Traumatic Brain InjuryPhase 3NCT00893789
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil as Treatment for Patients With Excessive Sleepiness Associated With Mild or Moderate Closed Traumatic Brain Injury
A Phase 3 study testing Armodafinil in people with Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Cephalon, Inc. at 73 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study is to determine whether armodafinil treatment is more effective than placebo treatment in patients with excessive sleepiness associated with mild or moderate closed traumatic brain injury (TBI). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- What is being tested?
- Armodafinil
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 117 participants
- Where
- 73 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 30 Apr 2009to 31 Jan 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient had a mild (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 13-15) or moderate (GCS score 9-12) closed TBI at the time of the injury, and the injury occurred 1 to 10 years prior to screening.
- The patient had a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 5 at the screening visit.
- The patient had an Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score of at least 10 at screening.
- The patient had a mean sleep latency on the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) (average of 4 naps) of less than 8 minutes at baseline.
- The patient had a Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) rating relating to their excessive sleepiness of 4 or more at the screening and baseline visits.
- The patient had a complaint of excessive sleepiness (at least 5 days/week on average) for at least 3 months, and the excessive sleepiness began within 12 months of the TBI.
Show all 18Show fewer
- Written informed consent was obtained.
- The patient was a man or woman of any ethnic origin 18 to 65 years of age.
- If admitted to an inpatient treatment facility, the patient was discharged at least 1 month prior to the screening visit.
- The patient did not have any medical or psychiatric disorders that could account for the excessive sleepiness.
- Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), used a medically accepted method of contraception, and continued use of one of these methods for the duration of the study (and for 30 days after participation in the study). Acceptable methods of contraception included: abstinence, barrier method with spermicide, steroidal contraceptive (oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected) in conjunction with a barrier method, or intrauterine device (IUD).
- The patient was in otherwise good health, as judged by the investigator, on the basis of a medical and psychiatric history, physical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG), serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis.
- The patient was willing and able to comply with study restrictions and to attend regularly scheduled clinic visits as specified in this protocol.
- The patient had a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of more than 26 at the screening visit.
- The patient was on stable dosages of medications (allowed by the protocol) for a minimum of 3 months (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs]), 8 weeks (contraceptives), or 4 weeks (all other allowed medication) before the screening visit and was not likely to require a change in therapy for at least 12 weeks on the basis of the investigators' assessment.
- The patient had a habitual bedtime between 2100 and 2400.
- The patient had no other head injuries that, based on medical record documentation or history from the patient and reliable informant (if available), were temporally related to the onset or to any worsening of excessive sleepiness.
- The patient had no other head injury fulfilling the criteria for TBI within ±1 year of the TBI identified according to criterion (a1).
Who cannot join
- The patient had a history of 2 or more episodes of transient loss of consciousness (LOC) without clear medical explanation, or had a history of known or suspected pseudo seizure (psychogenic seizure). Patients with a history of seizure or epilepsy may have been eligible following discussion with the medical monitor.
- The patient required, or was likely to require, treatment with anticonvulsant medication during the study, or had taken anticonvulsant medication within 6 months before the screening visit.
- The patient had an unstable or uncontrolled medical (including illnesses related to the cardiovascular [including patients with a history of left ventricular hypertrophy or in patients with mitral valve prolapse who had experienced the mitral valve prolapse syndrome], renal, or hepatic systems or surgical) condition (treated or untreated) or was not a suitable candidate for treatment with armodafinil, as judged by the investigator.
- The patient had neurosurgery involving the brain or brainstem.
- The patient had a history of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, psychotic depression, or other psychotic episode.
- The patient had any current Axis I disorder (including depression and posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD]), as assessed by Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (SCID). The patient had any Axis II disorder (as assessed by SCID) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would affect patient participation in the study or full compliance with study procedures.
Show all 26Show fewer
- The patient had a history of, or currently met The International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Edition 2 (ICSD 2) (American Academy of Sleep Medicine 2005) criteria for narcolepsy, obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS), shift work sleep disorder (SWSD), or any other sleep disorder associated with excessive daytime sleepiness; or the patient had a history of idiopathic hypersomnia, insomnia (requiring treatment), or sleep disorder before the development of the TBI.
