Cognitive DeclineNCT00938964
Lidocaine For Neuroprotection During Cardiac Surgery
A study testing Lidocaine in people with Cognitive Decline, run by Duke University at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to see if a drug called lidocaine prevents cognitive injury (a decline in mental abilities) after heart surgery. Lidocaine is currently FDA approved and is commonly used for treating some heart rhythm disorders and for regional anesthesia (blocking nerves). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cognitive Decline
- What is being tested?
- Lidocaine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 550 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2009to 23 May 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- CABG, CABG + Valve, or Valve surgery
- Use of cardiopulmonary bypass
Who cannot join
- Less than 50 years of age
- History of diabetes
- History of symptomatic cerebrovascular disease (e.g. prior stroke) with residual deficit
- Alcoholism (> 2 drinks/day)
- History of psychiatric illness (any clinical diagnoses requiring therapy)
- History of drug abuse (any illicit drug use in the past 3 months)
Show all 12Show fewer
- Hepatic insufficiency (liver function tests > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal)
- Severe pulmonary insufficiency (requiring home oxygen therapy)
- Renal failure (baseline serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl)
- Pregnant women
- Unable to read and thus unable to complete the cognitive testing
- Score < 24 on a baseline Mini Mental State examination (MMSE) or greater than or equal to 27 on the baseline Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale -
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Sentara Cardiovascular Research Institute
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
About this study
The purpose of this study is to see if a drug called lidocaine prevents cognitive injury (a decline in mental abilities) after heart surgery. Lidocaine is currently FDA approved and is commonly used for treating some heart rhythm disorders and for regional anesthesia (blocking nerves). The investigators are enrolling subjects in this research project to see if lidocaine will reduce the high incidence of cognitive injury seen after heart surgery. As part of this study, the investigators will also evaluate the relationship between cognitive injury and genetic makeup and the chemical changes in the subjects blood during and after surgery.
- Conditions
- Cognitive Decline
- Being tested
- Lidocaine, Placebo
- Keywords
- Cognition
- Medical subject headings
- Cognitive Dysfunction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LidocaineDrug
Lidocaine versus placebo infusion for 48 hours
PlaceboDrug
Lidocaine versus placebo infusion for 48 hours
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine | Experimental | Lidocaine infusion for 48 hours Receives: Drug: Lidocaine |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Normal saline infusion for 48 hours Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Cognitive Function From Baseline Characterized as Continuous Cognitive Change
To characterize cognitive function over time, while minimizing potential redundancy in the cognitive measures, a factor analysis was performed on the 14 cognitive test scores from baseline. We chose a five-factor solution, which represents 5 cognitive domains: structured verbal memory, unstructured verbal memory, executive function, visual memory and attention/concentration. To quantify overall cognitive function, a baseline cognitive index was first calculated as the mean of the 5 preoperative domain scores. The cognitive index score has a mean of zero, thus any positive score is above the mean, any negative score is below the mean. A continuous change score was then calculated by subtracting the baseline from the 6-week cognitive index. The resulting outcome measure is unbounded with standard deviation of 0.35. A negative change score indicating decline and a positive score indicating improvement.
Measured: Preoperative to 6 weeks after surgery
Count of Participants With a Decline of Greater Than or Equal to One Standard Deviation in One or More of Five Cognitive Domain Scores Reported as a Dichotomous Post-operative Cognitive Deficit (POCD) Outcome
To characterize cognitive function over time, while minimizing potential redundancy in the cognitive measures, a factor analysis was performed on the 14 cognitive test scores from baseline. We chose a five-factor solution, which represents 5 cognitive domains: structured verbal memory, unstructured verbal memory, executive function, visual memory and attention/concentration. Each domain score is normally distributed with a mean of zero. A change score was calculated for each domain by subtracting the baseline from the 6-week score. A dichotomous outcome variable of post-operative cognitive deficit was defined as a decline of ≥1 standard deviation in 1 or more of the 5 domains.
