AzTrials
AzTrials

Urinary Bladder, OveractivePhase 3CAPRICORNNCT00912964

A Study to Test the Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

A Phase 3 study testing Mirabegron in people with Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 151 sites in 11 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study is intended to test efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of once daily (qd) Mirabegron against placebo to treat patients with symptoms of overactive bladder. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Urinary Bladder, Overactive
What is being tested?
Mirabegron
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
2,030 participants
Where
151 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
28 Apr 2009to 27 Apr 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly
  • Patient has symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) for ≥ 3 months
  • Patient must experience frequency of micturition on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period
  • Patient must experience at least 3 episodes of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence during the 3-day micturition diary period

Who cannot join

  • Patient is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential, sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control
  • Patient has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor
  • Patient is using medications intended to treat OAB
  • Patient has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization
  • Patient has diabetic neuropathy
  • Patient has evidence of urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Patient receives non-drug treatment including electro-stimulation therapy
  • Patient has severe hypertension
  • Patient has participated in a clinical study within 30 days, or had participated in any previous study with mirabegron
  • Patient had an average total daily urine volume > 3000 mL as recorded in the 3-day micturition diary period
  • Patient has serum creatinine of >150 μmol/L, or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2x upper limit of normal range (ULN), or gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT) > 3x ULN
  • Patient has a clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG)

Trial locations and contacts

151 sites in 11 countries.

151 sites in 11 countries

United States82 sites
  • Study site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108

