AzTrials
AzTrials

Type 1 Diabetes MellitusNCT00870818

Protege Extension Trial - Long Term Follow Up Trial for Subjects Who Completed the Protege Study (CP-MGA031-01)

A study testing Blood samples for safety, Patient reported outcome questionnaires and Analysis of T-cell subsets in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by MacroGenics at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the long term safety and efficacy in subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus who completed the Protege Study (CP-MGA031-01). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 37 years
Conditions the study is for
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
What is being tested?
Blood samples for safety, Patient reported outcome questionnaires and Analysis of T-cell subsets
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
219 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2009to May 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 37 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Complete Protocol CP-MGA031-01 (i.e., all subjects who complete Study Day 728, regardless of how many doses of study drug are received).
  • Provide written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Atlanta Diabetes Associates

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30309

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: An Extension of Study CP-MGA031-01 to Evaluate the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Teplizumab (MGA031), a Humanized, FcR Non-Binding, Anti-CD3 Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients With Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

The purpose of this study is to assess the long term safety and efficacy in subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus who completed the Protege Study (CP-MGA031-01).

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of the extension study is to assess long-term safety, with particular focus on the development of serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events of special interest (AESIs) including opportunistic infections and lymphoproliferative disease, and other immediately reportable events (IREs), in subjects with recent-onset T1DM who complete CP-MGA031-01.

The secondary objectives of the extension study are to: 1) assess long-term efficacy; 2) evaluate immunological effects(North America only); 3) measure anti-teplizumab antibody levels;4) assess Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaires.

Being tested
Blood samples for safety, Patient reported outcome questionnaires, Analysis of T-cell subsets
Keywords
Teplizumab, Protege, MGA031, Monoclonal antibody, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, T1DM, MacroGenics
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blood samples for safetyDiagnostic test

    serum chemistry, hematology, infection screen, thyroid function, Insulin, hemoglobin A1c,and autoantibodies

  • Patient reported outcome questionnairesBehavioural

    EQ-5D, Peds QL, Low blood sugar survey, and hospitalization information.

  • Analysis of T-cell subsetsDiagnostic test

    CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, CD3+ CD16+ CD56+ subsets; CD3-CD16+ CD56+ subsets; CD4+CD25+, CD8+CD25+, CD4+CD69+, CD8+CD69+, CD4+CD40+ subsets CD4+ and CD8+CD25+FoxP3+Treg Subsets

Study groups in NCT00870818
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Double-blind Herold RegimenExperimentalPatients who had been assigned to Herold Regimen in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Blood samples for safety; Behavioral: Patient reported outcome questionnaires; Diagnostic Test: Analysis of T-cell subsets
Double-blind 33.3% Herold RegimenExperimentalPatients who had been assigned to 33.3% Herold Regimen in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Blood samples for safety; Behavioral: Patient reported outcome questionnaires; Diagnostic Test: Analysis of T-cell subsets
Double-blind Curtailed Herold RegimenExperimentalPatients who had been assigned to Curtailed Herold Regimen in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Blood samples for safety; Behavioral: Patient reported outcome questionnaires; Diagnostic Test: Analysis of T-cell subsets
Double-blind PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPatients who had been assigned to Placebo in Segment 2 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Blood samples for safety; Behavioral: Patient reported outcome questionnaires; Diagnostic Test: Analysis of T-cell subsets
Open-label Herold RegimenExperimentalPatients who had been assigned to Herold Regimen in Segment 1 of Study CP-MGA031-01 were enrolled to gather additional safety and efficacy data.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Blood samples for safety; Behavioral: Patient reported outcome questionnaires; Diagnostic Test: Analysis of T-cell subsets

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Number of Participants Who Experience an Adverse Event, Serious Adverse Event or Adverse Event of Special Interest.

    Measured: Duration of study participation up to 15 months

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Proportion of Subjects in Segment 2 With Both a Total Daily Insulin Dose of Less Than 0.5 U/kg/Day and Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Level of Less Than 6.5%.

    Measured: Month 6

  2. Proportion of Subjects in Segment 2 With Both a Total Daily Insulin Dose of Less Than 0.5 U/kg/Day and Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Level of Less Than 6.5%.

    Measured: Month 12

  3. Proportion of Subjects With HbA1c <6.5%

    Measured: Month 6

  4. Mean HbA1c at 6 Months

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Mean HbA1c at 12 Months

    Measured: Month 12

  6. C-peptide Area Under the Curve (AUC) at 6 Months

    This outcome measure summarizes the mean and standard deviation of the observed value.

    Measured: Month 6

  7. C-peptide AUC at 12 Months

    This outcome measure summarizes the mean and standard deviation of the observed value.

    Measured: Month 12

  8. Total Daily Insulin Usage at 6 Months

    Measured: Month 6

  9. Total Daily Insulin Usage at 12 Months

    Measured: Month 12

  10. Mean Values for Participant-reported Outcomes on the 5-dimension European Quality of Life Questionnaire. (EQ-5D)

    The EQ-5D is a self-reported survey that measures quality of life across 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is scored on a 3-level severity ranking that ranges from "no problems", "some problems", and "extreme problems". The lowest possible score is 5 and the highest possible score is 15. Lower scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: Month 6

  11. Mean Values for Participant-reported Outcomes on the EQ-5D

    The EQ-5D is a self-reported survey that measures quality of life across 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is scored on a 3-level severity ranking that ranges from "no problems", "some problems", and "extreme problems". The lowest possible score is 5 and the highest possible score is 15. Lower scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: Month 12

  12. Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire Total Score

    The 23-item PEDs QL generic core scales were designed to measure the core dimensions of health (physical, emotional, social and school functioning). Answers are scored from 0 meaning never to 4 meaning almost always. Lower scores indicated higher quality of life. Items on the questionnaire were reversely scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicated better patient reported outcome. The mean was computed as the sum of the items over the number of items answered (to account for missing data). If more than 50% of the items in the scale were missing, the score was not computed.

    Measured: Month 6

  13. Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire Total Score

    The 23-item PEDs QL generic core scales were designed to measure the core dimensions of health (physical, emotional, social and school functioning). Answers are scored from 0 meaning never to 4 meaning almost always. Lower scores indicated higher quality of life. Items on the questionnaire were reversely scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicated better patient reported outcome. The mean was computed as the sum of the items over the number of items answered (to account for missing data). If more than 50% of the items in the scale were missing, the score was not computed.

    Measured: Month 12

  14. Percentage of Cells by Immunophenotype

    Measured: Month 6

  15. Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Levels

    Patients with HAHA levels > 0.

    Measured: Month 6 and 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Mar 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2009
  3. Primary completionFeb 2011
  4. Study completionMay 2011

Why it stopped: Business decision

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
219 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00870818
Sponsor's protocol ID
CP-MGA031-02
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
26 Mar 2009
Last updated
9 Aug 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Blood samples for safety, Patient reported outcome questionnaires and Analysis of T-cell subsets in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by MacroGenics at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Aug 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Number of Participants Who Experience an Adverse Event, Serious Adverse Event or Adverse Event of Special Interest. (time frame: Duration of study participation up to 15 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in