AzTrials
AzTrials

HeadachesNCT00921453

Tailored Internet Information Supply for Patients - Part 2

An observational study of Headaches, run by Health & Life Sciences University, Tryol at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Medical expert systems in combination with portal searching meta-search engines are exploited to provide reliable patient-tailored information. A prototype of a web-based information system has been developed and is to be evaluated. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Headaches
How many people
140 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Apr 2009to Apr 2009
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Students and employees of Bamberg University.

Who may be able to join

  • can use a computer
  • can surf the internet

Who cannot join

  • is a medical expert

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Bamberg University

    Bamberg, 96047

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Quality of Self-Diagnosis by Headache Patients Getting Tailored Internet Information - Part 2

Medical expert systems in combination with portal searching meta-search engines are exploited to provide reliable patient-tailored information. A prototype of a web-based information system has been developed and is to be evaluated. Its aim is to answer the decisive question whether expert system guided internet meta-search provides a better information supply for patients seeking health information online then this is possible by using ordinary search engines or health portals. The research does neither investigate the influence of ethical nor legal aspects of internet health information supply.

Read the detailed description

The study is a follow-up of NCT00746408. It has been conducted because for the first study still not enough participants have been recruited. The study took part at Bamberg University in Germany with 140 participants.

Conditions
Headaches
Keywords
Internet, Information supply, Tailoring, Patient empowerment, Headaches, Meta-search, Consumer Health Information, Information Services, Information Storage and Retrieval, Information Systems
Medical subject headings
Headache, Patient Participation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT00921453
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention 1Participants using the prototype to receive expert system guided tailored internet information about the type of headache of a family member who provided anamnesis data for a common kind of headache.
Control 1Participants using search engines and portals to gather internet information about the type of headache of a family member who provided anamnesis data for a common kind of headache.
Intervention 2Participants using the prototype to receive expert system guided tailored internet information about the type of headache of a family member who provided anamnesis data for a less common kind of headache.
Control 2Participants using search engines and portals to gather internet information about the type of headache of a family member who provided anamnesis data for a less common kind of headache.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jun 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2009
  3. Primary completionApr 2009
  4. Study completionApr 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
140 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00921453
Sponsor's protocol ID
GWDiss3000490-2
Status last verified
Jun 2009
First submitted
15 Jun 2009
Last updated
16 Jun 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002 May 22-29;287(20):2691-700. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2691.

    PubMed 12020305
  • Andrew ME, Penzien DB, Rains JC, Knowlton GE, McAnulty RD. Development of a computer application for headache diagnosis: the Headache Diagnostic System. Int J Biomed Comput. 1992 Jul;31(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(92)90050-3.

    PubMed 1644498
  • Baur C, Deering MJ. Proposed frameworks to improve the quality of health web sites: review. MedGenMed. 2000 Sep 26;2(3):E35. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11104481
  • Bessell TL, McDonald S, Silagy CA, Anderson JN, Hiller JE, Sansom LN. Do Internet interventions for consumers cause more harm than good? A systematic review. Health Expect. 2002 Mar;5(1):28-37. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00156.x.

    PubMed 11906539
  • Bindels R, Winkens RA, van Wersch JW, Pop P, Hasman A. Comparing assessment of appropriateness of diagnostic tests between a human expert and an automated reminder system. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000;77:239-43.

    PubMed 11187550
  • Birru MS, Monaco VM, Charles L, Drew H, Njie V, Bierria T, Detlefsen E, Steinman RA. Internet usage by low-literacy adults seeking health information: an observational analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 3;6(3):e25. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e25.

    PubMed 15471751
  • Buchanan BG, Moore JD, Forsythe DE, Carenini G, Ohlsson S, Banks G. An intelligent interactive system for delivering individualized information to patients. Artif Intell Med. 1995 Apr;7(2):117-54. doi: 10.1016/0933-3657(94)00029-r.

    PubMed 7647838
  • Bull FC, Kreuter MW, Scharff DP. Effects of tailored, personalized and general health messages on physical activity. Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Feb;36(2):181-92. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00134-7.

    PubMed 10223022
  • Eysenbach G, Kohler C, Yihune G, Lampe K, Cross P, Brickley D. A metadata vocabulary for self- and third-party labeling of health web-sites: Health Information Disclosure, Description and Evaluation Language (HIDDEL). Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:169-73.

    PubMed 11825174
  • Gagliardi A, Jadad AR. Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination. BMJ. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):569-73. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.569.

    PubMed 11884320
  • Jadad AR, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA. 1998 Feb 25;279(8):611-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.8.611.

    PubMed 9486757
  • Kopec D, Shagas G, Selman J, Reinharth D, Tamang S. Development of an expert system for differentiating tension type headaches from migraines. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;103:81-92.

    PubMed 15747909
  • Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World. J Med Internet Res. 2006 Jun 16;8(2):e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9.

    PubMed 16867972
  • Olesen J. The International Classification of Headache Disorders. Headache. 2008 May;48(5):691-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01121.x.

    PubMed 18471112
  • Olesen J. International Classification of Headache Disorders, Second Edition (ICHD-2): current status and future revisions. Cephalalgia. 2006 Dec;26(12):1409-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01214.x. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17116090

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Headaches, run by Health & Life Sciences University, Tryol at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00921453, which also lists 20 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2009; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in