MalariaPhase 2/3NCT00941785
Dihydroartemisinin (DHA)-Piperaquine for IPT to Prevent Malaria in Children in Burkina Faso
A Phase 2/3 study testing DHA-PQ and SP-AQ in people with Malaria, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Burkina Faso.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to determine whether piperaquine plus dihydroartemisinin (DHA-PQ) is as effective, and better tolerated, than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (SP+AQ), when used for seasonal Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPT) to prevent malaria in children aged 3 to 59 months in Bobo-Dioulasso… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 59 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Malaria
- What is being tested?
- DHA-PQ and SP-AQ
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBurkina Faso
- Study dates
- Jul 2009to Dec 2009
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 59 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- signed consent from a parent
- age 3-59 months at enrolment
- no history of allergy to study drugs
- no chronic illness
Who cannot join
- history of allergy to study drugs
- intention to move away from the study area before the end of 2009
- any chronic illness
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Randomized Trial of the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for Seasonal IPT to Prevent Malaria in Children Under 5 Years
The aim of the study is to determine whether piperaquine plus dihydroartemisinin (DHA-PQ) is as effective, and better tolerated, than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (SP+AQ), when used for seasonal Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPT) to prevent malaria in children aged 3 to 59 months in Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso and to determine the pharmacokinetics of piperaquine in children.
Read the detailed description
There is evidence from several studies that in areas where the transmission of malaria is seasonal, the use of IPT can reduce substantially the incidence of clinical malaria in children under the age of five years, by as much as 90% (Greenwood et al, Trends in Parasitology 24(11):485-6, 2008). The most effective regimen is SP+AQ but alternative regimens are needed because amodiaquine can be poorly tolerated (Sokhna et al PlosOne 3:e1471, 2008) and resistance to SP is increasing. In recent trials in Senegal and The Gambia, PQ combined with DHA or SP was as effective against malaria, and better tolerated, than SP+AQ. Of these regimens, only DHA+PQ is licensed for use as an antimalarial in African countries. However there are no data on pharmacokinetics of PQ when used for IPT in children, and the impact of DHA+PQ in preventing spread of resistance is not known. This trial aims to provide this information in order to evaluate the suitability of DHA+PQ for use for seasonal IPT in children and to determine the optimum dose regimen for piperaquine.
Malaria (caused primarily by Plasmodium falciparum) is endemic in the southern third of Burkina Faso, occurring seasonally between June to November, with most cases occurring between August and October. In Burkina Faso there has been no evidence of a recent decline in malaria incidence as seen in some other African countries. Although the policy is to treat uncomplicated malaria with artemisin combinations, in practice chloroquine remains the treatment used in most health facilities. Several studies have shown that seasonal IPT in children (IPTc) can provide a high degree of protection against clinical malaria. SP+AQ is the most effective regimen but amodiaquine is not well tolerated and resistance to SP is increasing n many areas. Alternative regimens are required. Piperaquine (PQ), a long acting antimalarial used for prophylaxis in China, is suitable for use for IPT. In studies in Senegal and The Gambia piperaquine plus SP or dihydroartemisinin (DHA) was as effective and better tolerated than SP+AQ. The purpose of this study is to determine whether DHA-PQ is more effective than SP+AQ in preventing spread of drug resistant parasite genotypes and to determine the pharmacokinetics of piperaquine in children who receive this drug for IPT. Little was known about the pharmacokinetics of piperaquine until recently, and there is currently only limited information about the pharmacokinetics of piperaquine in children. The pharmacokinetic data from this study will allow us to estimate the optimum dose regimen for piperaquine; the current recommended regimen for DHA-PQ is three doses over three days. For IPT, a single dose regimen is highly desirable as it would be easier to deliver and better accepted by communities.
1500 children aged 3 to 59 months will be enrolled and randomized to receive 3 monthly administrations of DHA-PQ or SP-AQ, in August, September and October. From August to November children will be visited twice weekly to check for malaria symptoms.
A subset of 45 children in each treatment group will be asked to provide a venous blood sample on days 0 and 7 for analysis of biochemical and haematological parameters.
In the DHA-PQ group only, a subset of 210 children will be asked to provide finger prick blood samples for PK analysis on day 0, between day 0 and day 6, on day 7, and between day 8 and day 30. To calibrate measurements of drug concentration in peripheral blood against existing PK models, each month 17 of these children will be asked to also provide a venous sample (up to 2ml taken into a vacutainer) on three occasions (one between day 0 and 6, one on day 7, and one between day 8 and 30). In addition, a separate group of 750 children aged 3 to 59 months will be recruited to be surveyed at the end of the transmission season to determine the prevalence of malaria parasitaemia and of drug-resistance parasite genotypes in the study area.
