AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastric CancerPhase 3AVATARNCT00887822

A Study of Bevacizumab (Avastin) Versus Placebo in Combination With Capecitabine (Xeloda) and Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing Bevacizumab, Capecitabine and Cisplatin in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 14 sites in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This 2 arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with capecitabine and cisplatin versus placebo in combination with capecitabine and cisplatin in participants who have not received prior chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Gastric Cancer
What is being tested?
Bevacizumab, Capecitabine and Cisplatin
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
202 participants
Where
14 sitesChina
Study dates
Mar 2009to Aug 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction with inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic disease, not amenable to curative therapy
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0,1 or 2
  • Measurable disease or non-measurable but evaluable disease, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

Who cannot join

  • Previous chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer
  • Previous platinum or anti-angiogenic therapy
  • Radiotherapy within 28 days of randomization
  • Evidence of Central Nervous System (CNS) metastasis at baseline

Trial locations and contacts

14 sites in 1 country.

14 sites in 1 country

China14 sites
  • Study site

    Beijing, 100021

  • Study site

    Beijing, 100071

  • Study site

    Beijing, 100142

  • Study site

    Beijing, 100853

  • Study site

    Chongqing, 400042

  • Study site

    Guangzhou, 510060

  • Study site

    Hangzhou, 310016

  • Study site

    Nanjing, 210036

  • Study site

    Nanjing

  • Study site

    Shanghai, 200032

  • Study site

    Shanghai, 200080

  • Study site

    Shantou, 515041

  • Study site

    Shenyang, 110001

  • Study site

    Wuhan, 430030

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Capecitabine and Cisplatin Versus Placebo in Combination With Capecitabine and Cisplatin, as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer.

This 2 arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with capecitabine and cisplatin versus placebo in combination with capecitabine and cisplatin in participants who have not received prior chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Participants will be randomized to one of two treatment groups Bevacizumab + Capecitabine/Cisplatin (experimental arm) or Placebo + Capecitabine/Cisplatin (control arm).

Conditions
Gastric Cancer
Being tested
Bevacizumab, Placebo, Capecitabine, Cisplatin
Medical subject headings
Stomach Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BevacizumabDrug

    Also called Avastin

    7.5 mg/kg IV infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo matched to bevacizumab on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle

  • CapecitabineDrug

    Also called Xeloda

    1000 mg/m^2 orally twice daily on Days 1-14 of every 3-week cycle

  • CisplatinDrug

    80 mg/m^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles

Study groups in NCT00887822
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bevacizumab, Capecitabine and CisplatinExperimentalParticipants will receive bevacizumab 7.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle in combination with capecitabine 1000 milligrams per square meter (mg/m^2) orally twice daily (total daily dose 2000 mg/m^2) on Days 1-14 of every 3-week cycle and cisplatin 80 mg/m^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles; until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity.
Receives: Drug: Bevacizumab; Drug: Capecitabine; Drug: Cisplatin
Placebo, Capecitabine and CisplatinPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive placebo matched to bevacizumab on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle in combination with capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2 orally twice daily (total daily dose 2000 mg/m^2) on Days 1-14 of every 3-week cycle and cisplatin 80 mg/m^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of every 3-week cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles; until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity.
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Capecitabine; Drug: Cisplatin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Event (Death)

    Percentage of participants who died due to any cause was reported. As planned, ad hoc analysis was done for overall survival up to clinical cut-off date of 12 January 2012 (34 months), subsequent to the protocol-defined clinical cut-off date of 13 May 2011 (26 months). Overall survival was defined as the time between randomization and the date of death due to any cause.

    Measured: From randomization until death (up to 34 months)

  2. Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as the time between randomization and the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. Reported data included censored observations. Participants for whom no death was captured on the clinical database were censored at the most recent date they were known to be alive. As planned, ad hoc analysis was done for overall survival up to clinical clinical cut-off date of 12 January 2012 (34 months), subsequent to the protocol-defined clinical cut-off date of 13 May 2011 (26 months).

    Measured: From randomization until death (up to 34 months)

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Events (Disease Progression/Death)

    Progression of disease was defined as at least 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of longest diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm), progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. PFS was defined as the time between randomization and the date of first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first, according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST).

    Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)

  2. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS was defined as the time between randomization and the date of first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first, according to RECIST. Progression of disease was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of longest diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. PFS was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. Reported data included censored observations. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of study completion or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment or last follow-up for progression of disease. Participants for whom no post-baseline tumor assessments were available were censored at day of randomization.

    Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)

  3. Percentage of Participants With PFS Events (Disease Progression/Death) During First-line Therapy

    Progression of disease was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of longest diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. PFS during first-line therapy was defined as the time between randomization and the date of first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first and only if it occurred no later than 28 days after last confirmed intake of any study medication and before the start of non-study antineoplastic treatment, according to RECIST.

    Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)

  4. PFS During First-line Therapy

    PFS during first-line therapy was defined as time between randomization and date of first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first and only if it occurred no later than 28 days after last intake of any study medication and only if it occurred before start of non-study antineoplastic treatment, according to RECIST. Progression of disease was defined as at least 20% increase in sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of longest diameters on-study \& absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. PFS was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. Reported data included censored observations. Participants who neither progressed nor died in this interval, or who were lost to follow-up were censored at date of last tumor assessment/last follow-up within this time window. Participants for whom no post-baseline tumor assessments were available were censored at day of randomization.

    Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)

  5. Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression

    Progression of disease was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of longest diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions.

    Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)

  6. Time to Progression

    Time to progression was defined as the time between randomization and the first occurrence of disease progression. Progression of disease was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of longest diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. Time to progression was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. Reported data included censored observations. Participants who had not progressed at the time of study completion (including participants who had died before disease progression) or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment or last follow-up for progression of disease. Participants for whom no post-baseline tumor assessments were available were censored at day of randomization.

    Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)

  7. Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response as Assessed by RECIST During First-Line Therapy

    Best overall response during first-line therapy was defined as the occurrence of either a confirmed complete (CR) or a partial response (PR), as assessed by the RECIST criteria. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures less than (<) 10 mm. PR: at least a 30 % decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters.

    Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)

  8. Duration of Response During First-Line Therapy

    Duration of response during first-line therapy was defined as the time from when response (CR or PR) was first documented to first documented disease progression or death (whichever occurs first) during first-line therapy. CR: disappearance of all target and non-TLs and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures <10 mm. PR: at least a 30 % decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters. Duration of response was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. Reported data included censored observations. Participants who did not progress or die after they had had a confirmed response were censored at the date of their last tumor measurement or last follow-up for progression of disease during first line therapy.

    Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)

  9. Percentage of Participants With Disease Control During First-Line Therapy

    Disease control was defined as stable disease(SD) for 6 weeks or longer, CR plus PR as assessed by RECIST criteria for participants with measurable disease.CR:disappearance of all TLs \& normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures<10 mm. PR:at least 30% decrease in sum of measures(longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes)of TLs, taking as reference baseline sum of longest diameters.SD:neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression taking as reference smallest sum of longest diameters on study. For participants without measurable disease, clinical benefit rate was defined as no clinical disease progression for >/=6 weeks. Disease progression was defined as at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of TLs compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions.

    Measured: From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 26 months)

  10. Change From Cycle 1 in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 36 (QLQ-C30) Scale Over Time

    EORTC QLQ-C30 included global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QOL), functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used a 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; a higher score for Global Qol/functional scales=better level of QoL/functioning, or a higher score for symptom scale=greater degree of symptoms.

    Measured: From Cycle 1 until disease progression (up to 26 months)

  11. Change From Cycle 1 in EORTC QLQ-STO22 Scale Over Time

    The EORTC QLQ-STO22 is a gastric cancer quality of life questionnaire. There are 22 questions which comprise 5 scales (dysphagia, pain, reflux symptom, dietary restrictions, and anxiety) and 4 single items (dry mouth, hair loss, taste, body image). Most questions used 4-point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 1 question was a yes or no answer). A linear transformation was used to standardize all scores and single-items to a scale of 0 to 100; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.

    Measured: From Cycle 1 until disease progression (up to 26 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Apr 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2009
  3. Primary completionMay 2011
  4. Study completionAug 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
202 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00887822
Sponsor's protocol ID
ML22367
Acronym
AVATAR
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
22 Apr 2009
Last updated
1 Mar 2017

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Bevacizumab, Capecitabine and Cisplatin in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 14 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 14 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Mar 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With Event (Death) (time frame: From randomization until death (up to 34 months)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in