Measured: Preoperative to 6 weeks after surgery
Secondary outcomes (27)
Transcerebral Activation Gradients of Platelets
Paired jugular venous and radial arterial blood samples were drawn at baseline, cross-clamp removal, end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and 6 hours post cross-clamp removalime points and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify activated platelets. Transcerebral activation gradients were calculated by subtracting arterial values from venous values and were compared between groups
Measured: Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Transcerebral Activation Gradients of Neutrophils
Paired jugular venous and radial arterial blood samples were drawn at baseline, cross-clamp removal, end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and 6 hours post cross-clamp removal and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify activated platelets. Transcerebral activation gradients were calculated by subtracting arterial values from venous values and were compared between groups
Measured: Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Transcerebral Activation Gradients of Monocytes
Paired jugular venous and radial arterial blood samples were drawn at baseline, cross-clamp removal, end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and 6 hours post cross-clamp removalime points and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify activated platelets. Transcerebral activation gradients were calculated by subtracting arterial values from venous values and were compared between groups
Measured: Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Transcerebral Activation Gradient of Platelet-neutrophil Conjugates
Paired jugular venous and radial arterial blood samples were drawn at baseline, cross-clamp removal, end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and 6 hours post cross-clamp removalime points and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting to identify activated platelets. Transcerebral activation gradients were calculated by subtracting arterial values from venous values and were compared between groups
Measured: Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Change in Cognitive Function From Baseline
To characterize cognitive function over time, while minimizing potential redundancy in the cognitive measures, a factor analysis was performed on the 14 cognitive test scores from baseline. We chose a five-factor solution, which represents 5 cognitive domains: structured verbal memory, unstructured verbal memory, executive function, visual memory and attention/concentration. To quantify overall cognitive function, a baseline cognitive index was first calculated as the mean of the 5 preoperative domain scores. The cognitive index score has a mean of zero, thus any positive score is above the mean, any negative score is below the mean. A continuous change score was then calculated by subtracting the baseline from the 1 year cognitive index. The resulting outcome measure is unbounded with standard deviation of 0.35. A negative change score indicating decline and a positive score indicating improvement
Measured: 1 year after surgery
Change in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI)
The DASI is a 12-item scale of functional capacity that has been found to correlate well with objective measures of maximal exercise capacity. Items reflect activities of personal care, ambulation, household tasks, sexual function, and recreational activities. Activities done "with no difficulty" receive scores, which are weighted and summed, for a quantitative measure of functional status. Scores range from 0 to 60; a higher-weighted score indicates better function.
Measured: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI)
The DASI is a 12-item scale of functional capacity that has been found to correlate well with objective measures of maximal exercise capacity. Items reflect activities of personal care, ambulation, household tasks, sexual function, and recreational activities. Activities done "with no difficulty" receive scores, which are weighted and summed, for a quantitative measure of functional status. Scores range from 0 to 60; a higher-weighted score indicates better function.
Measured: baseline, 1-year
Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute cerebral infarction on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patent's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items. The range of scores is from 0 (normal) to 42 (profound effect of stroke on patient).
Measured: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute cerebral infarction on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patent's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items. The range of scores is from 0 (normal) to 42 (profound effect of stroke on patient).
Measured: baseline, 1-year
Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). The CES-D is a 20-item self-report examination designed to measure symptoms of depression. Subjects rate the degree to which they have experienced a range of symptoms of depression, such as "I had crying spells" and "I felt lonely." Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms. Scores greater than 16 are typically considered indicative of clinically significant depression.
Measured: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). The CES-D is a 20-item self-report examination designed to measure symptoms of depression. Subjects rate the degree to which they have experienced a range of symptoms of depression, such as "I had crying spells" and "I felt lonely." Scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms. Scores greater than 16 are typically considered indicative of clinically significant depression.
