A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) + Xeloda (Capecitabine)as Maintenance Therapy in Patients With HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Study at a glance

From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Mar 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.

Official title

A Randomized Study of the Effect of Maintenance Therapy With Bevacizumab + Capecitabine Versus Bevacizumab Alone on Progression-free Survival in Patients With HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer That Has Not Progressed During First-line Docetaxel Plus Bevacizumab Therapy

ClinicalTrials.gov ID

NCT00929240

Acronym / sponsor ID

MO22223

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Phase

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Recruitment status

Completed

Enrolment

287 participants (actual)

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)

Study start

Jul 2009

Primary completion

Jun 2014 (actual)

Study completion

Jun 2014 (actual)

First posted

26 Jun 2009 (estimated)

Results

Posted 3 Mar 2015

Clinical summary

The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.

Study design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomised

Intervention model

Parallel groups

Masking

None (open label)

Number of arms

2

Who may qualify

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Female only

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

Age groups

Adult, Older adult

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Interventions

Primary outcome

1. Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)

   Time frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years

   Progression Free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from first study drug dosing (during the maintenance treatment phase) to the first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. Progression was based on tumor assessment made by the investigators according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as a 20 percent (%) or greater increase in the sum of the Longest Diameter (LD) of the target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded or appearance of new lesions.

2. Progression Free Survival (Maintenance Phase Data Cutoff October 4, 2013)

   Time frame: Randomization, at the end of every third cycle (every 9 weeks) until the end of maintenance phase and every 3 months until disease progression or death until data cutoff on October 4, 2013, up to 4 years

   PFS was defined as the time from first study drug dosing to the first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first.Time to progression was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression defined per RECIST 1.0 criteria. Participants without an event at data cut-off or who were withdrawn from the study without documented progression were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment when the participant was known to be progression free. Participants who took other non-protocol anti-cancer drugs while being on study medication, and who were still event free were censored on the date of first dose of the anti-cancer drug. Participants without post-randomization tumor assessments but alive were censored at the time of randomization. Participants without post-randomization assessments, who died after randomization were considered to have the PFS event at date of death. Kaplan-Meier estimation was used for median time to PFS

Results and safety

Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…

Research links

• Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Mar 2015.
• Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
• Derived from this study: PubMed 25273343Gligorov J, Doval D, Bines J, Alba E, Cortes P, Pierga JY, Gupta V, Costa R, Srock S, de Ducla S, Freudensprung U, Mustacchi G. Maintenance capecitabine and bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone after initial first-line bevacizumab and docetaxel for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (IMELDA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):1351-60. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70444-9. Epub 2014 Sep 28.

Related trials for Breast Cancer

• Active, not recruiting

  Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology

  Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions

• RecruitingPhase 2

  Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort

  Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer

• Not yet recruitingObservational study

  Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity

  Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema

• RecruitingPhase 3

  A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)

  TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

• RecruitingPhase 3

  Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial

  Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8

Referral and contact

AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.

63 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.