AzTrials
AzTrials

Thrombocytopenia Related to Chronic Liver DiseasePhase 2NCT00914927

Once-Daily Oral Avatrombopag Tablets Used in Subjects With Chronic Liver Diseases and Thrombocytopenia Prior to Elective Surgical or Diagnostic Procedures

A Phase 2 study testing Avatrombopag in people with Thrombocytopenia Related to Chronic Liver Disease, run by Eisai Inc. at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of once-daily Oral avatrombopagin subjects with chronic liver diseases and thrombocytopenia prior to elective surgical or diagnostic procedures, to evaluate the safety of short-term administration of avatrombopag and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of E5501. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Avatrombopag
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
130 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2009to 21 Dec 2011
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Males or females ≥ 18 years of age
  • Thrombocytopenia (defined as a platelet count ≥ 10,000 - ≤ 50,000 (+15%)/mm^3 )
  • Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores ≤ 24
  • Chronic liver diseases due to one of the following three etiologies:
  • Chronic Viral Hepatitis from one of the following categories
  • Chronic Hepatitis C (defined as the presence of anti-hepatitis C virus [HCV] antibodies and/or detectable serum HCV ribonucleic acid [RNA] levels)
Show all 23Show fewer
  • OR chronic Hepatitis B (defined as the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] and/or detectable serum hepatitis B virus [HBV] deoxyribonucleic acid [DNA])
  • OR chronic Hepatitis B and C co-infection (as defined by the above bullet points)
  • OR chronic Hepatitis C and history of alcohol abuse
  • OR chronic Hepatitis B and history of alcohol abuse
  • NASH diagnosed as:
  • absence of serologic evidence of viral hepatitis and
  • convincing evidence of a history of minimal or no alcohol consumption, and
  • histologic picture of steatohepatitis OR
  • when histology is unavailable, then clinical, radiographic and laboratory evidence of NASH
  • Alcoholic liver disease diagnosed as:
  • absence of serologic evidence of viral hepatitis and
  • history of heavy alcohol consumption and
  • histologic picture of alcoholic liver disease OR
  • when histology is unavailable, then clinical, radiographic and laboratory evidence of hepatitis combined with years of excessive alcohol intake
  • Subjects who are scheduled to undergo an elective invasive procedure between 1 to 4 days post last dose of study drug.
  • Adequate renal function as evidenced by a calculated creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/minute per the Cockcroft and Gault formula
  • Life expectancy ≥3 months

Who cannot join

  • Hepatic encephalopathy that cannot be effectively treated.
  • Platelet transfusion within 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug
  • Received blood products, eg, FFP and cryoprecipitate 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug
  • Have surgical or diagnostic procedure scheduled during the Randomization Phase (Day 1 to Day 8) of this study
  • Interferon use within 2 weeks of Day 1
  • Hormonal contraceptive use within 60 days of study entry
Show all 21Show fewer
  • History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Any prohibited concomitant medications or therapy that cannot be discontinued by Visit 1
  • Active alcohol abuse, active alcohol dependence syndrome, drug abuse, or drug dependence within 6 months of the study start (unless participating in a controlled rehabilitation program)
  • Acute alcoholic hepatitis (chronic alcoholic hepatitis is allowed) within 6 months of the study start
  • History of any primary hematologic disorder
  • History of arterial or venous thrombosis, including thrombosis of any part of the splenic-mesenteric system
  • Any evidence of current portal vein thrombosis (PVT) as detected by Doppler sonography or appropriate MRI/CT imaging at Screening and/or within approximately 30 days prior to Screening
  • Any acute/active bleeding (gastrointestinal [GI], central nervous system [CNS], etc)
  • Uncompensated congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class III or IV)
  • Pre-diagnosed Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
  • History of Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
  • Females who are pregnant (positive β-hCG test ) or breastfeeding
  • Current use of recreational drugs
  • Post-transplant patients
  • Subjects who have participated in another investigational trial within 30 days prior to Visit 1.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Ochsner Clinic Foundation

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2, Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Population Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Oral E5501 Tablets Used Up to 7 Days in Subjects With Chronic Liver Diseases and Thrombocytopenia Prior to Elective Surgical or Diagnostic Procedures

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of once-daily Oral avatrombopagin subjects with chronic liver diseases and thrombocytopenia prior to elective surgical or diagnostic procedures, to evaluate the safety of short-term administration of avatrombopag and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of E5501.

