Acute Myeloid LeukemiaPhase 3NCT00927498
A Randomized Study of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) With Daunorubicine and Cytarabine in Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Aged of 50-70 Years Old
A Phase 3 study testing conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin), and Mylotarg associated with conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin), in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Acute Leukemia French Association at 19 sites in France.
Trial summary
The main objective of this study is to compare conventional chemotherapy: daunorubicin and the Aracytine and this chemotherapy in combination with the monoclonal antibody used Mylotarg in divided doses. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin), and Mylotarg associated with conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin),
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 280 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Dec 2007to Jul 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a morphologically proven diagnosis AML and both the two following criteria: Age > 50 years and £ 70 years. Not previously treated for their disease.
- ECOG performance status 0 to 3
- Negative serology HIV, HBV and HBC (except post vaccination)
- Serum creatinin inf 2.5N; AST and ALT inf 2.5N; total bilirubin inf 2N
- Cardiac function determined by radionucleide or echography within normal limits.
- Negative serum pregnancy test within one week before treatment for women of child bearing potential.
- Signed informed consent.
Who cannot join
- M3-AML
- AML following previously know myeloproliferative syndrome.
- Known central nervous system involvement.
- Uncontrolled infection
- Other active malignancy
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 1 country.
19 sites in 1 country
France19 sites
CH
Argenteuil, 95107
Hopital Avicenne
Bobigny, 93309
CH
Caen, 14033
Hopital Percy
Clamart, 92141
CHU
Créteil, 94010
CHU
Dijon, 21034
CH
Lens, 62307
CHU
Lille, 59037
CH
Limoges, 87042
Hopital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, 69437
CH
Meaux, 77104
Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere
Paris, 75651
Hopital Saint-Louis
Paris
CH
Roubaix, 59100
CHU
Rouen, 76038
CNLCC
Saint-Cloud, 92210
CH
Valenciennes, 59322
Hospital Central
Versailles, 78157
IGR
Villejuif, 94805
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Multicentric Randomized Study of the Combination of Repeated Doses of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) With Daunorubicin and Cytarabine Versus Daunorubicin and Cytarabine in Untreated Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Aged of 50-70 Years Old.
The main objective of this study is to compare conventional chemotherapy: daunorubicin and the Aracytine and this chemotherapy in combination with the monoclonal antibody used Mylotarg in divided doses.
Read the detailed description
Patients with a morphologically proven diagnosis AML and both the two following criteria:
- Age > 50 years and £ 70 years.
- Not previously treated for their disease.
Randomization will be centralized by phone :
Arm A chemotherapy with daunorubicin and Aracytine or Arm B Daunorubicin and Aracytine and Mylotarg.
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Being tested
- conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin),, Mylotarg associated with conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin),
- Keywords
- Acute myeloid Leukemia, patient aged 50 to 70 years
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin),Drug
Daunorubicin(DNR) induction : 60 mg/m2/day IV (30 min), Days 1,2,3 Daunorubicin (DNR)first consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1. Daunorubicin (DNR)second consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1 and day 2.
Cytarabine induction :200 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion, Days 1 to 7. Cytarabine (AraC)first and second consolidation: 1g/m2/12h days 1 to 4.
Mylotarg associated with conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin),Drug
Daunorubicin(DNR) induction : 60 mg/m2/day IV (30 min), Days 1,2,3 Daunorubicin (DNR)first consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1. Daunorubicin (DNR)second consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1 and day 2.
Cytarabine induction :200 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion, Days 1 to 7. Cytarabine (AraC)first and second consolidation: 1g/m2/12h days 1 to 4.
Mylotarg® (GO)induction : 3 mg/m2 IV (2 hours) Days 1, 4, 7. Mylotarg® (GO) First consolidation and Second Consolidation:3 mg/m2 day 1.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A Daunorubicin and Cytarabine | Active comparator | Daunorubicin(DNR) induction : 60 mg/m2/day IV (30 min), Days 1,2,3 Daunorubicin (DNR)first consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1. Daunorubicin (DNR)second consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1 and day 2.
