Vitamin D DeficiencyPhase 4NCT00933244
Treatment of Vitamin D Insufficiency
A Phase 4 study testing High Dose Vitamin D3 and Low Dose Vitamin D3 in people with Vitamin D Deficiency, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to answer the following questions: Does vitamin D increase calcium absorption, bone mass and muscle mass and function in women past menopause who have mildly low vitamin D levels? Do these benefits require prescription-strength vitamin D, or is an over the counter vitamin D dose enough? Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 75 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Vitamin D Deficiency
- What is being tested?
- High Dose Vitamin D3 and Low Dose Vitamin D3
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 230 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2010to Aug 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 75 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Vitamin D insufficiency, defined as a serum 25(OH)D 16 to 25 ng/mL by high performance liquid chromotography assay
- Women ≥ 5 years past the date of last menses or bilateral oophorectomy, or ≥ 60 years old if they had prior hysterectomy without bilateral oophorectomy
- Total dietary and supplemental calcium intake < 600 mg daily but ≤ 1,400 mg daily, based on a food frequency questionnaire
Who cannot join
- Women > 75 years old
- Hypercalcemia (serum calcium corrected for albumin > 10.4 mg/dL)
- Nephrolithiasis by medical record or patient report
- Inflammatory bowel disease, malabsorption or chronic diarrhea
- Stage 3, 4 or 5 Chronic Kidney Disease based on the Modification of Renal Diet (MDRD) formula
- Use of bone-active medications within the past 6 months including bisphosphonates, estrogen compounds, calcitonin, teriparatide, oral corticosteroids and anticonvulsants
Show all 9Show fewer
- Allergy or intolerance to orange juice
- Allergy or intolerance to sunscreen
- Prior adult clinical fragility fracture of the hip, spine or wrist or a T-score below -2.5 at the lumbar spine or femur
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705
About this study
The purpose of this study is to answer the following questions: Does vitamin D increase calcium absorption, bone mass and muscle mass and function in women past menopause who have mildly low vitamin D levels? Do these benefits require prescription-strength vitamin D, or is an over the counter vitamin D dose enough?
Read the detailed description
Osteoporosis is a major health problem in postmenopausal women. At age 50, half of women will suffer an osteoporotic fracture in their remaining lifetime, causing increased disability and mortality. Vitamin D deficiency, defined as a serum 25(OH)D <15 ng/mL, contributes to osteoporosis via decreased calcium absorption (Ca·Ab), secondary hyperparathyroidism (HPT), increased bone resorption and decreased bone mineral density (BMD). Thus, experts agree that patients with vitamin D deficiency should receive vitamin D therapy.
Vitamin D insufficiency (VDI) is a milder form of hypovitaminosis D defined as a 25(OH)D level between 15 and 30 ng/mL regardless of parathyroid hormone (PTH) status. Experts disagree on whether to treat VDI, as the clinical benefits of therapy are uncertain. Some experts insist the optimal 25(OH)D level is ≥30 ng/mL. By contrast, both the Food and Nutrition Board and NIH Evidence Report No. 158 state that insufficient evidence exists to declare the optimal serum 25(OH)D for bone health, despite review of ~170 studies. Consequently, the Food and Nutrition Board cannot determine a recommended daily allowance for vitamin D. Confusion over the optimal 25(OH)D level results, in part, because previous trials failed to recruit subjects based on initial 25(OH)D levels and/or failed to target or achieve 25(OH)D levels ≥30 ng/mL. Moreover, secondary HPT, the proposed mechanism by which VDI causes bone loss, occurs in only 10% to 33% of people with VDI. As such, people with VDI and normal PTH might not experience clinical benefits from vitamin D therapy. VDI is widespread, affecting 26% to 39% of postmenopausal American women with and without osteoporosis. Therefore, determining the ideal 25(OH)D level for optimal calcium homeostasis and bone health is of utmost clinical and public health importance. Our overall goal, congruent with Healthy People 2010 objective 2-9, is to evaluate the effect of vitamin D therapy on the risk of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with VDI, as reflected by changes in Ca·Ab, BMD and muscle fitness. Our second goal is to evaluate whether a high-dose vitamin D regimen, chosen to achieve and maintain a 25(OH)D level ≥30 ng/mL, is superior in its effects on study outcomes compared to a low-dose vitamin D regimen that can permit continued VDI.
