Rheumatoid ArthritisNCT00929357
Retrospective Evaluation of the Radiographic Efficacy of Conventional and Biologic Treatment
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
This study involves review and analysis of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who where treated with either conventional DMARDs (Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs) or Biologics and have two existing, consecutive radiographs (x-ray images) of hand and feet taken as part of routine treatment… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- DMARDs or Biologics
- How many people
- 156 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Aug 2009to Jun 2010
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 200
Who may be able to join
- Secure diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
- Older than 18 years
- Two consecutive plain radiographs of the hands and feet with a time interval of 12 to 36 months are available. The radiographs are recorded 2003 or later and are in accordance with a defined X-ray protocol.
Who cannot join
- Patients who receive Anakinra, Rituximab or Abatacept
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Retrospective Evaluation of the Radiographic Efficacy of Different Conventional Systemic Therapies and Biologics in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Routine Practice.
This study involves review and analysis of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who where treated with either conventional DMARDs (Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs) or Biologics and have two existing, consecutive radiographs (x-ray images) of hand and feet taken as part of routine treatment monitoring within a time interval of 12 to 36 months.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- DMARDs or Biologics
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DMARDs or BiologicsDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | DMARDs Receives: Drug: DMARDs or Biologics | |
| 2 | Biologics Receives: Drug: DMARDs or Biologics |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Joint Status Assessed by Radiographic (Roentgen) Progression
Radiographic progression assessed using Ratingen score with range of 0 = normal joint; 1 = one or more erosions, <20% of the joint surface are destroyed; 2 = 21% to 40% of the joint surface are destroyed; 3 = 41% to 60% of joint surface are destroyed; 4 = 61% to 80% of the joint surface are destroyed; 5 = >80% of the joint surface are destroyed. Total possible score based on 38 joints was 0 to 190; higher scores indicated greater joint destruction. Annualized change in Ratingen score calculated as (total change in Ratingen score / time period between radiograph 1 and 2 [months])*12 months.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Number of Participants Without Radiographic Progression
An increase of 4 or more points in the Ratingen score was necessary to detect a difference in radiographic progression. Ratingen score range 0 = normal joint to 5 = >80% of the joint surface are destroyed. Total possible score based on 38 joints was 0 to 190; higher scores indicated greater joint destruction. A decrease of 4 (smallest detectable difference) or more points in total Ratingen score was considered a decrease in erosive damage.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Number of Participants Without Erosions
Radiographic assessment of no erosions using Ratingen scoring categorized as score of 0=normal joint.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints (DAS 28)
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and painful joints (PJC) using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and patient's global assessment (PGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 ≤3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate measured as millimeters per hour (mm/h).
Measured: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)
C-reactive protein measured as milligrams per liter (mg/l)
Measured: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Factor (RF)
Rheumatoid Factor measured as a titer and categorized as negative (<1:16 ratio) or positive. A ratio >1:16 indicates a higher level of RF.
Measured: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Number of Participants With Laboratory Result for Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide-autoantibody-test (CCP)
Cyclic citrullinated peptide-autoantibody-test measured as Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA units or EU) and categorized as negative (<20 EU) or positive (≥20 up to >60 EU).
Measured: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jun 2009 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2009
- Primary completionJun 2010
- Study completionJun 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 156 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00929357
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0881X1-4617
- Status last verified
- Aug 2011
- First submitted
- 25 Jun 2009
- Last updated
- 10 Aug 2011
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Aug 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Retrospective Evaluation of the Radiographic Efficacy of Different Conventional Systemic Therapies and Biologics in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Routine Practice.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00929357
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0881X1-4617
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 156 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2009
- Primary completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jun 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 Jun 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study involves review and analysis of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who where treated with either conventional DMARDs (Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs) or Biologics and have two existing, consecutive radiographs (x-ray images) of hand and feet taken as part of routine treatment monitoring within a time interval of 12 to 36 months.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | – | Drug: DMARDs or BiologicsDMARDs |
| 2 | – | Drug: DMARDs or BiologicsBiologics |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 200
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Secure diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis
- Older than 18 years
- Two consecutive plain radiographs of the hands and feet with a time interval of 12 to 36 months are available. The radiographs are recorded 2003 or later and are in accordance with a defined X-ray protocol.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who receive Anakinra, Rituximab or Abatacept
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DMARDs or Biologics | Drug | 1, 2 |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Joint Status Assessed by Radiographic (Roentgen) Progression
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Radiographic progression assessed using Ratingen score with range of 0 = normal joint; 1 = one or more erosions, <20% of the joint surface are destroyed; 2 = 21% to 40% of the joint surface are destroyed; 3 = 41% to 60% of joint surface are destroyed; 4 = 61% to 80% of the joint surface are destroyed; 5 = >80% of the joint surface are destroyed. Total possible score based on 38 joints was 0 to 190; higher scores indicated greater joint destruction. Annualized change in Ratingen score calculated as (total change in Ratingen score / time period between radiograph 1 and 2 [months])*12 months.
7 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Without Radiographic Progression
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Number of Participants Without Erosions
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joints (DAS 28)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Factor (RF)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Number of Participants With Laboratory Result for Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide-autoantibody-test (CCP)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Aug 2011.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Aug 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Jun 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Joint Status Assessed by Radiographic (Roentgen) Progression (time frame: Baseline (Day 0) up to 48 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Aug 2011.