- The patient had 85% or less sleep efficiency (sleep duration ÷ time in bed x 100%) as determined from nocturnal polysomnography (NPSG).
- The patient had any disorder that may interfere with drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion.
- The patient used any medications, including over-the-counter (OTC) medicines disallowed by the protocol, within 7 days or 5 half lives (medication or its active metabolites), whichever was longer, before the screening visit.
- The patient had a need for chronic pain medications.
- In the judgment of the investigator, the patient had a clinically significant deviation from normal in the physical examination.
- In the judgment of the investigator, the patient had any clinically significant ECG finding.
- The patient had a diagnosis of any type of dementia.
- The patient had a history of suicidal ideation (considered by the investigator to be of current clinical significance), or was currently suicidal.
- The patient had a known hypersensitivity to armodafinil, racemic modafinil, or any component of the study drug tablets. Armodafinil tablets contain the following inactive ingredients: croscarmellose sodium, lactose, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, povidone, and pregelatinized starch.
- The patient had a history of any clinically significant cutaneous drug reaction, or a history of clinically significant hypersensitivity reaction, including multiple allergies or drug reactions.
- The patient had a clinical laboratory test value(s) outside the range(s) specified by protocol (or any other clinically significant laboratory abnormality), and the medical monitor had not provided written approval for study participation.
- The patient had a history (within the past 5 years) of alcohol, narcotic, or any other drug abuse (with the exception of nicotine) as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders of the American Psychiatric Association, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR), or the patient had current evidence of substance use, without medical explanation, confirmed by results of a urine drug screen (UDS).
- The patient had taken armodafinil, modafinil or other stimulant medication for excessive sleepiness within 1 month of the screening visit.
- The patient was a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any women becoming pregnant during the study were to be withdrawn from the study.)
- The patient was known to have tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
- The patient consumed an average of more than 600 mg of caffeine per day, including coffee, tea and/or other caffeine-containing beverages or food.
- The patient used any investigational drug within 1 month before the screening visit.
- The patient was receiving workmen's compensation or was in active litigation with regard to TBI.
- The patient had a self-reported Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 6 Item Version (S HAM D6) score of more than 4 at the screening visit.
Trial locations and contacts
73 sites in 4 countries.
73 sites in 4 countries
United States68 sites
Teva Investigational Site 26
Atlanta, Georgia, 30321
Teva Investigational Site 12
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Teva Investigational Site 14
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Teva Investigational Site 60
Austin, Texas, 78756
Teva Investigational Site 37
Belmont, Massachusetts, 02478
Teva Investigational Site 58
Birmingham, Alabama, 35213
Teva Investigational Site 70
Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135
Teva Investigational Site 32
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815-6901
Teva Investigational Site 46
Chicago, Illinois, 60675-6714
Teva Investigational Site 54
Chicago, Illinois, 60675-6714
Teva Investigational Site 59
Chicago, Illinois, 60675-6714
Teva Investigational Site 31
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45227
Teva Investigational Site 34
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45246
Teva Investigational Site 64
Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania, 18411
Teva Investigational Site 65
Columbia, South Carolina, 29201
Teva Investigational Site 25
Dallas, Texas, 75235
Teva Investigational Site 28
Danville, Indiana, 46122
Teva Investigational Site 11
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Teva Investigational Site 19
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46805
Teva Investigational Site 44
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Teva Investigational Site 68
Gainesville, Georgia, 30501
Teva Investigational Site 61
Germantown, Tennessee, 38139
Teva Investigational Site 52
Hallandale, Florida, 33009
Teva Investigational Site 7
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 39402
Teva Investigational Site 16
Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913
Teva Investigational Site 8
Houston, Texas, 77030
Teva Investigational Site 20
Houston, Texas, 77063
Teva Investigational Site 2
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250
