DepressionPhase 2/3NCT00866593
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Generic Escitalopram in Depression
A Phase 2/3 study testing Generic Escitalopram and Innovator Escitalopram in people with Depression, run by Shanghai Mental Health Center at 6 sites in China.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Generic Escitalopram in the treatment of Chinese patients with depression compared with Innovator Escitalopram(Lexapro®) by evaluating the change of HAMD-17 total score from the baseline to week 8. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Depression
- What is being tested?
- Generic Escitalopram and Innovator Escitalopram
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 260 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesChina
- Study dates
- Mar 2009to Mar 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Outpatients
- Patients who met DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder(MDD):a single major depressive episode or recurrent major depressive episode, without psychotic features, MDD is primary mental disorder
- Age from 18-65 years old, male or female
- HAMD-17 total score at least 20 at screening and baseline, and first item's score at least 2
- CGI-S at least 4 at screening and baseline
- Written informed consent provided by patient himself/herself
Who cannot join
- Severe suicide attempt
- Any unstable medical illness would affect study or increase patients' risk to participate this study, including disease of heart, lung, liver, kidney,cardiovascular system, eyes, nervous system, endocrine system, hematological system etc.
- History of epilepsy(except children febrile seizure/convulsion)
- Known history of high intraocular pressure or angle closure glaucoma
- Psychoactive substance abuse or dependence within 1 year prior enrollment
- Depressive episode due to other mental disorders or physical diseases
Show all 19Show fewer
- Bipolar disorder, rapid cycling/circulation
- Female patients during their pregnant and lactation period or childbearing potential during study
- History of severe drug hypersensitivity
- A significantly clinical abnormal value in ECG or lab results which would affect assessment for efficacy or safety decided by the investigator
- ALT and AST values in the liver function test exceeding two times of the upper limits of normal values
- Participation in another drug trial within 28 days prior enrollment into this study
- Use of MAOI within 4 weeks prior to randomization
- Duration of discontinuing other psychotropics is shorter than its 7 half life periods
- Patients can not administrate drug according to medical order
- HAMD total score decreased more than 25% from screening to baseline
- Use of Electroconvulsive therapy within half year prior enrollment
- Known lack of efficacy to escitalpram by formal treatment before
- Other situation unsuitable to enroll in this study as judged by the investigator
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
China6 sites
Hebei Mental Health Center
Baoding, Hebei, 071000
The First Affilliated Hospital Of Kunming Medical College
Kunming, Yunnan, 650032
Nanjing Brain Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029
Shanghai Mental Health Center
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200030
the First Affiliated Hospital,Medical School of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061
Xi'an Mental Health Center
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Double-blind Parallel Innovator-Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Generic Escitalopram Oxalate Tablets in the Treatment of Chinese Patients With Depression
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Generic Escitalopram in the treatment of Chinese patients with depression compared with Innovator Escitalopram(Lexapro®) by evaluating the change of HAMD-17 total score from the baseline to week 8.
Read the detailed description
This is a double-blind, parallel assignment, randomized and innovator controlled study. The subjects investigated are outpatients with major depressive disorder(MDD)according to DSM-IV from the Chinese population. The screening phase lasts for 1 week. The eligible patients enter the next randomized treatment phase. The fixed dose(generic escitalopram 10mg/d or Innovator Escitalopram(Lexapro®) 10mg/d) duration is 2 week. After the first 2 weeks, according to CGI and investigator's assessment the patients are administrated 2 different dose, one is previous dose 10mg/d, the other is high dose 20mg/d. In this study, total duration lasts for 8 weeks.
The efficacy and safety of Innovator Escitalopram(Lexapro®) in the treatment of patients with MDD have been confirmed by multiple double blind studies. This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of genetic escitalopram in the treatment of Chinese patients with MDD. Therefore, the double blind and innovator control(Lexapro®) design should be selected for this study. The drug titration method and dose are within the range specified in the instruction and patients with MDD are tolerant to the drug in practical clinical treatment.
