Urinary Bladder, OveractivePhase 3CAPRICORNNCT00912964
A Study to Test the Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder
A Phase 3 study testing Mirabegron in people with Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 151 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
The study is intended to test efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of once daily (qd) Mirabegron against placebo to treat patients with symptoms of overactive bladder. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- What is being tested?
- Mirabegron
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 2,030 participants
- Where
- 151 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Apr 2009to 27 Apr 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly
- Patient has symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) for ≥ 3 months
- Patient must experience frequency of micturition on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period
- Patient must experience at least 3 episodes of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence during the 3-day micturition diary period
Who cannot join
- Patient is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential, sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control
- Patient has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor
- Patient is using medications intended to treat OAB
- Patient has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization
- Patient has diabetic neuropathy
- Patient has evidence of urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
Show all 12Show fewer
- Patient receives non-drug treatment including electro-stimulation therapy
- Patient has severe hypertension
- Patient has participated in a clinical study within 30 days, or had participated in any previous study with mirabegron
- Patient had an average total daily urine volume > 3000 mL as recorded in the 3-day micturition diary period
- Patient has serum creatinine of >150 μmol/L, or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2x upper limit of normal range (ULN), or gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT) > 3x ULN
- Patient has a clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG)
Trial locations and contacts
151 sites in 11 countries.
151 sites in 11 countries
United States82 sites
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87109
Study site
Alpharetta, Georgia, 30005
Study site
Arlington, Texas, 76017
Study site
Atherton, California, 94027
Study site
Aventura, Florida, 33180
Study site
Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, 19004
Study site
Bethany, Oklahoma, 73008
Study site
Billings, Montana, 59102
Study site
Binghamton, New York, 13901
Study site
Buena Park, California, 90620
Study site
Chandler, Arizona, 85224
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45212
Study site
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Study site
Clearwater, Florida, 33761
Study site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44122
Study site
Columbus, Ohio, 43220
Study site
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78414
Study site
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Study site
Denver, Colorado, 80211
Study site
Edmond, Oklahoma, 73034
Study site
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825
Study site
Fresno, California, 93720
Study site
Garden City, New York, 11530
Study site
Greer, South Carolina, 29650
Study site
Hickory, North Carolina, 28601
Study site
Homewood, Alabama, 35209
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77024
Study site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Study site
Jeffersonville, Indiana, 47130
Study site
Kingston, New York, 12401
Study site
La Mesa, California, 91942
Study site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148
Study site
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33319
Study site
Lawrenceville, New Jersey, 08648
Study site
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72204
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Study site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40291
Study site
Lyndhurst, Ohio, 44124
Study site
Madisonville, Kentucky, 42431
Study site
Melrose Park, Illinois, 60160
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33136
Study site
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Study site
Mountlake Terrace, Washington, 98043
Study site
New Britain, Connecticut, 06052
Study site
New York, New York, 10016
Study site
Newport Beach, California, 92660
Study site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Study site
Overland Park, Kansas, 66211
Study site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33024
Study site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33027
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19114
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27509
Study site
Roswell, Georgia, 30076
Study site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107
Study site
San Bernardino, California, 92404
Study site
San Diego, California, 92108
Study site
Sarasota, Florida, 34237
Study site
Seattle, Washington, 98166
Study site
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71106
Study site
Simpsonville, South Carolina, 29681
Study site
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Study site
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01103
Study site
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33709
Study site
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308
Study site
Tarzana, California, 91356
Study site
Torrance, California, 90505
Study site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Study site
Tucson, Arizona, 85741
Study site
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23454
Study site
Wadsworth, Ohio, 44281
Study site
Warwick, Rhode Island, 02886
Study site
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708
Study site
Watertown, Massachusetts, 02472
Study site
Wellington, Florida, 33414
Study site
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266
Study site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33407
Study site
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19605
Study site
Wichita, Kansas, 67207
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Canada15 sites
Study site
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 7G1
Study site
Bathurst, New Brunswick, E2A 4Z9
Study site
Brampton, Ontario, L6T 4S5
Study site
Brantford, Ontario, N3R 4N3
Study site
Granby, Quebec, J2G 8Z9
Study site
Kitchener, Ontario, N2N 2B9
Study site
North Bay, Ontario, P1B 7K8
Study site
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 3J8
Study site
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4
Study site
Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7E 6E7
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M6A 3B5
