LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00967057
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Young Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
A Phase 3 study testing asparaginase, dexamethasone and idarubicin in people with Leukemia, run by Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group at 6 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating young patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- asparaginase, dexamethasone and idarubicin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 470 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2002to Dec 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) meeting 1 of the following criteria:
- In first relapse after treatment
- Has not yet received chemotherapy or radiotherapy for the first relapse
- Primary refractory disease
- No mature B-cell ALL
- Meets criteria for one of the following risk groups:
- Standard-risk disease: non-T-cell or T-cell ALL with late isolated extramedullary relapse
- Intermediate-risk disease: non-T-cell ALL with early isolated extramedullary relapse or combined marrow and extramedullary relapse; non-T-cell ALL with late combined marrow and extramedullary relapse or isolated marrow relapse; or T-cell ALL with early isolated extramedullary relapse
- High-risk disease: non-T-cell ALL with very early isolated extramedullary relapse, combined marrow and extramedullary relapse, or isolated marrow relapse; non-T-cell ALL with early isolated marrow relapse; T-cell ALL with very early isolated extramedullary relapse, combined marrow and extramedullary relapse, or isolated marrow relapse; T-cell ALL with early combined marrow and extramedullary relapse or isolated marrow relapse; or T-cell ALL with late combined marrow and extramedullary relapse or isolated marrow relapse
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- Not specified
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- See Disease Characteristics
- No prior bone marrow transplant
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 2 countries.
6 sites in 2 countries
United Kingdom5 sites
Birmingham Children's Hospital
Birmingham, England, B4 6NH
Bristol Royal Hospital for Children
Bristol, England, BS2 8BJ
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children
London, England, WC1N 3JH
Christie Hospital
Manchester, England, M20 4BX
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton, England, SO16 6YD
Australia1 site
Women's and Children's Hospital
North Adelaide, South Australia, 5006
About this study
Official title: ALLR3: An International Collaborative Trial for Relapsed and Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating young patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
PURPOSE: This partially randomized phase III trial is studying how well combination chemotherapy works in treating young patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Evaluate the progression-free survival (defined as the time from study entry to the first occurrence of progression, relapse, death while in complete clinical remission, or second malignancy) of United Kingdom patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia stratified by risk group.
- Evaluate whether a minimal residual disease (MRD) level of 10^-4 is a suitable criterion at the end of induction therapy on which to decide whether chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation will be most beneficial to patients with intermediate-risk disease.
Secondary
- Use MRD as a surrogate marker for response to therapy.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified by risk group (standard vs intermediate vs high) and participating country (UK and Ireland vs Australia and New Zealand vs The Netherlands).
Patients with standard-risk disease receive induction therapy, consolidation therapy, intensification therapy, interim maintenance therapy, and maintenance therapy. Patients with intermediate-risk disease receive induction therapy followed by assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD). Those whose MRD status is < 10^-4 at week 5 (after induction therapy) proceed to consolidation therapy followed by intensification therapy, interim maintenance therapy, and maintenance therapy. Those whose MRD status is ≥ 10^-4 at week 5 (after induction therapy) proceed to consolidation therapy followed by intensification therapy and assessment of MRD at week 13 (after intensification therapy). Those whose MRD status is ≥ 10^-3 at week 13 proceed to pre-stem cell transplantation cytoreduction (FLAD) followed by allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT). Those whose MRD status is < 10^-3 at week 13 proceed directly to ASCT. Patients with high-risk disease receive induction therapy, consolidation therapy, and intensification therapy followed by assessment of MRD at week 13 (after intensification therapy). These patients then proceed to further treatment (FLAD and/or ASCT) based on the same MRD parameters at week 13 as for patients with intermediate-risk disease.
- Induction therapy (weeks 1-4): Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 induction therapy arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive idarubicin IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2; oral dexamethasone twice daily on days 1-5 and 15-19; intrathecal (IT) methotrexate on days 1 and 8; vincristine sulfate IV on days 3, 10, 17, and 24; and pegaspargase intramuscularly (IM) on days 3 and 17 or asparaginase IM on days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, and 25.