Teva Investigational Site 39
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260
Teva Investigational Site 41
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Teva Investigational Site 13
Jefferson Hills, Pennsylvania, 15025
Teva Investigational Site 73
Kingwood, Texas, 77339
Teva Investigational Site 49
La Palma, California, 90623
Teva Investigational Site 51
La Palma, California, 90623
Teva Investigational Site 56
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510
Teva Investigational Site 5
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Teva Investigational Site 48
Louisville, Kentucky, 40217
Teva Investigational Site 67
Macon, Georgia, 31201
Teva Investigational Site 71
Mather, California, 95655
Teva Investigational Site 47
Miami, Florida, 33173
Teva Investigational Site 57
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130
Teva Investigational Site 35
Midvale, Utah, 84047
Teva Investigational Site 66
Midvale, Utah, 84047
Teva Investigational Site 72
New York, New York, 10010
Teva Investigational Site 63
New York, New York, 10019
Teva Investigational Site 3
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Teva Investigational Site 1
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Teva Investigational Site 18
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33026
Teva Investigational Site 24
Richmond, Virginia, 23249
Teva Investigational Site 22
Saginaw, Michigan, 48604
Teva Investigational Site 23
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Teva Investigational Site 55
San Diego, California, 92103
Teva Investigational Site 33
San Diego, California, 92161
Teva Investigational Site 53
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Teva Investigational Site 9
Shawnee Mission, Kansas, 66201
Teva Investigational Site 10
Spring Hill, Florida, 34609
Teva Investigational Site 42
St Louis, Missouri, 63143
Teva Investigational Site 38
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33707
Teva Investigational Site 29
Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281
Teva Investigational Site 15
Suwanee, Georgia, 30024
Teva Investigational Site 17
Tampa, Florida, 33607
Teva Investigational Site 30
Toledo, Ohio, 43623
Teva Investigational Site 62
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Teva Investigational Site 40
Tucson, Arizona, 85723
Teva Investigational Site 69
Wallingford, Connecticut, 06492
Teva Investigational Site 50
West Allis, Wisconsin, 53227
Teva Investigational Site 36
West Seneca, New York, 14224
Teva Investigational Site 45
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Germany2 sites
Teva Investigational Site 405
Berlin, 10117
Teva Investigational Site 404
München, 80331
Spain2 sites
Teva Investigational Site 704
Barcelona, 08003
Teva Investigational Site 701
Madrid, 28036
About this study
Official title: A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Fixed-Dosage Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil (50, 150, and 250 mg/Day) as Treatment for Patients With Excessive Sleepiness Associated With Mild or Moderate Closed Traumatic Brain Injury
The primary objective of the study is to determine whether armodafinil treatment is more effective than placebo treatment in patients with excessive sleepiness associated with mild or moderate closed traumatic brain injury (TBI).
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Being tested
- Armodafinil, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ArmodafinilDrug
Armodafinil 50 mg/day
ArmodafinilDrug
Armodafinil 150 mg/day
ArmodafinilDrug
Armodafinil 250 mg/day
PlaceboOther
Placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Armodafinil 50 mg/day Receives: Drug: Armodafinil |
| 2 | Experimental | Armodafinil 150 mg/day Receives: Drug: Armodafinil |
| 3 | Experimental | Armodafinil 250 mg/day Receives: Drug: Armodafinil |
| 4 | Placebo comparator | Placebo Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) at Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)
The MSLT is an objective assessment of sleepiness that measures the likelihood of falling asleep. Four 20-minute (maximum) MSLT naps were performed at 0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500. The participant, dressed in nonconstricting clothes, was instructed to lie quietly and attempt sleep. Each MSLT nap continued until: (a) 3 consecutive 30-second epochs of stage 1 sleep were reached or (b) any single, 30-second epoch of stage 2, 3, 4, or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep was reached. Sleep latency for each nap and average sleep latency for the 4 naps were tabulated. According to clinical protocol for the MSLT, each nap was terminated after 20 minutes if no sleep occurred. If a participant did not fall asleep in 20 minutes, his/her sleep latency for that nap was set to 20 minutes. Sleep latency was measured as the elapsed time from lights-out to the first epoch scored as sleep. With a 30-second scoring epoch, this criterion was reached when sleep occupied at least 16 seconds of any epoch.