Study site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9
Study site
Victoria, British Columbia, V8T 5G1
Study site
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 0N2
Germany13 sites
Study site
Bad Ems, 56130
Study site
Eisleben Lutherstadt, 06295
Study site
Frankfurt, 65933
Study site
Hagenow, 19230
Study site
Halle, 06132
Study site
Henningsdorf, 16761
Study site
Hettstedt, 06333
Study site
Koblenz, 56068
Study site
Leipzig, 04109
Study site
Neunkirchen, 66538
Study site
Neustadt in Sachsen, 01844
Study site
Radebeul, 01445
Study site
Sangerhausen, 06526
Hungary9 sites
Study site
Budapest, 1115
Study site
Budapest, 1204
Study site
Körmend, 9900
Study site
Nyíregyháza, 4400
Study site
Sopron, 9400
Study site
Székesfehérvár, 8000
Study site
Szekszárd, 7100
Study site
Szentes, 6600
Study site
Tatabánya, 2800
Spain7 sites
Study site
Barcelona, 8036
Study site
Coslada, 28822
Study site
Getafe Madrid, 28905
Study site
Gran Canaria, 38320
Study site
Madrid, 28031
Study site
Madrid, 28041
Study site
Vic, 8500
Sweden7 sites
Study site
Gothenburg, SE-40014
Study site
Huddinge, SE-14186
Study site
Jönköping, SE-55466
Study site
Karlshamn, SE-37435
Study site
Malmö, SE-21744
Study site
Stockholm, SE-17176
Study site
Stockholm, SE-18288
Czechia5 sites
Study site
Olomouc, 779 00
Study site
Ostrava, 735 81
Study site
Prague, 128 51
Study site
Prague, 140 00
Study site
Prague, 180 81
Denmark4 sites
Study site
Aalborg, DK-9100
Study site
Aarhus N, DK-8200
Study site
Frederiksberg, DK-2000
Study site
Holstebro, DK-7500
Finland3 sites
Study site
Helsinki, FIN-00029
Study site
Oulu, FIN-90220
Study site
Tampere, FIN-33521
Norway3 sites
Study site
Bergen, NO-5053
Study site
Hamar, NO-2317
Study site
Tønsberg, NO-3116
Slovakia3 sites
Study site
Martin, 036 59
Study site
Trenčín, 911 01
Study site
Žilina, 012 07
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (25 mg qd and 50 mg qd) in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder
The study is intended to test efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of once daily (qd) Mirabegron against placebo to treat patients with symptoms of overactive bladder.
- Conditions
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- Being tested
- Mirabegron, Placebo
- Keywords
- Urgency, YM178, Urinary incontinence, Mirabegron, Micturition, Frequency, Urinary urgency incontinence, Overactive Bladder
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Urinary Incontinence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MirabegronDrug
Also called YM178, Myrebtriq
Mirabegron tablets
PlaceboDrug
Matching mirabegron placebo tablets.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Experimental | Participants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Mirabegron |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Experimental | Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Mirabegron |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was derived from the number of times a patient urinates (excluding incontinence only episodes) per day recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Secondary outcomes (37)
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Level of Urgency
Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 4, 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency
Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Nocturia is defined as waking at night one or more times to void. The average number of times a patient urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) during sleeping time per day was derived from the 3-day patient micturition diary.
LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
The average number of times a patient records a new pad used per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.
LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes for the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the micturition diary recorded by the patient.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
The percentage of participants with at least a 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the patient micturition diary.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Responders for Mean Level of Urgency
Percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline to Final Visit in mean level of urgency at least as large as the pre-specified minimally important difference (MID). The MID was determined to be 0.24 for mean level of urgency. Mean level of urgency was derived from the average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale which ranged from 0 (No urgency) to 4 (Urge incontinence).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Responders for Number of Grade 3 or 4 Urgency Episodes
Percentage of participants with a decrease from baseline to final visit in mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 or 4) at least as large as the pre-specified minimally important difference (MID). The MID was determined to be 1.54 for mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 or 4). The mean number of urgency episodes was derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale where a score 3=severe urgency and 4=urge incontinence.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score
Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the symptom bother scale of the overactive bladder questionnaire. The symptom bother scale consists of 8 questions answered by the participant on a scale from 1-6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating worst severity. A negative change from Baseline in symptom bother score indicates improvements.
LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
Health-related quality of life was assessed by the HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social interaction) of the overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq). The HRQL total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQL subscale scores, and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline in HRQL score indicates improvements.
LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent of work time missed is derived from the number of hours of work missed due to OAB symptoms as a percentage of total hours that should have been worked. A higher percentage indicates more hours missed. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent impairment while working was derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent overall work impairment takes into account both hours missed due to OAB symptoms and the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with daily activities over the last 7 days. Percent activity impairment is derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their regular daily activities. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:
I have no problems in walking about; I have some problems in walking about; I am confined to bed.
