AzTrials
AzTrials

Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein OcclusionPhase 3NCT00943072

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO)

A Phase 3 study testing VEGF Trap-Eye 2.0mg in people with Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 61 sites in 5 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a phase 3 study to determine the efficacy of VEGF Trap-Eye injected into the eye on vision function in subjects with macular edema as a consequence of central retinal vein occlusion. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
VEGF Trap-Eye 2.0mg
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
189 participants
Where
61 sitesin 5 countries
Study dates
Jul 2009to Apr 2012
Phase
Phase 3

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects at least 18 years of age with center-involved macular edema secondary to CRVO with mean central retinal thickness ≥ 250 μm on OCT
  • ETDRS best corrected visual acuity of 20/40 to 20/320 (73 to 24 letters) in the study eye

Who cannot join

  • Previous treatment with anti-angiogenic drugs in the study eye (Pegaptanib sodium,anecortave acetate, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, etc.)
  • Prior panretinal laser photocoagulation or macular laser photocoagulation in the study eye
  • CRVO disease duration > 9 months from date of diagnosis
  • Previous use of intraocular corticosteroids in the study eye or use of periocular corticosteroids in the study eye within the 3 months prior to Day 1
  • Iris neovascularization, vitreous hemorrhage, traction retinal detachment, or preretinal fibrosis involving the macula in either the study eye or fellow eye

Trial locations and contacts

61 sites in 5 countries.

61 sites in 5 countries

United States46 sites
  • Study site

    Abilene, Texas, 79606

  • Study site

    Altamonte Springs, Florida, 32701

  • Study site

    Arcadia, California, 91007

  • Study site

    Augusta, Georgia, 30909

  • Study site

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21209

  • Study site

    Beverly Hills, California, 90211

  • Study site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Study site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • Study site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Study site

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33334

  • Study site

    Fort Myers, Florida, 33907

  • Study site

    Fort Myers, Florida, 33912

  • Study site

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76102

  • Study site

    Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49525

  • Study site

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Study site

    Jackson, Michigan, 48104

  • Study site

    Kingston, Pennsylvania, 18704

  • Study site

    La Jolla, California, 92037

  • Study site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89135

  • Study site

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68506

  • Study site

    Miami, Florida, 33143

  • Study site

    Mountain View, California, 94040

  • Study site

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • Study site

    New London, Connecticut, 06320

  • Study site

    Northfield, New Jersey, 08225

  • Study site

    Oakland, California, 94609

  • Study site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104

  • Study site

    Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 33410

  • Study site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85014

  • Study site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85020

  • Study site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Study site

    Portland, Oregon, 97210

  • Study site

    Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701

  • Study site

    Rochester, New York, 14620

  • Study site

    Sacramento, California, 95841

  • Study site

    Salem, Oregon, 97302

  • Study site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78240

  • Study site

    Toms River, New Jersey, 08755

  • Study site

    Torrance, California, 90503

  • Study site

    Towson, Maryland, 21204

  • Study site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85704

  • Study site

    West Columbia, South Carolina, 29169

  • Study site

    Wichita, Kansas, 67214

  • Study site

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157

  • Study site

    Winter Haven, Florida, 33880

Other trials in United States

Canada6 sites
  • Study site

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9

  • Study site

    London, Ontario, N6A 4V2

  • Study site

    Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 1W9

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

  • Study site

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 3N9

  • Study site

    Victoria, British Columbia, V8V 4X3

Other trials in Canada

Israel4 sites
  • Study site

    Kfar Saba, Israel, 44281

  • Study site

    Petah Tikva, Israel, 49100

  • Study site

    Rehovot, Israel, 76100

  • Study site

    Tel Aviv, Israel, 64239

Other trials in Israel

India3 sites
  • Study site

    Bangalore, Karnataka, 560010

  • Study site

    Hyderabad, A.p., 500034

  • Study site

    Kolkata, West Bengal, 700073

Other trials in India

Colombia2 sites
  • Study site

    Bogotá

  • Study site

    Medellín, Antioquia

Other trials in Colombia

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double Masked, Controlled Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Repeated Intravitreal Administration of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Trap-Eye in Subjects With Macular Edema Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

This is a phase 3 study to determine the efficacy of VEGF Trap-Eye injected into the eye on vision function in subjects with macular edema as a consequence of central retinal vein occlusion.

Being tested
VEGF Trap-Eye 2.0mg, Sham
Keywords
Macular edema, Retinal vein occlusion, CRVO, VEGF Trap-Eye, best-corrected visual acuity, Regeneron, COPERNICUS
Medical subject headings
Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VEGF Trap-Eye 2.0mgBiological

    Monthly intravitreal injection out to the Week 24 Primary endpoint

  • ShamDrug

    Monthly sham intravitreal injection out to Week 24 Primary Endpoint

Study groups in NCT00943072
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
VEGF Trap-EyeExperimentalMonthly IVT injection of VEGF Trap-Eye 2.0 mg until Week 24 Primary Endpoint
Receives: Biological: VEGF Trap-Eye 2.0mg
ShamSham comparatorMonthly Sham IVT injection until Week 24 Primary Endpoint
Receives: Drug: Sham

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Gained at Least 15 Letters in BCVA at Week 24 as Measured by ETDRS Letter Score

    Percentage values indicate the number of subjects in each arm who were able to read an additional 15 letters or more at Week 24 compared to baseline.

    Defined study baseline range of ETDRS Best Corrected Visual Acuity letter score of 73 to 24 letters (= Acuity of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 24

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change From Baseline in BCVA as Measured by ETDRS Letter Score at Week 24 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

    Defined study baseline range of ETDRS Best Corrected Visual Acuity letter score of 73 to 24 (= Acuity of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye; a higher score represents better functioning.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 24

  2. Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Week 24 - LOCF

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 24

  3. Percentage of Participants Progressing to Any of the Following: Anterior Segment Neovascularization, New Vessels of the Disc (NVD) or New Vessels Elsewhere (NVE) During the First 24 Weeks

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  4. Change From Baseline in the NEI VFQ-25 in Total Score at Week 24 (LOCF)

    The NEI VFQ-25 assesses visual function and quality of life. Total score ranges from 0-100 with a score of 0 being the worst outcome and 100 being the best outcome. The NEI VFQ questionnaire is organized as a collection of subscales which are all scored from 0-100. To reach the overall composite score, each sub-scale score is averaged in order to give each sub-scale equal weight.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jul 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2009
  3. Primary completionOct 2010
  4. Study completionApr 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
189 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00943072
Sponsor's protocol ID
VGFT-OD-0819
Status last verified
Apr 2013
First submitted
10 Jul 2009
Last updated
27 May 2013
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in