Cytarabine induction :200 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion, Days 1 to 7. Cytarabine (AraC)first and second consolidation: 1g/m2/12h days 1 to 4. Receives: Drug: conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin), |
| Arm B Daunorubicin and Cytarabine and Mylotarg | Experimental | Daunorubicin(DNR) induction : 60 mg/m2/day IV (30 min), Days 1,2,3 Daunorubicin (DNR)first consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1. Daunorubicin (DNR)second consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1 and day 2.
Cytarabine induction :200 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion, Days 1 to 7. Cytarabine (AraC)first and second consolidation: 1g/m2/12h days 1 to 4.
Mylotarg® (GO)induction : 3 mg/m2 IV (2 hours) Days 1, 4, 7. Mylotarg® (GO) First consolidation and Second Consolidation:3 mg/m2 day 1. Receives: Drug: Mylotarg associated with conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin), |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Event Free Survival (EFS)
Measured: Relapse or death measured from randomization
Secondary outcomes (6)
CR rate
Measured: CR after induction
Cumulative incidence of relapse
Measured: Relapse from CR
Overall Survival
Measured: Survival from randomization
Safety of the combination Mylotarg+chemotherapy
Measured: Duration of study
Possible predictors of response to Mylotarg: with respect to MDR (multi drug resistance) status, cytogenetics risk groups and mutational status (FLT3, MLL, CEBPa, NPM)
Measured: Duration of study
Relationship between minimal residual disease measured on the expression of WT1 gene and relapse of AML.
Measured: Duration of study
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jun 2009 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2007
- Primary completionJul 2011
- Study completionJul 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Myeloid LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Acute Leukemia French Association
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Versailles Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Castaigne Sylvie, Professor, Principal investigator, Versailles Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00927498
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ALFA 0701
- Status last verified
- Jul 2013
- First submitted
- 29 Apr 2009
- Last updated
- 11 Jul 2013
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Muresan B, Mamolo C, Cappelleri JC, Mokgokong R, Palaka A, Soikkeli F, Heeg B. Comparing cure rates for gemtuzumab ozogamicin plus standard chemotherapy vs standard chemotherapy alone in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Future Oncol. 2021 Aug;17(22):2883-2892. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-1287. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
PubMed 33858190Renneville A, Abdelali RB, Chevret S, Nibourel O, Cheok M, Pautas C, Dulery R, Boyer T, Cayuela JM, Hayette S, Raffoux E, Farhat H, Boissel N, Terre C, Dombret H, Castaigne S, Preudhomme C. Clinical impact of gene mutations and lesions detected by SNP-array karyotyping in acute myeloid leukemia patients in the context of gemtuzumab ozogamicin treatment: results of the ALFA-0701 trial. Oncotarget. 2014 Feb 28;5(4):916-32. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1536.
PubMed 24659740
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jul 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Multicentric Randomized Study of the Combination of Repeated Doses of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) With Daunorubicin and Cytarabine Versus Daunorubicin and Cytarabine in Untreated Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Aged of 50-70 Years Old.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00927498
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ALFA 0701
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Keywords
- Acute myeloid Leukemia, patient aged 50 to 70 years
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Acute Leukemia French AssociationUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Versailles Hospital
- Study start
- Dec 2007
- Primary completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jun 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of this study is to compare conventional chemotherapy: daunorubicin and the Aracytine and this chemotherapy in combination with the monoclonal antibody used Mylotarg in divided doses.
Detailed description
Patients with a morphologically proven diagnosis AML and both the two following criteria:
- Age > 50 years and £ 70 years.
- Not previously treated for their disease.