Measured: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12
Percentage of Responders and Nonresponders According to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Ratings at Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)
The CGI-C is the clinician's rating of disease severity as compared with pretreatment, assessed by the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). Severity of illness, as related to excessive sleepiness, was assessed at baseline by the CGI-S, which consists of 7 categories: normal-shows no sign of illness, borderline ill, mildly (slightly) ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, and among the most extremely ill. The clinician assessed the change from baseline in the participant's condition, as related to excessive sleepiness, in response to treatment. The CGI-C uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, and very much worse. Responders were defined as those participants who were considered much or very much improved on the CGI-C. Those in all other categories of the CGI-C were considered nonresponders.
Measured: Last postbaseline observation up to Week 12
Secondary outcomes (17)
Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Latency From the MSLT at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
The MSLT is an objective assessment of sleepiness that measures the likelihood of falling asleep. Four 20-minute (maximum) MSLT naps were performed at 0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500. The participant, dressed in nonconstricting clothes, was instructed to lie quietly and attempt sleep. Each MSLT nap continued until: (a) 3 consecutive 30-second epochs of stage 1 sleep were reached or (b) any single, 30-second epoch of stage 2, 3, 4, or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep was reached. Sleep latency for each nap and average sleep latency for the 4 naps were tabulated. According to clinical protocol for the MSLT, each nap was terminated after 20 minutes if no sleep occurred. Sleep latency was measured as the elapsed time from lights-out to the first epoch scored as sleep. With a 30-second scoring epoch, this criterion was reached when sleep occupied at least 16 seconds of any epoch.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Percentage of Responders and Nonresponders According to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Ratings at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
The CGI-C is the clinician's rating of disease severity as compared with pretreatment, assessed by the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). Severity of illness, as related to excessive sleepiness, was assessed at baseline by the CGI-S, which consists of 7 categories: normal-shows no sign of illness, borderline ill, mildly (slightly) ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, and among the most extremely ill. The clinician assessed the change from baseline in the participant's condition, as related to excessive sleepiness, in response to treatment. The CGI-C uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, and very much worse. Responders were defined as those participants who were considered much or very much improved on the CGI-C. Those in all other categories of the CGI-C were considered nonresponders.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in Traumatic Brain Injury - Work Instability Scale (TBI-WIS) Total Score At Weeks 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)
The TBI-WIS is a validated participant-rated instrument for assessing a participant's functional ability after TBI and the functional demands of their job. The assessment consists of 36 questions to which the participant responded with a "true" or "not true" answer. To score the questionnaire, the number of "true" responses is counted: if < 2, the risk is low; 2 to 23, the risk is medium; and >23, the risk is high, for work instability. Score range is 0 (lowest risk for work instability) to 36 (highest risk for work instability).
