Prostate CancerPhase 2NCT00866554
Efficacy and Toxicity of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride vs. Standard Care for Prostate Cytoreduction for Brachytherapy
A Phase 2 study testing administration of a LHRH agonist and Bicalutamide and administration of Bicalutamide, Dutasteride and Tamoxifen in people with Prostate Cancer and Erectile Dysfunction, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if a combination of neoadjuvant dutasteride and bicalutamide has the same efficacy and less toxicity than standard treatment with an LHRH agonist and bicalutamide for prostate cytoreduction prior to permanent implant brachytherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer, Erectile Dysfunction, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
- What is being tested?
- administration of a LHRH agonist and Bicalutamide and administration of Bicalutamide, Dutasteride and Tamoxifen
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Mar 2009to Dec 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male sex
- Diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma as confirmed by prostate biopsy
- Prostate cancer with stage T1a, T1b T2a or T2b Nx Mx as determined by clinical examination
- Gleason score of 6 or less or 7 (3+4)*
- If Gleason score is 7(3+4) patient must have less than 30% of biopsied tissue positive
- Serum PSA of ≤ 15ng/ml during the month before study entry
Show all 10Show fewer
- Prostate volume ≥ 45cc
- Normal serum testosterone during the month before study entry
- Availability for treatment and follow-up visits
- Having signed required consent form before study entry
Who cannot join
- Abnormal Liver Function tests (>2x normal AST or ALT and/or >1.5x normal bilirubin)
- Prostate volume less than 50 cc
- History of hormonal treatment including any of the above: LHRH agonists, antiandrogens during the year before study entry
- Use of a 5 alpha reductase inhibitor for more than one month during the year prior to study entry
- History of pelvic irradiation
- History of past chemotherapy
Show all 13Show fewer
- History of TURP
- History of past treatment for prostate cancer
- Known hypersensitivity to Dutasteride or Bicalutamide
- Co-morbid disease possibly compromising treatment compliance
- History of DVT or pulmonary embolism
- Anticoagulation with coumarin
- Inability to give consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Phase II Study of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride for Prostate Cytoreduction Prior to Permanent Implant I-125 Prostate Brachytherapy
The purpose of this study is to determine if a combination of neoadjuvant dutasteride and bicalutamide has the same efficacy and less toxicity than standard treatment with an LHRH agonist and bicalutamide for prostate cytoreduction prior to permanent implant brachytherapy.
Read the detailed description
Permanent implant prostate brachytherapy is recognized as the treatment method for prostate cancer that results in the least amount of sexual side effects including erectile dysfunction (ED). However prostate brachytherapy is often limited to patients with a prostate volume less than 50cc because of dosimetric and technical considerations. To counter this fact patients with a prostate larger than 50cc are offered neoadjuvant hormonal therapy to reduce their prostate volume to a value less than 50cc. The pharmacological method most often employed involves treatment with an LHRH agonist, which also involves multiple adverse effects for patients including ED in the majority of patients.
This approach may also involve other disadvantages including a possibility of increased cardiovascular mortality a possible increase in urinary toxicity and a reduction in health-related quality of life in patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Despite theses facts, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy remains essentially the sole method used to reduce prostate volume prior to prostate brachytherapy. One study has evaluated the efficacy of a neoadjuvant regimen without an LHRH agonist, comprised of Dutasteride and Bicalutamide to reduce prostate volume. This treatment could theoretically have fewer effects on sexual function and quality of life and could also possibly reduce urinary toxicity of brachytherapy. Nonetheless, these factors have never been evaluated. The cytoreductive efficacy of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride have never been directly compared to standard treatments. The current study is necessary to determine the effects of a neoadjuvant regimen of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride on prostate volume, sexual function, urinary toxicity and quality of life as compared to standard treatment. If it can be determined that there is an advantage with Bicalutamide and Dutasteride this regimen could become a standard of care for prostate cytoreduction prior to brachytherapy.
