AzTrials
AzTrials

Traumatic Brain InjuryPhase 3NCT00893789

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil as Treatment for Patients With Excessive Sleepiness Associated With Mild or Moderate Closed Traumatic Brain Injury

A Phase 3 study testing Armodafinil in people with Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Cephalon, Inc. at 73 sites in 4 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of the study is to determine whether armodafinil treatment is more effective than placebo treatment in patients with excessive sleepiness associated with mild or moderate closed traumatic brain injury (TBI). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Traumatic Brain Injury
What is being tested?
Armodafinil
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
117 participants
Where
73 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
30 Apr 2009to 31 Jan 2011
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The patient had a mild (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 13-15) or moderate (GCS score 9-12) closed TBI at the time of the injury, and the injury occurred 1 to 10 years prior to screening.
  • The patient had a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 5 at the screening visit.
  • The patient had an Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score of at least 10 at screening.
  • The patient had a mean sleep latency on the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) (average of 4 naps) of less than 8 minutes at baseline.
  • The patient had a Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) rating relating to their excessive sleepiness of 4 or more at the screening and baseline visits.
  • The patient had a complaint of excessive sleepiness (at least 5 days/week on average) for at least 3 months, and the excessive sleepiness began within 12 months of the TBI.
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Written informed consent was obtained.
  • The patient was a man or woman of any ethnic origin 18 to 65 years of age.
  • If admitted to an inpatient treatment facility, the patient was discharged at least 1 month prior to the screening visit.
  • The patient did not have any medical or psychiatric disorders that could account for the excessive sleepiness.
  • Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), used a medically accepted method of contraception, and continued use of one of these methods for the duration of the study (and for 30 days after participation in the study). Acceptable methods of contraception included: abstinence, barrier method with spermicide, steroidal contraceptive (oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected) in conjunction with a barrier method, or intrauterine device (IUD).
  • The patient was in otherwise good health, as judged by the investigator, on the basis of a medical and psychiatric history, physical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG), serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis.
  • The patient was willing and able to comply with study restrictions and to attend regularly scheduled clinic visits as specified in this protocol.
  • The patient had a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of more than 26 at the screening visit.
  • The patient was on stable dosages of medications (allowed by the protocol) for a minimum of 3 months (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs]), 8 weeks (contraceptives), or 4 weeks (all other allowed medication) before the screening visit and was not likely to require a change in therapy for at least 12 weeks on the basis of the investigators' assessment.
  • The patient had a habitual bedtime between 2100 and 2400.
  • The patient had no other head injuries that, based on medical record documentation or history from the patient and reliable informant (if available), were temporally related to the onset or to any worsening of excessive sleepiness.
  • The patient had no other head injury fulfilling the criteria for TBI within ±1 year of the TBI identified according to criterion (a1).

