Liver CancerPhase 2NCT00941967
Sorafenib With or Without Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic Liver Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing gemcitabine hydrochloride, oxaliplatin and sorafenib tosylate in people with Liver Cancer, run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Sorafenib tosylate may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth and by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Liver Cancer
- What is being tested?
- gemcitabine hydrochloride, oxaliplatin and sorafenib tosylate
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 78 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Dec 2008to Dec 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 120 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to liver transplantation
- Locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic disease
- At least 1 lesion accurately measured in ≥ 1 dimension according to RECIST criteria AND has not been previously treated with local therapy (e.g., intra-arterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, or cryoablation)
- No presence of bone metastasis only
- No known brain metastasis
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- WHO performance status 0-1
- Life expectancy > 12 weeks
- ANC > 1,500/mm^3
- WBC > 3,000/mm^3
- Platelet count ≥ 90,000/mm^3
- Hemoglobin > 10 g/dL
- Total protein ≥ 40%
- ALT or AST ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times ULN
- Amylase and lipase < 1.5 times ULN
- Creatinine < 1.5 times ULN
- Creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min
- Albumin ≥ 2.8 mg/dL
- INR ≤ 2.3
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception during study and for up to 4 months for females and 6 months for males after completion of study treatment
- CLIP score 0-3
- No Child Pugh score B or C cirrhosis
- No known HIV positivity
- No other prior malignancy, except adequately treated or curative basal cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
- No known or suspected allergy to the investigational agent or any agent given in association with this study
- No cardiovascular disease, including any of the following:
- Cardiac arrhythmia requiring antiarrhythmic therapy, except beta-blockers or digoxin for chronic atrial fibrillation
- Active coronary artery disease or ischemia
- Myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
- NYHA class II-IV congestive heart failure
- No uncontrolled hypertension
- No severe active bacterial or fungal infection > CTCAE v3.0 grade 2
- No peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2
- No condition that could affect the absorption of study drug, including any of the following:
- Malabsorption syndrome
- Disease significantly affecting gastrointestinal function
- Bowel obstruction or sub-obstruction
- No dysphagia or inability to swallow tablets
- No history of seizures requiring long-term antiepileptic treatment
- No unstable condition that would jeopardize safety or compliance with study including any of the following :
- Medical, psychological, or social conditions
- Substance abuse
- Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity
- No psychological, familial, social, or geographic reasons that would preclude clinical follow-up
- Must be registered in a social security program
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- No prior organ transplantation with immunosuppressive treatment
- No prior systemic chemotherapy or systemic antiangiogenic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma
- No prior major resection of the stomach or proximal small bowel
- Prior anticoagulation therapy (e.g., warfarin or heparin) allowed with INR parameters within normal limit range
- At least 4 weeks since prior local therapy to lesions and treated lesions may not be selected as target lesions
- No concurrent or prior long-term treatment with CYP3A4 inducers (e.g., rifampin, hypericum perforatum, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and dexamethasone)
- No concurrent antitumoral treatment, including tamoxifen, interferon, or somatostatin analogues
- No other concurrent experimental drugs or anticancer therapy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site
Centre Regional de Lutte Contre le Cancer - Centre Val d'Aurelle
Montpellier, 34295
About this study
Official title: Randomized Phase II Trial Assessing the Combination of Nexavar® (Sorafenib), and Gemcitabine/Oxaliplatin in Patients Treated for Advanced (Unresectable/Metastatic) Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
RATIONALE: Sorafenib tosylate may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth and by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known whether sorafenib tosylate is more effective when given with or without gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin in treating patients with liver cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying sorafenib tosylate to see how well it works when given with or without gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin in treating patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic liver cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Assess progression-free survival (RECIST) in patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib tosylate with vs without gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin.
Secondary
- Evaluate the tolerability of these regimens in these patients.
- Determine the objective response rate (RECIST) in patients treated with these regimens.
- Assess the overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Evaluate the pharmacokinetics of sorafenib tosylate.
- Assess biomarkers (e.g., pERK levels) associated with treatment response.
- Assess angiogenic response by functional imaging.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to performance status and CLIP score. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive oral sorafenib tosylate as in arm I. Patients also receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 100 minutes on day 1 and oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 2. Treatment with gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin repeats every 14 days for 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive oral sorafenib tosylate twice daily on days 1-14. In both arms, courses with sorafenib tosylate repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Blood samples and/ or tumor tissue samples may be collected for further analysis.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 2 months until disease progression and then every 6 months thereafter.