- Being tested
- administration of a LHRH agonist and Bicalutamide, administration of Bicalutamide, Dutasteride and Tamoxifen
- Keywords
- Prostate, Brachytherapy, Cytoreduction, Sexual function, Toxicity
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms, Erectile Dysfunction, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
administration of a LHRH agonist and BicalutamideDrug
Also called Bicalutamide(Casodex)
3-month treatment with an LHRH agonist chosen by the treating radiation oncologist and Bicalutamide 50 mg daily for the first month of treatment with the LHRH agonist.
administration of Bicalutamide, Dutasteride and TamoxifenDrug
Also called Bicalutamide (Casodex), Dutasteride (Avodart), Tamoxifen (Nolvadex)
Dutasteride given at dose of 0.5 mg daily starting three months prior to day of implant procedure and continued for 3 months up until procedure.
Bicalutamide: given at a dose of 50 mg daily for 3 the same 3 month period as dutasteride
Tamoxifen: given at dose of 10 mg daily for 3 months that dutasteride and bicalutamide are administered.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LHRH agonist | Active comparator | Administration of a 3-month treatment with an LHRH agonist (chosen by the treating radiation oncologist) and Bicalutamide 50 mg daily for the first month of treatment with the LHRH agonist. Receives: Drug: administration of a LHRH agonist and Bicalutamide |
| Dutasteride, Bicalutamide, Tamoxifen | Experimental | Administration of Dutasteride given at dose of 0.5 mg daily starting three months prior to day of implant procedure and continued for 3 months up until procedure.
Bicalutamide: given at a dose of 50 mg daily for 3 the same 3 month period as dutasteride
Tamoxifen: given at dose of 10 mg daily for 3 months that dutasteride and bicalutamide are administered. Receives: Drug: administration of Bicalutamide, Dutasteride and Tamoxifen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total prostate volume
Trans rectal ultra sound 3 dimensional volume evaluation
Measured: 3 months after start of therapy
Secondary outcomes (13)
EPIC questionnaire urinary function and bother scores
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Measured: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
EPIC questionnaire sexual function and bother scores
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Measured: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
EPIC questionnaire bowel function and bother scores
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Measured: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
EPIC questionnaire hormonal function and bother scores
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Measured: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
IPSS scores
International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS)
Measured: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Acute urinary retention rates
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Measured: 0 to 6 months post-implant
SF-12 Quality of life questionnaire results
International Quality of Life Assessment - Short Form
Measured: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Rate of gynecomastia and breast tenderness
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Measured: 6 weeks pre-implant, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Serum testosterone
testosterone blood level
Measured: 3 months pre-implant, pre-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Anemia
haemoglobin blood level
Measured: baseline, pre-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Abnormal liver function tests
Blood level of Alanine transaminase (ALT), Aspartate transaminase (AST), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Bilirubin, Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), L-lactate dehydrogenase (LD).
Measured: 6 weeks pre-implant, pre-implant, 3 months post-implant
Serum PSA
serum testosterone blood level
Measured: baseline, pre-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Adverse events recording
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Measured: 6 weeks pre-implant, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2009
- Primary completionMar 2019
- Study completionDec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, André-Guy Martin, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
- Investigators
- Andre-Guy Martin, MD, Principal investigator, CHUQ-Hotel-Dieu de Québec
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00866554
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DUT112661
- Other IDs
- Health Canada-112661
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2009
- Last updated
- 2 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II Study of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride for Prostate Cytoreduction Prior to Permanent Implant I-125 Prostate Brachytherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00866554
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DUT112661
- Keywords
- Prostate, Brachytherapy, Cytoreduction, Sexual function, Toxicity
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CHU de Quebec-Universite LavalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Study start
- Mar 2009
- Primary completion
- Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine if a combination of neoadjuvant dutasteride and bicalutamide has the same efficacy and less toxicity than standard treatment with an LHRH agonist and bicalutamide for prostate cytoreduction prior to permanent implant brachytherapy.
Detailed description
Permanent implant prostate brachytherapy is recognized as the treatment method for prostate cancer that results in the least amount of sexual side effects including erectile dysfunction (ED). However prostate brachytherapy is often limited to patients with a prostate volume less than 50cc because of dosimetric and technical considerations. To counter this fact patients with a prostate larger than 50cc are offered neoadjuvant hormonal therapy to reduce their prostate volume to a value less than 50cc. The pharmacological method most often employed involves treatment with an LHRH agonist, which also involves multiple adverse effects for patients including ED in the majority of patients.