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Being tested
- DHA-PQ, SP-AQ
- Keywords
- Malaria, Intermittent Preventive Treatment, IPTc, sIPTc, Burkina Faso
- Medical subject headings
- Malaria
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DHA-PQDrug
Also called Seasonal IPTc with Duocotexcin (Holley)
Three monthly administrations of Duocotexcin (DHA-PQ):
dihydroartemisinin 2.1mg/kg and piperaquine phosphate 16.8 mg/kg once daily for three days
SP-AQDrug
Also called Seasonal IPTc with Fansidar plus amodiaquine (Flavoquine)
Three monthly administrations of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine:
One dose of Sulfadoxine 25mg/kg and pyrimethamine 1.25mg/kg Three daily doses of amodiaquine phosphate 10mg/kg
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| DHA-PQ | Experimental | Three monthly administrations of dihydroartemisinin (DHA) plus piperaquine (PQ) in August, September and October. Receives: Drug: DHA-PQ |
| SP-AQ | Active comparator | Three monthly administrations of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine Receives: Drug: SP-AQ |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy against clinical malaria
Measured: August to December 2009
Incidence of adverse events
Measured: Within 7 days of each treatment round and within 1 month of treatment
Secondary outcomes (1)
Pharmacokinetics of piperaquie: the oral clearance (CL/F), AUC, steady state volume of distribution(s) (Vss/F), inter-compartment clearance(s) (Q/F) and absorption rate (ka) will be estimated.
Measured: during 30 days after start of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2009
- Primary completionDec 2009
- Study completionDec 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MalariaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,500 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- BEIJING HOLLEY-COTEC PHARMACEUTICALS CO. LTD.
- Investigators
- Jean-Bosco Ouédraogo, MD, Study director, IRSS, Direction Régionale,BP 545 Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso)Paul JM Milligan, PhD, Study chair, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineIssaka Zongo, MD, Principal investigator, IRSS, Burkina Faso and LSHTM, UK
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00941785
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EC5550
- Status last verified
- Mar 2011
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2009
- Last updated
- 21 Mar 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Zongo I, Milligan P, Compaore YD, Some AF, Greenwood B, Tarning J, Rosenthal PJ, Sutherland C, Nosten F, Ouedraogo JB. Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine Compared with Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine plus Amodiaquine for Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention in Burkina Faso. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Aug;59(8):4387-96. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04923-14. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
PubMed 25918149Some AF, Zongo I, Compaore YD, Sakande S, Nosten F, Ouedraogo JB, Rosenthal PJ. Selection of drug resistance-mediating Plasmodium falciparum genetic polymorphisms by seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Burkina Faso. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Jul;58(7):3660-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02406-14. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
PubMed 24733476
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Mar 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Trial of the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for Seasonal IPT to Prevent Malaria in Children Under 5 Years
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00941785
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EC5550
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Keywords
- Malaria, Intermittent Preventive Treatment, IPTc, sIPTc, Burkina Faso
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,500 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- BEIJING HOLLEY-COTEC PHARMACEUTICALS CO. LTD.
- Study start
- Jul 2009
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to determine whether piperaquine plus dihydroartemisinin (DHA-PQ) is as effective, and better tolerated, than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine (SP+AQ), when used for seasonal Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPT) to prevent malaria in children aged 3 to 59 months in Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso and to determine the pharmacokinetics of piperaquine in children.
Detailed description
There is evidence from several studies that in areas where the transmission of malaria is seasonal, the use of IPT can reduce substantially the incidence of clinical malaria in children under the age of five years, by as much as 90% (Greenwood et al, Trends in Parasitology 24(11):485-6, 2008). The most effective regimen is SP+AQ but alternative regimens are needed because amodiaquine can be poorly tolerated (Sokhna et al PlosOne 3:e1471, 2008) and resistance to SP is increasing. In recent trials in Senegal and The Gambia, PQ combined with DHA or SP was as effective against malaria, and better tolerated, than SP+AQ. Of these regimens, only DHA+PQ is licensed for use as an antimalarial in African countries. However there are no data on pharmacokinetics of PQ when used for IPT in children, and the impact of DHA+PQ in preventing spread of resistance is not known. This trial aims to provide this information in order to evaluate the suitability of DHA+PQ for use for seasonal IPT in children and to determine the optimum dose regimen for piperaquine.
Malaria (caused primarily by Plasmodium falciparum) is endemic in the southern third of Burkina Faso, occurring seasonally between June to November, with most cases occurring between August and October. In Burkina Faso there has been no evidence of a recent decline in malaria incidence as seen in some other African countries. Although the policy is to treat uncomplicated malaria with artemisin combinations, in practice chloroquine remains the treatment used in most health facilities. Several studies have shown that seasonal IPT in children (IPTc) can provide a high degree of protection against clinical malaria. SP+AQ is the most effective regimen but amodiaquine is not well tolerated and resistance to SP is increasing n many areas. Alternative regimens are required. Piperaquine (PQ), a long acting antimalarial used for prophylaxis in China, is suitable for use for IPT. In studies in Senegal and The Gambia piperaquine plus SP or dihydroartemisinin (DHA) was as effective and better tolerated than SP+AQ. The purpose of this study is to determine whether DHA-PQ is more effective than SP+AQ in preventing spread of drug resistant parasite genotypes and to determine the pharmacokinetics of piperaquine in children who receive this drug for IPT. Little was known about the pharmacokinetics of piperaquine until recently, and there is currently only limited information about the pharmacokinetics of piperaquine in children. The pharmacokinetic data from this study will allow us to estimate the optimum dose regimen for piperaquine; the current recommended regimen for DHA-PQ is three doses over three days. For IPT, a single dose regimen is highly desirable as it would be easier to deliver and better accepted by communities.