- Conditions
- Liver Cancer
- Being tested
- gemcitabine hydrochloride, oxaliplatin, sorafenib tosylate
- Keywords
- adult primary hepatocellular carcinoma, localized unresectable adult primary liver cancer, recurrent adult primary liver cancer, advanced adult primary liver cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Liver Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Given IV
oxaliplatinDrug
Given IV
sorafenib tosylateDrug
Given orally.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I | Experimental | Patients receive oral sorafenib tosylate as in arm I. Patients also receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 100 minutes on day 1 and oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 2. Treatment with gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin repeats every 14 days for 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Receives: Drug: sorafenib tosylate |
| Arm II | Experimental | Patients receive oral sorafenib tosylate twice daily on days 1-14. Receives: Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride; Drug: oxaliplatin; Drug: sorafenib tosylate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Tumor response according to RECIST criteria
Measured: 18 months
Progression-free survival
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2008
- Primary completionDec 2010
- Study completionDec 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Liver CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eric Assenat, MD, Principal investigator, Hopital Saint Eloi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00941967
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CDR0000638394
- Other IDs
- CLCC-GONEXT-PRODIGE-10, VA 2007/40, INCA-RECF0917, EUDRACT-2008-000123-26
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 17 Jul 2009
- Last updated
- 10 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205-16. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205.
PubMed 10655437Blay JY, Bonvalot S, Casali P, Choi H, Debiec-Richter M, Dei Tos AP, Emile JF, Gronchi A, Hogendoorn PC, Joensuu H, Le Cesne A, McClure J, Maurel J, Nupponen N, Ray-Coquard I, Reichardt P, Sciot R, Stroobants S, van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom A, Demetri GD; GIST consensus meeting panelists. Consensus meeting for the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Report of the GIST Consensus Conference of 20-21 March 2004, under the auspices of ESMO. Ann Oncol. 2005 Apr;16(4):566-78. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi127.
PubMed 15781488Blay JY, Landi B, Bonvalot S, Monges G, Ray-Coquard I, Duffaud F, Bui NB, Bugat R, Chayvialle JA, Rougier P, Bouche O, Bonichon F, Lassau N, Vanel D, Nordlinger B, Stoeckle E, Meeus P, Coindre JM, Scoazec JY, Emile JF, Ranchere D, Le Cesne A. [Recommendations for the management of GIST patients]. Bull Cancer. 2005 Oct;92(10):907-18. French.
PubMed 16266874Lassau N, Lamuraglia M, Leclere J, Rouffiac V. [Functional and early evaluation of treatments in oncology: interest of ultrasonographic contrast agents]. J Radiol. 2004 May;85(5 Pt 2):704-12. doi: 10.1016/s0221-0363(04)97651-2. French.
PubMed 15238871Lassau N, Chami L, Peronneau P. [Current events about echography in 2006: position of the ultrasound functional imaging for the early evaluation of targeted therapeutics]. Bull Cancer. 2006 Dec;93(12):1207-11. French.
PubMed 17182377Lassau N, Lamuraglia M, Chami L, Leclere J, Bonvalot S, Terrier P, Roche A, Le Cesne A. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib: monitoring response with contrast-enhanced sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Nov;187(5):1267-73. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.1192.
PubMed 17056915Lamuraglia M, Escudier B, Chami L, Schwartz B, Leclere J, Roche A, Lassau N. To predict progression-free survival and overall survival in metastatic renal cancer treated with sorafenib: pilot study using dynamic contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasound. Eur J Cancer. 2006 Oct;42(15):2472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.023. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
PubMed 16965911Escudier B, Lassau N, Angevin E, Soria JC, Chami L, Lamuraglia M, Zafarana E, Landreau V, Schwartz B, Brendel E, Armand JP, Robert C. Phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with IFN alpha-2a in patients with unresectable and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma or malignant melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Mar 15;13(6):1801-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1432.
PubMed 17363536
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Phase II Trial Assessing the Combination of Nexavar® (Sorafenib), and Gemcitabine/Oxaliplatin in Patients Treated for Advanced (Unresectable/Metastatic) Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00941967
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CDR0000638394
- Conditions
- Liver Cancer
- Keywords
- adult primary hepatocellular carcinoma, localized unresectable adult primary liver cancer, recurrent adult primary liver cancer, advanced adult primary liver cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Sorafenib tosylate may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth and by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. It is not yet known whether sorafenib tosylate is more effective when given with or without gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin in treating patients with liver cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying sorafenib tosylate to see how well it works when given with or without gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin in treating patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic liver cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Assess progression-free survival (RECIST) in patients with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib tosylate with vs without gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin.
Secondary
- Evaluate the tolerability of these regimens in these patients.