- Arm II: Patients receive mitoxantrone IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2. Patients also receive dexamethasone, methotrexate, vincristine sulfate, and pegaspargase or asparaginase as in arm I.
- Consolidation therapy (weeks 5-8): Patients receive oral dexamethasone twice daily on days 1-5; vincristine sulfate IV on day 3; IT methotrexate on day 8; methotrexate IV continuously over 36 hours beginning on day 8; pegaspargase IM on day 9 or asparaginase IM on days 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, and 19; leucovorin calcium IV twice on day 10; and cyclophosphamide IV over 30 minutes and etoposide phosphate IV over 4 hours on days 15-19.
- Intensification therapy (weeks 9-13): Patients receive oral dexamethasone twice daily on days 1-5; vincristine sulfate IV on 3; IT methotrexate on days 1 and 22; cytarabine IV over 3 hours twice on days 1, 2, 8, and 9; asparaginase IM on days 2, 4, 9, 11, and 23; methotrexate IV continuously over 36 hours beginning on day 22; and leucovorin calcium IV twice on day 24.
- Interim maintenance therapy (weeks 14-29): Patients receive oral dexamethasone twice daily on days 1-5; IT methotrexate* on days 1 and 43; vincristine sulfate IV on day 3; high-dose oral methotrexate 4 times on day 22; oral leucovorin calcium twice on day 24; oral mercaptopurine once daily on days 1-42; oral methotrexate on days 8, 15, 29, and 36; oral thioguanine on days 43-49; etoposide phosphate IV over 4 hours and cyclophosphamide IV over 30 minutes on days 43 and 50; and cytarabine IV or subcutaneously (SC) on days 44-47 and 51-54. Treatment repeats every 56 days (8 weeks) for 2 courses.
Patients undergoing cranial irradiation do so before starting interim maintenance therapy. Patients undergoing testicular irradiation do so concurrently with interim maintenance therapy.
NOTE: *Patients who undergo cranial irradiation do not receive IT methotrexate.
- Maintenance therapy (weeks 30-117): Patients receive IT methotrexate* on day 15; oral dexamethasone twice daily on days 1-5, 29-33, and 57-61; vincristine sulfate IV on days 1, 29, and 57; oral mercaptopurine once daily on days 1-84; and oral methotrexate on days 1, 8, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, and 78. Treatment repeats every 84 days (12 weeks) for 7 courses. Patients then receive 4 additional weeks (course 8) of maintenance therapy without IT methotrexate.
NOTE: *Patients who undergo cranial irradiation do not receive IT methotrexate.
- Pre-stem cell transplantation cytoreduction (FLAD): Patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes and cytarabine over 4 hours on days 1-5 and liposomal daunorubicin citrate IV over 2 hours on day 1. Patients also receive filgrastim IV or SC beginning on day 7 and continuing until blood counts recover.
- ASCT: Patients undergo ASCT (including conditioning and graft-vs-host disease [GVHD] prophylaxis) according to national transplant guidelines based on the type of donor.
- Post-transplant immunotherapy: Patients who undergo ASCT may receive incremental doses of donor lymphocytes by infusion until a response and/or GVHD has occurred.
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Being tested
- asparaginase, dexamethasone, idarubicin, methotrexate, mitoxantrone hydrochloride
- Keywords
- recurrent childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, T-cell childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
asparaginaseDrug
Given intramuscularly
dexamethasoneDrug
Given orally
idarubicinDrug
Given IV
methotrexateDrug
Given intrathecally
mitoxantrone hydrochlorideDrug
Given IV
pegaspargaseDrug
Given intramuscularly
Given IV
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I (induction therapy) | Experimental | Patients receive idarubicin IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2; oral dexamethasone twice daily on days 1-5 and 15-19; intrathecal (IT) methotrexate on days 1 and 8; vincristine sulfate IV on days 3, 10, 17, and 24; and pegaspargase intramuscularly (IM) on days 3 and 17 or asparaginase IM on days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, and 25. Receives: Drug: asparaginase; Drug: dexamethasone; Drug: idarubicin; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: pegaspargase; Drug: vincristine sulfate |
| Arm II (induction therapy) | Experimental | Patients receive mitoxantrone IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2. Patients also receive dexamethasone, methotrexate, vincristine sulfate, and pegaspargase or asparaginase as in arm I. Receives: Drug: asparaginase; Drug: dexamethasone; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: mitoxantrone hydrochloride; Drug: pegaspargase; Drug: vincristine sulfate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free survival (PFS) of United Kingdom (UK) patients stratified by risk groups
Evaluation of whether a minimal residual disease (MRD) level of 10(-4) is a suitable criterion at the end of induction therapy on which to decide whether chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation will be most beneficial to patients with intermediate- ...