We will conduct a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind trial of low-dose and high-dose vitamin D in postmenopausal women with vitamin D insufficiency in order to investigate the following aims:
- To evaluate the effect of vitamin D3 therapy on Ca·Ab in postmenopausal women less than or equal to 75 years old with VDI. Sub-aims include the investigation of subject variables influencing Ca·Ab and 25(OH)D levels at baseline and one month, the accuracy of oral isotope plasma levels for Ca·Ab measurement and the ability of a questionnaire to identify patients with low vitamin D status.
- To evaluate the effects of vitamin D3 therapy on the 12-month change in BMD and bone turnover in the same trial conducted for Aim 1. Sub-aims include the identification of subject variables significantly influencing change in BMD and an evaluation of the relationship between changes in Ca·Ab and changes in BMD.
- To evaluate the effect of vitamin D therapy on muscle mass and functional capacity in the same trial conducted for Aim 1. We will measure muscle mass by whole body bone densitometry and assess muscle function using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test and the modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score. Sub-aims include the identification of subject variables significantly influencing muscle outcomes.
- Conditions
- Vitamin D Deficiency
- Being tested
- High Dose Vitamin D3, Low Dose Vitamin D3, Placebo
- Keywords
- Vitamin D, Cholecalciferol, Parathyroid Hormone, Calcium Absorption, Bone Mineral Density, Muscle Function
- Medical subject headings
- Vitamin D Deficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High Dose Vitamin D3Dietary supplement
Also called Vitamin D, Cholecalciferol
Yellow gel-cap vitamin D3 at 50,000 International Units daily for 15 days then two times a month for 350 days. Daily white placebo pills.
Low Dose Vitamin D3Dietary supplement
Also called Vitamin D, Cholecalciferol
White gel-cap vitamin D3 at 800 International Units to take orally, daily for 365 days. Intermittent yellow placebo pills.
PlaceboDietary supplement
Also called sugar pill
Yellow gel-cap placebo pills to take orally, daily for 15 days then two times a month for 350 days. White gel-cap placebo pills once daily for 365 days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High Dose Vitamin D3 | Other | Loading Dose: 50,000 International Units vitamin D3 gel-caps (yellow) to take daily for 15 days and placebo gel-caps (white) to take daily for 15 days.
Maintenance Dose: 50,000 International Units vitamin D3 gel-caps (yellow) to take two times a month for 350 days and placebo gel-caps (white) to take daily for 350 days. Receives: Dietary Supplement: High Dose Vitamin D3 |
| Low Dose Vitamin D3 | Other | Loading Dose: 800 International Units vitamin D3 gel-caps (white) to take daily for 15 days plus placebo gel-caps (yellow) to take daily for 15 days.
Maintenance Dose: 800 International Units vitamin D3 gel-caps (white) to take daily for 350 days plus placebo gel-caps (yellow) to take two times a month for 350 days. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Low Dose Vitamin D3 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Loading Dose: Placebo gel-caps (yellow) to take daily for 15 days plus placebo gel-caps (white) to take daily for 15 days.
Maintenance Dose: Placebo gel-caps (yellow) to take two times a month for 350 days plus placebo gel-caps (white) to take daily for 350 days. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intestinal Calcium Absorption
Percent of calcium absorbed in the intestinal tract within one day
Measured: One Year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Bone Mineral Density
Annualized percent change in bone mineral density at spine, hip, femoral neck, and body
Measured: 1 Year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2010
- Primary completionAug 2014
- Study completionAug 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Vitamin D DeficiencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Wisconsin, MadisonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 230 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Karen E Hansen, MD, MS, Principal investigator, University of Wisconsin, Madison
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00933244
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-2009-0055
- Other IDs
- R01AG028739, supplement
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 2 Jul 2009
- Last updated
- 10 Nov 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Hansen KE, Jones AN, Lindstrom MJ, Davis LA, Engelke JA, Shafer MM. Vitamin D insufficiency: disease or no disease? J Bone Miner Res. 2008 Jul;23(7):1052-60. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080230.
PubMed 18302509Ramsubeik K, Keuler NS, Davis LA, Hansen KE. Factors associated with calcium absorption in postmenopausal women: a post hoc analysis of dual-isotope studies. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 May;114(5):761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.041. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
PubMed 24209888Nabak AC, Johnson RE, Keuler NS, Hansen KE. Can a questionnaire predict vitamin D status in postmenopausal women? Public Health Nutr. 2014 Apr;17(4):739-46. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013001973. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
PubMed 23870503Hansen KE, Johnson RE, Chambers KR, Johnson MG, Lemon CC, Vo TN, Marvdashti S. Treatment of Vitamin D Insufficiency in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Oct;175(10):1612-21. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3874.
