Influenza With Pneumonia, Influenza Virus IdentifiedPhase 4NCT00883012
Influenza Vaccine in HIV Infected Children
A Phase 4 study testing Trivalent sub-unit influenza vaccine and Saline, 0.5ml in people with Influenza With Pneumonia, Influenza Virus Identified, run by University of Witwatersrand, South Africa at 1 site in South Africa.
Trial summary
Influenza associated pneumonia causes significant morbidity in young HIV-infected children. Although annual vaccination against influenza is recommended for HIV infected children, it has not been implemented as routine care, due to the lack of data on disease burden and vaccine efficacy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 months to 5 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Influenza With Pneumonia, Influenza Virus Identified
- What is being tested?
- Trivalent sub-unit influenza vaccine and Saline, 0.5ml
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 412 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Africa
- Study dates
- Feb 2009to Jun 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 months to 5 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- HIV infected children with CD4% ≥ 15% performed within the previous 3 months in relation to the date of randomization.
- Age 6 month- 5 years old.
- Willing and able to maintain weekly contact at least during period of April - August (i.e. presupposed influenza period) either through SMS or telephonic contact.
- Willing and able to adhere to study protocol re: attendance to clinic for scheduled and illness visits.
Who cannot join
- Any contraindication to influenza vaccination, including known allergy to egg.
- History of chronic lung disease which required maintenance therapy either currently or in the past 6 months.
- Any contraindication to intramuscular injections.
- Current known grade 3 or grade 4 laboratory or clinical toxicity as per DAIDS toxicity tables.
- Any previous history of influenza vaccination.
- Plan to emigrate from the study area within the next year.
- On steroid therapy for > 21 days (current or within the past 30 days).
- In the investigators opinion unable to maintain study procedures.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Immunogenicity, Safety and Efficacy of Influenza Vaccine in HIV Infected Children
Influenza associated pneumonia causes significant morbidity in young HIV-infected children. Although annual vaccination against influenza is recommended for HIV infected children, it has not been implemented as routine care, due to the lack of data on disease burden and vaccine efficacy.
This study aims at determining the effectiveness of influenza vaccination in HIV infected children in South Africa.
Read the detailed description
Influenza virus infects 30 to 50% of children under five years of age during the course of any epidemic. The attack rates of influenza virus associated illness during infancy remains high, and at least 50% of influenza associated hospitalisation amongst children occurs in infants <6 months of age. Approximately 33% of children would have been infected at least once during their first year of life. The estimated attack rates in children aged 0-5 and 6-12 months for influenza illness is 12.4/100 and 20.3/100 child years respectively. Influenza virus causes LRTI amongst 89% of children infected in the 6-12 month age group. The risk of influenza infection is higher amongst older children (2-5 years of age); however, the risk of developing LRTI (78 versus 2.5 per 100 child years) is greater amongst younger children (< 2 years of age).
In South Africa, the burden of influenza associated pneumonia has been characterized in HIV infected children. The incidence of severe pneumonia in which influenza virus was identified was 8.03 fold (95%CI 5.05-12.76) greater in HIV infected compared to HIV non-infected children (1 268 versus 148 per 100 000 child years) aged < 2 years. These rates however provide a very conservative estimate as to the burden of influenza illness, since it excludes children with influenza illness that were hospitalized for syndromes other than pneumonia as well as children managed as outpatients. Furthermore, although the duration of hospitalization for influenza associated pneumonia was similar between HIV infected and HIV uninfected children (median 4-5 days), there was a statistically non-significant increased risk of mortality among HIV infected children (8.0% versus 2.2%; P=0.20). Much of the differences in morbidity and mortality in HIV infected individuals with influenza-associated pneumonia may be due to contribution of other co-existing pathogens.
Recommendations made by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) advocating the annual use of the subunit influenza vaccine in HIV-1 infected children are largely founded on the theoretical concern regarding the potential severity of influenza disease in HIV-1 infected children. Although vaccination with the subunit influenza vaccine is recommended for HIV-1 infected children >6 months of age, there are concerns regarding the benefits of vaccination in these children. These include that in addition to a poor immune response to the vaccine, particularly in severely immunocompromised HIV-1 infected children, increases in plasma HIV RNA following vaccination have been described. The increase in plasma HIV RNA was transient and does not appear to be of any long-term clinical significance. Recently a few studies, with partly conflicting results, have been undertaken evaluating the immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in children on antiretroviral therapy. However, no such studies have been undertaken in Africa or Asia where the burden of paediatric HIV is the greatest.
