Urinary IncontinenceNCT00906607
Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence in Different Age Categories
An observational study of Urinary Incontinence, run by Universidade de Franca.
Trial summary
Introduction: Urinary incontinence (UI) is considered erroneously by many as being a phenomenon of the aging process, however there is a growing prevalence of complaints of UI in nulliparous and nulligest young women. Objective: To investigate the prevalence of urinary incontinence in women of different age groups. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 to 75 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Incontinence
- How many people
- 78 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Feb 2008to Oct 2008
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 to 75 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study included 78 nulliparous and nulligest women of different ages living in the city of Franca, and these are divided into: G1 (10-18 years), G2 (20-35 years), G3 (45-60 years) and G4 (65-75 years). Women with a history of cancer or surgery of the lower urinary tract, urinary tract infection, cognitive changes, pregnancy and obesity, were excluded from this study.
Who may be able to join
- nulliparous and nulligest women
Who cannot join
- women with cancer reported
- surgeries of the inferior urinary treatment
- urinary infection
- cognitive alterations
- pregnant
- obesity
About this study
Official title: Prevalence of the Urinary Incontinence in Adolescents, Young, Adults and Aged
Introduction: Urinary incontinence (UI) is considered erroneously by many as being a phenomenon of the aging process, however there is a growing prevalence of complaints of UI in nulliparous and nulligest young women.
Objective: To investigate the prevalence of urinary incontinence in women of different age groups.
Method: 78 nulliparous and nulligest women of different resident age groups in the city of France, being these divided in: G1 (10-18 years); G2 (20-35 years); G3 (45-60 years) and G4 (65-75 years). Excluded from this study were women with cancer or surgeries of the inferior urinary treatment, urinary infection, alterations cognitive, pregnant and obesity. All the participants were questioned as a perception of urine loss, to the efforts or effortlessly evident.
Read the detailed description
All participants were asked about perceived loss of urine, the effort or without apparent effort. The responses of participants from G1 were offered by parents and / or responsible.
- Conditions
- Urinary Incontinence
- Keywords
- Urinary Incontinence
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group I | 10-18 years | |
| Group II | 20-35 years | |
| Group III | 45-60 years | |
| Group IV | 65-75 years |
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 May 2009 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2008
- Primary completionAug 2008
- Study completionOct 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Urinary IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade de Franca
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Lislei Patrizzi, Study director, Universidade de Franca
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00906607
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0077/08
- Status last verified
- May 2009
- First submitted
- 19 May 2009
- Last updated
- 21 May 2009
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 May 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prevalence of the Urinary Incontinence in Adolescents, Young, Adults and Aged
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00906607
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0077/08
- Conditions
- Urinary Incontinence
- Keywords
- Urinary Incontinence
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade de FrancaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2008
- Primary completion
- Aug 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 May 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction: Urinary incontinence (UI) is considered erroneously by many as being a phenomenon of the aging process, however there is a growing prevalence of complaints of UI in nulliparous and nulligest young women.
Objective: To investigate the prevalence of urinary incontinence in women of different age groups.
Method: 78 nulliparous and nulligest women of different resident age groups in the city of France, being these divided in: G1 (10-18 years); G2 (20-35 years); G3 (45-60 years) and G4 (65-75 years). Excluded from this study were women with cancer or surgeries of the inferior urinary treatment, urinary infection, alterations cognitive, pregnant and obesity. All the participants were questioned as a perception of urine loss, to the efforts or effortlessly evident.
Detailed description
All participants were asked about perceived loss of urine, the effort or without apparent effort. The responses of participants from G1 were offered by parents and / or responsible.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group I | – | –10-18 years |
| Group II | – | –20-35 years |
| Group III | – | –45-60 years |
| Group IV | – | –65-75 years |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 to 75 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study included 78 nulliparous and nulligest women of different ages living in the city of Franca, and these are divided into: G1 (10-18 years), G2 (20-35 years), G3 (45-60 years) and G4 (65-75 years). Women with a history of cancer or surgery of the lower urinary tract, urinary tract infection, cognitive changes, pregnancy and obesity, were excluded from this study.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- nulliparous and nulligest women
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- women with cancer reported
- surgeries of the inferior urinary treatment
- urinary infection
- cognitive alterations
- pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 May 2009.
Related trials for Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Examining the Effects of Intra-detrusor Botox at Time of HoLEP in Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms
Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder Syndrome
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
UCon Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Males
Urinary Incontinence, Urge Incontinence
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Overactive Bladder Symptoms and Urinary Incontinence In Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lislei Patrizzi study director
Universidade de Franca
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Urinary Incontinence, run by Universidade de Franca.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 May 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 May 2009.