Randomization will be centralized by phone :
Arm A chemotherapy with daunorubicin and Aracytine or Arm B Daunorubicin and Aracytine and Mylotarg.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A Daunorubicin and Cytarabine | Active comparator | Drug: conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin),Daunorubicin(DNR) induction : 60 mg/m2/day IV (30 min), Days 1,2,3 Daunorubicin (DNR)first consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1. Daunorubicin (DNR)second consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1 and day 2. Cytarabine induction :200 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion, Days 1 to 7. Cytarabine (AraC)first and second consolidation: 1g/m2/12h days 1 to 4. |
| Arm B Daunorubicin and Cytarabine and Mylotarg | Experimental | Drug: Mylotarg associated with conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin),Daunorubicin(DNR) induction : 60 mg/m2/day IV (30 min), Days 1,2,3 Daunorubicin (DNR)first consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1. Daunorubicin (DNR)second consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1 and day 2. Cytarabine induction :200 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion, Days 1 to 7. Cytarabine (AraC)first and second consolidation: 1g/m2/12h days 1 to 4. Mylotarg® (GO)induction : 3 mg/m2 IV (2 hours) Days 1, 4, 7. Mylotarg® (GO) First consolidation and Second Consolidation:3 mg/m2 day 1. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with a morphologically proven diagnosis AML and both the two following criteria: Age > 50 years and £ 70 years. Not previously treated for their disease.
- ECOG performance status 0 to 3
- Negative serology HIV, HBV and HBC (except post vaccination)
- Serum creatinin inf 2.5N; AST and ALT inf 2.5N; total bilirubin inf 2N
- Cardiac function determined by radionucleide or echography within normal limits.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- M3-AML
- AML following previously know myeloproliferative syndrome.
- Known central nervous system involvement.
- Uncontrolled infection
- Other active malignancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin),Daunorubicin(DNR) induction : 60 mg/m2/day IV (30 min), Days 1,2,3 Daunorubicin (DNR)first consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1. Daunorubicin (DNR)second consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1 and day 2. Cytarabine induction :200 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion, Days 1 to 7. Cytarabine (AraC)first and second consolidation: 1g/m2/12h days 1 to 4. | Drug | Arm A Daunorubicin and Cytarabine |
| Mylotarg associated with conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin),Daunorubicin(DNR) induction : 60 mg/m2/day IV (30 min), Days 1,2,3 Daunorubicin (DNR)first consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1. Daunorubicin (DNR)second consolidation : 60 mg/m2 day 1 and day 2. Cytarabine induction :200 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion, Days 1 to 7. Cytarabine (AraC)first and second consolidation: 1g/m2/12h days 1 to 4. Mylotarg® (GO)induction : 3 mg/m2 IV (2 hours) Days 1, 4, 7. Mylotarg® (GO) First consolidation and Second Consolidation:3 mg/m2 day 1. | Drug | Arm B Daunorubicin and Cytarabine and Mylotarg |
Primary outcome
Event Free Survival (EFS)
Time frame: Relapse or death measured from randomization
6 secondary outcomes
CR rate
Time frame: CR after induction
Cumulative incidence of relapse
Time frame: Relapse from CR
Overall Survival
Time frame: Survival from randomization
Safety of the combination Mylotarg+chemotherapy
Time frame: Duration of study
Possible predictors of response to Mylotarg: with respect to MDR (multi drug resistance) status, cytogenetics risk groups and mutational status (FLT3, MLL, CEBPa, NPM)
Time frame: Duration of study
Relationship between minimal residual disease measured on the expression of WT1 gene and relapse of AML.
Time frame: Duration of study
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jul 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33858190Muresan B, Mamolo C, Cappelleri JC, Mokgokong R, Palaka A, Soikkeli F, Heeg B. Comparing cure rates for gemtuzumab ozogamicin plus standard chemotherapy vs standard chemotherapy alone in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Future Oncol. 2021 Aug;17(22):2883-2892. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-1287. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24659740Renneville A, Abdelali RB, Chevret S, Nibourel O, Cheok M, Pautas C, Dulery R, Boyer T, Cayuela JM, Hayette S, Raffoux E, Farhat H, Boissel N, Terre C, Dombret H, Castaigne S, Preudhomme C. Clinical impact of gene mutations and lesions detected by SNP-array karyotyping in acute myeloid leukemia patients in the context of gemtuzumab ozogamicin treatment: results of the ALFA-0701 trial. Oncotarget. 2014 Feb 28;5(4):916-32. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1536.
Related trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax and CLAG-M for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Castaigne Sylvie, Professor principal investigator
Versailles Hospital
19 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin), and Mylotarg associated with conventional chemotherapy (AraC + Daunorubicin), in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Acute Leukemia French Association at 19 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Event Free Survival (EFS) (time frame: Relapse or death measured from randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00927498, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2013.