controlled Trial of the Effect of furoSemide in Critically Ill Patients With eARly Acute Kidney Injury (The SPARK Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00978354
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPARK / AHFMR-0920
- Conditions
- Acute Renal Failure
- Keywords
- acute kidney injury, acute renal failure, loop diuretic, critical illness, sepsis, renal replacement therapy, dialysis, renal recovery
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Feasibility of target enrollment within the context of available funding resources.
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Austin Hospital, Melbourne Australia, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Study start
- Sep 2009
- Primary completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute renal failure, now referred to as acute kidney injury, is common in intensive care unit patients, contributes to high morbidity and mortality, and has no proven interventions with benefit once established. In addition to supportive care, these patients frequently receive diuretic therapy, most commonly furosemide.
Prior trials showed no impact of furosemide on clinical outcomes and perhaps harm, however, these trials suffered from numerous limitations and lack applicability to modern intensive care unit patients. As a result, there appears a disconnect between clinical practice and available evidence. Survey data supports the view of clinical equipoise for use of furosemide in intensive care unit patients with early acute kidney injury. Moreover, these data also confirm there is an urgent need for higher quality and more definitive evidence from randomized trial on furosemide use in early acute kidney injury.
Accordingly, the investigators propose to conduct a pilot phase II randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing furosemide to placebo in ICU patients with early acute kidney injury.
The specific aims of this study are:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of a continuous infusion of furosemide versus placebo titrated to the physiology parameter of urine output in early acute kidney injury on the primary outcome of progression in severity of kidney injury in intensive care unit patients with early AKI and stratified by the presence of sepsis.
- To evaluate selected secondary endpoints on the impact of furosemide versus placebo, specifically: fluid balance goals; electrolyte and acid-base balance; the need for renal replacement therapy (i.e. dialysis); total duration of acute kidney injury; the rate of renal recovery; and mortality.
- To compare the impact of furosemide versus placebo on the trajectory of serum and urinary biomarkers (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL], interleukin-18 [IL-18]) and evaluate whether these biomarkers perform superior to conventional measures (creatinine, urea) for monitoring the progression of kidney injury and the prediction of outcome.
This trial represents part of a larger initiative aimed towards expanding our understanding of the treatment of acute kidney injury in intensive care unit patients and evaluating interventions that may potentially reduce kidney injury and improve clinical outcomes.
Detailed description
Study Design, Setting and Patient Population
This is a phase II multi-centre, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of ICU patients with early AKI with randomization stratified by sepsis. All critically ill patients admitted to the participating ICUs will be screened for eligibility.
Operational Definitions
- Acute kidney injury (AKI) - The operational definition for early AKI will be defined and classified according to the RIFLE criteria (and modified AKIN). The presence of early AKI will be defined by the RIFLE class - RISK: an abrupt (within 48hr) reduction in kidney function characterized by an relative increase in serum creatinine of >50% (1.5 fold) or >26.5 mcmol/L from baseline or a reduction in urine output of ≤0.5 mL/kg/hr for >6 hours.
Trial Protocol
Description of Study Flow
Patients will be identified in the ICU by daily surveillance of admitted patients by the PI and/or research coordinator or when identified by the treating ICU physician. Each patient's eligibility will be verified by use of a one-page checklist that summarizes the inclusion and exclusion criteria. This checklist will be included in the standardized case-report form (CRF).
Study Intervention
Following obtainment of consent, patients will be commenced on a continuous infusion of either the intervention (furosemide) or identical placebo (0.9% NaCl). The study protocol for administration of furosemide by continuous infusion is adapted from the phase I study by Ostermann et al. The study infusion bag will contain 2000mg of furosemide in 500mL of 0.9%NaCl for a final concentration of 4mg/mL. The continuous infusion will be titrated to achieve a target urine output in the range of 1.0-2.0 mL/kg/hr. Each patient will be administered a loading dose of 0.4 mg/kg as a separate infusion bag followed by a continuous infusion commenced at a dose of 0.0125 ml/kg/hr. The maximum infusion rate will be 0.125ml/kg/hr. The urine output will be assessed hourly. If the target urine output has been achieved, then the current infusion rate will be continued. If the target urine output has not been achieved, the dose will be increased to the next infusion rate in the algorithm. If the urine output is too brisk (>2mL/kg/hr), the dose will be maintained unless any of the following criteria are fulfilled: decrease in mean arterial pressure <65 AND/OR addition of or an increase in vasoactive requirements of ≥20% to achieve goal mean arterial pressure OR central venous pressure <8 cmH2O OR central venous oxygen saturation <60% OR a cardiac index <2.0L/min/1.73m2 (if measured). If any of these criteria are achieved, the dose will be decreased to the next lower infusion rate in the algorithm. If any of the aforementioned criteria have been fulfilled AND urine output remains >2mL/kg/hr for 2 consecutive hours despite the lowest infusion rate, the treatment will be discontinued for 1 hour then resumed at the lowest infusion rate. The fulfillment of these criteria will be brought to the attention of the consultant ICU physician for review. At any time during the trial, if the responsible ICU physician believes that diuretics are urgently indicated (pulmonary edema), diuretics can be administered and this event will be documented.