Secondary outcomes (5)
MRD as a surrogate marker for treatment response and PFS
Comparison of PFS, MRD level at day 35, and toxicity as response variables in patients randomized to receive induction therapy with mitoxantrone hydrochloride or idarubicin
PFS of all patients (UK, Dutch, Australian, and New Zealand) stratified by risk groups
Comparison of PFS and overall survival between patients enrolled in this study and patients enrolled in R2 or I-BFM
Evaluation of whether pre-stem cell transplantation cytoreduction (FLAD) reduces tumor load and how it affects outcome following transplant
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2002
- Primary completionJan 2010
- Study completionDec 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Enrolment
- 470 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Vaskar Saha, MD, Principal investigator, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00967057
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CCLG-ALLR3
- Other IDs
- CDR0000642221, ISCRTN45724312, EUDRACT-2004-000052-16, EU-20938
- Status last verified
- Jan 2011
- First submitted
- 26 Aug 2009
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Parker C, Waters R, Leighton C, Hancock J, Sutton R, Moorman AV, Ancliff P, Morgan M, Masurekar A, Goulden N, Green N, Revesz T, Darbyshire P, Love S, Saha V. Effect of mitoxantrone on outcome of children with first relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL R3): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Dec 11;376(9757):2009-17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62002-8. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
PubMed 21131038Eckert C, Parker C, Moorman AV, Irving JA, Kirschner-Schwabe R, Groeneveld-Krentz S, Revesz T, Hoogerbrugge P, Hancock J, Sutton R, Henze G, Chen-Santel C, Attarbaschi A, Bourquin JP, Sramkova L, Zimmermann M, Krishnan S, von Stackelberg A, Saha V. Risk factors and outcomes in children with high-risk B-cell precursor and T-cell relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: combined analysis of ALLR3 and ALL-REZ BFM 2002 clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jul;151:175-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.034. Epub 2021 May 16.
PubMed 34010787Parker C, Krishnan S, Hamadeh L, Irving JAE, Kuiper RP, Revesz T, Hoogerbrugge P, Hancock J, Sutton R, Moorman AV, Saha V. Outcomes of patients with childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with late bone marrow relapses: long-term follow-up of the ALLR3 open-label randomised trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Apr;6(4):e204-e216. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30003-1. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
PubMed 30826273
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Aug 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- ALLR3: An International Collaborative Trial for Relapsed and Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00967057
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CCLG-ALLR3
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Keywords
- recurrent childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, T-cell childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 470 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Cancer and Leukaemia GroupUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2002
- Primary completion
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Aug 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating young patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
PURPOSE: This partially randomized phase III trial is studying how well combination chemotherapy works in treating young patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Evaluate the progression-free survival (defined as the time from study entry to the first occurrence of progression, relapse, death while in complete clinical remission, or second malignancy) of United Kingdom patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia stratified by risk group.
- Evaluate whether a minimal residual disease (MRD) level of 10^-4 is a suitable criterion at the end of induction therapy on which to decide whether chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation will be most beneficial to patients with intermediate-risk disease.
Secondary
- Use MRD as a surrogate marker for response to therapy.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified by risk group (standard vs intermediate vs high) and participating country (UK and Ireland vs Australia and New Zealand vs The Netherlands).