This approach may also involve other disadvantages including a possibility of increased cardiovascular mortality a possible increase in urinary toxicity and a reduction in health-related quality of life in patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Despite theses facts, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy remains essentially the sole method used to reduce prostate volume prior to prostate brachytherapy. One study has evaluated the efficacy of a neoadjuvant regimen without an LHRH agonist, comprised of Dutasteride and Bicalutamide to reduce prostate volume. This treatment could theoretically have fewer effects on sexual function and quality of life and could also possibly reduce urinary toxicity of brachytherapy. Nonetheless, these factors have never been evaluated. The cytoreductive efficacy of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride have never been directly compared to standard treatments. The current study is necessary to determine the effects of a neoadjuvant regimen of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride on prostate volume, sexual function, urinary toxicity and quality of life as compared to standard treatment. If it can be determined that there is an advantage with Bicalutamide and Dutasteride this regimen could become a standard of care for prostate cytoreduction prior to brachytherapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LHRH agonist | Active comparator | Drug: administration of a LHRH agonist and BicalutamideAdministration of a 3-month treatment with an LHRH agonist (chosen by the treating radiation oncologist) and Bicalutamide 50 mg daily for the first month of treatment with the LHRH agonist. |
| Dutasteride, Bicalutamide, Tamoxifen | Experimental | Drug: administration of Bicalutamide, Dutasteride and TamoxifenAdministration of Dutasteride given at dose of 0.5 mg daily starting three months prior to day of implant procedure and continued for 3 months up until procedure. Bicalutamide: given at a dose of 50 mg daily for 3 the same 3 month period as dutasteride Tamoxifen: given at dose of 10 mg daily for 3 months that dutasteride and bicalutamide are administered. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Male sex
- Diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma as confirmed by prostate biopsy
- Prostate cancer with stage T1a, T1b T2a or T2b Nx Mx as determined by clinical examination
- Gleason score of 6 or less or 7 (3+4)*
- Serum PSA of ≤ 15ng/ml during the month before study entry
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Abnormal Liver Function tests (>2x normal AST or ALT and/or >1.5x normal bilirubin)
- Prostate volume less than 50 cc
- History of hormonal treatment including any of the above: LHRH agonists, antiandrogens during the year before study entry
- Use of a 5 alpha reductase inhibitor for more than one month during the year prior to study entry
- History of pelvic irradiation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| administration of a LHRH agonist and BicalutamideAlso: Bicalutamide(Casodex)3-month treatment with an LHRH agonist chosen by the treating radiation oncologist and Bicalutamide 50 mg daily for the first month of treatment with the LHRH agonist. | Drug | LHRH agonist |
| administration of Bicalutamide, Dutasteride and TamoxifenAlso: Bicalutamide (Casodex), Dutasteride (Avodart), Tamoxifen (Nolvadex)Dutasteride given at dose of 0.5 mg daily starting three months prior to day of implant procedure and continued for 3 months up until procedure. Bicalutamide: given at a dose of 50 mg daily for 3 the same 3 month period as dutasteride Tamoxifen: given at dose of 10 mg daily for 3 months that dutasteride and bicalutamide are administered. | Drug | Dutasteride, Bicalutamide, Tamoxifen |
Primary outcome
Total prostate volume
Time frame: 3 months after start of therapy
Trans rectal ultra sound 3 dimensional volume evaluation
13 secondary outcomes
EPIC questionnaire urinary function and bother scores
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
EPIC questionnaire sexual function and bother scores
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
EPIC questionnaire bowel function and bother scores
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
EPIC questionnaire hormonal function and bother scores
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
IPSS scores
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Acute urinary retention rates
Time frame: 0 to 6 months post-implant
SF-12 Quality of life questionnaire results
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Rate of gynecomastia and breast tenderness
Time frame: 6 weeks pre-implant, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Serum testosterone
Time frame: 3 months pre-implant, pre-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Anemia
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Abnormal liver function tests
Time frame: 6 weeks pre-implant, pre-implant, 3 months post-implant
Serum PSA
Time frame: baseline, pre-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Adverse events recording
Time frame: 6 weeks pre-implant, pre-implant, 6 weeks post-implant, 3,6,12,18 and 24 months post-implant
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jun 2023.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andre-Guy Martin, MD principal investigator
CHUQ-Hotel-Dieu de Québec
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing administration of a LHRH agonist and Bicalutamide and administration of Bicalutamide, Dutasteride and Tamoxifen in people with Prostate Cancer and Erectile Dysfunction, run by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total prostate volume (time frame: 3 months after start of therapy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jun 2023.