Being tested
Avatrombopag, Placebo
Keywords
Thrombocytopenia, chronic liver disease
Medical subject headings
Thrombocytopenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AvatrombopagDrug

    Avatrombopag first Dose 80 mg followed by 10 mg a day for up to 6 additional days

  • AvatrombopagDrug

    Avatrombopag first Dose 80 mg followed by 20 mg a day for 3 days and then Placebo for 3 additional days

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo or inactive substance once a day for up to 7 days

Study groups in NCT00914927
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Avatrombopag
2ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Avatrombopag; Drug: Placebo
3Placebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Experiencing Response

    Platelet counts (PC) were determined from blood draws. A responder is defined as a participant having an increase of at least 20,000/mm^3 PC from Baseline and a PC greater than 50,000/mm^3 at least once during Day 4 through Day 8. Missing PC assessments at any given time point was considered to be a non-response at that point and were not estimated. For PC measurements taken after the last dose day (end of treatment (EOT)), the postdose windows applied. If there was more than one PC within the same analysis visit window, the following selection rules were applied sequentially to determine which PC was used for that time point: 1) the PC that was closer to the target date was used, 2) if PC were equal-distance in days from the target day, the later one based on measurement date and time was used, and 3) if there was more than one PC on the same day, if it was a baseline record, the largest one was used; if it was a postbaseline record, the smallest one was used.

    Measured: Day 8 (Visit 5, EOT)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in Platelet Count on Day 8 (Visit 5 and/or End of Treatment) From Baseline

    Platelet counts were determined from blood draws. Missing PC assessments at any given time point was considered to be a non-response at that point and were not estimated. For PC measurements taken after the last dose day (EOT), the postdose windows applied. If there was more than one PC within the same analysis visit window, the following selection rules were applied sequentially to determine which PC was used for that time point: 1) the PC that was closer to the target date was used, 2) if PC were equal-distance in days from the target day, the later one based on measurement date and time was used, and 3) if there was more than one PC on the same day, if it was a baseline record, the largest one was used; if it was a postbaseline record, the smallest one was used.

    Measured: Day 8 (Visit 5, EOT)

  2. Percentage of Participants Experiencing Dose-response by Visit

    Platelet counts were determined from blood draws. Missing PC assessments at any given time point was considered to be a non-response at that point and were not estimated. For PC measurements taken after the last dose day (EOT), the postdose windows applied. If there was more than one PC within the same analysis visit window, the following selection rules were applied sequentially to determine which PC was used for that time point: 1) the PC that was closer to the target date was used, 2) if PC were equal-distance in days from the target day, the later one based on measurement date and time was used, and 3) if there was more than one PC on the same day, if it was a baseline record, the largest one was used; if it was a postbaseline record, the smallest one was used.

    Measured: Day 4 (Visit 3), Day 6 ( Visit 4), Day 8 (Visit 5, EOT), 3 Day Post Last Dose (Visit 6), and 7 Day Post Last Dose (Visit 7)

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Platelet Count Greater Than 75,000/mm^3 on Day 4

    Platelet counts were determined from blood draws. Missing PC assessments at any given time point was considered to be a non-response at that point and were not estimated. For PC measurements taken after the last dose day (EOT), the postdose windows applied. If there was more than one PC within the same analysis visit window, the following selection rules were applied sequentially to determine which PC was used for that time point: 1) the PC that was closer to the target date was used, 2) if PC were equal-distance in days from the target day, the later one based on measurement date and time was used, and 3) if there was more than one PC on the same day, if it was a baseline record, the largest one was used; if it was a postbaseline record, the smallest one was used.

    Measured: Day 4 (Visit 3)

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Platelet Count Greater Than 100,000/mm^3 on Days 4 and 8

    Platelet counts were determined from blood draws. Missing PC assessments at any given time point was considered to be a non-response at that point and were not estimated. For PC measurements taken after the last dose day (EOT), the postdose windows applied. If there was more than one PC within the same analysis visit window, the following selection rules were applied sequentially to determine which PC was used for that time point: 1) the PC that was closer to the target date was used, 2) if PC were equal-distance in days from the target day, the later one based on measurement date and time was used, and 3) if there was more than one PC on the same day, if it was a baseline record, the largest one was used; if it was a postbaseline record, the smallest one was used.

    Measured: Day 4 (Visit 3) and Day 8 (Visit 5, EOT)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jun 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2009
  3. Primary completion11 Nov 2011
  4. Study completion21 Dec 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
130 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00914927
Sponsor's protocol ID
E5501-G000-202
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
4 Jun 2009
Last updated
23 Jan 2018

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Avatrombopag in people with Thrombocytopenia Related to Chronic Liver Disease, run by Eisai Inc. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 23 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jan 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Response (time frame: Day 8 (Visit 5, EOT)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in