Patients with standard-risk disease receive induction therapy, consolidation therapy, intensification therapy, interim maintenance therapy, and maintenance therapy. Patients with intermediate-risk disease receive induction therapy followed by assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD). Those whose MRD status is < 10^-4 at week 5 (after induction therapy) proceed to consolidation therapy followed by intensification therapy, interim maintenance therapy, and maintenance therapy. Those whose MRD status is ≥ 10^-4 at week 5 (after induction therapy) proceed to consolidation therapy followed by intensification therapy and assessment of MRD at week 13 (after intensification therapy). Those whose MRD status is ≥ 10^-3 at week 13 proceed to pre-stem cell transplantation cytoreduction (FLAD) followed by allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT). Those whose MRD status is < 10^-3 at week 13 proceed directly to ASCT. Patients with high-risk disease receive induction therapy, consolidation therapy, and intensification therapy followed by assessment of MRD at week 13 (after intensification therapy). These patients then proceed to further treatment (FLAD and/or ASCT) based on the same MRD parameters at week 13 as for patients with intermediate-risk disease.
- Induction therapy (weeks 1-4): Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 induction therapy arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive idarubicin IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2; oral dexamethasone twice daily on days 1-5 and 15-19; intrathecal (IT) methotrexate on days 1 and 8; vincristine sulfate IV on days 3, 10, 17, and 24; and pegaspargase intramuscularly (IM) on days 3 and 17 or asparaginase IM on days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, and 25.
- Arm II: Patients receive mitoxantrone IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2. Patients also receive dexamethasone, methotrexate, vincristine sulfate, and pegaspargase or asparaginase as in arm I.
- Consolidation therapy (weeks 5-8): Patients receive oral dexamethasone twice daily on days 1-5; vincristine sulfate IV on day 3; IT methotrexate on day 8; methotrexate IV continuously over 36 hours beginning on day 8; pegaspargase IM on day 9 or asparaginase IM on days 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, and 19; leucovorin calcium IV twice on day 10; and cyclophosphamide IV over 30 minutes and etoposide phosphate IV over 4 hours on days 15-19.
- Intensification therapy (weeks 9-13): Patients receive oral dexamethasone twice daily on days 1-5; vincristine sulfate IV on 3; IT methotrexate on days 1 and 22; cytarabine IV over 3 hours twice on days 1, 2, 8, and 9; asparaginase IM on days 2, 4, 9, 11, and 23; methotrexate IV continuously over 36 hours beginning on day 22; and leucovorin calcium IV twice on day 24.
- Interim maintenance therapy (weeks 14-29): Patients receive oral dexamethasone twice daily on days 1-5; IT methotrexate* on days 1 and 43; vincristine sulfate IV on day 3; high-dose oral methotrexate 4 times on day 22; oral leucovorin calcium twice on day 24; oral mercaptopurine once daily on days 1-42; oral methotrexate on days 8, 15, 29, and 36; oral thioguanine on days 43-49; etoposide phosphate IV over 4 hours and cyclophosphamide IV over 30 minutes on days 43 and 50; and cytarabine IV or subcutaneously (SC) on days 44-47 and 51-54. Treatment repeats every 56 days (8 weeks) for 2 courses.
Patients undergoing cranial irradiation do so before starting interim maintenance therapy. Patients undergoing testicular irradiation do so concurrently with interim maintenance therapy.
NOTE: *Patients who undergo cranial irradiation do not receive IT methotrexate.
- Maintenance therapy (weeks 30-117): Patients receive IT methotrexate* on day 15; oral dexamethasone twice daily on days 1-5, 29-33, and 57-61; vincristine sulfate IV on days 1, 29, and 57; oral mercaptopurine once daily on days 1-84; and oral methotrexate on days 1, 8, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, and 78. Treatment repeats every 84 days (12 weeks) for 7 courses. Patients then receive 4 additional weeks (course 8) of maintenance therapy without IT methotrexate.
NOTE: *Patients who undergo cranial irradiation do not receive IT methotrexate.
- Pre-stem cell transplantation cytoreduction (FLAD): Patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV over 30 minutes and cytarabine over 4 hours on days 1-5 and liposomal daunorubicin citrate IV over 2 hours on day 1. Patients also receive filgrastim IV or SC beginning on day 7 and continuing until blood counts recover.
- ASCT: Patients undergo ASCT (including conditioning and graft-vs-host disease [GVHD] prophylaxis) according to national transplant guidelines based on the type of donor.