In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:
I have no problems with self-care; I have some problems washing or dressing myself; I am unable to wash or dress myself. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
The EQ-5D is a standardized, nondisease-specific instrument for describing health status. Participants were asked which statement best describes their health state with regard to usual activities (work, study or leisure): I have no problems performing my usual activities; I have some problems performing my usual activities; I am unable to perform my usual activities. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available at that Visit.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:
I have no pain or discomfort; I have moderate pain or discomfort; I have extreme pain or discomfort. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:
I am not anxious or depressed; I am moderately anxious or depressed; I am extremely anxious or depressed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, generic instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Health status is assessed by patients evaluating their health on a vertical, visual analog scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labeled 'Worst imaginable health state' (=0) and 'Best imaginable health state' (=100). On the EQ-5D VAS, a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)
The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale (VAS) that asks patients to rate their satisfaction with treatment by placing a vertical mark on a 10 cm line where the endpoints are labeled 'No, not at all' on the left (=0) to 'Yes, completely satisfied' on the right (=10). LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician
The number of times the patient visited a physician's office during the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (excluding study visits) because of the patient's bladder condition.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
The Clinician Global Impression Scale (CGI) assessed the change in the patient's bladder symptoms since the start of the study and was completed by the physician at Baseline and at Week 12/end of treatment. The degree of change was categorized as one of the following: 'Very much improved', 'Much improved', 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse', or 'Very much worse'.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
The patient global impression (PGI) scale assessed the change in bladder symptoms since the start of the study and was completed by the patient at Baseline and at Week 12/end of treatment. The degree of change was categorized as one of the following: 'Very much improved', 'Much improved', 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse', or 'Very much worse'.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
The patient global impression (PGI) scale assessed the change in the patient's overall condition since the start of the study and was completed by the patient at Baseline and at Week 12/end of treatment. The degree of change was categorized as one of the following: 'Very much improved', 'Much improved', 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse', or 'Very much worse'.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit
The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. Improvement was defined as at least a one point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline and a major improvement was defined as at least a two point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline in PPBC score.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jun 2009 (estimated)
- Study start28 Apr 2009
- Primary completion27 Apr 2010
- Study completion27 Apr 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urinary Bladder, OveractiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 2,030 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Astellas Pharma Inc
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Use Central Contact, Study director, Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00912964
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 178-CL-074
- Other IDs
- 2008-007087-42, 2008
- Acronym
- CAPRICORN
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 1 Jun 2009
- Last updated
- 21 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
Publications
Desroziers K, Aballea S, Maman K, Nazir J, Odeyemi I, Hakimi Z. Estimating EQ-5D and OAB-5D health state utilities for patients with overactive bladder. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Nov 19;11:200. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-200.
PubMed 24246044Herschorn S, Barkin J, Castro-Diaz D, Frankel JM, Espuna-Pons M, Gousse AE, Stolzel M, Martin N, Gunther A, Van Kerrebroeck P. A phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicentre study to assess the efficacy and safety of the beta(3) adrenoceptor agonist, mirabegron, in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder. Urology. 2013 Aug;82(2):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.02.077. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
PubMed 23769122
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (25 mg qd and 50 mg qd) in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00912964
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAPRICORN / 178-CL-074
- Conditions
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- Keywords
- Urgency, YM178, Urinary incontinence, Mirabegron, Micturition, Frequency, Urinary urgency incontinence, Overactive Bladder
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,030 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Astellas Pharma IncIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Apr 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Apr 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Apr 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jun 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Oct 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is intended to test efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of once daily (qd) Mirabegron against placebo to treat patients with symptoms of overactive bladder.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks. |
| Mirabegron 25 mg | Experimental | Drug: MirabegronParticipants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks. |
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Experimental | Drug: MirabegronParticipants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly
- Patient has symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) for ≥ 3 months
- Patient must experience frequency of micturition on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period
- Patient must experience at least 3 episodes of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence during the 3-day micturition diary period
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patient is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential, sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control
- Patient has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor
- Patient is using medications intended to treat OAB
- Patient has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization
- Patient has diabetic neuropathy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MirabegronAlso: YM178, MyrebtriqMirabegron tablets | Drug | Mirabegron 25 mg, Mirabegron 50 mg |
| PlaceboMatching mirabegron placebo tablets. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was derived from the number of times a patient urinates (excluding incontinence only episodes) per day recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
37 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Level of Urgency
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Responders for Mean Level of Urgency
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Responders for Number of Grade 3 or 4 Urgency Episodes
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Nov 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24246044Desroziers K, Aballea S, Maman K, Nazir J, Odeyemi I, Hakimi Z. Estimating EQ-5D and OAB-5D health state utilities for patients with overactive bladder. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Nov 19;11:200. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-200.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23769122Herschorn S, Barkin J, Castro-Diaz D, Frankel JM, Espuna-Pons M, Gousse AE, Stolzel M, Martin N, Gunther A, Van Kerrebroeck P. A phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicentre study to assess the efficacy and safety of the beta(3) adrenoceptor agonist, mirabegron, in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder. Urology. 2013 Aug;82(2):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.02.077. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
Related trials for Urinary Bladder, Overactive
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Examining the Effects of Intra-detrusor Botox at Time of HoLEP in Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms
Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder Syndrome
Recruiting
UCon Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Males
Urinary Incontinence, Urge Incontinence
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Overactive Bladder Symptoms and Urinary Incontinence In Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
RecruitingObservational study
Predictive Value of Inflammatory Biomarkers for Mirabegron Response in Women With Overactive Bladder
Overactive Bladder (OAB)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Use Central Contact study director
Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
151 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Mirabegron in people with Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 151 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 151 sites in United States, Canada, Germany, Hungary, Spain and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours (time frame: Baseline and Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00912964, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.