In-Stent RestenosisPhase 1/2PERVIDEO INCT00916279
PERVIDEO I Registry, The Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis
A Phase 1/2 study testing Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in people with In-Stent Restenosis, run by C. R. Bard at 8 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The study will enroll patients with angiographic evidence of in-stent restenosis of a previously placed bare-metal stent. Subjects will be treated with a Lutonix Catheter. The purpose is to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the Lutonix Catheter in the native coronary system. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- In-Stent Restenosis
- What is being tested?
- Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 41 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2009to Dec 2011
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or non-pregnant/non-breast feeding Female ≥18 Years of age. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days of the procedure;
- Documented stable angina pectoris Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification (CCSC) 1-4, unstable angina pectoris with documented ischemia (Braunwald I-II) or documented silent ischemia;
- Previous history of native coronary bare metal stenting ≥60 days;
- LVEF ≥25%;
- Patient is an acceptable candidate for PTCA, stenting, and emergent CABG;
- Patient is willing to provide informed consent and comply with follow-up visits and testing schedule;
Show all 11Show fewer
- Target lesion is in a native coronary with previous single bare metal stent; Stenosis is ≥50% and <100% by visual estimate or QCA prior to defined pre-dilatation;
- Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD) is ≥2.5 and ≤3.25;
- Target lesion is ≤40 mm in length and can be treated in its entirety by no more than 2 contiguous Lutonix Catheters;
- Guidewire is able to cross lesion(s) and be placed in distal vessel prior to enrollment;
- Enrollment permitted after successful treatment of 1 to 2 non-study lesions in a single other non-study vessel. Successful treatment is defined as ≤30% residual stenosis with TIMI III flow and no evidence of dissection.
Who cannot join
- History of Stroke within past 6 months;
- History of MI or thrombolysis within 72 hours of randomization;
- History of previous target vessel perforation;
- Prior vascular brachytherapy;
- Angiographic evidence of thrombus or dissection within the target vessel;
- Intervention of another coronary lesion <60 days before index procedure day or planned following index procedure;
Show all 19Show fewer
- Target lesion is in the Left Main or vessel ostium and has excessive calcification or tortuosity or involves bifurcation disease of vessel ≥2.5 mm;
- Target lesion is planned to be treated with something other than PTCA (i.e. stent, cutting balloon, atherectomy, VBT, etc.);
- Uncontrollable allergies to procedure medications, materials, or contrast;
- Patient has previous stent procedure with any drug-coated or drug eluting stent device in the target coronary vessel;
- Known sensitivity to paclitaxel or other antimitogenic agent;
- Patient has a stent sandwich (a stench previously deployed within another stent;
- Pre-procedure CKMB >2x ULN or positive Troponin;
- Creatinine >2.0 mg/dl;
- Leukocyte <3500/mL;
- Platelet <100,000 mL or >750,000 mL;
- Currently taking or must resume warfarin;
- Patient is contraindicated for anti-platelet therapy or it will need to be withdrawn for a planned procedure;
- The patient is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not completed its primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the endpoints of this study;
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 3 countries.
8 sites in 3 countries
Germany4 sites
Kerckhoff Klinik
Bad Nauheim, 61231
Westdeutsches Herzzentrum Essen
Essen
Alte Clinic Center for Cardiology
Hamburg, 22527
Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH
Leipzig
Netherlands3 sites
Academic Medical Center
Amsterdam
Catherina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven
Sint Antonius Ziehenhuis
Nieuwegein
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multicenter, European Registry Investigating the Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis Within Bare-Metal Stents
The study will enroll patients with angiographic evidence of in-stent restenosis of a previously placed bare-metal stent. Subjects will be treated with a Lutonix Catheter. The purpose is to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the Lutonix Catheter in the native coronary system. Angiographic and clinical outcomes will be assessed.
- Conditions
- In-Stent Restenosis
- Being tested
- Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon
- Keywords
- Bare Metal In-Stent Restenosis, Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter, Drug Coated Balloon, Coronary Artery Disease
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated BalloonDevice
Also called Drug Coated Balloon
PTCA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lutonix Catheter | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) in the Analysis Segment
Measured: 6 months
Change in Diameter Stenosis (%DS) From Post-procedure Through 6 Months
Paired change in percent diameter stenosis (%DS) in the analysis segment from post-procedure through 6 months. I.e., %DS at follow-up less %DS post procedure per patient.
Measured: 6 Months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Late Lumen Loss
Change in (loss of) lumen diameter from baseline through 6 months in the analysis segment (including the treated segment and 5mm proximal and distal).
Measured: 6 months
MACE Rate
Major adverse coronary events (MACE), including the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR).
Measured: 30 Days
Binary Restenosis
Subjects with percent diameter stenosis >50% in the analysis segment.
Measured: 6 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jun 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2009
- Primary completionOct 2010
- Study completionDec 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for In-Stent RestenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by C. R. BardThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- C. R. Bard
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Laura Mauri, MD, Principal investigator, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00916279
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CL0010-01
- Acronym
- PERVIDEO I
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 4 Jun 2009
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Scheller B, Speck U, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Paclitaxel balloon coating, a novel method for prevention and therapy of restenosis. Circulation. 2004 Aug 17;110(7):810-4. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138929.71660.E0. Epub 2004 Aug 9.
PubMed 15302790Speck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, Breitwieser C, Dobberstein J, Boehm M, Hamm B. Neointima inhibition: comparison of effectiveness of non-stent-based local drug delivery and a drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries. Radiology. 2006 Aug;240(2):411-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2402051248.