Measured: baseline, 1-year
Change in Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI): The STAI consists of two 20-item scales that measure anxiety. Representative items include statements such as "I feel nervous" and "I feel worried." These items are rated on a 4-point scale, based on how well they describe the patient's current or typical mood, from "not at all" to "very much so." Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.
Measured: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI): The STAI consists of two 20-item scales that measure anxiety. Representative items include statements such as "I feel nervous" and "I feel worried." These items are rated on a 4-point scale, based on how well they describe the patient's current or typical mood, from "not at all" to "very much so." Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.
Measured: baseline, 1-year
Change in Symptom Limitations
Symptom limitations: Patients were given a list of eight symptoms and asked to rate the degree to which the symptom limited daily activities. The symptoms were angina, shortness of breath, arthritis, back trouble, leg pains, headaches, fatigue, and other. Scores range from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater limitations.
Measured: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Symptom Limitations
Symptom limitations: Patients were given a list of eight symptoms and asked to rate the degree to which the symptom limited daily activities. The symptoms were angina, shortness of breath, arthritis, back trouble, leg pains, headaches, fatigue, and other. Scores range from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater limitations.
Measured: baseline, 1-year
Change in the Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL)
Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL): This measure contains six items that assess the ability to perform important tasks for daily living (e.g., "Could you prepare your own meals?" "Could you drive a car?"). Scores range from 6 to 24. Higher scores indicate increasing difficulty in engaging in daily activities.
Measured: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in the Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL)
Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL): This measure contains six items that assess the ability to perform important tasks for daily living (e.g., "Could you prepare your own meals?" "Could you drive a car?"). Scores range from 6 to 24. Higher scores indicate increasing difficulty in engaging in daily activities.
Measured: baseline, 1-year
Change in the Cognitive Difficulties Scale
Cognitive Difficulties Scale: a 39-item scale, is a self-report assessment of perceived problems in long- and short-term memory, concentration, attention, and psycho-motor coordination. Sample items are "I forget errands I planned to do" and "I fail to recognize people I know." Scores range from 39 to 164, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive difficulty.
Measured: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in the Cognitive Difficulties Scale
Cognitive Difficulties Scale: a 39-item scale, is a self-report assessment of perceived problems in long- and short-term memory, concentration, attention, and psycho-motor coordination. Sample items are "I forget errands I planned to do" and "I fail to recognize people I know." Scores range from 39 to 164, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive difficulty.
Measured: baseline, 1-year
Change in Perceived Social Support
Perceived Social Support Scale: Twelve items indicate how strongly subjects agree that there is "a special person who is around when I am in need" and "my family really tries to help me." Choices range from "very strongly disagree" to "very strongly agree." Items are summed for a range of 12 to 84, with a high score meaning more social support.
Measured: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Perceived Social Support
Perceived Social Support Scale: Twelve items indicate how strongly subjects agree that there is "a special person who is around when I am in need" and "my family really tries to help me." Choices range from "very strongly disagree" to "very strongly agree." Items are summed for a range of 12 to 84, with a high score meaning more social support.
Measured: baseline, 1-year
Change in Social Activity
Social Activity: This measure consisted of eight items that indicate the degree of social interaction. Sample items are "How often do you talk on the telephone with friends and relatives?" and "How often do you attend meetings of social groups, clubs, or civic organizations?" Scores range from 8 to 32. A lower score indicates more social activity.
Measured: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Social Activity
Social Activity: This measure consisted of eight items that indicate the degree of social interaction. Sample items are "How often do you talk on the telephone with friends and relatives?" and "How often do you attend meetings of social groups, clubs, or civic organizations?" Scores range from 8 to 32. A lower score indicates more social activity.
Measured: baseline, 1-year
Change in Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): The SF-36 was designed to measure general health status. Two scales were used: Work Activities (four items) and General Health (one item). For the work activities scale, the reported score was the sum of four questions, each with values ranging from 1 to 4, the total score could range from 4 to 16. A higher score on Work Activities indicates more health-related problems For the general health question, the patients ranked their health from Excellent (1) to poor (5), the scale ranged from 1 to 5 with 1 being best health and 5 being worst. A high score in General Health indicates poorer health state.