  • Study site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87109

  • Study site

    Alpharetta, Georgia, 30005

  • Study site

    Arlington, Texas, 76017

  • Study site

    Atherton, California, 94027

  • Study site

    Aventura, Florida, 33180

  • Study site

    Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, 19004

  • Study site

    Bethany, Oklahoma, 73008

  • Study site

    Billings, Montana, 59102

  • Study site

    Binghamton, New York, 13901

  • Study site

    Buena Park, California, 90620

  • Study site

    Chandler, Arizona, 85224

  • Study site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209

  • Study site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45212

  • Study site

    Clearwater, Florida, 33756

  • Study site

    Clearwater, Florida, 33761

  • Study site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44122

  • Study site

    Columbus, Ohio, 43220

  • Study site

    Corpus Christi, Texas, 78414

  • Study site

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Study site

    Denver, Colorado, 80211

  • Study site

    Edmond, Oklahoma, 73034

  • Study site

    Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825

  • Study site

    Fresno, California, 93720

  • Study site

    Garden City, New York, 11530

  • Study site

    Greer, South Carolina, 29650

  • Study site

    Hickory, North Carolina, 28601

  • Study site

    Homewood, Alabama, 35209

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas, 77024

  • Study site

    Huntsville, Alabama, 35801

  • Study site

    Jeffersonville, Indiana, 47130

  • Study site

    Kingston, New York, 12401

  • Study site

    La Mesa, California, 91942

  • Study site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148

  • Study site

    Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33319

  • Study site

    Lawrenceville, New Jersey, 08648

  • Study site

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516

  • Study site

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72204

  • Study site

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • Study site

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40291

  • Study site

    Lyndhurst, Ohio, 44124

  • Study site

    Madisonville, Kentucky, 42431

  • Study site

    Melrose Park, Illinois, 60160

  • Study site

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Study site

    Mobile, Alabama, 36608

  • Study site

    Mountlake Terrace, Washington, 98043

  • Study site

    New Britain, Connecticut, 06052

  • Study site

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Study site

    Newport Beach, California, 92660

  • Study site

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68114

  • Study site

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66211

  • Study site

    Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33024

  • Study site

    Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33027

  • Study site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19114

  • Study site

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27509

  • Study site

    Roswell, Georgia, 30076

  • Study site

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107

  • Study site

    San Bernardino, California, 92404

  • Study site

    San Diego, California, 92108

  • Study site

    Sarasota, Florida, 34237

  • Study site

    Seattle, Washington, 98166

  • Study site

    Shreveport, Louisiana, 71106

  • Study site

    Simpsonville, South Carolina, 29681

  • Study site

    Spokane, Washington, 99204

  • Study site

    Springfield, Massachusetts, 01103

  • Study site

    St. Petersburg, Florida, 33709

  • Study site

    Tallahassee, Florida, 32308

  • Study site

    Tarzana, California, 91356

  • Study site

    Torrance, California, 90505

  • Study site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85712

  • Study site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85741

  • Study site

    Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23454

  • Study site

    Wadsworth, Ohio, 44281

  • Study site

    Warwick, Rhode Island, 02886

  • Study site

    Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708

  • Study site

    Watertown, Massachusetts, 02472

  • Study site

    Wellington, Florida, 33414

  • Study site

    West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266

  • Study site

    West Palm Beach, Florida, 33407

  • Study site

    West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19605

  • Study site

    Wichita, Kansas, 67207

  • Study site

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103

Other trials in United States

Canada15 sites
  • Study site

    Barrie, Ontario, L4M 7G1

  • Study site

    Bathurst, New Brunswick, E2A 4Z9

  • Study site

    Brampton, Ontario, L6T 4S5

  • Study site

    Brantford, Ontario, N3R 4N3

  • Study site

    Granby, Quebec, J2G 8Z9

  • Study site

    Kitchener, Ontario, N2N 2B9

  • Study site

    North Bay, Ontario, P1B 7K8

  • Study site

    Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 3J8

  • Study site

    Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4

  • Study site

    Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7E 6E7

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

  • Study site

    Toronto, Ontario, M6A 3B5

  • Study site

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9

  • Study site

    Victoria, British Columbia, V8T 5G1

  • Study site

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 0N2

Other trials in Canada

Germany13 sites
  • Study site

    Bad Ems, 56130

  • Study site

    Eisleben Lutherstadt, 06295

  • Study site

    Frankfurt, 65933

  • Study site

    Hagenow, 19230

  • Study site

    Halle, 06132

  • Study site

    Henningsdorf, 16761

  • Study site

    Hettstedt, 06333

  • Study site

    Koblenz, 56068

  • Study site

    Leipzig, 04109

  • Study site

    Neunkirchen, 66538

  • Study site

    Neustadt in Sachsen, 01844

  • Study site

    Radebeul, 01445

  • Study site

    Sangerhausen, 06526

Other trials in Germany

Hungary9 sites
  • Study site

    Budapest, 1115

  • Study site

    Budapest, 1204

  • Study site

    Körmend, 9900

  • Study site

    Nyíregyháza, 4400

  • Study site

    Sopron, 9400

  • Study site

    Székesfehérvár, 8000

  • Study site

    Szekszárd, 7100

  • Study site

    Szentes, 6600

  • Study site

    Tatabánya, 2800

Other trials in Hungary

Spain7 sites
  • Study site

    Barcelona, 8036

  • Study site

    Coslada, 28822

  • Study site

    Getafe Madrid, 28905

  • Study site

    Gran Canaria, 38320

  • Study site

    Madrid, 28031

  • Study site

    Madrid, 28041

  • Study site

    Vic, 8500

Other trials in Spain

Sweden7 sites
  • Study site

    Gothenburg, SE-40014

  • Study site

    Huddinge, SE-14186

  • Study site

    Jönköping, SE-55466

  • Study site

    Karlshamn, SE-37435

  • Study site

    Malmö, SE-21744

  • Study site

    Stockholm, SE-17176

  • Study site

    Stockholm, SE-18288

Other trials in Sweden

Czechia5 sites
  • Study site

    Olomouc, 779 00

  • Study site

    Ostrava, 735 81

  • Study site

    Prague, 128 51

  • Study site

    Prague, 140 00

  • Study site

    Prague, 180 81

Other trials in Czechia

Denmark4 sites
  • Study site

    Aalborg, DK-9100

  • Study site

    Aarhus N, DK-8200

  • Study site

    Frederiksberg, DK-2000

  • Study site

    Holstebro, DK-7500

Other trials in Denmark

Finland3 sites
  • Study site

    Helsinki, FIN-00029

  • Study site

    Oulu, FIN-90220

  • Study site

    Tampere, FIN-33521

Other trials in Finland

Norway3 sites
  • Study site

    Bergen, NO-5053

  • Study site

    Hamar, NO-2317

  • Study site

    Tønsberg, NO-3116

Other trials in Norway

Slovakia3 sites
  • Study site

    Martin, 036 59

  • Study site

    Trenčín, 911 01

  • Study site

    Žilina, 012 07

Other trials in Slovakia

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (25 mg qd and 50 mg qd) in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