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (last postbaseline observation up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Week 12 and Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)
The patient's evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness was measured by the ESS. The ESS score is based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg, sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. The ESS score is derived from the sum of the values from questions corresponding to the 8 situations. Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating a greater daytime sleepiness. This test was self-administered.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Endpoint (last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12)
Percentage of Participants Answering "No" to All Questions on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale Since Last Visit Version (C-SSRS SLV) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)
The C-SSRS captures occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors since last visit (SLV). The number of participants answering 'no' to all 9 yes/no questions about suicidal behaviors, ideations, and acts are presented. Questions included the presence of the following: a wish to be dead; nonspecific active suicidal thoughts; actual suicide attempt; non-suicidal self-injurious behavior; interrupted attempt; aborted attempt; suicidal behavior; preparatory suicidal acts or behavior; and completed suicide.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (last postbaseline observation up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline in the Total Score From the Self-Reported Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 6 Item Version (S-HAM-D6) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to 12 Weeks)
The self-reported S-HAM-D6 is a validated scale developed from the core depressive items of the 17 Item Hamilton Depression Inventory (HAM-D17). The HAM-D6 (Items 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, 13 from the 17-item HAMD) evaluates "core" symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). The assessment consists of 6 items representing depressed mood, guilt, work and activities, retardation, psychic anxiety, and general somatic symptoms. Each item is evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale (e.g. absent, mild, moderate, severe, very severe) or a 3-point scale (e.g. absent, mild, marked). Total scores range from 0 (normal) to 22 (severe). Scores greater than 12 indicate moderate to severe depression and scores less than 12 indicate mild depression.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and Endpoint (last postbaseline observation up to 12 weeks)
Change From Baseline in the Total Sleep Time As Assessed by Nocturnal Polysomnography (NPSG) at Weeks 2, 4, 12 and Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to 12 Weeks)
NPSG continuously records normal and abnormal physiological activity during an entire night. It documents the adequacy of sleep, including the frequency, duration, and total amounts of stage 1-2, stage 3-4 (slow wave sleep), and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 12, and Endpoint (last postbaseline observation up to 12 weeks)
Plasma Concentrations of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) and Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs) at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 (or Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)
To evaluate the impact of treatment with armodafinil on the pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (as appropriate), plasma concentrations at weeks 4, 8, and 12 (or last postbaseline observation) were to be assessed.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 (or last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12)
Concomitant Medication Usage In ≥5% of Participants Throughout the Study
Therapeutic classification of concomitant medications used by ≥5% of participants throughout the study. Participants are counted only once in each therapeutic class category. Medications were included in the table if the proportion of participants in the combined armodafinil treatment group was ≥5%.
Measured: Screening through Week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths, and Withdrawals Due to AEs
AE=any untoward medical occurrence in a patient that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of the clinical study of a pharmaceutical product and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. SAE=any AE that resulted in any of the following: death; a life-threatening adverse event; inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; a congenital anomaly or birth defect; an important medical event that required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. Treatment-related AEs=definite, probable, possible, or missing relationship. Protocol-defined AEs=treatment-emergent adverse events associated with skin rash, hypersensitivity reaction, emergent suicidal ideation or suicide attempt, depression, psychosis (including hypomanic or manic episode), and seizure or suspected seizure were considered to be of potential clinical importance.
Measured: Screening through Week 12
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Postbaseline Serum Chemistry Values
Normal ranges for serum chemistry values: blood urea nitrogen (BUN), 1.43 - 8.57 mmol/L; uric acid, 124.91 - 493.68 μmol/L; aspartate aminotransferase (AST), 11 - 36 U/L; gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), 10 - 61 U/L; total bilirubin, 3.42 - 20.52 μmol/L.
Measured: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Postbaseline Hematology Values
Normal ranges for hematology values: white blood cell (WBC) count, 3.8 - 10.7 x 10^9/L; absolute neutrophil count (ANC), 1.96 - 7.23 x 10^9/L. Participants may have had more than one clinically significant abnormal value.
Measured: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Postbaseline Urinalysis Values
Participants with at least one clinically significant postbaseline urinalysis abnormality, specifically presented is blood (hemoglobin) in urine >=2 units increase from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Sign Values
Criteria for clinically significant abnormal vital signs values: heart rate, ≤50 beats per minute (bpm) and decrease from baseline of ≥15 bpm; sitting systolic blood pressure, ≤90 mm Hg and decrease from baseline of ≥20 mm Hg; sitting diastolic blood pressure, ≤50 mm Hg and decrease from baseline of ≥15 mm Hg.
Measured: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Notable Blood Pressure Values Per World Health Organization Criteria
Criteria for World Health Organization (WHO) notable blood pressure (BP) values: systolic blood pressure, ≥140 mm Hg plus increase of ≥10% from baseline; diastolic blood pressure, ≥90 mm Hg plus increase of ≥10% from baseline.
