AzTrials
AzTrials

Ankylosing SpondylitisPhase 4CRESTNCT00910273

Effects of Etanercept on the Heart, Veins and Thickness of Certain Major Arteries In Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients

A Phase 4 study testing etanercept in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Pfizer at 4 sites in Italy.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study to assess whether etanercept therapy is able to increase flow-mediated vasodilatation in AS, and whether etanercept can modify the intima-media thickness (IMT) in these patients Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ankylosing Spondylitis
What is being tested?
etanercept
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
34 participants
Where
4 sitesItaly
Study dates
Jul 2009to Oct 2011
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of AS, as defined by Modified New York Criteria for Ankylosing Spondylitis.
  • AS with active disease as defined by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI, see Attachment 4) >= 4 at screening visit.
  • Patients capable, in the opinion of the investigator, of complying with the treatment schedule and doses throughout the 52 weeks
  • Agreement by male subjects who are not surgically sterile and female subjects who are not surgically sterile or postmenopausal to use reliable methods of birth control for the duration of the study.
  • Ability to self-inject drug or have a designee who can do so.
  • Ability to store injectable test article at 2ºC to 8ºC.

Who cannot join

  • 1. Pregnancy confirmed by test taken at screening in all women except those who were surgically sterile or at least 1 year postmenopausal. Sexually active women of childbearing potential participating in the study must use a medically acceptable form of contraception that needs to be continued for 15 days following discontinuation of the test article.

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

Italy4 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Bologna, 40138

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Prato, 59100

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Reggio Emilia, 42100

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Roma, 00161

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Effects of Etanercept on Endothelial Function and Carotid Intima-media Thickness (IMT) in Patients With Active AS

Study to assess whether etanercept therapy is able to increase flow-mediated vasodilatation in AS, and whether etanercept can modify the intima-media thickness (IMT) in these patients

Being tested
etanercept
Keywords
IMT evaluation in AS patients treated with etanercept
Medical subject headings
Spondylitis, Ankylosing

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • etanerceptDrug

    Also called Enbrel

    etanercept 50 mg/week

Study groups in NCT00910273
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Experimentaletanercept 50 mg/week
Receives: Drug: etanercept

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12

    Brachial artery (BA) FMD equals (=)(maximum diameter minus[-] baseline diameter divided by baseline diameter) times (*) 100 percent (%). Ultrasound images of BA at rest were followed by blood pressure (BP) cuff inflated to at least 50 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) above participants systolic BP for 5 minutes. Cuff released and reactive hyperaemia was produced. BA was imaged continuously from 30 seconds prior cuff inflation to 2 minutes after cuff deflation. Higher scores indicate improved endothelial function.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

Secondary outcomes (22)
  1. Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation at Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52

    BA FMD =(maximum diameter -baseline diameter divided by baseline diameter) * 100%. Ultrasound images of BA at rest were followed by BP cuff inflated to at least 50 mm Hg above participants systolic BP for 5 minutes. Cuff released and reactive hyperaemia was produced. BA was imaged continuously from 30 seconds prior cuff inflation to 2 minutes after cuff deflation. Higher scores indicate improved endothelial function. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 24, 36, and 52 or Early Termination (ET)

  2. Change From Baseline in Carotid Intima Media Thickness (IMT) at Weeks 12 and 52

    Change in IMT in the distal common carotid arteries (CCA), common bulbs (CB), and internal carotid arteries (ICA) as determined by ultrasound. Higher scores indicate worsening in cardiovascular risk assessment. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12 and 52 or ET

  3. Change From Baseline Lipid Parameters at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    Mean Total Cholesterol (TC), Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) and Triglyceride (TGL) blood concentrations, lower values indicated improvement in cardiovascular risk. Mean High Density Lipoprotein (HDL), higher values indicated improvement in cardiovascular risk. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

  4. Change From Baseline in Total Serum Homocysteine at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    Mean serum homocysteine blood concentrations. Lower values of homocysteine indicate improvement in inflammation. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

  5. Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 mm/hour (hr). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

  6. Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52

    CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

  7. Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    BASDAI a validated self assessment tool to determine disease activity in participant with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0 (none) to 10 (very severe) centimeter (cm). Participant answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. Final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score range of 0-10. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Higher score indicates greater disability. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET

  8. Percentage of Participants With BASDAI 50 Percent (%) Improvement at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

    BASDAI a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participants with AS. Utilizing a VAS of 0 (none) to 10 cm (very severe), participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. BASDAI 50 response defined as at least a 50% improvement (decrease) from baseline in BASDAI. Baseline score - score at observation divided by Baseline score * 100 = greater than or equal to 50%.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET

  9. Percentage of Participants With Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) 20 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

    ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 20 = 20% improvement from baseline and an absolute change greater than or equal to (≥) 10 units on a 0-100 millimeter (mm) scale (0 mm = no disease activity; 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.

