Gastric CancerPhase 3AVATARNCT00887822
A Study of Bevacizumab (Avastin) Versus Placebo in Combination With Capecitabine (Xeloda) and Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Bevacizumab, Capecitabine and Cisplatin in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 14 sites in China.
Trial summary
This 2 arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with capecitabine and cisplatin versus placebo in combination with capecitabine and cisplatin in participants who have not received prior chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastric Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Bevacizumab, Capecitabine and Cisplatin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 202 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesChina
- Study dates
- Mar 2009to Aug 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction with inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic disease, not amenable to curative therapy
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0,1 or 2
- Measurable disease or non-measurable but evaluable disease, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
Who cannot join
- Previous chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer
- Previous platinum or anti-angiogenic therapy
- Radiotherapy within 28 days of randomization
- Evidence of Central Nervous System (CNS) metastasis at baseline
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
China14 sites
Study site
Beijing, 100021
Study site
Beijing, 100071
Study site
Beijing, 100142
Study site
Beijing, 100853
Study site
Chongqing, 400042
Study site
Guangzhou, 510060
Study site
Hangzhou, 310016
Study site
Nanjing, 210036
Study site
Nanjing
Study site
Shanghai, 200032
Study site
Shanghai, 200080
Study site
Shantou, 515041
Study site
Shenyang, 110001
Study site
Wuhan, 430030
About this study
Official title: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Capecitabine and Cisplatin Versus Placebo in Combination With Capecitabine and Cisplatin, as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer.
This 2 arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with capecitabine and cisplatin versus placebo in combination with capecitabine and cisplatin in participants who have not received prior chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Participants will be randomized to one of two treatment groups Bevacizumab + Capecitabine/Cisplatin (experimental arm) or Placebo + Capecitabine/Cisplatin (control arm).
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer
- Being tested
- Bevacizumab, Placebo, Capecitabine, Cisplatin
- Medical subject headings
- Stomach Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BevacizumabDrug
Also called Avastin
7.5 mg/kg IV infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle
PlaceboDrug
Placebo matched to bevacizumab on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle
CapecitabineDrug
Also called Xeloda
1000 mg/m^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of every 3-week cycle
CisplatinDrug
80 mg/m^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab, Capecitabine and Cisplatin | Experimental | Participants will receive bevacizumab 7.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle in combination with capecitabine 1000 milligrams per square meter (mg/m^2) orally twice daily (total daily dose 2000 mg/m^2) on Days 1-14 of every 3-week cycle and cisplatin 80 mg/m^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles; until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity. Receives: Drug: Bevacizumab; Drug: Capecitabine; Drug: Cisplatin |
| Placebo, Capecitabine and Cisplatin | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive placebo matched to bevacizumab on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle in combination with capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2 orally twice daily (total daily dose 2000 mg/m^2) on Days 1-14 of every 3-week cycle and cisplatin 80 mg/m^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles; until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Capecitabine; Drug: Cisplatin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Event (Death)
Percentage of participants who died due to any cause was reported. As planned, ad hoc analysis was done for overall survival up to clinical cut-off date of 12 January 2012 (34 months), subsequent to the protocol-defined clinical cut-off date of 13 May 2011 (26 months). Overall survival was defined as the time between randomization and the date of death due to any cause.
Measured: From randomization until death (up to 34 months)
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time between randomization and the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. Reported data included censored observations. Participants for whom no death was captured on the clinical database were censored at the most recent date they were known to be alive. As planned, ad hoc analysis was done for overall survival up to clinical clinical cut-off date of 12 January 2012 (34 months), subsequent to the protocol-defined clinical cut-off date of 13 May 2011 (26 months).
Measured: From randomization until death (up to 34 months)
Secondary outcomes (11)
Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Events (Disease Progression/Death)
Progression of disease was defined as at least 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of longest diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm), progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. PFS was defined as the time between randomization and the date of first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first, according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST).
Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time between randomization and the date of first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first, according to RECIST. Progression of disease was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of longest diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. PFS was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. Reported data included censored observations. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of study completion or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment or last follow-up for progression of disease. Participants for whom no post-baseline tumor assessments were available were censored at day of randomization.
Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Percentage of Participants With PFS Events (Disease Progression/Death) During First-line Therapy
Progression of disease was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of longest diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. PFS during first-line therapy was defined as the time between randomization and the date of first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first and only if it occurred no later than 28 days after last confirmed intake of any study medication and before the start of non-study antineoplastic treatment, according to RECIST.
Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
PFS During First-line Therapy
PFS during first-line therapy was defined as time between randomization and date of first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first and only if it occurred no later than 28 days after last intake of any study medication and only if it occurred before start of non-study antineoplastic treatment, according to RECIST. Progression of disease was defined as at least 20% increase in sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of longest diameters on-study \& absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. PFS was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. Reported data included censored observations. Participants who neither progressed nor died in this interval, or who were lost to follow-up were censored at date of last tumor assessment/last follow-up within this time window. Participants for whom no post-baseline tumor assessments were available were censored at day of randomization.
Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression
Progression of disease was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of longest diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions.
Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Time to Progression
Time to progression was defined as the time between randomization and the first occurrence of disease progression. Progression of disease was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of longest diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. Time to progression was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. Reported data included censored observations. Participants who had not progressed at the time of study completion (including participants who had died before disease progression) or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment or last follow-up for progression of disease. Participants for whom no post-baseline tumor assessments were available were censored at day of randomization.
Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response as Assessed by RECIST During First-Line Therapy
Best overall response during first-line therapy was defined as the occurrence of either a confirmed complete (CR) or a partial response (PR), as assessed by the RECIST criteria. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures less than (<) 10 mm. PR: at least a 30 % decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters.
Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Duration of Response During First-Line Therapy
Duration of response during first-line therapy was defined as the time from when response (CR or PR) was first documented to first documented disease progression or death (whichever occurs first) during first-line therapy. CR: disappearance of all target and non-TLs and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures <10 mm. PR: at least a 30 % decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters. Duration of response was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. Reported data included censored observations. Participants who did not progress or die after they had had a confirmed response were censored at the date of their last tumor measurement or last follow-up for progression of disease during first line therapy.
Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control During First-Line Therapy
Disease control was defined as stable disease(SD) for 6 weeks or longer, CR plus PR as assessed by RECIST criteria for participants with measurable disease.CR:disappearance of all TLs \& normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures<10 mm. PR:at least 30% decrease in sum of measures(longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes)of TLs, taking as reference baseline sum of longest diameters.SD:neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression taking as reference smallest sum of longest diameters on study. For participants without measurable disease, clinical benefit rate was defined as no clinical disease progression for >/=6 weeks. Disease progression was defined as at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions.
Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Change From Cycle 1 in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 36 (QLQ-C30) Scale Over Time
EORTC QLQ-C30 included global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QOL), functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used a 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; a higher score for Global Qol/functional scales=better level of QoL/functioning, or a higher score for symptom scale=greater degree of symptoms.
Measured: From Cycle 1 until disease progression (up to 26 months)
Change From Cycle 1 in EORTC QLQ-STO22 Scale Over Time
The EORTC QLQ-STO22 is a gastric cancer quality of life questionnaire. There are 22 questions which comprise 5 scales (dysphagia, pain, reflux symptom, dietary restrictions, and anxiety) and 4 single items (dry mouth, hair loss, taste, body image). Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 1 question was a yes or no answer). A linear transformation was used to standardize all scores and single-items to a scale of 0 to 100; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.