Measured: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12
Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Shifts From Baseline to Overall
Number of participants with shifts from normal/abnormal 12-lead ECG findings at baseline (BL) to (→) normal/abnormal findings overall are presented. For overall, the worst postbaseline finding (the abnormal finding if there are both normal and abnormal findings) for the participant between baseline and endpoint (defined as last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12) is summarized. Shifts (normal and abnormal) from baseline to overall are summarized using participant counts. Any ECG finding that was judged by the investigator as a clinically meaningful change (worsening) compared to baseline was recorded as an adverse event.
Measured: Baseline through Endpoint (last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12)
Physical Examination Findings Shifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation, up to Week 12)
Number of participants with shifts from normal/abnormal physical examination findings at baseline (BL) to (→) normal/abnormal findings at endpoint (EP, defined as last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12). Shifts (normal and abnormal) from baseline to endpoint are summarized using participant counts for each physical examination category. A newly diagnosed finding was defined as being normal or missing at baseline and abnormal at least once during the study. Any physical examination finding that was judged by the investigator as a clinically significant change (worsening) compared to a baseline value was considered an adverse event. HEENT=head, eyes, ears, nose, throat.
Measured: Baseline through Endpoint (last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2009 (estimated)
- Study start30 Apr 2009
- Primary completion31 Jan 2011
- Study completion31 Jan 2011
Why it stopped: Study has been stopped by sponsor decision.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Traumatic Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 117 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cephalon, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sponsor's Medical Expert, MD, Study director, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00893789
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C10953/3067/ES/MN
- Status last verified
- Dec 2021
- First submitted
- 4 May 2009
- Last updated
- 17 Dec 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Menn SJ, Yang R, Lankford A. Armodafinil for the treatment of excessive sleepiness associated with mild or moderate closed traumatic brain injury: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind study followed by a 12-month open-label extension. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014 Nov 15;10(11):1181-91. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4196.
PubMed 25325609
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Dec 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Fixed-Dosage Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil (50, 150, and 250 mg/Day) as Treatment for Patients With Excessive Sleepiness Associated With Mild or Moderate Closed Traumatic Brain Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00893789
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C10953/3067/ES/MN
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Study has been stopped by sponsor decision.
- Enrolment
- 117 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cephalon, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Apr 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 May 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Oct 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study is to determine whether armodafinil treatment is more effective than placebo treatment in patients with excessive sleepiness associated with mild or moderate closed traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: ArmodafinilArmodafinil 50 mg/day |
| 2 | Experimental | Drug: ArmodafinilArmodafinil 150 mg/day |
| 3 | Experimental | Drug: ArmodafinilArmodafinil 250 mg/day |
| 4 | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboPlacebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (18 listed)
- The patient had a mild (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 13-15) or moderate (GCS score 9-12) closed TBI at the time of the injury, and the injury occurred 1 to 10 years prior to screening.
- The patient had a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 5 at the screening visit.
- The patient had an Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score of at least 10 at screening.
- The patient had a mean sleep latency on the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) (average of 4 naps) of less than 8 minutes at baseline.
- The patient had a Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) rating relating to their excessive sleepiness of 4 or more at the screening and baseline visits.
Key exclusion criteria (26 listed)
- The patient had a history of 2 or more episodes of transient loss of consciousness (LOC) without clear medical explanation, or had a history of known or suspected pseudo seizure (psychogenic seizure). Patients with a history of seizure or epilepsy may have been eligible following discussion with the medical monitor.
- The patient required, or was likely to require, treatment with anticonvulsant medication during the study, or had taken anticonvulsant medication within 6 months before the screening visit.
- The patient had an unstable or uncontrolled medical (including illnesses related to the cardiovascular [including patients with a history of left ventricular hypertrophy or in patients with mitral valve prolapse who had experienced the mitral valve prolapse syndrome], renal, or hepatic systems or surgical) condition (treated or untreated) or was not a suitable candidate for treatment with armodafinil, as judged by the investigator.
- The patient had neurosurgery involving the brain or brainstem.