The study is intended to test efficacy, safety and tolerability of two doses of once daily (qd) Mirabegron against placebo to treat patients with symptoms of overactive bladder.

Being tested
Mirabegron, Placebo
Keywords
Urgency, YM178, Urinary incontinence, Mirabegron, Micturition, Frequency, Urinary urgency incontinence, Overactive Bladder
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Urinary Incontinence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MirabegronDrug

    Also called YM178, Myrebtriq

    Mirabegron tablets

  • PlaceboDrug

    Matching mirabegron placebo tablets.

Study groups in NCT00912964
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants received matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo
Mirabegron 25 mgExperimentalParticipants received mirabegron 25 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Mirabegron
Mirabegron 50 mgExperimentalParticipants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets orally once a day for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Mirabegron

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Least Squares (LS) Means were generated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

    The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was derived from the number of times a patient urinates (excluding incontinence only episodes) per day recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

Secondary outcomes (37)
  1. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition

    The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

    The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline and Week 4 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4

  4. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Level of Urgency

    Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  5. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  6. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours

    The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  7. Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours

    The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was calculated from the number of micturitions recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12

  8. Change From Baseline to Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per 24 hours was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days before the Baseline, Week 8 and Week 12 clinic visits. LS Means were generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12

  9. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition

    The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days before the Baseline and Week 4, 8 and 12 clinic visits. LS Means generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  10. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours

    The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  11. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grades 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours

    The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer), derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  12. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 in Mean Level of Urgency

    Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the following 5-point categorical scale (Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale): 0: No urgency; 1: Mild urgency; 2: Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3: Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4: Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  13. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours

    Nocturia is defined as waking at night one or more times to void. The average number of times a patient urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) during sleeping time per day was derived from the 3-day patient micturition diary.

    LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  14. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours

    The average number of times a patient records a new pad used per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.

    LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  15. Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit

    The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes for the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the micturition diary recorded by the patient.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  16. Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and the Final Visit

    The percentage of participants with at least a 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the patient micturition diary.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  17. Percentage of Responders for Mean Level of Urgency

    Percentage of participants with a decrease from Baseline to Final Visit in mean level of urgency at least as large as the pre-specified minimally important difference (MID). The MID was determined to be 0.24 for mean level of urgency. Mean level of urgency was derived from the average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale which ranged from 0 (No urgency) to 4 (Urge incontinence).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  18. Percentage of Responders for Number of Grade 3 or 4 Urgency Episodes

    Percentage of participants with a decrease from baseline to final visit in mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 or 4) at least as large as the pre-specified minimally important difference (MID). The MID was determined to be 1.54 for mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 or 4). The mean number of urgency episodes was derived from urgency episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as grade 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale where a score 3=severe urgency and 4=urge incontinence.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  19. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score

    Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the symptom bother scale of the overactive bladder questionnaire. The symptom bother scale consists of 8 questions answered by the participant on a scale from 1-6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating worst severity. A negative change from Baseline in symptom bother score indicates improvements.

    LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  20. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score

    Health-related quality of life was assessed by the HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social interaction) of the overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq). The HRQL total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQL subscale scores, and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline in HRQL score indicates improvements.

    LS Means are from an ANCOVA with treatment group, gender, and geographic region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  21. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent of work time missed is derived from the number of hours of work missed due to OAB symptoms as a percentage of total hours that should have been worked. A higher percentage indicates more hours missed. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  22. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent impairment while working was derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  23. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent overall work impairment takes into account both hours missed due to OAB symptoms and the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  24. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment

    The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with daily activities over the last 7 days. Percent activity impairment is derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their regular daily activities. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  25. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score

    The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

    I have no problems in walking about; I have some problems in walking about; I am confined to bed.