    Measured: Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET

  10. Percentage of Participants With ASAS 40 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

    ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 40 = 40% improvement from baseline and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 or ET

  11. Percentage of Participants With ASAS 50 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

    ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 50 = 50% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

  12. Percentage of Participants With ASAS 70 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

    ASAS measures symptomatic improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) participants ASAS = 4 domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation. ASAS 70 = 70% improvement (vs. baseline) and an absolute change ≥ 20 units on a 0-100 mm scale (0 mm = no disease activity, 100 mm = high disease activity) for ≥ 3 domains, and no worsening in remaining domain.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

  13. Percentage of Participants With ASAS 5/6 at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

    ASAS 5/6 consists of 6 domains: the 4 used in ASAS 20 (participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, inflammation measured on a 0-100 scale, where 0 = no disease activity and 100=high disease activity) plus spinal mobility and an acute phase reactant, C Reactive Protein (CRP). Achieving ASAS 5/6 requires a 20% improvement compared to baseline in ≥ 5 domains and no worsening in the remaining domain.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

  14. Percentage of Participants With ASAS Partial Remission at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

    Partial remission defined as a score of less than 20 units (on a scale of 0-100, where 0 = no disease activity and 100 = high disease activity) in each of the 4 Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) domains: participant global assessment of disease activity, pain, function, and inflammation. For scale, 100=high disease activity.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

  15. Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) at Week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52

    BASMI is an objective measure of spinal mobility. The BASMI score is composed of 5 measures: cervical rotation, intermalleolar distance, modified Schober's test, lateral flexion and tragus to wall distance. Each measure was scored 0-2 (0=normal mobility, 2=severe reduction) to give a final score ranging 0 to 10. Lower score indicated better spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

  16. Change From Baseline in BASMI-Cervical Rotation at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    While in a neutral position, the participant turned the head as far as possible to the right and then to the left. Using a goniometer the degrees of movement were measured. Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the highest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Actual rotation ranged from 3.0 to 99.0 degrees. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 52 or ET

  17. Change From Baseline in BASMI-Intermalleolar Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    Measurement in cm of the distance between the medial malleoli when participant was lying supine with knees straight and feet pointed straight up with legs separated as far as possible, 2 attempts were measured. The best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

  18. Change From Baseline in BASMI-Modified Schober's Test at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    Measurement in cm of distance between marks originally placed while participant was standing erect 10 cm above and 5 cm below the midpoint of a line that joins the posterior superior iliac spines. Distance between marks was re-measured with participant maximally bent forward, knees fully extended, with supine in full flexion. The measurement was carried out two times and best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

  19. Change From Baseline in BASMI-Tragus to Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    Measurement in cm of distance between the tragus and wall from the right and left side while participant was standing with back against the wall; knees straight; scapulae, buttocks, and heels against the wall; with head in a neutral position. Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the smallest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

  20. Change From Baseline in BASMI-Lateral Flexion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    Measurement in cm of distance between participant's middle fingertip and the floor after bending sideways, without bending knees or lifting heels, while attempting to keep shoulders in same place (flexion position). Two measurements on the right and 2 on the left were made. The best of the two measurements for each side (corresponding to the highest value), were then averaged. Higher score indicated greater spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

  21. Change From Baseline in Occiput-to-Wall Distance at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    While participant stood with back against the wall and during maximal effort to touch head to the wall, the distance between the occiput (back of head) and the wall was measured. The measurement of two attempts was made and best of the two measurements which corresponds to the highest value were reported. Lower scores indicated improvement in spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

  22. Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion at Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    Chest expansion defined as the difference in thoracic circumference during full expiration versus full inspiration, measured in cm at the fourth intercostal space (nipple line) while participant was standing. Measurement taken twice and best of the two measurements (corresponding to the highest value of inspiration and smallest value for expiration), were then averaged. Greater chest circumference indicated improvement in spinal mobility. Change: Week x observation minus Baseline observation. Baseline value was used when present, otherwise valid screening value used as baseline if within 14 days of first test article injection.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 or ET

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 May 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2009
  3. Primary completionOct 2011
  4. Study completionOct 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00910273
Sponsor's protocol ID
0881A3-4458
Acronym
CREST
Status last verified
Dec 2015
First submitted
27 May 2009
Last updated
13 Jan 2016
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing etanercept in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by Pfizer at 4 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jan 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in