PubMed 26237520Vreede AP, Jones AN, Hansen KE. Can serum isotope levels accurately measure intestinal calcium absorption compared to gold-standard methods? Nutr J. 2015 Jul 31;14:73. doi: 10.1186/s12937-015-0065-5.
PubMed 26227019
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Nov 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment of Vitamin D Insufficiency
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00933244
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-2009-0055
- Conditions
- Vitamin D Deficiency
- Keywords
- Vitamin D, Cholecalciferol, Parathyroid Hormone, Calcium Absorption, Bone Mineral Density, Muscle Function
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 230 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, MadisonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Study start
- Apr 2010
- Primary completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jul 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Nov 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to answer the following questions: Does vitamin D increase calcium absorption, bone mass and muscle mass and function in women past menopause who have mildly low vitamin D levels? Do these benefits require prescription-strength vitamin D, or is an over the counter vitamin D dose enough?
Detailed description
Osteoporosis is a major health problem in postmenopausal women. At age 50, half of women will suffer an osteoporotic fracture in their remaining lifetime, causing increased disability and mortality. Vitamin D deficiency, defined as a serum 25(OH)D <15 ng/mL, contributes to osteoporosis via decreased calcium absorption (Ca·Ab), secondary hyperparathyroidism (HPT), increased bone resorption and decreased bone mineral density (BMD). Thus, experts agree that patients with vitamin D deficiency should receive vitamin D therapy.
Vitamin D insufficiency (VDI) is a milder form of hypovitaminosis D defined as a 25(OH)D level between 15 and 30 ng/mL regardless of parathyroid hormone (PTH) status. Experts disagree on whether to treat VDI, as the clinical benefits of therapy are uncertain. Some experts insist the optimal 25(OH)D level is ≥30 ng/mL. By contrast, both the Food and Nutrition Board and NIH Evidence Report No. 158 state that insufficient evidence exists to declare the optimal serum 25(OH)D for bone health, despite review of ~170 studies. Consequently, the Food and Nutrition Board cannot determine a recommended daily allowance for vitamin D. Confusion over the optimal 25(OH)D level results, in part, because previous trials failed to recruit subjects based on initial 25(OH)D levels and/or failed to target or achieve 25(OH)D levels ≥30 ng/mL. Moreover, secondary HPT, the proposed mechanism by which VDI causes bone loss, occurs in only 10% to 33% of people with VDI. As such, people with VDI and normal PTH might not experience clinical benefits from vitamin D therapy. VDI is widespread, affecting 26% to 39% of postmenopausal American women with and without osteoporosis. Therefore, determining the ideal 25(OH)D level for optimal calcium homeostasis and bone health is of utmost clinical and public health importance. Our overall goal, congruent with Healthy People 2010 objective 2-9, is to evaluate the effect of vitamin D therapy on the risk of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with VDI, as reflected by changes in Ca·Ab, BMD and muscle fitness. Our second goal is to evaluate whether a high-dose vitamin D regimen, chosen to achieve and maintain a 25(OH)D level ≥30 ng/mL, is superior in its effects on study outcomes compared to a low-dose vitamin D regimen that can permit continued VDI.
We will conduct a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind trial of low-dose and high-dose vitamin D in postmenopausal women with vitamin D insufficiency in order to investigate the following aims:
- To evaluate the effect of vitamin D3 therapy on Ca·Ab in postmenopausal women less than or equal to 75 years old with VDI. Sub-aims include the investigation of subject variables influencing Ca·Ab and 25(OH)D levels at baseline and one month, the accuracy of oral isotope plasma levels for Ca·Ab measurement and the ability of a questionnaire to identify patients with low vitamin D status.
- To evaluate the effects of vitamin D3 therapy on the 12-month change in BMD and bone turnover in the same trial conducted for Aim 1. Sub-aims include the identification of subject variables significantly influencing change in BMD and an evaluation of the relationship between changes in Ca·Ab and changes in BMD.