Measured: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): The SF-36 was designed to measure general health status. Two scales were used: Work Activities (four items) and General Health (one item). For the work activities scale, the reported score was the sum of four questions, each with values ranging from 1 to 4, the total score could range from 4 to 16. A higher score on Work Activities indicates more health-related problems For the general health question, the patients ranked their health from Excellent (1) to poor (5), the scale ranged from 1 to 5 with 1 being best health and 5 being worst. A high score in General Health indicates poorer health state.
Measured: baseline, 1-year
Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the Western Perioperative Neurologic Scale (WPNS)
The Western perioperative neurologic scale was designed to detect neurologic deficits after cardiac surgery. It includes 14 items classified into eight domains (mentation, speech, cranial nerve function, motor weakness, sensation and cerebellum, reflexes, and gait). Each item is scored from 0 (severe deficit) to3 (normal), and a maximum score of 42 indicates normal neurological function.
Measured: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the Western Perioperative Neurologic Scale (WPNS)
The Western perioperative neurologic scale was designed to detect neurologic deficits after cardiac surgery. It includes 14 items classified into eight domains (mentation, speech, cranial nerve function, motor weakness, sensation and cerebellum, reflexes, and gait). Each item is scored from 0 (severe deficit) to3 (normal), and a maximum score of 42 indicates normal neurological function.
Measured: baseline, 1-year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2009
- Primary completion18 Jul 2016
- Study completion23 May 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (46)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cognitive DeclineStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Duke UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 550 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Duke University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), CAS Medical Systems, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Joseph P Mathew, M. D., Principal investigator, Duke University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00938964
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00015641
- Other IDs
- R01HL096978
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 10 Jul 2009
- Last updated
- 10 May 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, Gaver V, Grocott H, Jones RH, Mark DB, Reves JG, Blumenthal JA; Neurological Outcome Research Group and the Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Research Endeavors Investigators. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001 Feb 8;344(6):395-402. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102083440601.
PubMed 11172175Newman MF, Grocott HP, Mathew JP, White WD, Landolfo K, Reves JG, Laskowitz DT, Mark DB, Blumenthal JA; Neurologic Outcome Research Group and the Cardiothoracic Anesthesia Research Endeavors (CARE) Investigators of the Duke Heart Center. Report of the substudy assessing the impact of neurocognitive function on quality of life 5 years after cardiac surgery. Stroke. 2001 Dec 1;32(12):2874-81. doi: 10.1161/hs1201.099803.
PubMed 11739990Phillips-Bute B, Mathew JP, Blumenthal JA, Grocott HP, Laskowitz DT, Jones RH, Mark DB, Newman MF. Association of neurocognitive function and quality of life 1 year after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Psychosom Med. 2006 May-Jun;68(3):369-75. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000221272.77984.e2.
PubMed 16738066Mathew JP, Mackensen GB, Phillips-Bute B, Grocott HP, Glower DD, Laskowitz DT, Blumenthal JA, Newman MF; Neurologic Outcome Research Group (NORG) of the Duke Heart Center. Randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled study of neuroprotection with lidocaine in cardiac surgery. Stroke. 2009 Mar;40(3):880-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.531236. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
PubMed 19164788Evans DE, Kobrine AI, LeGrys DC, Bradley ME. Protective effect of lidocaine in acute cerebral ischemia induced by air embolism. J Neurosurg. 1984 Feb;60(2):257-63. doi: 10.3171/jns.1984.60.2.0257.
PubMed 6693953Mitchell SJ. Lidocaine in the treatment of decompression illness: a review of the literature. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2001 Fall;28(3):165-74.