- The patient had a history of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, psychotic depression, or other psychotic episode.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ArmodafinilArmodafinil 50 mg/day | Drug | 1 |
| ArmodafinilArmodafinil 150 mg/day | Drug | 2 |
| ArmodafinilArmodafinil 250 mg/day | Drug | 3 |
| PlaceboPlacebo | Other | 4 |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) at Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)
Time frame: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12
The MSLT is an objective assessment of sleepiness that measures the likelihood of falling asleep. Four 20-minute (maximum) MSLT naps were performed at 0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500. The participant, dressed in nonconstricting clothes, was instructed to lie quietly and attempt sleep. Each MSLT nap continued until: (a) 3 consecutive 30-second epochs of stage 1 sleep were reached or (b) any single, 30-second epoch of stage 2, 3, 4, or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep was reached. Sleep latency for each nap and average sleep latency for the 4 naps were tabulated. According to clinical protocol for the MSLT, each nap was terminated after 20 minutes if no sleep occurred. If a participant did not fall asleep in 20 minutes, his/her sleep latency for that nap was set to 20 minutes. Sleep latency was measured as the elapsed time from lights-out to the first epoch scored as sleep. With a 30-second scoring epoch, this criterion was reached when sleep occupied at least 16 seconds of any epoch.
Percentage of Responders and Nonresponders According to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Ratings at Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)
Time frame: Last postbaseline observation up to Week 12
The CGI-C is the clinician's rating of disease severity as compared with pretreatment, assessed by the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). Severity of illness, as related to excessive sleepiness, was assessed at baseline by the CGI-S, which consists of 7 categories: normal-shows no sign of illness, borderline ill, mildly (slightly) ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, and among the most extremely ill. The clinician assessed the change from baseline in the participant's condition, as related to excessive sleepiness, in response to treatment. The CGI-C uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, and very much worse. Responders were defined as those participants who were considered much or very much improved on the CGI-C. Those in all other categories of the CGI-C were considered nonresponders.
17 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Latency From the MSLT at Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Percentage of Responders and Nonresponders According to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Ratings at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in Traumatic Brain Injury - Work Instability Scale (TBI-WIS) Total Score At Weeks 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (last postbaseline observation up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Week 12 and Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Endpoint (last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12)
Percentage of Participants Answering "No" to All Questions on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale Since Last Visit Version (C-SSRS SLV) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (last postbaseline observation up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline in the Total Score From the Self-Reported Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 6 Item Version (S-HAM-D6) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to 12 Weeks)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and Endpoint (last postbaseline observation up to 12 weeks)
Change From Baseline in the Total Sleep Time As Assessed by Nocturnal Polysomnography (NPSG) at Weeks 2, 4, 12 and Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to 12 Weeks)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 12, and Endpoint (last postbaseline observation up to 12 weeks)
Plasma Concentrations of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) and Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs) at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 (or Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 (or last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12)
Concomitant Medication Usage In ≥5% of Participants Throughout the Study
Time frame: Screening through Week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths, and Withdrawals Due to AEs
Time frame: Screening through Week 12
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Postbaseline Serum Chemistry Values
Time frame: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Postbaseline Hematology Values
Time frame: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Postbaseline Urinalysis Values
Time frame: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Sign Values
Time frame: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Notable Blood Pressure Values Per World Health Organization Criteria
Time frame: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12
Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Shifts From Baseline to Overall
Time frame: Baseline through Endpoint (last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12)
Physical Examination Findings Shifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation, up to Week 12)
Time frame: Baseline through Endpoint (last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Dec 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25325609Menn SJ, Yang R, Lankford A. Armodafinil for the treatment of excessive sleepiness associated with mild or moderate closed traumatic brain injury: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind study followed by a 12-month open-label extension. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014 Nov 15;10(11):1181-91. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4196.
Related trials for Traumatic Brain Injury
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Pilot Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of PSC-05 for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Nanopulse Laser Therapy
TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Different Intravenous Fluids on Post-operative Chronic Subdural Hematoma Size and Recurrence
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sponsor's Medical Expert, MD study director
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
73 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Armodafinil in people with Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Cephalon, Inc. at 73 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 26 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 73 sites in United States, Germany, Spain, Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Oct 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) at Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12) (time frame: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00893789, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Dec 2021.