Measured: From Cycle 1 until disease progression (up to 26 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Apr 2009 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2009
- Primary completionMay 2011
- Study completionAug 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Gastric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 202 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00887822
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML22367
- Acronym
- AVATAR
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 22 Apr 2009
- Last updated
- 1 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-Blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Capecitabine and Cisplatin Versus Placebo in Combination With Capecitabine and Cisplatin, as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00887822
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AVATAR / ML22367
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 202 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2009
- Primary completion
- May 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Apr 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 1 Mar 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This 2 arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with capecitabine and cisplatin versus placebo in combination with capecitabine and cisplatin in participants who have not received prior chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Participants will be randomized to one of two treatment groups Bevacizumab + Capecitabine/Cisplatin (experimental arm) or Placebo + Capecitabine/Cisplatin (control arm).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab, Capecitabine and Cisplatin | Experimental | Drug: Bevacizumab, Drug: Capecitabine, Drug: CisplatinParticipants will receive bevacizumab 7.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle in combination with capecitabine 1000 milligrams per square meter (mg/m^2) orally twice daily (total daily dose 2000 mg/m^2) on Days 1-14 of every 3-week cycle and cisplatin 80 mg/m^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles; until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity. |
| Placebo, Capecitabine and Cisplatin | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo, Drug: Capecitabine, Drug: CisplatinParticipants will receive placebo matched to bevacizumab on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle in combination with capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2 orally twice daily (total daily dose 2000 mg/m^2) on Days 1-14 of every 3-week cycle and cisplatin 80 mg/m^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles; until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction with inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic disease, not amenable to curative therapy
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0,1 or 2
- Measurable disease or non-measurable but evaluable disease, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Previous chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer
- Previous platinum or anti-angiogenic therapy
- Radiotherapy within 28 days of randomization
- Evidence of Central Nervous System (CNS) metastasis at baseline
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BevacizumabAlso: Avastin7.5 mg/kg IV infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle | Drug | Bevacizumab, Capecitabine and Cisplatin |
| PlaceboPlacebo matched to bevacizumab on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle | Drug | Placebo, Capecitabine and Cisplatin |
| CapecitabineAlso: Xeloda1000 mg/m^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of every 3-week cycle | Drug | Bevacizumab, Capecitabine and Cisplatin, Placebo, Capecitabine and Cisplatin |
| Cisplatin80 mg/m^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles | Drug | Bevacizumab, Capecitabine and Cisplatin, Placebo, Capecitabine and Cisplatin |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Event (Death)
Time frame: From randomization until death (up to 34 months)
Percentage of participants who died due to any cause was reported. As planned, ad hoc analysis was done for overall survival up to clinical cut-off date of 12 January 2012 (34 months), subsequent to the protocol-defined clinical cut-off date of 13 May 2011 (26 months). Overall survival was defined as the time between randomization and the date of death due to any cause.
Overall Survival
Time frame: From randomization until death (up to 34 months)
Overall survival was defined as the time between randomization and the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. Reported data included censored observations. Participants for whom no death was captured on the clinical database were censored at the most recent date they were known to be alive. As planned, ad hoc analysis was done for overall survival up to clinical clinical cut-off date of 12 January 2012 (34 months), subsequent to the protocol-defined clinical cut-off date of 13 May 2011 (26 months).
11 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Events (Disease Progression/Death)
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Percentage of Participants With PFS Events (Disease Progression/Death) During First-line Therapy
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
PFS During First-line Therapy
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Time to Progression
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response as Assessed by RECIST During First-Line Therapy
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Duration of Response During First-Line Therapy
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control During First-Line Therapy
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)
Change From Cycle 1 in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 36 (QLQ-C30) Scale Over Time
Time frame: From Cycle 1 until disease progression (up to 26 months)
Change From Cycle 1 in EORTC QLQ-STO22 Scale Over Time
Time frame: From Cycle 1 until disease progression (up to 26 months)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Mar 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
GK01 Cell Therapy in Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis
Gastric Cancer (GC)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Neoadjuvant-adjuvant Durvalumab and FLOT Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Durvalumab in Chinese Patients With Resectable GC/GEJC.
Gastric, Esophagogastric Junction
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Bevacizumab, Capecitabine and Cisplatin in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 14 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Mar 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Event (Death) (time frame: From randomization until death (up to 34 months)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2017.