PubMed 12067153Astrup J, Sorensen PM, Sorensen HR. Inhibition of cerebral oxygen and glucose consumption in the dog by hypothermia, pentobarbital, and lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 1981 Sep;55(3):263-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198109000-00013.
PubMed 7270951Weber ML, Taylor CP. Damage from oxygen and glucose deprivation in hippocampal slices is prevented by tetrodotoxin, lidocaine and phenytoin without blockade of action potentials. Brain Res. 1994 Nov 21;664(1-2):167-77. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91967-4.
PubMed 7895026Ayad M, Verity MA, Rubinstein EH. Lidocaine delays cortical ischemic depolarization: relationship to electrophysiologic recovery and neuropathology. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1994 Apr;6(2):98-110. doi: 10.1097/00008506-199404000-00005.
PubMed 8012179LoPachin RM, Gaughan CL, Lehning EJ, Weber ML, Taylor CP. Effects of ion channel blockade on the distribution of Na, K, Ca and other elements in oxygen-glucose deprived CA1 hippocampal neurons. Neuroscience. 2001;103(4):971-83. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00035-5.
PubMed 11301205Zhang Y, Lipton P. Cytosolic Ca2+ changes during in vitro ischemia in rat hippocampal slices: major roles for glutamate and Na+-dependent Ca2+ release from mitochondria. J Neurosci. 1999 May 1;19(9):3307-15. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-09-03307.1999.
PubMed 10212290Fujitani T, Adachi N, Miyazaki H, Liu K, Nakamura Y, Kataoka K, Arai T. Lidocaine protects hippocampal neurons against ischemic damage by preventing increase of extracellular excitatory amino acids: a microdialysis study in Mongolian gerbils. Neurosci Lett. 1994 Sep 26;179(1-2):91-4. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90942-3.
PubMed 7845632Diaz L, Gomez A, Bustos G. Lidocaine reduces the hypoxia-induced release of an excitatory amino acid analog from rat striatal slices in superfusion. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1995 Sep;19(5):943-53. doi: 10.1016/0278-5846(95)00122-c.
PubMed 8539430Dutka AJ, Mink R, McDermott J, Clark JB, Hallenbeck JM. Effect of lidocaine on somatosensory evoked response and cerebral blood flow after canine cerebral air embolism. Stroke. 1992 Oct;23(10):1515-20; discussion 1520-1. doi: 10.1161/01.str.23.10.1515.
PubMed 1412590Evans DE, Kobrine AI. Reduction of experimental intracranial hypertension by lidocaine. Neurosurgery. 1987 Apr;20(4):542-7. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198704000-00006.
PubMed 3587544
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Lidocaine For Neuroprotection During Cardiac Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00938964
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00015641
- Conditions
- Cognitive Decline
- Keywords
- Cognition
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 550 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Duke UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), CAS Medical Systems, Inc.
- Study start
- Jul 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jul 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Aug 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to see if a drug called lidocaine prevents cognitive injury (a decline in mental abilities) after heart surgery. Lidocaine is currently FDA approved and is commonly used for treating some heart rhythm disorders and for regional anesthesia (blocking nerves). The investigators are enrolling subjects in this research project to see if lidocaine will reduce the high incidence of cognitive injury seen after heart surgery. As part of this study, the investigators will also evaluate the relationship between cognitive injury and genetic makeup and the chemical changes in the subjects blood during and after surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine | Experimental | Drug: LidocaineLidocaine infusion for 48 hours |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboNormal saline infusion for 48 hours |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- CABG, CABG + Valve, or Valve surgery
- Use of cardiopulmonary bypass
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Less than 50 years of age
- History of diabetes
- History of symptomatic cerebrovascular disease (e.g. prior stroke) with residual deficit
- Alcoholism (> 2 drinks/day)
- History of psychiatric illness (any clinical diagnoses requiring therapy)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LidocaineLidocaine versus placebo infusion for 48 hours | Drug | Lidocaine |
| PlaceboLidocaine versus placebo infusion for 48 hours | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change in Cognitive Function From Baseline Characterized as Continuous Cognitive Change
Time frame: Preoperative to 6 weeks after surgery
To characterize cognitive function over time, while minimizing potential redundancy in the cognitive measures, a factor analysis was performed on the 14 cognitive test scores from baseline. We chose a five-factor solution, which represents 5 cognitive domains: structured verbal memory, unstructured verbal memory, executive function, visual memory and attention/concentration. To quantify overall cognitive function, a baseline cognitive index was first calculated as the mean of the 5 preoperative domain scores. The cognitive index score has a mean of zero, thus any positive score is above the mean, any negative score is below the mean. A continuous change score was then calculated by subtracting the baseline from the 6-week cognitive index. The resulting outcome measure is unbounded with standard deviation of 0.35. A negative change score indicating decline and a positive score indicating improvement.
