Breast CancerNCT00899509
Gene Expression Profiling and Genetic Analysis of Tissues From Patients With Breast Cancer
An observational study of Breast Cancer, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This research trial studies deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in tumor tissue from women with node-positive breast cancer to see if genetic factors are related to the patient's response to chemotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- laboratory biomarker analysis
- How many people
- 1,500 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2000to Feb 2011
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with breast cancer enrolled on Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9344 or 9741.
- Registration to CALGB 9344 or 9741
- Samples collected, shipped and stored appropriately at the CALGB Pathology Coordinating Office
- Institutional Review Board (IRB) review and approval at the institution where the laboratory work will be performed is required.
- Informed consent: The CALGB does not require that a separate consent form be signed for this study.
- The subject population to be studied in this protocol includes patients selected from one or more of the following CALGB treatment protocols: CALGB 9344 and 9741.
- All patients have signed a written informed consent document meeting all federal, state and institutional guidelines as part of entry into those trials.
- All samples to be studied were obtained and stored as part of the patient's respective treatment trial. The data obtained from the patient's record will be used to obtain appropriate clinical information. In no instance will the patient be contacted directly.
- There should be no physical, psychological, social or legal risks associated with this study. No invasive procedures are recommended or requested.
- All appropriate and necessary procedures will be utilized to maintain confidentiality. All patients who have had samples submitted for analysis will have their CALGB ID number used to identify specimens.
- This study does not require direct patient contact and no specific risk or benefits to individuals involved in the trial are anticipated. It is likely, however, tIt is likely, however, that the information gained will substantially help similar patients in the future.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
Siouxland Hematology-Oncology Associates, LLP
Sioux City, Iowa, 51101
Mercy Medical Center - Sioux City
Sioux City, Iowa, 51102
St. Luke's Regional Medical Center
Sioux City, Iowa, 51104
About this study
Official title: Correlative Studies of ERBB-2/HER-2/NEU and p53 in CALGB Protocol 9344/INT Protocol 0148: Doxorubicin Dose Escalation, With or Without Taxol®, as Part of the CA Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen For Node Positive Breast Cancer: A Phase III Intergroup Study
This research trial studies deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in tumor tissue from women with node-positive breast cancer to see if genetic factors are related to the patient's response to chemotherapy. DNA analysis of tumor tissue may help doctors predict how well patients will respond to treatment with certain chemotherapy drugs.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine if amplification and/or overexpression of erbB-2 is associated with either additional or less benefit from increasing doses of doxorubicin or four cycles of paclitaxel.
- To determine if abnormalities in p53 (mutations, deletions, protein stabilization) are associated with either additional or less benefit from increasing doses of doxorubicin or four cycles of paclitaxel.
- To compare methods of analysis of erbB-2 and p53, using the most common means of assaying for these biomarkers, in order to determine whether one method is more predictive of clinical outcome than another, or whether methods are complementary.
- To identify biomarkers that can be used to individually tailor the use of adjuvant dose-dense therapy.
- To identify groups of patients who have a poor prognosis, despite adjuvant chemotherapy, who should be prospectively targeted for new approaches to adjuvant treatment.
- To identify biomarkers that can be used to individually tailor the use of adjuvant paclitaxel therapy.
- To identify groups of patients who have a poor prognosis despite adjuvant chemotherapy who should be prospectively targeted for new approaches to adjuvant treatment.
- To determine if the intrinsic subtype, as determined by PAM50 assay, is associated with benefit from paclitaxel (C9344) and from dose dense chemotherapy (C9741) regardless of clinical estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status.
- To determine if intrinsic subtype is associated with benefit from paclitaxel and from dose dense chemotherapy in the HER2 negative subset, as defined by the tissue microarray (TMA) analysis of HER2 completed in sections B2 and B3 of this protocol.
- To determine if relapse score, as determined by PAM50 assay, is associated with benefit from paclitaxel and from dose dense chemotherapy regardless of clinical ER and HER2 status.
- To determine if relapse score is associated with benefit from paclitaxel and from dose dense chemotherapy in the HER2 negative subset.
- To evaluate the association of a PAM50-defined proliferation score and benefit from paclitaxel and from dose dense chemotherapy.
- To evaluate whether patients identified as having basal breast cancer by the PAM50 assay benefit from paclitaxel.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To compare the performance of the PAM50-defined intrinsic subtypes with the subtype diagnoses determined by the antibody panel, developed in sections B2 and B3 of this protocol, in predicting benefit from paclitaxel and from dose dense chemotherapy in the HER2 negative subset.