- To evaluate the effect of vitamin D therapy on muscle mass and functional capacity in the same trial conducted for Aim 1. We will measure muscle mass by whole body bone densitometry and assess muscle function using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test and the modified Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score. Sub-aims include the identification of subject variables significantly influencing muscle outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High Dose Vitamin D3 | Other | Dietary Supplement: High Dose Vitamin D3Loading Dose: 50,000 International Units vitamin D3 gel-caps (yellow) to take daily for 15 days and placebo gel-caps (white) to take daily for 15 days. Maintenance Dose: 50,000 International Units vitamin D3 gel-caps (yellow) to take two times a month for 350 days and placebo gel-caps (white) to take daily for 350 days. |
| Low Dose Vitamin D3 | Other | Dietary Supplement: Low Dose Vitamin D3Loading Dose: 800 International Units vitamin D3 gel-caps (white) to take daily for 15 days plus placebo gel-caps (yellow) to take daily for 15 days. Maintenance Dose: 800 International Units vitamin D3 gel-caps (white) to take daily for 350 days plus placebo gel-caps (yellow) to take two times a month for 350 days. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Dietary Supplement: PlaceboLoading Dose: Placebo gel-caps (yellow) to take daily for 15 days plus placebo gel-caps (white) to take daily for 15 days. Maintenance Dose: Placebo gel-caps (yellow) to take two times a month for 350 days plus placebo gel-caps (white) to take daily for 350 days. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 75 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Vitamin D insufficiency, defined as a serum 25(OH)D 16 to 25 ng/mL by high performance liquid chromotography assay
- Women ≥ 5 years past the date of last menses or bilateral oophorectomy, or ≥ 60 years old if they had prior hysterectomy without bilateral oophorectomy
- Total dietary and supplemental calcium intake < 600 mg daily but ≤ 1,400 mg daily, based on a food frequency questionnaire
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Women > 75 years old
- Hypercalcemia (serum calcium corrected for albumin > 10.4 mg/dL)
- Nephrolithiasis by medical record or patient report
- Inflammatory bowel disease, malabsorption or chronic diarrhea
- Stage 3, 4 or 5 Chronic Kidney Disease based on the Modification of Renal Diet (MDRD) formula
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High Dose Vitamin D3Also: Vitamin D, CholecalciferolYellow gel-cap vitamin D3 at 50,000 International Units daily for 15 days then two times a month for 350 days. Daily white placebo pills. | Dietary supplement | High Dose Vitamin D3 |
| Low Dose Vitamin D3Also: Vitamin D, CholecalciferolWhite gel-cap vitamin D3 at 800 International Units to take orally, daily for 365 days. Intermittent yellow placebo pills. | Dietary supplement | Low Dose Vitamin D3 |
| PlaceboAlso: sugar pillYellow gel-cap placebo pills to take orally, daily for 15 days then two times a month for 350 days. White gel-cap placebo pills once daily for 365 days. | Dietary supplement | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Intestinal Calcium Absorption
Time frame: One Year
Percent of calcium absorbed in the intestinal tract within one day
1 secondary outcome
Bone Mineral Density
Time frame: 1 Year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Nov 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 18302509Hansen KE, Jones AN, Lindstrom MJ, Davis LA, Engelke JA, Shafer MM. Vitamin D insufficiency: disease or no disease? J Bone Miner Res. 2008 Jul;23(7):1052-60. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080230.
- Background: PubMed 24209888Ramsubeik K, Keuler NS, Davis LA, Hansen KE. Factors associated with calcium absorption in postmenopausal women: a post hoc analysis of dual-isotope studies. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 May;114(5):761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.041. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 23870503Nabak AC, Johnson RE, Keuler NS, Hansen KE. Can a questionnaire predict vitamin D status in postmenopausal women? Public Health Nutr. 2014 Apr;17(4):739-46. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013001973. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 26237520Hansen KE, Johnson RE, Chambers KR, Johnson MG, Lemon CC, Vo TN, Marvdashti S. Treatment of Vitamin D Insufficiency in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Oct;175(10):1612-21. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3874.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26227019Vreede AP, Jones AN, Hansen KE. Can serum isotope levels accurately measure intestinal calcium absorption compared to gold-standard methods? Nutr J. 2015 Jul 31;14:73. doi: 10.1186/s12937-015-0065-5.
Related trials for Vitamin D Deficiency
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A First-in-human Study of KK8123 in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia
X-linked Hypophosphatemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
REducing Systemic Inflammation With LOw-dose Colchicine to ImproVE Cardiovascular Calcification in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Pilot Randomized Open-Label Trial
Chronic Kidney Disease Mineral and Bone Disorder, Cognitive Function
Recruiting
Role of Vitamin D Supplementation in Children With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), Vitamin D Deficiency
RecruitingObservational study
Post Marketing Surveillance Study to Observe Safety and Effectiveness of CRYSVITA® in S. Korean Patients
FGF23-related Hypophosphataemic Rickets and Osteomalacia
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation Added to Iron Therapy in Children With Iron Deficiency Anemia
Iron Deficiency Anemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Karen E Hansen, MD, MS principal investigator
University of Wisconsin, Madison
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing High Dose Vitamin D3 and Low Dose Vitamin D3 in people with Vitamin D Deficiency, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Nov 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intestinal Calcium Absorption (time frame: One Year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00933244, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Nov 2015.