The routine use of influenza vaccine in HIV infected children remains low, partly related to the lack of adequate data regarding the burden of influenza associated disease in these children as well as the lack on any vaccine-efficacy data in HIV infected children. Determining the burden of disease and effectiveness of influenza vaccine in HIV infected children will have a bearing on routine immunization recommendations as well as planning for future influenza pandemics.
Differences in the epidemiology of HIV between developing and developed countries in which the prevalence of HIV is low to that of high-burden sub-Saharan African countries makes it necessary to be cautious in extrapolating data and recommendations of developed countries to developing countries. These differences may include: i. differences in standard of care, including access to prophylaxis against opportunistic infections and use of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART); ii. differences in risk for disease from opportunistic pathogens, e.g. Mycobacterium tuberculosis, etc. These differences may all contribute to differences in the risk and severity of influenza illness among HIV infected individuals from these communities as well as possibly responsiveness and effectiveness of vaccination.
It is within this context that this study aims at determining the effectiveness of influenza vaccination in HIV infected children in South Africa. The significance of the findings from this study will help quantify the burden of influenza illness in African HIV infected children, in the era of HAART, as well as assist in making more informed recommendations for the use of influenza vaccine in HIV infected children and in guiding national policy for preparing for a future influenza virus-pandemic.
350 Patients will be recruited at Chris Hani-Baragwanath Hospital, Soweto, South Africa onto this prospective, double-blind, placebo randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a tri-valent sub-unit influenza vaccine in HIV infected children. Participants will be randomized to receive either two doses of Influenza sub-unit vaccine or placebo one month apart, preceding the 2009 Influenza season. 100 children will be included into the immunogenicity cohort, and have blood drawn to evaluate baseline influenza strain specific antibody levels and subsequent levels one-month following the first and second doses of study vaccine.
Study participants will be followed up during the course of the influenza season, which will be defined as starting 1st May 2009 and ending 30th September 2009. Subjects will be contacted weekly to determine whether they fulfill the criteria for Influenza-like illness. Subjects who fulfill the criteria for diagnosing ILI will be requested to come into the clinic within 48 hours for further investigation, which will involve a nasopharyngeal aspirate (for identification of respiratory viruses), nasopharyngeal swab (for identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae colonization) and blood draw (for culture and Streptococcus pneumoniae testing).
- Being tested
- Trivalent sub-unit influenza vaccine, Saline, 0.5ml
- Keywords
- Viral-confirmed
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Trivalent sub-unit influenza vaccineBiological
Composition per 0.5 ml dose:
Active substance:
Split Influenza virus*, inactivated Strains for 2009 Southern hemisphere A/Brisbane/59/2007- like (H1N1) 15 micrograms, A/Brisbane/10/2007 (H3N2) - like strain (A/Brisbane/10/2007 (IVR-147) 15 micrograms, B/Florida/4/2006 - like strain (B/Brisbane/3/2007)15 micrograms** Two doses, one month apart
Saline, 0.5mlBiological
Saline IMI, 0.5ml. Two doses one month apart
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Influenza vaccine | Experimental | Two doses of trivalent sub-unit influenza vaccine (2009) to be administered one month apart Receives: Biological: Trivalent sub-unit influenza vaccine |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Two doses of saline administered one month apart Receives: Biological: Saline, 0.5ml |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Determine the efficacy of a tri-valent influenza sub-unit vaccine, in HIV infected children with a CD4+ percentage >15% against vaccine-strain viral confirmed influenza illness.
Measured: One year
Define the immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in a nested cohort of HIV infected children with CD4+ percentage >15% that are naïve to anti-retroviral or on antiretroviral therapy for more than 3 months
Measured: One year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Determine the safety of influenza vaccination in relation to solicited vaccine-related adverse events in the 72 hour period post-vaccination and any other unsolicited adverse event.
Measured: One year
Compare the effect of the influenza vaccination on viral control and CD4+ cell count in HIV infected children six months following influenza vaccination.