The purpose of MDD patient treatment is to improve the core symptoms, prevent suicide, alleviate the side reactions caused by the antidepressant, and recover the life functions of patients. Generally, the treatment in the acute phase lasts for 6 to 8 weeks. In this study, the treatment in the acute phase lasts for 8 weeks.
The rating scales used in this study are standard psychiatric rating scales with good validity and are widely used in the study of antidepressants and in the treatment of patients with MDD. The high inter-investigator reliability and repeated measurement reliability of these scales(HAMD,MADRS,HAMA) have been proved by multiple studies. The clinical global impression (CGI) is a simple but convenient global impression scale. It is applicable to any patients treated and studied by the psychiatric department. The VAS-PI(Visual Analog Scale-Pain Intensity) is used to evaluate the reduction in pain intensity,a common symptom of patients with MDD. It has good reliability and validity. The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) was developed to assess functional impairment in three inter-related domains; work/school, social and family life.
- Conditions
- Depression
- Being tested
- Generic Escitalopram, Innovator Escitalopram
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder(MDD), depression, antidepressant, escitalpram oxalate, generic, innovator, Lexapro, efficacy, safety, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, chinese, HAMD, MADRS, HAMA, VAS-PI, SDS, CGI
- Medical subject headings
- Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Generic EscitalopramDrug
Also called Generic Escitalopram Oxalate Tablet
10mg/d or 20mg/d
Innovator EscitalopramDrug
Also called Lexapro®
10mg/d or 20mg/d
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Generic Escitalopram Oxalate Tablets Receives: Drug: Generic Escitalopram |
| 2 | Active comparator | Innovator Escitalopram(Lexapro®) Receives: Drug: Innovator Escitalopram |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the change of HAMD-17 total score
Measured: from the baseline to week 8
Secondary outcomes (5)
the change of MADRS total score
Measured: from the baseline to week 8
the change of HAMA total score
Measured: from the baseline to week 8
the clinical global impression (CGI),including CGI-I and CGI-S
Measured: from the baseline to week 8
the change of VAS-PI
Measured: from the baseline to Week 8
the change of Sheehan Disability Scale(SDS)
Measured: from the baseline to Week 8
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2009
- Primary completionMar 2010
- Study completionMar 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DepressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Shanghai Mental Health CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Mental Health Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Jiangsu Nhwa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Huafang LI, MD,PhD, Principal investigator, Drug Clinical Trial Office, Shanghai Mental Health Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00866593
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2004L04118
- Other IDs
- SMHC-101
- Status last verified
- Apr 2013
- First submitted
- 18 Mar 2009
- Last updated
- 4 Apr 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Yu Y, Li H, Wang B, Li K, Xu X, Shi J, Gao C, Tan Q. Efficacy and safety of generic escitalopram versus Lexapro in the treatment of major depression: a multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;25(2):107-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2013.02.007.
PubMed 24991142
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Apr 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Double-blind Parallel Innovator-Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Generic Escitalopram Oxalate Tablets in the Treatment of Chinese Patients With Depression
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00866593
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2004L04118
- Conditions
- Depression
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder(MDD), depression, antidepressant, escitalpram oxalate, generic, innovator, Lexapro, efficacy
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Mental Health CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Jiangsu Nhwa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Study start
- Mar 2009
- Primary completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Generic Escitalopram in the treatment of Chinese patients with depression compared with Innovator Escitalopram(Lexapro®) by evaluating the change of HAMD-17 total score from the baseline to week 8.
Detailed description
This is a double-blind, parallel assignment, randomized and innovator controlled study. The subjects investigated are outpatients with major depressive disorder(MDD)according to DSM-IV from the Chinese population. The screening phase lasts for 1 week. The eligible patients enter the next randomized treatment phase. The fixed dose(generic escitalopram 10mg/d or Innovator Escitalopram(Lexapro®) 10mg/d) duration is 2 week. After the first 2 weeks, according to CGI and investigator's assessment the patients are administrated 2 different dose, one is previous dose 10mg/d, the other is high dose 20mg/d. In this study, total duration lasts for 8 weeks.