    In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  26. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score

    The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

    I have no problems with self-care; I have some problems washing or dressing myself; I am unable to wash or dress myself. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  27. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score

    The EQ-5D is a standardized, nondisease-specific instrument for describing health status. Participants were asked which statement best describes their health state with regard to usual activities (work, study or leisure): I have no problems performing my usual activities; I have some problems performing my usual activities; I am unable to perform my usual activities. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available at that Visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  28. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score

    The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

    I have no pain or discomfort; I have moderate pain or discomfort; I have extreme pain or discomfort. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  29. Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score

    The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

    I am not anxious or depressed; I am moderately anxious or depressed; I am extremely anxious or depressed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  30. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, generic instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Health status is assessed by patients evaluating their health on a vertical, visual analog scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labeled 'Worst imaginable health state' (=0) and 'Best imaginable health state' (=100). On the EQ-5D VAS, a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  31. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)

    The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  32. Change From Baseline to Week 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction on Visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)

    The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale (VAS) that asks patients to rate their satisfaction with treatment by placing a vertical mark on a 10 cm line where the endpoints are labeled 'No, not at all' on the left (=0) to 'Yes, completely satisfied' on the right (=10). LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, gender, and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  33. Change From Baseline to Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician

    The number of times the patient visited a physician's office during the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (excluding study visits) because of the patient's bladder condition.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8 and 12

  34. Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Clinician Global Impression Scale

    The Clinician Global Impression Scale (CGI) assessed the change in the patient's bladder symptoms since the start of the study and was completed by the physician at Baseline and at Week 12/end of treatment. The degree of change was categorized as one of the following: 'Very much improved', 'Much improved', 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse', or 'Very much worse'.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  35. Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Bladder Symptoms on the Patient Global Impression Scale

    The patient global impression (PGI) scale assessed the change in bladder symptoms since the start of the study and was completed by the patient at Baseline and at Week 12/end of treatment. The degree of change was categorized as one of the following: 'Very much improved', 'Much improved', 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse', or 'Very much worse'.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  36. Summary of Baseline, Week 12 and Final Visit Change in Overall Condition on the Patient Global Impression Scale

    The patient global impression (PGI) scale assessed the change in the patient's overall condition since the start of the study and was completed by the patient at Baseline and at Week 12/end of treatment. The degree of change was categorized as one of the following: 'Very much improved', 'Much improved', 'Minimally improved', 'No change', 'Minimally worse', 'Much worse', or 'Very much worse'.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  37. Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 12 and Final Visit

    The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. Improvement was defined as at least a one point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline and a major improvement was defined as at least a two point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline in PPBC score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jun 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study start28 Apr 2009
  3. Primary completion27 Apr 2010
  4. Study completion27 Apr 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
2,030 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00912964
Sponsor's protocol ID
178-CL-074
Other IDs
2008-007087-42, 2008
Acronym
CAPRICORN
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
1 Jun 2009
Last updated
21 Nov 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.

Publications

  • Desroziers K, Aballea S, Maman K, Nazir J, Odeyemi I, Hakimi Z. Estimating EQ-5D and OAB-5D health state utilities for patients with overactive bladder. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Nov 19;11:200. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-200.

    PubMed 24246044
  • Herschorn S, Barkin J, Castro-Diaz D, Frankel JM, Espuna-Pons M, Gousse AE, Stolzel M, Martin N, Gunther A, Van Kerrebroeck P. A phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicentre study to assess the efficacy and safety of the beta(3) adrenoceptor agonist, mirabegron, in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder. Urology. 2013 Aug;82(2):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.02.077. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

    PubMed 23769122

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Mirabegron in people with Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 151 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 151 sites in United States, Canada, Germany, Hungary, Spain and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (Final Visit) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours (time frame: Baseline and Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00912964, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in