Measured: One year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Apr 2009 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2009
- Primary completionDec 2009
- Study completionJun 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Influenza With Pneumonia, Influenza Virus IdentifiedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 412 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michelle Groome, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
- Investigators
- Shabir A Madhi, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, VPD- RMPRU
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00883012
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Paediatric influenza vax
- Status last verified
- Apr 2012
- First submitted
- 15 Apr 2009
- Last updated
- 3 Apr 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immunogenicity, Safety and Efficacy of Influenza Vaccine in HIV Infected Children
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00883012
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Paediatric influenza vax
- Keywords
- Viral-confirmed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 412 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Witwatersrand, South AfricaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2009
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Apr 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Influenza associated pneumonia causes significant morbidity in young HIV-infected children. Although annual vaccination against influenza is recommended for HIV infected children, it has not been implemented as routine care, due to the lack of data on disease burden and vaccine efficacy.
This study aims at determining the effectiveness of influenza vaccination in HIV infected children in South Africa.
Detailed description
Influenza virus infects 30 to 50% of children under five years of age during the course of any epidemic. The attack rates of influenza virus associated illness during infancy remains high, and at least 50% of influenza associated hospitalisation amongst children occurs in infants <6 months of age. Approximately 33% of children would have been infected at least once during their first year of life. The estimated attack rates in children aged 0-5 and 6-12 months for influenza illness is 12.4/100 and 20.3/100 child years respectively. Influenza virus causes LRTI amongst 89% of children infected in the 6-12 month age group. The risk of influenza infection is higher amongst older children (2-5 years of age); however, the risk of developing LRTI (78 versus 2.5 per 100 child years) is greater amongst younger children (< 2 years of age).
In South Africa, the burden of influenza associated pneumonia has been characterized in HIV infected children. The incidence of severe pneumonia in which influenza virus was identified was 8.03 fold (95%CI 5.05-12.76) greater in HIV infected compared to HIV non-infected children (1 268 versus 148 per 100 000 child years) aged < 2 years. These rates however provide a very conservative estimate as to the burden of influenza illness, since it excludes children with influenza illness that were hospitalized for syndromes other than pneumonia as well as children managed as outpatients. Furthermore, although the duration of hospitalization for influenza associated pneumonia was similar between HIV infected and HIV uninfected children (median 4-5 days), there was a statistically non-significant increased risk of mortality among HIV infected children (8.0% versus 2.2%; P=0.20). Much of the differences in morbidity and mortality in HIV infected individuals with influenza-associated pneumonia may be due to contribution of other co-existing pathogens.
Recommendations made by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) advocating the annual use of the subunit influenza vaccine in HIV-1 infected children are largely founded on the theoretical concern regarding the potential severity of influenza disease in HIV-1 infected children. Although vaccination with the subunit influenza vaccine is recommended for HIV-1 infected children >6 months of age, there are concerns regarding the benefits of vaccination in these children. These include that in addition to a poor immune response to the vaccine, particularly in severely immunocompromised HIV-1 infected children, increases in plasma HIV RNA following vaccination have been described. The increase in plasma HIV RNA was transient and does not appear to be of any long-term clinical significance. Recently a few studies, with partly conflicting results, have been undertaken evaluating the immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in children on antiretroviral therapy. However, no such studies have been undertaken in Africa or Asia where the burden of paediatric HIV is the greatest.
The routine use of influenza vaccine in HIV infected children remains low, partly related to the lack of adequate data regarding the burden of influenza associated disease in these children as well as the lack on any vaccine-efficacy data in HIV infected children. Determining the burden of disease and effectiveness of influenza vaccine in HIV infected children will have a bearing on routine immunization recommendations as well as planning for future influenza pandemics.
Differences in the epidemiology of HIV between developing and developed countries in which the prevalence of HIV is low to that of high-burden sub-Saharan African countries makes it necessary to be cautious in extrapolating data and recommendations of developed countries to developing countries. These differences may include: i. differences in standard of care, including access to prophylaxis against opportunistic infections and use of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART); ii. differences in risk for disease from opportunistic pathogens, e.g. Mycobacterium tuberculosis, etc. These differences may all contribute to differences in the risk and severity of influenza illness among HIV infected individuals from these communities as well as possibly responsiveness and effectiveness of vaccination.