- Determine the objective response rate (RECIST) in patients treated with these regimens.
- Assess the overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.
- Evaluate the pharmacokinetics of sorafenib tosylate.
- Assess biomarkers (e.g., pERK levels) associated with treatment response.
- Assess angiogenic response by functional imaging.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to performance status and CLIP score. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive oral sorafenib tosylate as in arm I. Patients also receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 100 minutes on day 1 and oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 2. Treatment with gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin repeats every 14 days for 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm II: Patients receive oral sorafenib tosylate twice daily on days 1-14. In both arms, courses with sorafenib tosylate repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Blood samples and/ or tumor tissue samples may be collected for further analysis.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 2 months until disease progression and then every 6 months thereafter.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I | Experimental | Drug: sorafenib tosylatePatients receive oral sorafenib tosylate as in arm I. Patients also receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 100 minutes on day 1 and oxaliplatin IV over 2 hours on day 2. Treatment with gemcitabine hydrochloride and oxaliplatin repeats every 14 days for 12 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
| Arm II | Experimental | Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride, Drug: oxaliplatin, Drug: sorafenib tosylatePatients receive oral sorafenib tosylate twice daily on days 1-14. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 120 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| gemcitabine hydrochlorideGiven IV | Drug | Arm II |
| oxaliplatinGiven IV | Drug | Arm II |
| sorafenib tosylateGiven orally. | Drug | Arm I, Arm II |
Primary outcome
Tumor response according to RECIST criteria
Time frame: 18 months
Progression-free survival
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jul 2019.
- Background: PubMed 10655437Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205-16. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205.
- Background: PubMed 15781488Blay JY, Bonvalot S, Casali P, Choi H, Debiec-Richter M, Dei Tos AP, Emile JF, Gronchi A, Hogendoorn PC, Joensuu H, Le Cesne A, McClure J, Maurel J, Nupponen N, Ray-Coquard I, Reichardt P, Sciot R, Stroobants S, van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom A, Demetri GD; GIST consensus meeting panelists. Consensus meeting for the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Report of the GIST Consensus Conference of 20-21 March 2004, under the auspices of ESMO. Ann Oncol. 2005 Apr;16(4):566-78. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi127.
- Background: PubMed 16266874Blay JY, Landi B, Bonvalot S, Monges G, Ray-Coquard I, Duffaud F, Bui NB, Bugat R, Chayvialle JA, Rougier P, Bouche O, Bonichon F, Lassau N, Vanel D, Nordlinger B, Stoeckle E, Meeus P, Coindre JM, Scoazec JY, Emile JF, Ranchere D, Le Cesne A. [Recommendations for the management of GIST patients]. Bull Cancer. 2005 Oct;92(10):907-18. French.
- Background: PubMed 15238871Lassau N, Lamuraglia M, Leclere J, Rouffiac V. [Functional and early evaluation of treatments in oncology: interest of ultrasonographic contrast agents]. J Radiol. 2004 May;85(5 Pt 2):704-12. doi: 10.1016/s0221-0363(04)97651-2. French.
- Background: PubMed 17182377Lassau N, Chami L, Peronneau P. [Current events about echography in 2006: position of the ultrasound functional imaging for the early evaluation of targeted therapeutics]. Bull Cancer. 2006 Dec;93(12):1207-11. French.
- Background: PubMed 17056915Lassau N, Lamuraglia M, Chami L, Leclere J, Bonvalot S, Terrier P, Roche A, Le Cesne A. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib: monitoring response with contrast-enhanced sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Nov;187(5):1267-73. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.1192.
- Background: PubMed 16965911Lamuraglia M, Escudier B, Chami L, Schwartz B, Leclere J, Roche A, Lassau N. To predict progression-free survival and overall survival in metastatic renal cancer treated with sorafenib: pilot study using dynamic contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasound. Eur J Cancer. 2006 Oct;42(15):2472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.023. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
- Background: PubMed 17363536Escudier B, Lassau N, Angevin E, Soria JC, Chami L, Lamuraglia M, Zafarana E, Landreau V, Schwartz B, Brendel E, Armand JP, Robert C. Phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with IFN alpha-2a in patients with unresectable and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma or malignant melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Mar 15;13(6):1801-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1432.
Related trials for Liver Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
SAMe in Prevention of Oxaliplatin-associated Liver Injury
Colorectal Cancer, Liver Metastases
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eric Assenat, MD principal investigator
Hopital Saint Eloi
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing gemcitabine hydrochloride, oxaliplatin and sorafenib tosylate in people with Liver Cancer, run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Tumor response according to RECIST criteria (time frame: 18 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00941967, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2019.