AzTrials
AzTrials

Neuropathic PainPAINSNCT00892008

A Post Marketing Surveillance Study On Pregabalin (Lyrica) On Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Of Pregabalin

An observational study of Neuropathic Pain, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc..

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is being conducted as a regulatory requirement post initial marketing authorization. This is primarily a safety study. This was an open label study and patients were enrolled once the decision to prescribe the medication was made by the Investigator. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Neuropathic Pain
What is being tested?
Pregabalin
How many people
2,278 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2006to Aug 2008
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Male or female, 18 years and above diagnosed with neuropathic pain.

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female, 18 years old and above diagnosed with neuropathic pain.

Who cannot join

  • Patients that are pregnant and lactating; and patients with known hypersensitivity to pregabalin or its related components.

About this study

Official title: Pregabalin (Lyrica) Action In Neuropathic Pain Syndrome (PAINS): A Post Marketing Surveillance Study On Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Of Pregabalin

This study is being conducted as a regulatory requirement post initial marketing authorization. This is primarily a safety study. This was an open label study and patients were enrolled once the decision to prescribe the medication was made by the Investigator.

Being tested
Pregabalin
Keywords
pregabalin, neuropathic pain, safety
Medical subject headings
Neuralgia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PregabalinDrug

    Also called Lyrica

    Pregabalin 75-150 mg BID for at least 2 weeks.

Study groups in NCT00892008
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Open-LabelThis study was open-label with only one treatment group. Pregabalin was prescribed in accordance with usual clinical practice.
Receives: Drug: Pregabalin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)

    Number and severity of adverse events, including serious adverse events. If the same subject had more than one occurance in the same preferred term event category, only the most severe occurrence was taken.

    Measured: Baseline through Final Visit (Week 4)

  2. Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events

    Discontinuations due to adverse events by MedDRA system organ class and preferred term.

    Measured: Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score

    Change from Baseline in 10 cm VAS pain score; 10-point pain intensity ordinal rating system: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-9 = severe pain, 10 = worst possible pain. Change = scores at second visit and final visit minus score at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

  2. VAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second Visit

    VAS Pain Score: 10 cm (10-point) pain intensity ordinal rating system: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-9 = severe pain, 10 = worst possible pain. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at the Second Visit by the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at Baseline. Abbreviations: mod = moderate, sev = severe, wrst = worst, poss = possible, pn = pain, vst = visit .

    Measured: Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2)

  3. VAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final Visit

    VAS Pain Score 10 cm (10-point) pain intensity ordinal rating system: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-9 = severe pain, 10 = worst possible pain. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at Baseline. Abbreviations: mod = moderate, sev = severe, wrst = worst, poss = possible, pn = pain, vst = visit.

    Measured: Baseline, Final Visit (Week 4)

  4. Physician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits

    Physician's Clinical Global Impression of treatment satisfaction. Treatment satisfaction item of the CGI has a scale of five discrete score points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.

    Measured: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

  5. Patient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits

    Patient's Clinical Global Impression of treatment satisfaction. Treatment satisfaction item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.

    Measured: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

  6. Physician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit

    Physician's Clinical Global Impression of efficacy. Efficacy item of the CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.

    Measured: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

  7. Patient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit

    Patient's Clinical Global Impression of efficacy. Efficacy item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.

    Measured: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

  8. Physician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist

    Physician's Clinical Global Impression of tolerability. Tolerability item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.

    Measured: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

  9. Patient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit

    Patient's Clinical Global Impression of tolerability. The tolerability item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit. Abbreviation: vst = visit.

    Measured: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 May 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2006
  3. Primary completionAug 2008
  4. Study completionAug 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
2,278 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00892008
Sponsor's protocol ID
A0081094
Acronym
PAINS
Status last verified
Jan 2010
First submitted
30 Apr 2009
Last updated
25 Jan 2021
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Neuropathic Pain, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc..

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Nov 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4) (time frame: Baseline through Final Visit (Week 4)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in