1500 children aged 3 to 59 months will be enrolled and randomized to receive 3 monthly administrations of DHA-PQ or SP-AQ, in August, September and October. From August to November children will be visited twice weekly to check for malaria symptoms.
A subset of 45 children in each treatment group will be asked to provide a venous blood sample on days 0 and 7 for analysis of biochemical and haematological parameters.
In the DHA-PQ group only, a subset of 210 children will be asked to provide finger prick blood samples for PK analysis on day 0, between day 0 and day 6, on day 7, and between day 8 and day 30. To calibrate measurements of drug concentration in peripheral blood against existing PK models, each month 17 of these children will be asked to also provide a venous sample (up to 2ml taken into a vacutainer) on three occasions (one between day 0 and 6, one on day 7, and one between day 8 and 30). In addition, a separate group of 750 children aged 3 to 59 months will be recruited to be surveyed at the end of the transmission season to determine the prevalence of malaria parasitaemia and of drug-resistance parasite genotypes in the study area.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| DHA-PQ | Experimental | Drug: DHA-PQThree monthly administrations of dihydroartemisinin (DHA) plus piperaquine (PQ) in August, September and October. |
| SP-AQ | Active comparator | Drug: SP-AQThree monthly administrations of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 59 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- signed consent from a parent
- age 3-59 months at enrolment
- no history of allergy to study drugs
- no chronic illness
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- history of allergy to study drugs
- intention to move away from the study area before the end of 2009
- any chronic illness
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DHA-PQAlso: Seasonal IPTc with Duocotexcin (Holley)Three monthly administrations of Duocotexcin (DHA-PQ): dihydroartemisinin 2.1mg/kg and piperaquine phosphate 16.8 mg/kg once daily for three days | Drug | DHA-PQ |
| SP-AQAlso: Seasonal IPTc with Fansidar plus amodiaquine (Flavoquine)Three monthly administrations of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine: One dose of Sulfadoxine 25mg/kg and pyrimethamine 1.25mg/kg Three daily doses of amodiaquine phosphate 10mg/kg | Drug | SP-AQ |
Primary outcome
Efficacy against clinical malaria
Time frame: August to December 2009
Incidence of adverse events
Time frame: Within 7 days of each treatment round and within 1 month of treatment
1 secondary outcome
Pharmacokinetics of piperaquie: the oral clearance (CL/F), AUC, steady state volume of distribution(s) (Vss/F), inter-compartment clearance(s) (Q/F) and absorption rate (ka) will be estimated.
Time frame: during 30 days after start of treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Mar 2011.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25918149Zongo I, Milligan P, Compaore YD, Some AF, Greenwood B, Tarning J, Rosenthal PJ, Sutherland C, Nosten F, Ouedraogo JB. Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine Compared with Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine plus Amodiaquine for Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention in Burkina Faso. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Aug;59(8):4387-96. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04923-14. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24733476Some AF, Zongo I, Compaore YD, Sakande S, Nosten F, Ouedraogo JB, Rosenthal PJ. Selection of drug resistance-mediating Plasmodium falciparum genetic polymorphisms by seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Burkina Faso. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Jul;58(7):3660-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02406-14. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
Related trials for Malaria
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Trajectories and Mechanisms of Recovery From Malaria: An Observational Study
Malaria
Not yet recruiting
Positron Emission Tomography and Organ-Specific Changes in Participants Co-Enrolled in NIH Studies of Plasmodium Vivax Controlled Human Malaria Infection
Healthy Volunteer, Malaria
Recruiting
The Effects of Iron Treatment on Vaccine Immunogenicity in Kenyan Infants With Iron Deficiency
Iron Deficiencies
RecruitingObservational study
Host and Parasite Factors That Influence Susceptibility to Malaria Infection and Disease During Pregnancy and Early Childhood in Ouelessebougou and Bamako, Mali
Malaria
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of PfSPZ-LARC2 Vaccine Against CHMI in Malaria-Naïve Adults
Malaria Falciparum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean-Bosco Ouédraogo, MD study director
IRSS, Direction Régionale,BP 545 Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso)
Paul JM Milligan, PhD study chair
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Issaka Zongo, MD principal investigator
IRSS, Burkina Faso and LSHTM, UK
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing DHA-PQ and SP-AQ in people with Malaria, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Burkina Faso.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Burkina Faso. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy against clinical malaria (time frame: August to December 2009). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00941785, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2011.