It is within this context that this study aims at determining the effectiveness of influenza vaccination in HIV infected children in South Africa. The significance of the findings from this study will help quantify the burden of influenza illness in African HIV infected children, in the era of HAART, as well as assist in making more informed recommendations for the use of influenza vaccine in HIV infected children and in guiding national policy for preparing for a future influenza virus-pandemic.
350 Patients will be recruited at Chris Hani-Baragwanath Hospital, Soweto, South Africa onto this prospective, double-blind, placebo randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a tri-valent sub-unit influenza vaccine in HIV infected children. Participants will be randomized to receive either two doses of Influenza sub-unit vaccine or placebo one month apart, preceding the 2009 Influenza season. 100 children will be included into the immunogenicity cohort, and have blood drawn to evaluate baseline influenza strain specific antibody levels and subsequent levels one-month following the first and second doses of study vaccine.
Study participants will be followed up during the course of the influenza season, which will be defined as starting 1st May 2009 and ending 30th September 2009. Subjects will be contacted weekly to determine whether they fulfill the criteria for Influenza-like illness. Subjects who fulfill the criteria for diagnosing ILI will be requested to come into the clinic within 48 hours for further investigation, which will involve a nasopharyngeal aspirate (for identification of respiratory viruses), nasopharyngeal swab (for identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae colonization) and blood draw (for culture and Streptococcus pneumoniae testing).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Influenza vaccine | Experimental | Biological: Trivalent sub-unit influenza vaccineTwo doses of trivalent sub-unit influenza vaccine (2009) to be administered one month apart |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Biological: Saline, 0.5mlTwo doses of saline administered one month apart |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 months to 5 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- HIV infected children with CD4% ≥ 15% performed within the previous 3 months in relation to the date of randomization.
- Age 6 month- 5 years old.
- Willing and able to maintain weekly contact at least during period of April - August (i.e. presupposed influenza period) either through SMS or telephonic contact.
- Willing and able to adhere to study protocol re: attendance to clinic for scheduled and illness visits.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Any contraindication to influenza vaccination, including known allergy to egg.
- History of chronic lung disease which required maintenance therapy either currently or in the past 6 months.
- Any contraindication to intramuscular injections.
- Current known grade 3 or grade 4 laboratory or clinical toxicity as per DAIDS toxicity tables.
- Any previous history of influenza vaccination.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Trivalent sub-unit influenza vaccineComposition per 0.5 ml dose: Active substance: Split Influenza virus*, inactivated Strains for 2009 Southern hemisphere A/Brisbane/59/2007- like (H1N1) 15 micrograms, A/Brisbane/10/2007 (H3N2) - like strain (A/Brisbane/10/2007 (IVR-147) 15 micrograms, B/Florida/4/2006 - like strain (B/Brisbane/3/2007)15 micrograms** Two doses, one month apart | Biological | Influenza vaccine |
| Saline, 0.5mlSaline IMI, 0.5ml. Two doses one month apart | Biological | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Determine the efficacy of a tri-valent influenza sub-unit vaccine, in HIV infected children with a CD4+ percentage >15% against vaccine-strain viral confirmed influenza illness.
Time frame: One year
Define the immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in a nested cohort of HIV infected children with CD4+ percentage >15% that are naïve to anti-retroviral or on antiretroviral therapy for more than 3 months
Time frame: One year
2 secondary outcomes
Determine the safety of influenza vaccination in relation to solicited vaccine-related adverse events in the 72 hour period post-vaccination and any other unsolicited adverse event.
Time frame: One year
Compare the effect of the influenza vaccination on viral control and CD4+ cell count in HIV infected children six months following influenza vaccination.
Time frame: One year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2012.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Shabir A Madhi, MD, PhD principal investigator
VPD- RMPRU
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Trivalent sub-unit influenza vaccine and Saline, 0.5ml in people with Influenza With Pneumonia, Influenza Virus Identified, run by University of Witwatersrand, South Africa at 1 site in South Africa.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Determine the efficacy of a tri-valent influenza sub-unit vaccine, in HIV infected children with a CD4+ percentage >15% against vaccine-strain viral confirmed influenza illness. (time frame: One year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2012.