AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseNCT00960648

Registry to Evaluate Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in Reducing Late Loss After Stenting

An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 18 sites in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and long-term effectiveness of coronary stenting with the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and to determine clinical device and procedural success during commercial use of EES in the real world. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
What is being tested?
Xience/Promus and Cypher
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
3,056 participants
Where
18 sitesSouth Korea
Study dates
Apr 2008to Jan 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Approximately 4000 patients derived from a population of patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention for ischemic heart disease will be enrolled in the present registry.

Who may be able to join

  • The patient agrees to participate in this study by signing the informed consent form.
  • Alternatively, a legally authorized patient representative may agree to the patient's participation in this study and sign the informed consent form.

Who cannot join

  • There are no exclusion criteria for this registry.

Trial locations and contacts

18 sites in 1 country.

18 sites in 1 country

South Korea18 sites
  • Dankook University Hospital

    Cheonan

  • Soon Chun Hyang University Hospital Cheonan

    Cheonan

  • Chungbuk National University Hospital

    Cheongju-si

  • Kwangju Veterans Hospital

    Gwangju

  • Chonbuk National University Hospital

    Iksan

  • Wonkwang University Hospital

    Iksan

  • Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital

    Ilsan

  • Gachon Kil Medical Center

    Inchon

  • Presbyterian Medical Center

    Jeonju

  • Gyeongsang National University Hospital

    Jinju

  • Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital

    Pusan

  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    Seongnam

  • Gangnam Severance Hospital

    Seoul

  • Kyung Hee University Medical Center

    Seoul

  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul

  • Yonsei University Medical Center

    Seoul

  • St. Carollo Hospital

    Suncheon

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: EXCELLENT (Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher in rEducing Late Loss After stENTing) Registry

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and long-term effectiveness of coronary stenting with the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and to determine clinical device and procedural success during commercial use of EES in the real world.

The investigators will compare EES (Xience/Promus, prospective arm) with sirolimus-eluting stent (SES, Cypher, retrospective arm).

Being tested
Xience/Promus, Cypher
Keywords
Everolimus, Sirolimus, Drug eluting stent
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Xience/PromusDevice

    Also called EES

    Active prospective registration of patients receiving everolimus-eluting stent

  • CypherDevice

    Also called SES

    Retrospective historical controls that received sirolimus-eluting stent

Study groups in NCT00960648
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Xience/PromusActive prospective registration of patients receiving everolimus eluting stent
Receives: Device: Xience/Promus
CypherRetrospective historical controls that received sirolimus-eluting stent
Receives: Device: Cypher

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Major Adverse Cardiac Events (composite of cardiac death, non-fatal MI, target lesion revascularization)

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. In-stent & In-segment Late Loss

    Measured: 9 months

  2. Stent Thrombosis

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Target Vessel Failure (composite of cardiac death, MI, and TVR)

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Any death, cardiac death, MI, TLR, TVR

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Composite rate of cardiac death and any MI

    Measured: 1 year

  6. Composite rate of all death and any MI

    Measured: 1 year

  7. Composite rate of all death, any MI (Q-wave and non Q-wave) and any repeat revascularization

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Compliance and therapy interruptions with prescribed adjunctive antiplatelet therapy

    Measured: 1 year

  9. Clinical device and procedural success

    Measured: During the health care facility stay

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Aug 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2008
  3. Primary completionJan 2014
  4. Study completionJan 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
3,056 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00960648
Sponsor's protocol ID
EXCELLENT-REGISTRY
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
14 Aug 2009
Last updated
27 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Lee JM, Hahn JY, Kang J, Park KW, Chun WJ, Rha SW, Yu CW, Jeong JO, Jeong MH, Yoon JH, Jang Y, Tahk SJ, Gwon HC, Koo BK, Kim HS. Differential Prognostic Effect Between First- and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Patient-Level Analysis of the Korean Bifurcation Pooled Cohorts. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 24;8(10):1318-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.05.014.

    PubMed 26315734

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 18 sites in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 18 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Major Adverse Cardiac Events (composite of cardiac death, non-fatal MI, target lesion revascularization) (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00960648, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in