Who cannot join

  • The patient had a history of 2 or more episodes of transient loss of consciousness (LOC) without clear medical explanation, or had a history of known or suspected pseudo seizure (psychogenic seizure). Patients with a history of seizure or epilepsy may have been eligible following discussion with the medical monitor.
  • The patient required, or was likely to require, treatment with anticonvulsant medication during the study, or had taken anticonvulsant medication within 6 months before the screening visit.
  • The patient had an unstable or uncontrolled medical (including illnesses related to the cardiovascular [including patients with a history of left ventricular hypertrophy or in patients with mitral valve prolapse who had experienced the mitral valve prolapse syndrome], renal, or hepatic systems or surgical) condition (treated or untreated) or was not a suitable candidate for treatment with armodafinil, as judged by the investigator.
  • The patient had neurosurgery involving the brain or brainstem.
  • The patient had a history of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, psychotic depression, or other psychotic episode.
  • The patient had any current Axis I disorder (including depression and posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD]), as assessed by Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (SCID). The patient had any Axis II disorder (as assessed by SCID) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would affect patient participation in the study or full compliance with study procedures.
Show all 26Show fewer
  • The patient had a history of, or currently met The International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Edition 2 (ICSD 2) (American Academy of Sleep Medicine 2005) criteria for narcolepsy, obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS), shift work sleep disorder (SWSD), or any other sleep disorder associated with excessive daytime sleepiness; or the patient had a history of idiopathic hypersomnia, insomnia (requiring treatment), or sleep disorder before the development of the TBI.
  • The patient had 85% or less sleep efficiency (sleep duration ÷ time in bed x 100%) as determined from nocturnal polysomnography (NPSG).
  • The patient had any disorder that may interfere with drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion.
  • The patient used any medications, including over-the-counter (OTC) medicines disallowed by the protocol, within 7 days or 5 half lives (medication or its active metabolites), whichever was longer, before the screening visit.
  • The patient had a need for chronic pain medications.
  • In the judgment of the investigator, the patient had a clinically significant deviation from normal in the physical examination.
  • In the judgment of the investigator, the patient had any clinically significant ECG finding.
  • The patient had a diagnosis of any type of dementia.
  • The patient had a history of suicidal ideation (considered by the investigator to be of current clinical significance), or was currently suicidal.
  • The patient had a known hypersensitivity to armodafinil, racemic modafinil, or any component of the study drug tablets. Armodafinil tablets contain the following inactive ingredients: croscarmellose sodium, lactose, magnesium stearate, microcrystalline cellulose, povidone, and pregelatinized starch.
  • The patient had a history of any clinically significant cutaneous drug reaction, or a history of clinically significant hypersensitivity reaction, including multiple allergies or drug reactions.
  • The patient had a clinical laboratory test value(s) outside the range(s) specified by protocol (or any other clinically significant laboratory abnormality), and the medical monitor had not provided written approval for study participation.
  • The patient had a history (within the past 5 years) of alcohol, narcotic, or any other drug abuse (with the exception of nicotine) as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders of the American Psychiatric Association, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR), or the patient had current evidence of substance use, without medical explanation, confirmed by results of a urine drug screen (UDS).
  • The patient had taken armodafinil, modafinil or other stimulant medication for excessive sleepiness within 1 month of the screening visit.
  • The patient was a pregnant or lactating woman. (Any women becoming pregnant during the study were to be withdrawn from the study.)
  • The patient was known to have tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
  • The patient consumed an average of more than 600 mg of caffeine per day, including coffee, tea and/or other caffeine-containing beverages or food.
  • The patient used any investigational drug within 1 month before the screening visit.
  • The patient was receiving workmen's compensation or was in active litigation with regard to TBI.
  • The patient had a self-reported Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 6 Item Version (S HAM D6) score of more than 4 at the screening visit.

Trial locations and contacts

73 sites in 4 countries.

73 sites in 4 countries

United States68 sites
  • Teva Investigational Site 26

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30321

  • Teva Investigational Site 12

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342

  • Teva Investigational Site 14

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342

  • Teva Investigational Site 60

    Austin, Texas, 78756

  • Teva Investigational Site 37

    Belmont, Massachusetts, 02478

  • Teva Investigational Site 58

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35213

  • Teva Investigational Site 70

    Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135

  • Teva Investigational Site 32

    Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815-6901

  • Teva Investigational Site 46

    Chicago, Illinois, 60675-6714

  • Teva Investigational Site 54

    Chicago, Illinois, 60675-6714

  • Teva Investigational Site 59

    Chicago, Illinois, 60675-6714

  • Teva Investigational Site 31

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45227

  • Teva Investigational Site 34

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45246

  • Teva Investigational Site 64

    Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania, 18411

  • Teva Investigational Site 65

    Columbia, South Carolina, 29201

  • Teva Investigational Site 25

    Dallas, Texas, 75235

  • Teva Investigational Site 28

    Danville, Indiana, 46122

  • Teva Investigational Site 11

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • Teva Investigational Site 19

    Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46805

  • Teva Investigational Site 44

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Teva Investigational Site 68

    Gainesville, Georgia, 30501

  • Teva Investigational Site 61

    Germantown, Tennessee, 38139

  • Teva Investigational Site 52

    Hallandale, Florida, 33009

  • Teva Investigational Site 7

    Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 39402

  • Teva Investigational Site 16

    Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913

  • Teva Investigational Site 8

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Teva Investigational Site 20

    Houston, Texas, 77063

  • Teva Investigational Site 2

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46250

  • Teva Investigational Site 39

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260

  • Teva Investigational Site 41

    Iowa City, Iowa, 52242

  • Teva Investigational Site 13

    Jefferson Hills, Pennsylvania, 15025

  • Teva Investigational Site 73

    Kingwood, Texas, 77339

  • Teva Investigational Site 49

    La Palma, California, 90623

  • Teva Investigational Site 51

    La Palma, California, 90623

  • Teva Investigational Site 56

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510

  • Teva Investigational Site 5

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • Teva Investigational Site 48

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40217

  • Teva Investigational Site 67

    Macon, Georgia, 31201

  • Teva Investigational Site 71

    Mather, California, 95655

  • Teva Investigational Site 47

    Miami, Florida, 33173

  • Teva Investigational Site 57

    Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130

  • Teva Investigational Site 35

    Midvale, Utah, 84047

  • Teva Investigational Site 66

    Midvale, Utah, 84047

  • Teva Investigational Site 72

    New York, New York, 10010

  • Teva Investigational Site 63

    New York, New York, 10019

  • Teva Investigational Site 3

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112

  • Teva Investigational Site 1

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • Teva Investigational Site 18

    Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33026

  • Teva Investigational Site 24

    Richmond, Virginia, 23249

  • Teva Investigational Site 22

    Saginaw, Michigan, 48604

  • Teva Investigational Site 23

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Teva Investigational Site 55

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • Teva Investigational Site 33

    San Diego, California, 92161

  • Teva Investigational Site 53

    Santa Monica, California, 90404

  • Teva Investigational Site 9

    Shawnee Mission, Kansas, 66201

  • Teva Investigational Site 10

    Spring Hill, Florida, 34609

  • Teva Investigational Site 42

    St Louis, Missouri, 63143

  • Teva Investigational Site 38

    St. Petersburg, Florida, 33707

  • Teva Investigational Site 29

    Stockbridge, Georgia, 30281

  • Teva Investigational Site 15

    Suwanee, Georgia, 30024

  • Teva Investigational Site 17

    Tampa, Florida, 33607

  • Teva Investigational Site 30

    Toledo, Ohio, 43623

  • Teva Investigational Site 62

    Tucson, Arizona, 85712

  • Teva Investigational Site 40

    Tucson, Arizona, 85723

  • Teva Investigational Site 69

    Wallingford, Connecticut, 06492

  • Teva Investigational Site 50

    West Allis, Wisconsin, 53227

  • Teva Investigational Site 36

    West Seneca, New York, 14224

  • Teva Investigational Site 45

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157

Other trials in United States

Germany2 sites
  • Teva Investigational Site 405

    Berlin, 10117

  • Teva Investigational Site 404

    München, 80331

Other trials in Germany

Spain2 sites
  • Teva Investigational Site 704

    Barcelona, 08003

  • Teva Investigational Site 701

    Madrid, 28036

Other trials in Spain

Italy1 site
  • Teva Investigational Site 501

    Pisa, 56126

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Fixed-Dosage Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil (50, 150, and 250 mg/Day) as Treatment for Patients With Excessive Sleepiness Associated With Mild or Moderate Closed Traumatic Brain Injury

The primary objective of the study is to determine whether armodafinil treatment is more effective than placebo treatment in patients with excessive sleepiness associated with mild or moderate closed traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Being tested
Armodafinil, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Brain Injuries, Traumatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ArmodafinilDrug

    Armodafinil 50 mg/day

  • ArmodafinilDrug

    Armodafinil 150 mg/day

  • ArmodafinilDrug

    Armodafinil 250 mg/day

  • PlaceboOther

    Placebo

Study groups in NCT00893789
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalArmodafinil 50 mg/day
Receives: Drug: Armodafinil
2ExperimentalArmodafinil 150 mg/day
Receives: Drug: Armodafinil
3ExperimentalArmodafinil 250 mg/day
Receives: Drug: Armodafinil
4Placebo comparatorPlacebo
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) at Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)

    The MSLT is an objective assessment of sleepiness that measures the likelihood of falling asleep. Four 20-minute (maximum) MSLT naps were performed at 0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500. The participant, dressed in nonconstricting clothes, was instructed to lie quietly and attempt sleep. Each MSLT nap continued until: (a) 3 consecutive 30-second epochs of stage 1 sleep were reached or (b) any single, 30-second epoch of stage 2, 3, 4, or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep was reached. Sleep latency for each nap and average sleep latency for the 4 naps were tabulated. According to clinical protocol for the MSLT, each nap was terminated after 20 minutes if no sleep occurred. If a participant did not fall asleep in 20 minutes, his/her sleep latency for that nap was set to 20 minutes. Sleep latency was measured as the elapsed time from lights-out to the first epoch scored as sleep. With a 30-second scoring epoch, this criterion was reached when sleep occupied at least 16 seconds of any epoch.

    Measured: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12

  2. Percentage of Responders and Nonresponders According to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Ratings at Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)

    The CGI-C is the clinician's rating of disease severity as compared with pretreatment, assessed by the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). Severity of illness, as related to excessive sleepiness, was assessed at baseline by the CGI-S, which consists of 7 categories: normal-shows no sign of illness, borderline ill, mildly (slightly) ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, and among the most extremely ill. The clinician assessed the change from baseline in the participant's condition, as related to excessive sleepiness, in response to treatment. The CGI-C uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, and very much worse. Responders were defined as those participants who were considered much or very much improved on the CGI-C. Those in all other categories of the CGI-C were considered nonresponders.

    Measured: Last postbaseline observation up to Week 12

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Latency From the MSLT at Weeks 4, 8, and 12

    The MSLT is an objective assessment of sleepiness that measures the likelihood of falling asleep. Four 20-minute (maximum) MSLT naps were performed at 0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500. The participant, dressed in nonconstricting clothes, was instructed to lie quietly and attempt sleep. Each MSLT nap continued until: (a) 3 consecutive 30-second epochs of stage 1 sleep were reached or (b) any single, 30-second epoch of stage 2, 3, 4, or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep was reached. Sleep latency for each nap and average sleep latency for the 4 naps were tabulated. According to clinical protocol for the MSLT, each nap was terminated after 20 minutes if no sleep occurred. Sleep latency was measured as the elapsed time from lights-out to the first epoch scored as sleep. With a 30-second scoring epoch, this criterion was reached when sleep occupied at least 16 seconds of any epoch.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12

  2. Percentage of Responders and Nonresponders According to Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Ratings at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

    The CGI-C is the clinician's rating of disease severity as compared with pretreatment, assessed by the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). Severity of illness, as related to excessive sleepiness, was assessed at baseline by the CGI-S, which consists of 7 categories: normal-shows no sign of illness, borderline ill, mildly (slightly) ill, moderately ill, markedly ill, severely ill, and among the most extremely ill. The clinician assessed the change from baseline in the participant's condition, as related to excessive sleepiness, in response to treatment. The CGI-C uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, and very much worse. Responders were defined as those participants who were considered much or very much improved on the CGI-C. Those in all other categories of the CGI-C were considered nonresponders.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  3. Change From Baseline in Traumatic Brain Injury - Work Instability Scale (TBI-WIS) Total Score At Weeks 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)

    The TBI-WIS is a validated participant-rated instrument for assessing a participant's functional ability after TBI and the functional demands of their job. The assessment consists of 36 questions to which the participant responded with a "true" or "not true" answer. To score the questionnaire, the number of "true" responses is counted: if < 2, the risk is low; 2 to 23, the risk is medium; and >23, the risk is high, for work instability. Score range is 0 (lowest risk for work instability) to 36 (highest risk for work instability).