Count of Participants With a Decline of Greater Than or Equal to One Standard Deviation in One or More of Five Cognitive Domain Scores Reported as a Dichotomous Post-operative Cognitive Deficit (POCD) Outcome
Time frame: Preoperative to 6 weeks after surgery
To characterize cognitive function over time, while minimizing potential redundancy in the cognitive measures, a factor analysis was performed on the 14 cognitive test scores from baseline. We chose a five-factor solution, which represents 5 cognitive domains: structured verbal memory, unstructured verbal memory, executive function, visual memory and attention/concentration. Each domain score is normally distributed with a mean of zero. A change score was calculated for each domain by subtracting the baseline from the 6-week score. A dichotomous outcome variable of post-operative cognitive deficit was defined as a decline of ≥1 standard deviation in 1 or more of the 5 domains.
27 secondary outcomes
Transcerebral Activation Gradients of Platelets
Time frame: Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Transcerebral Activation Gradients of Neutrophils
Time frame: Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Transcerebral Activation Gradients of Monocytes
Time frame: Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Transcerebral Activation Gradient of Platelet-neutrophil Conjugates
Time frame: Baseline to 6 hours post cross-clamp removal
Change in Cognitive Function From Baseline
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
Change in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI)
Time frame: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI)
Time frame: baseline, 1-year
Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Time frame: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Time frame: baseline, 1-year
Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time frame: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time frame: baseline, 1-year
Change in Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time frame: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time frame: baseline, 1-year
Change in Symptom Limitations
Time frame: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Symptom Limitations
Time frame: baseline, 1-year
Change in the Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL)
Time frame: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in the Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures- Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (OARS-IADL)
Time frame: baseline, 1-year
Change in the Cognitive Difficulties Scale
Time frame: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in the Cognitive Difficulties Scale
Time frame: baseline, 1-year
Change in Perceived Social Support
Time frame: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Perceived Social Support
Time frame: baseline, 1-year
Change in Social Activity
Time frame: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Social Activity
Time frame: baseline, 1-year
Change in Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time frame: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time frame: baseline, 1-year
Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the Western Perioperative Neurologic Scale (WPNS)
Time frame: baseline, 6-weeks
Change in Neurological Function, as Measured by the Western Perioperative Neurologic Scale (WPNS)
Time frame: baseline, 1-year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 May 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 11172175Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, Gaver V, Grocott H, Jones RH, Mark DB, Reves JG, Blumenthal JA; Neurological Outcome Research Group and the Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology Research Endeavors Investigators. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001 Feb 8;344(6):395-402. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102083440601.
- Background: PubMed 11739990Newman MF, Grocott HP, Mathew JP, White WD, Landolfo K, Reves JG, Laskowitz DT, Mark DB, Blumenthal JA; Neurologic Outcome Research Group and the Cardiothoracic Anesthesia Research Endeavors (CARE) Investigators of the Duke Heart Center. Report of the substudy assessing the impact of neurocognitive function on quality of life 5 years after cardiac surgery. Stroke. 2001 Dec 1;32(12):2874-81. doi: 10.1161/hs1201.099803.