- Post-transplant immunotherapy: Patients who undergo ASCT may receive incremental doses of donor lymphocytes by infusion until a response and/or GVHD has occurred.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I (induction therapy) | Experimental | Drug: asparaginase, Drug: dexamethasone, Drug: idarubicin, Drug: methotrexate, Drug: pegaspargase, Drug: vincristine sulfatePatients receive idarubicin IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2; oral dexamethasone twice daily on days 1-5 and 15-19; intrathecal (IT) methotrexate on days 1 and 8; vincristine sulfate IV on days 3, 10, 17, and 24; and pegaspargase intramuscularly (IM) on days 3 and 17 or asparaginase IM on days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, and 25. |
| Arm II (induction therapy) | Experimental | Drug: asparaginase, Drug: dexamethasone, Drug: methotrexate, Drug: mitoxantrone hydrochloride, Drug: pegaspargase, Drug: vincristine sulfatePatients receive mitoxantrone IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2. Patients also receive dexamethasone, methotrexate, vincristine sulfate, and pegaspargase or asparaginase as in arm I. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| asparaginaseGiven intramuscularly | Drug | Arm I (induction therapy), Arm II (induction therapy) |
| dexamethasoneGiven orally | Drug | Arm I (induction therapy), Arm II (induction therapy) |
| idarubicinGiven IV | Drug | Arm I (induction therapy) |
| methotrexateGiven intrathecally | Drug | Arm I (induction therapy), Arm II (induction therapy) |
| mitoxantrone hydrochlorideGiven IV | Drug | Arm II (induction therapy) |
| pegaspargaseGiven intramuscularly | Drug | Arm I (induction therapy), Arm II (induction therapy) |
| vincristine sulfateGiven IV | Drug | Arm I (induction therapy), Arm II (induction therapy) |
Primary outcome
Progression-free survival (PFS) of United Kingdom (UK) patients stratified by risk groups
Evaluation of whether a minimal residual disease (MRD) level of 10(-4) is a suitable criterion at the end of induction therapy on which to decide whether chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation will be most beneficial to patients with intermediate- ...
5 secondary outcomes
MRD as a surrogate marker for treatment response and PFS
Comparison of PFS, MRD level at day 35, and toxicity as response variables in patients randomized to receive induction therapy with mitoxantrone hydrochloride or idarubicin
PFS of all patients (UK, Dutch, Australian, and New Zealand) stratified by risk groups
Comparison of PFS and overall survival between patients enrolled in this study and patients enrolled in R2 or I-BFM
Evaluation of whether pre-stem cell transplantation cytoreduction (FLAD) reduces tumor load and how it affects outcome following transplant
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Aug 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 21131038Parker C, Waters R, Leighton C, Hancock J, Sutton R, Moorman AV, Ancliff P, Morgan M, Masurekar A, Goulden N, Green N, Revesz T, Darbyshire P, Love S, Saha V. Effect of mitoxantrone on outcome of children with first relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL R3): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Dec 11;376(9757):2009-17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62002-8. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34010787Eckert C, Parker C, Moorman AV, Irving JA, Kirschner-Schwabe R, Groeneveld-Krentz S, Revesz T, Hoogerbrugge P, Hancock J, Sutton R, Henze G, Chen-Santel C, Attarbaschi A, Bourquin JP, Sramkova L, Zimmermann M, Krishnan S, von Stackelberg A, Saha V. Risk factors and outcomes in children with high-risk B-cell precursor and T-cell relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: combined analysis of ALLR3 and ALL-REZ BFM 2002 clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Jul;151:175-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.034. Epub 2021 May 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30826273Parker C, Krishnan S, Hamadeh L, Irving JAE, Kuiper RP, Revesz T, Hoogerbrugge P, Hancock J, Sutton R, Moorman AV, Saha V. Outcomes of patients with childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with late bone marrow relapses: long-term follow-up of the ALLR3 open-label randomised trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019 Apr;6(4):e204-e216. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30003-1. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
Related trials for Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vaskar Saha, MD principal investigator
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
6 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing asparaginase, dexamethasone and idarubicin in people with Leukemia, run by Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group at 6 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in United Kingdom, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free survival (PFS) of United Kingdom (UK) patients stratified by risk groups. The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00967057, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2013.