Colorectal CancerPhase 2NCT00967655
Capecitabine, Panitumumab, and Radiation Therapy With or Without Irinotecan Hydrochloride in Treating Patients Undergoing Surgery for Localized Rectal Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing panitumumab, capecitabine and irinotecan hydrochloride in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Loma Linda Oncology Medical Group, Inc. at 4 sites in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as capecitabine and irinotecan hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as panitumumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- panitumumab, capecitabine and irinotecan hydrochloride
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2009to Jul 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the distal rectum (0-9 cm from the dentate line or 3-12 cm from the anal verge)
- T3 or T4 tumor or nodal involvement by endorectal ultrasound or CT scan or MRI
- Patients with any T status where tumor is close to but not involving the sphincter who otherwise would be candidates for abdominoperineal resection are eligible
- No known homozygotes to UGT1A1* 28
- No distant metastases
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- ECOG performance status 0-1
- ANC ≥ 1,500/mm³
- Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³
- Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- ALT and AST ≤ 3 times ULN
- Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN
- Creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min
- Magnesium normal
- Able to tolerate major surgery
- Able and willing to comply with study requirements
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 4 weeks (males) or 24 weeks (females) after completion of study therapy
- No prior diagnosis of interstitial lung disease
- No prior unanticipated severe reaction to fluoropyrimidine therapy or known hypersensitivity to fluorouracil
- No other prior or concurrent invasive malignancy unless disease-free for ≥ 5 years
- No lack of physical integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract, inability to swallow tablets, or malabsorption syndrome
- No concurrent serious infections
- No clinically significant cardiovascular disease within the past year, including any of the following:
- Myocardial infarction
- Unstable angina
- Symptomatic congestive heart failure
- Symptomatic coronary artery disease
- Serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia
- No history of any medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that, in the opinion of the investigator, may increase risks associated with study participation or investigational product(s) administration or may interfere with the interpretation of the study results
- No known positivity for HIV, hepatitis C, or acute or chronic active hepatitis B
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- No prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy for rectal cancer
- No prior anti-EGFr antibody therapy (e.g., cetuximab)
- No prior treatment with small molecule EGFr inhibitors (e.g., gefitinib, erlotinib hydrochloride, or lapatinib ditosylate)
- No prior therapeutic radiotherapy to the pelvis
- More than 28 days since prior major surgery
- More than 14 days since prior minor surgery
- At least 30 days since prior investigational agent or therapy
- At least 4 weeks since prior and no concurrent sorivudine or brivudine
- No concurrent chronic immunosuppressive agents (e.g., methotrexate or cyclosporine)
- No concurrent cimetidine
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United States4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
Davood Vafai, MD, Medical Offices, Incorporated
Redlands, California, 92374
Pedro Bernal, MD, 909-796-4333
- Recruiting
Loma Linda Oncology Medical Group, Incorporated
Redlands, California, 92374
Pedro Bernal, MD, 909-796-4333
- Recruiting
New Hope Cancer and Research Institute - Glendora
Redlands, California, 92374
Pedro Bernal, MD, 909-796-4333
- Recruiting
New Hope Cancer and Research Institute - Pomona
Redlands, California, 92374
Pedro Bernal, MD, 909-796-4333
About this study
Official title: A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Radiation in Combination With Capecitabine & Paniumumab With and Without Irinotecan in Patients With Localized Rectal Cancer
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as capecitabine and irinotecan hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as panitumumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Giving chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, and radiation therapy before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed.
PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying the side effects of giving capecitabine and panitumumab together with radiation therapy with or without irinotecan hydrochloride and to see how well it works in treating patients undergoing surgery for localized rectal cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To assess the pathological tumor response rate in patients with localized rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy comprising capecitabine, panitumumab, and radiotherapy with or without irinotecan hydrochloride.
- To assess the incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Secondary
- To assess the disease-free survival.
- To assess the time to treatment failure.
- To assess the1-year and 2-year survival rates.
- To assess local recurrence, defined as recurrence in pelvis at the site of previous disease.
- To assess the safety and toxicity grade using NCI CTCAE v3.0 criteria.