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (last postbaseline observation up to Week 12)

  4. Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Week 12 and Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)

    The patient's evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness was measured by the ESS. The ESS score is based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg, sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. The ESS score is derived from the sum of the values from questions corresponding to the 8 situations. Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating a greater daytime sleepiness. This test was self-administered.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Endpoint (last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12)

  5. Percentage of Participants Answering "No" to All Questions on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale Since Last Visit Version (C-SSRS SLV) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)

    The C-SSRS captures occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors since last visit (SLV). The number of participants answering 'no' to all 9 yes/no questions about suicidal behaviors, ideations, and acts are presented. Questions included the presence of the following: a wish to be dead; nonspecific active suicidal thoughts; actual suicide attempt; non-suicidal self-injurious behavior; interrupted attempt; aborted attempt; suicidal behavior; preparatory suicidal acts or behavior; and completed suicide.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (last postbaseline observation up to Week 12)

  6. Change From Baseline in the Total Score From the Self-Reported Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 6 Item Version (S-HAM-D6) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to 12 Weeks)

    The self-reported S-HAM-D6 is a validated scale developed from the core depressive items of the 17 Item Hamilton Depression Inventory (HAM-D17). The HAM-D6 (Items 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, 13 from the 17-item HAMD) evaluates "core" symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). The assessment consists of 6 items representing depressed mood, guilt, work and activities, retardation, psychic anxiety, and general somatic symptoms. Each item is evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale (e.g. absent, mild, moderate, severe, very severe) or a 3-point scale (e.g. absent, mild, marked). Total scores range from 0 (normal) to 22 (severe). Scores greater than 12 indicate moderate to severe depression and scores less than 12 indicate mild depression.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and Endpoint (last postbaseline observation up to 12 weeks)

  7. Change From Baseline in the Total Sleep Time As Assessed by Nocturnal Polysomnography (NPSG) at Weeks 2, 4, 12 and Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to 12 Weeks)

    NPSG continuously records normal and abnormal physiological activity during an entire night. It documents the adequacy of sleep, including the frequency, duration, and total amounts of stage 1-2, stage 3-4 (slow wave sleep), and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 12, and Endpoint (last postbaseline observation up to 12 weeks)

  8. Plasma Concentrations of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) and Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs) at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 (or Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12)

    To evaluate the impact of treatment with armodafinil on the pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (as appropriate), plasma concentrations at weeks 4, 8, and 12 (or last postbaseline observation) were to be assessed.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, and 12 (or last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12)

  9. Concomitant Medication Usage In ≥5% of Participants Throughout the Study

    Therapeutic classification of concomitant medications used by ≥5% of participants throughout the study. Participants are counted only once in each therapeutic class category. Medications were included in the table if the proportion of participants in the combined armodafinil treatment group was ≥5%.

    Measured: Screening through Week 12

  10. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), Deaths, and Withdrawals Due to AEs

    AE=any untoward medical occurrence in a patient that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of the clinical study of a pharmaceutical product and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. SAE=any AE that resulted in any of the following: death; a life-threatening adverse event; inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; a congenital anomaly or birth defect; an important medical event that required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. Treatment-related AEs=definite, probable, possible, or missing relationship. Protocol-defined AEs=treatment-emergent adverse events associated with skin rash, hypersensitivity reaction, emergent suicidal ideation or suicide attempt, depression, psychosis (including hypomanic or manic episode), and seizure or suspected seizure were considered to be of potential clinical importance.