PubMed 16864669Stone GW, Ellis SG, O'Shaughnessy CD, Martin SL, Satler L, McGarry T, Turco MA, Kereiakes DJ, Kelley L, Popma JJ, Russell ME; TAXUS V ISR Investigators. Paclitaxel-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the TAXUS V ISR randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1253-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1253. Epub 2006 Mar 12.
PubMed 16531618Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, Rutsch W, Haghi D, Dietz U, Bohm M, Speck U. Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 16;355(20):2113-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061254. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
PubMed 17101615Holmes DR Jr, Teirstein P, Satler L, Sketch M, O'Malley J, Popma JJ, Kuntz RE, Fitzgerald PJ, Wang H, Caramanica E, Cohen SA; SISR Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the SISR randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1264-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1264. Epub 2006 Mar 12.
PubMed 16531619Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 25;331(8):489-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408253310801.
PubMed 8041413Kastrati A, Mehilli J, von Beckerath N, Dibra A, Hausleiter J, Pache J, Schuhlen H, Schmitt C, Dirschinger J, Schomig A; ISAR-DESIRE Study Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Jan 12;293(2):165-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.2.165.
PubMed 15644543
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multicenter, European Registry Investigating the Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis Within Bare-Metal Stents
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00916279
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PERVIDEO I / CL0010-01
- Conditions
- In-Stent Restenosis
- Keywords
- Bare Metal In-Stent Restenosis, Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter, Drug Coated Balloon, Coronary Artery Disease
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- C. R. BardIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2009
- Primary completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jun 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Dec 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study will enroll patients with angiographic evidence of in-stent restenosis of a previously placed bare-metal stent. Subjects will be treated with a Lutonix Catheter. The purpose is to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the Lutonix Catheter in the native coronary system. Angiographic and clinical outcomes will be assessed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lutonix Catheter | Experimental | Device: Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Male or non-pregnant/non-breast feeding Female ≥18 Years of age. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days of the procedure;
- Documented stable angina pectoris Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification (CCSC) 1-4, unstable angina pectoris with documented ischemia (Braunwald I-II) or documented silent ischemia;
- Previous history of native coronary bare metal stenting ≥60 days;
- LVEF ≥25%;
- Patient is an acceptable candidate for PTCA, stenting, and emergent CABG;
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- History of Stroke within past 6 months;
- History of MI or thrombolysis within 72 hours of randomization;
- History of previous target vessel perforation;
- Prior vascular brachytherapy;
- Angiographic evidence of thrombus or dissection within the target vessel;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated BalloonAlso: Drug Coated BalloonPTCA | Device | Lutonix Catheter |
Primary outcome
Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) in the Analysis Segment
Time frame: 6 months
Change in Diameter Stenosis (%DS) From Post-procedure Through 6 Months
Time frame: 6 Months
Paired change in percent diameter stenosis (%DS) in the analysis segment from post-procedure through 6 months. I.e., %DS at follow-up less %DS post procedure per patient.
3 secondary outcomes
Late Lumen Loss
Time frame: 6 months
MACE Rate
Time frame: 30 Days
Binary Restenosis
Time frame: 6 Months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 15302790Scheller B, Speck U, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Paclitaxel balloon coating, a novel method for prevention and therapy of restenosis. Circulation. 2004 Aug 17;110(7):810-4. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138929.71660.E0. Epub 2004 Aug 9.
- Background: PubMed 16864669Speck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, Breitwieser C, Dobberstein J, Boehm M, Hamm B. Neointima inhibition: comparison of effectiveness of non-stent-based local drug delivery and a drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries. Radiology. 2006 Aug;240(2):411-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2402051248.
- Background: PubMed 16531618Stone GW, Ellis SG, O'Shaughnessy CD, Martin SL, Satler L, McGarry T, Turco MA, Kereiakes DJ, Kelley L, Popma JJ, Russell ME; TAXUS V ISR Investigators. Paclitaxel-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the TAXUS V ISR randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1253-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1253. Epub 2006 Mar 12.
- Background: PubMed 17101615Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, Rutsch W, Haghi D, Dietz U, Bohm M, Speck U. Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 16;355(20):2113-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061254. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
- Background: PubMed 16531619Holmes DR Jr, Teirstein P, Satler L, Sketch M, O'Malley J, Popma JJ, Kuntz RE, Fitzgerald PJ, Wang H, Caramanica E, Cohen SA; SISR Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the SISR randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Mar 15;295(11):1264-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1264. Epub 2006 Mar 12.
- Background: PubMed 8041413Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 25;331(8):489-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199408253310801.
- Background: PubMed 15644543Kastrati A, Mehilli J, von Beckerath N, Dibra A, Hausleiter J, Pache J, Schuhlen H, Schmitt C, Dirschinger J, Schomig A; ISAR-DESIRE Study Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Jan 12;293(2):165-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.2.165.
Related trials for In-Stent Restenosis
Not yet recruiting
Sirolimus-Coated Versus Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Recurrent Coronary In-Stent Restenosis After Prior Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Treatment (SPRIT)
Coronary In-stent Restenosis, Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Drug-coated Balloons Versus Drug-eluting Stents for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis
Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis (ISR)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial to Assess the Agent Paclitaxel Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Subjects With In-Stent Restenosis (ISR)
In-Stent Restenosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial to Assess the Agent Paclitaxel Coated PTCA Balloon Catheter for the Treatment of Subjects With In-Stent Restenosis (ISR) - Long Lesion Cohort
In-Stent Restenosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The ReCAna for Lower ExtremIty Venous OBstructions and In-StEnt Restenosis Registry
Chronic Venous Disease, Chronic Venous Insufficiency, CVI
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Laura Mauri, MD principal investigator
Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
8 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in people with In-Stent Restenosis, run by C. R. Bard at 8 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in Germany, Netherlands, Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Dec 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) in the Analysis Segment (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00916279, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2017.