- To assess the number and percentage of patients who undergo down staging of their disease as determined before initiating neoadjuvant therapy and at the time of surgery.
- To assess the number and percentage of patients where permanent colostomy can be avoided as determined by the surgeon before initiating neoadjuvant therapy and at the time actual surgery is performed.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.
- Phase A: Patients undergo radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week and receive oral capecitabine twice daily 5 days a week for 5½ weeks. Patients also receive panitumumab IV over 1 hour on days 1, 15, and 29 during radiotherapy in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Phase B: Patients undergo radiotherapy and receive capecitabine and panitumumab as in Phase A. Patients also receive irinotecan hydrochloride IV on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients undergo surgery 6-8 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy,
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months thereafter.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- panitumumab, capecitabine, irinotecan hydrochloride, neoadjuvant therapy, therapeutic conventional surgery
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of the rectum, stage I rectal cancer, stage II rectal cancer, stage III rectal cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
panitumumabBiological
capecitabineDrug
neoadjuvant therapyProcedure or surgery
therapeutic conventional surgeryProcedure or surgery
radiation therapyRadiation
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pathological complete response rate
Grade 3/4 toxicity rate
Disease-free survival
Time to treatment failure
1-year survival rate
2-year survival rate
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2009
- Primary completionJul 2012 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Loma Linda Oncology Medical Group, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Imtiaz A. Malik, MD, Principal investigator, Loma Linda Oncology Medical Group, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00967655
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000652936
- Other IDs
- LLOMGI-20050743, MALIK 012009
- Status last verified
- Sep 2009
- First submitted
- 27 Aug 2009
- Last updated
- 10 Jan 2014
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jan 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Radiation in Combination With Capecitabine & Paniumumab With and Without Irinotecan in Patients With Localized Rectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00967655
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000652936
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Keywords
- adenocarcinoma of the rectum, stage I rectal cancer, stage II rectal cancer, stage III rectal cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Loma Linda Oncology Medical Group, Inc.University, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2009
- Primary completion
- Jul 2012 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as capecitabine and irinotecan hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as panitumumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Giving chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, and radiation therapy before surgery may make the tumor smaller and reduce the amount of normal tissue that needs to be removed.
PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying the side effects of giving capecitabine and panitumumab together with radiation therapy with or without irinotecan hydrochloride and to see how well it works in treating patients undergoing surgery for localized rectal cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To assess the pathological tumor response rate in patients with localized rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy comprising capecitabine, panitumumab, and radiotherapy with or without irinotecan hydrochloride.
- To assess the incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Secondary
- To assess the disease-free survival.
- To assess the time to treatment failure.
- To assess the1-year and 2-year survival rates.
- To assess local recurrence, defined as recurrence in pelvis at the site of previous disease.
- To assess the safety and toxicity grade using NCI CTCAE v3.0 criteria.
- To assess the number and percentage of patients who undergo down staging of their disease as determined before initiating neoadjuvant therapy and at the time of surgery.
- To assess the number and percentage of patients where permanent colostomy can be avoided as determined by the surgeon before initiating neoadjuvant therapy and at the time actual surgery is performed.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.
- Phase A: Patients undergo radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week and receive oral capecitabine twice daily 5 days a week for 5½ weeks. Patients also receive panitumumab IV over 1 hour on days 1, 15, and 29 during radiotherapy in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Phase B: Patients undergo radiotherapy and receive capecitabine and panitumumab as in Phase A. Patients also receive irinotecan hydrochloride IV on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients undergo surgery 6-8 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy,
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months thereafter.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| panitumumab | Biological | – |
| capecitabine | Drug | – |
| irinotecan hydrochloride | Drug | – |
| neoadjuvant therapy | Procedure or surgery | – |
| therapeutic conventional surgery | Procedure or surgery | – |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Pathological complete response rate
Grade 3/4 toxicity rate
Disease-free survival
Time to treatment failure
1-year survival rate
2-year survival rate
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jan 2014.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Imtiaz A. Malik, MD principal investigator
Loma Linda Oncology Medical Group, Inc.
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing panitumumab, capecitabine and irinotecan hydrochloride in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Loma Linda Oncology Medical Group, Inc. at 4 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pathological complete response rate. The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2014.