    Measured: Screening through Week 12

  11. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Postbaseline Serum Chemistry Values

    Normal ranges for serum chemistry values: blood urea nitrogen (BUN), 1.43 - 8.57 mmol/L; uric acid, 124.91 - 493.68 μmol/L; aspartate aminotransferase (AST), 11 - 36 U/L; gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), 10 - 61 U/L; total bilirubin, 3.42 - 20.52 μmol/L.

    Measured: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12

  12. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Postbaseline Hematology Values

    Normal ranges for hematology values: white blood cell (WBC) count, 3.8 - 10.7 x 10^9/L; absolute neutrophil count (ANC), 1.96 - 7.23 x 10^9/L. Participants may have had more than one clinically significant abnormal value.

    Measured: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12

  13. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Postbaseline Urinalysis Values

    Participants with at least one clinically significant postbaseline urinalysis abnormality, specifically presented is blood (hemoglobin) in urine >=2 units increase from baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12

  14. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Sign Values

    Criteria for clinically significant abnormal vital signs values: heart rate, ≤50 beats per minute (bpm) and decrease from baseline of ≥15 bpm; sitting systolic blood pressure, ≤90 mm Hg and decrease from baseline of ≥20 mm Hg; sitting diastolic blood pressure, ≤50 mm Hg and decrease from baseline of ≥15 mm Hg.

    Measured: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12

  15. Number of Participants With Notable Blood Pressure Values Per World Health Organization Criteria

    Criteria for World Health Organization (WHO) notable blood pressure (BP) values: systolic blood pressure, ≥140 mm Hg plus increase of ≥10% from baseline; diastolic blood pressure, ≥90 mm Hg plus increase of ≥10% from baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12

  16. Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Shifts From Baseline to Overall

    Number of participants with shifts from normal/abnormal 12-lead ECG findings at baseline (BL) to (→) normal/abnormal findings overall are presented. For overall, the worst postbaseline finding (the abnormal finding if there are both normal and abnormal findings) for the participant between baseline and endpoint (defined as last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12) is summarized. Shifts (normal and abnormal) from baseline to overall are summarized using participant counts. Any ECG finding that was judged by the investigator as a clinically meaningful change (worsening) compared to baseline was recorded as an adverse event.

    Measured: Baseline through Endpoint (last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12)

  17. Physical Examination Findings Shifts From Baseline to Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation, up to Week 12)

    Number of participants with shifts from normal/abnormal physical examination findings at baseline (BL) to (→) normal/abnormal findings at endpoint (EP, defined as last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12). Shifts (normal and abnormal) from baseline to endpoint are summarized using participant counts for each physical examination category. A newly diagnosed finding was defined as being normal or missing at baseline and abnormal at least once during the study. Any physical examination finding that was judged by the investigator as a clinically significant change (worsening) compared to a baseline value was considered an adverse event. HEENT=head, eyes, ears, nose, throat.

    Measured: Baseline through Endpoint (last postbaseline observation, up to Week 12)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study start30 Apr 2009
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2011
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2011

Why it stopped: Study has been stopped by sponsor decision.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
117 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00893789
Sponsor's protocol ID
C10953/3067/ES/MN
Status last verified
Dec 2021
First submitted
4 May 2009
Last updated
17 Dec 2021

Publications

  • Menn SJ, Yang R, Lankford A. Armodafinil for the treatment of excessive sleepiness associated with mild or moderate closed traumatic brain injury: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind study followed by a 12-month open-label extension. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014 Nov 15;10(11):1181-91. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4196.

    PubMed 25325609

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Armodafinil in people with Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Cephalon, Inc. at 73 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 26 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 73 sites in United States, Germany, Spain, Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Oct 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) at Endpoint (Last Postbaseline Observation Up to Week 12) (time frame: Baseline, last postbaseline observation up to Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00893789, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Dec 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in