All other aspects of patient management within the parameters outlined (methods of fluid resuscitation, choice of fluids, vasoactive therapy, choice of vasoactive therapy, adjuvant therapies such as hrAPC, intensive insulin therapy, will be at the discretion of the consultant ICU physician.
The study drug infusion will be continued until any one of the following events occur:
- the patient is initiated on RRT;
- the patient dies;
- the patient is discharged from the ICU;
- the patient recovers kidney function; or
- the patient develops a recognized adverse reaction potentially related to the study infusion.
Methods of Randomization
The randomization sequence will be created at a single central location at the University of Alberta Hospital (EPICORE Centre). The sequence will be stratified by the presence of a diagnosis of sepsis.
Data Collection
Detailed clinical, physiologic, laboratory and outcome data will be collected. Data will be collected each day on whether the primary endpoint (progression of AKI) has occurred, for evidence of any secondary endpoints and criteria for trial discontinuation. Plasma and urine will be collected for biomarkers studies. Any study protocol violations will be recorded. The adjudication of protocol violations will be determined by a study investigator blinded to the treatment allocation.
Proposed Follow-up
The investigators plan to follow all patients to determine the duration of AKI, continued need for RRT, renal recovery and mortality until death or discharge from hospital and at 30, 60 and 90-days after randomization.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Furosemide | Active comparator | Drug: FurosemideFurosemide intravenous continuous infusion |
| Normal Saline | Placebo comparator | Drug: Normal SalineNormal saline titrated continuous intravenous infusion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Informed and written consent by patient or surrogate
- Peripheral or central intravenous catheter
- The presence of early AKI
- 2 or more criteria for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) within 24 hours
- Achieved immediate resuscitation goals
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Confirmed or suspected pregnancy
- Age <18 years
- Stage 4 or greater chronic kidney disease or kidney transplantation
- Acute pulmonary edema requiring urgent use of furosemide or RRT
- Patient is moribund with expected death within 24 hours
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FurosemideAlso: LasixContinuous intravenous infusion of furosemide titrated to urine output | Drug | Furosemide |
| Normal SalineAlso: 0.9% salineContinuous intravenous infusion 0.9% normal saline placebo control | Drug | Normal Saline |
Primary outcome
Worsening AKI
Time frame: 7 days
4 secondary outcomes
Fluid balance
Time frame: 7 days
Renal replacement therapy (RRT)
Time frame: 7 days
Renal Recovery
Time frame: 90-days
Survival
Time frame: 90-days
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Feasibility of target enrollment within the context of available funding resources.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39878152Hashimoto H, Yamada H, Murata M, Watanabe N. Diuretics for preventing and treating acute kidney injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD014937. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014937.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28732314Bagshaw SM, Gibney RTN, Kruger P, Hassan I, McAlister FA, Bellomo R. The effect of low-dose furosemide in critically ill patients with early acute kidney injury: A pilot randomized blinded controlled trial (the SPARK study). J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:138-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.07.030. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 20459801Bagshaw SM, Gibney RT, McAlister FA, Bellomo R. The SPARK Study: a phase II randomized blinded controlled trial of the effect of furosemide in critically ill patients with early acute kidney injury. Trials. 2010 May 11;11:50. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-50.
Related trials for Acute Renal Failure
Not yet recruiting
Vitamin C for Acute Kidney Injury in ACLF With Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Revumenib in Participants With Advanced Cancer and Hepatic or Renal Impairment
Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Hematologic Malignancies, Acute Leukemia
Not yet recruiting
Early Biomarker Kidney Injury Assessment After Acumen Directed Fluid Management in Cardiac Surgery
Renal Injury, Acute Kidney Injury
Recruiting
Acute Kidney Injury and Ultra-endurance Running
AKI (Acute Kidney Injury) Due to Trauma
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sean M Bagshaw, MD MSc principal investigator
University of Alberta
4 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Furosemide and Normal Saline in people with Acute Renal Failure, run by University of Alberta at 4 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Australia, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Feasibility of target enrollment within the context of available funding resources.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Worsening AKI (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00978354, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2015.