The efficacy and safety of Innovator Escitalopram(Lexapro®) in the treatment of patients with MDD have been confirmed by multiple double blind studies. This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of genetic escitalopram in the treatment of Chinese patients with MDD. Therefore, the double blind and innovator control(Lexapro®) design should be selected for this study. The drug titration method and dose are within the range specified in the instruction and patients with MDD are tolerant to the drug in practical clinical treatment.
The purpose of MDD patient treatment is to improve the core symptoms, prevent suicide, alleviate the side reactions caused by the antidepressant, and recover the life functions of patients. Generally, the treatment in the acute phase lasts for 6 to 8 weeks. In this study, the treatment in the acute phase lasts for 8 weeks.
The rating scales used in this study are standard psychiatric rating scales with good validity and are widely used in the study of antidepressants and in the treatment of patients with MDD. The high inter-investigator reliability and repeated measurement reliability of these scales(HAMD,MADRS,HAMA) have been proved by multiple studies. The clinical global impression (CGI) is a simple but convenient global impression scale. It is applicable to any patients treated and studied by the psychiatric department. The VAS-PI(Visual Analog Scale-Pain Intensity) is used to evaluate the reduction in pain intensity,a common symptom of patients with MDD. It has good reliability and validity. The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) was developed to assess functional impairment in three inter-related domains; work/school, social and family life.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: Generic EscitalopramGeneric Escitalopram Oxalate Tablets |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: Innovator EscitalopramInnovator Escitalopram(Lexapro®) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Outpatients
- Patients who met DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder(MDD):a single major depressive episode or recurrent major depressive episode, without psychotic features, MDD is primary mental disorder
- Age from 18-65 years old, male or female
- HAMD-17 total score at least 20 at screening and baseline, and first item's score at least 2
- CGI-S at least 4 at screening and baseline
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Severe suicide attempt
- Any unstable medical illness would affect study or increase patients' risk to participate this study, including disease of heart, lung, liver, kidney,cardiovascular system, eyes, nervous system, endocrine system, hematological system etc.
- History of epilepsy(except children febrile seizure/convulsion)
- Known history of high intraocular pressure or angle closure glaucoma
- Psychoactive substance abuse or dependence within 1 year prior enrollment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Generic EscitalopramAlso: Generic Escitalopram Oxalate Tablet10mg/d or 20mg/d | Drug | 1 |
| Innovator EscitalopramAlso: Lexapro®10mg/d or 20mg/d | Drug | 2 |
Primary outcome
the change of HAMD-17 total score
Time frame: from the baseline to week 8
5 secondary outcomes
the change of MADRS total score
Time frame: from the baseline to week 8
the change of HAMA total score
Time frame: from the baseline to week 8
the clinical global impression (CGI),including CGI-I and CGI-S
Time frame: from the baseline to week 8
the change of VAS-PI
Time frame: from the baseline to Week 8
the change of Sheehan Disability Scale(SDS)
Time frame: from the baseline to Week 8
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Apr 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24991142Yu Y, Li H, Wang B, Li K, Xu X, Shi J, Gao C, Tan Q. Efficacy and safety of generic escitalopram versus Lexapro in the treatment of major depression: a multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;25(2):107-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2013.02.007.
Related trials for Depression
Recruiting
Unified Protocol in Penitentiary Facilities
Depression Disorders, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Functional Impact of Psychological Symptoms in Patients With Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome (SSCD): a National Cross-sectional Study
Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Recruiting
Cultural Adaptation of an Online Parenting Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Depression and Anxiety in Adolescents
Risk of Depression and Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Huafang LI, MD,PhD principal investigator
Drug Clinical Trial Office, Shanghai Mental Health Center
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Generic Escitalopram and Innovator Escitalopram in people with Depression, run by Shanghai Mental Health Center at 6 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Apr 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the change of HAMD-17 total score (time frame: from the baseline to week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00866593, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Apr 2013.