- Background: PubMed 16738066Phillips-Bute B, Mathew JP, Blumenthal JA, Grocott HP, Laskowitz DT, Jones RH, Mark DB, Newman MF. Association of neurocognitive function and quality of life 1 year after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Psychosom Med. 2006 May-Jun;68(3):369-75. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000221272.77984.e2.
- Background: PubMed 19164788Mathew JP, Mackensen GB, Phillips-Bute B, Grocott HP, Glower DD, Laskowitz DT, Blumenthal JA, Newman MF; Neurologic Outcome Research Group (NORG) of the Duke Heart Center. Randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled study of neuroprotection with lidocaine in cardiac surgery. Stroke. 2009 Mar;40(3):880-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.531236. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
- Background: PubMed 6693953Evans DE, Kobrine AI, LeGrys DC, Bradley ME. Protective effect of lidocaine in acute cerebral ischemia induced by air embolism. J Neurosurg. 1984 Feb;60(2):257-63. doi: 10.3171/jns.1984.60.2.0257.
- Background: PubMed 12067153Mitchell SJ. Lidocaine in the treatment of decompression illness: a review of the literature. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2001 Fall;28(3):165-74.
- Background: PubMed 7270951Astrup J, Sorensen PM, Sorensen HR. Inhibition of cerebral oxygen and glucose consumption in the dog by hypothermia, pentobarbital, and lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 1981 Sep;55(3):263-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198109000-00013.
- Background: PubMed 7895026Weber ML, Taylor CP. Damage from oxygen and glucose deprivation in hippocampal slices is prevented by tetrodotoxin, lidocaine and phenytoin without blockade of action potentials. Brain Res. 1994 Nov 21;664(1-2):167-77. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91967-4.
- Background: PubMed 8012179Ayad M, Verity MA, Rubinstein EH. Lidocaine delays cortical ischemic depolarization: relationship to electrophysiologic recovery and neuropathology. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1994 Apr;6(2):98-110. doi: 10.1097/00008506-199404000-00005.
- Background: PubMed 11301205LoPachin RM, Gaughan CL, Lehning EJ, Weber ML, Taylor CP. Effects of ion channel blockade on the distribution of Na, K, Ca and other elements in oxygen-glucose deprived CA1 hippocampal neurons. Neuroscience. 2001;103(4):971-83. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00035-5.
- Background: PubMed 10212290Zhang Y, Lipton P. Cytosolic Ca2+ changes during in vitro ischemia in rat hippocampal slices: major roles for glutamate and Na+-dependent Ca2+ release from mitochondria. J Neurosci. 1999 May 1;19(9):3307-15. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-09-03307.1999.
- Background: PubMed 7845632Fujitani T, Adachi N, Miyazaki H, Liu K, Nakamura Y, Kataoka K, Arai T. Lidocaine protects hippocampal neurons against ischemic damage by preventing increase of extracellular excitatory amino acids: a microdialysis study in Mongolian gerbils. Neurosci Lett. 1994 Sep 26;179(1-2):91-4. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90942-3.
Related trials for Cognitive Decline
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Recruiting
HEARS-NPS: Addressing Hearing Loss as a Common Unmet Contributor of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms
Alzheimer Disease, Dementia
RecruitingObservational study
Locus Coeruleus and CCHS (Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome)
Ondine Syndrome (Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome)
RecruitingPhase 1
PET Imaging of Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) in Volunteers With Alzheimer Disease (AD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Alzheimer s Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment
RecruitingObservational study
Community-based Screening for Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease(AD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joseph P Mathew, M. D. principal investigator
Duke University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Lidocaine in people with Cognitive Decline, run by Duke University at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Cognitive Function From Baseline Characterized as Continuous Cognitive Change (time frame: Preoperative to 6 weeks after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00938964, which also lists 46 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2019.