- To evaluate the prognostic value of the PAM50-defined relapse score in patients receiving no paclitaxel therapy (C9344).
- To investigate the performance of a multivariate model including proliferation score and risk of relapse in predicting benefit from paclitaxel and from dose dense chemotherapy.
OUTLINE:
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks are analyzed for amplification and/or overexpression of erbB-2 (HER-2/neu) and for mutations or deletions of p53 by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- laboratory biomarker analysis
- Keywords
- stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
laboratory biomarker analysisOther
correlative studies
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disease free survival
Measured: Up to 10 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Overall survival
Measured: Up to 10 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 May 2009 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2000
- Primary completionFeb 2011
- Study completionFeb 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 1,500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Minetta C. Liu, MD, Study chair, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00899509
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CALGB-159905
- Other IDs
- CDR0000285697
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 9 May 2009
- Last updated
- 8 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Correlative Studies of ERBB-2/HER-2/NEU and p53 in CALGB Protocol 9344/INT Protocol 0148: Doxorubicin Dose Escalation, With or Without Taxol®, as Part of the CA Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen For Node Positive Breast Cancer: A Phase III Intergroup Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00899509
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CALGB-159905
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- stage II breast cancer, stage IIIA breast cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Oct 2000
- Primary completion
- Feb 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 May 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research trial studies deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in tumor tissue from women with node-positive breast cancer to see if genetic factors are related to the patient's response to chemotherapy. DNA analysis of tumor tissue may help doctors predict how well patients will respond to treatment with certain chemotherapy drugs.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- To determine if amplification and/or overexpression of erbB-2 is associated with either additional or less benefit from increasing doses of doxorubicin or four cycles of paclitaxel.
- To determine if abnormalities in p53 (mutations, deletions, protein stabilization) are associated with either additional or less benefit from increasing doses of doxorubicin or four cycles of paclitaxel.
- To compare methods of analysis of erbB-2 and p53, using the most common means of assaying for these biomarkers, in order to determine whether one method is more predictive of clinical outcome than another, or whether methods are complementary.
- To identify biomarkers that can be used to individually tailor the use of adjuvant dose-dense therapy.
- To identify groups of patients who have a poor prognosis, despite adjuvant chemotherapy, who should be prospectively targeted for new approaches to adjuvant treatment.
- To identify biomarkers that can be used to individually tailor the use of adjuvant paclitaxel therapy.
- To identify groups of patients who have a poor prognosis despite adjuvant chemotherapy who should be prospectively targeted for new approaches to adjuvant treatment.
- To determine if the intrinsic subtype, as determined by PAM50 assay, is associated with benefit from paclitaxel (C9344) and from dose dense chemotherapy (C9741) regardless of clinical estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status.
- To determine if intrinsic subtype is associated with benefit from paclitaxel and from dose dense chemotherapy in the HER2 negative subset, as defined by the tissue microarray (TMA) analysis of HER2 completed in sections B2 and B3 of this protocol.
- To determine if relapse score, as determined by PAM50 assay, is associated with benefit from paclitaxel and from dose dense chemotherapy regardless of clinical ER and HER2 status.
- To determine if relapse score is associated with benefit from paclitaxel and from dose dense chemotherapy in the HER2 negative subset.
- To evaluate the association of a PAM50-defined proliferation score and benefit from paclitaxel and from dose dense chemotherapy.
- To evaluate whether patients identified as having basal breast cancer by the PAM50 assay benefit from paclitaxel.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To compare the performance of the PAM50-defined intrinsic subtypes with the subtype diagnoses determined by the antibody panel, developed in sections B2 and B3 of this protocol, in predicting benefit from paclitaxel and from dose dense chemotherapy in the HER2 negative subset.
- To evaluate the prognostic value of the PAM50-defined relapse score in patients receiving no paclitaxel therapy (C9344).
- To investigate the performance of a multivariate model including proliferation score and risk of relapse in predicting benefit from paclitaxel and from dose dense chemotherapy.
OUTLINE:
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks are analyzed for amplification and/or overexpression of erbB-2 (HER-2/neu) and for mutations or deletions of p53 by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with breast cancer enrolled on Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9344 or 9741.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| laboratory biomarker analysiscorrelative studies | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Disease free survival
Time frame: Up to 10 years
1 secondary outcome
Overall survival
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Aug 2017.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Minetta C. Liu, MD study chair
Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Breast Cancer, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disease free survival (time frame: Up to 10 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Aug 2017.