In Vitro FertilizationPhase 4NCT00866008
A Study of the Effects of a Novel Ovarian Stimulation Regimen on Embryo Aneuploidy Rates in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)
A Phase 4 study testing Ovarian stimulation in people with In Vitro Fertilization, run by Bart CJM Fauser at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Background: By limiting the number of embryos transferred to the uterus to only a single embryo, the risk of multiple gestation can be reduced. In order to improve the effectiveness of single embryo transfer, the ability to select the embryo with the highest potential to develop into a healthy child is of vital… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 37 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- In Vitro Fertilization
- What is being tested?
- Ovarian stimulation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- Oct 2008to Jan 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 37 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Female age ≤ 37 years
- BMI 18-29 kg/m2
- Regular cycle (25-35 days)
- Standard indication for IVF
- No major uterine abnormalities
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Indication for IVF male factor with a total motile sperm count < 20x106
- ICSI or andrological indication
- Known abnormal (male or female) karyotype
- Oocyte donation
- One previous IVF treatment not resulting in embryo transfer
- History of recurrent abortion
Show all 9Show fewer
- Medical contra indication for pregnancy or IVF treatment
- Relevant systemic disease
- Active substance abuse
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Impact of the Heterogeneity of the Recruited Cohort of Follicles During Ovarian Hyperstimulation for IVF on Aneuploidy Rates of Generated Embryos.
Background:
By limiting the number of embryos transferred to the uterus to only a single embryo, the risk of multiple gestation can be reduced. In order to improve the effectiveness of single embryo transfer, the ability to select the embryo with the highest potential to develop into a healthy child is of vital importance. While embryos rated as high quality by standardized morphological assessment are associated with higher implantation and pregnancy rates, it is still not possible to predict with certainty which embryo will implant and has the highest potential to develop into a healthy child. An increasing body of evidence indicates that the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in embryos is extremely high and good embryo morphology does not necessarily exclude an abnormal chromosomal constitution. Since aneuploidies are considered the main cause of embryonic wastage and loss, this phenomenon may be primarily responsible for the relatively poor pregnancy rates reported after IVF.
Read more
The introduction of fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) techniques for preimplantation genetic diagnosis has enabled screening of embryos for chromosomal aneuploidies before transfer. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) would be of special interest for couples that are thought to have a higher risk of developing chromosomally abnormal embryos, with the aim of improving their chances for an ongoing pregnancy after IVF. PGS is applied clinically in numerous IVF laboratories throughout the world, and high rates of chromosomal abnormalities have been reported in IVF derived embryos. However, a recent meta-analysis has shown that PGS is yet to have a significant impact on IVF outcomes. This may partly be explained by the fact that most aneuploidies observed at this stage originate during the first mitotic divisions of early preimplantation development, resulting in chromosomally mosaic embryos. If a chromosomally mosaic embryo is biopsied, this cell may not be representative for the remaining embryo.
The investigators' group recently completed the first prospectively designed, randomized trial, comparing embryo aneuploidy rates following two ovarian hyperstimulation regimes in a group of 111 IVF patients. Milder stimulation was associated with a reduction in the number of oocytes retrieved and embryos generated. However, the proportion of chromosomally normal embryos was significantly increased. These results showed for the first time a direct correlation between the ovarian stimulation protocol and the incidence of chromosome abnormalities in the embryo. The observation that mild stimulation in some patients still resulted in a high oocyte yield and concurring higher proportions of abnormal embryos, underscores the need for further development of minimal stimulation approaches.
Primary Objective:
To determine whether the administration of hCG during the late follicular phase, instead of continuing with a fixed dose FSH, results in a more homogeneous cohort of growing follicles and the development of only the most competent oocytes, leading to lower aneuploidy rates in resulting embryos.
Study design:
Prospectively randomized, clinical study in 110 women undergoing IVF treatment
Intervention:
Randomization to one of two ovarian stimulation protocols:
- Conventional regimen with a daily dose of 225 IU recombinant FSH and GnRH agonist long protocol co-treatment
- Mild ovarian stimulation regimen using the endogenous FSH production by starting treatment on day 5 of the menstrual cycle with 150 IU / d recFSH with GnRH antagonist co treatment starting on day 6. As soon as two follicles reach 12 mm, treatment is continued with 200 IU / d rec hCG.
In both arms, oocyte pick up, insemination and embryo culture will be performed according to standard procedures. On day 3, all suitable embryos will be biopsied and one or two blastomeres removed, depending on the number of cells within the embryo.
FISH analysis will be performed for 10 chromosomes (1, 7, 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y). Only chromosomally normal embryos will be transferred and cryopreserved. Embryos diagnosed as aneuploid or mosaic will be investigated for their implantation and developmental potential, by transferring them to an in vitro implantation model. After an extended culture period, implantation behaviour will be assessed and the entire embryo is reanalysed to detect the proportion of chromosomally abnormal cells. The implantation behaviour will be correlated to the type of abnormality and the chromosome(s) involved.
Primary outcome parameters:
Ovarian response, as assessed by the number of oocytes obtained and the proportion of chromosomally abnormal embryos per patient.
Secondary outcome parameters:
Number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rates and proportion of morphologically high quality embryos on day 3.
Serum estradiol, LH, progesterone, androgen and hCG levels on cycle day 3 and day of hCG.
- Conditions
- In Vitro Fertilization
- Being tested
- Ovarian stimulation
- Keywords
- IVF, In vitro implantation, Preimplantation genetic screening, Aneuploidy
- Medical subject headings
- Aneuploidy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ovarian stimulationDrug
Also called Follitropine (Puregon), Ganirelix (Orgalutran), Triptoreline (Decapeptyl)
- Conventional regimen with a daily dose of 225 IU recombinant FSH and GnRH agonist long protocol co-treatment
- Mild ovarian stimulation regimen using the endogenous FSH production by starting treatment on day 5 of the menstrual cycle with 150 IU / d recFSH with GnRH antagonist co treatment starting on day 6. As soon as two follicles reach 12 mm, treatment is continued with 200 IU / d rec hCG.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Conventional regimen with a daily dose of 225 IU recombinant FSH and GnRH agonist long protocol co-treatment. Receives: Drug: Ovarian stimulation |
| 2 | Experimental | Mild ovarian stimulation regimen using the endogenous FSH production by starting treatment on day 5 of the menstrual cycle with 150 IU / d recFSH with GnRH antagonist co treatment starting on day 6. As soon as two follicles reach 12 mm, treatment is continued with 200 IU / d rec hCG. Receives: Drug: Ovarian stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of chromosomally abnormal and mosaic day 3 embryos per patient based on PGS analysis.
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of oocytes retrieved.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2008
- Primary completionJan 2011
- Study completionJan 2011
Why it stopped: Due to a very slow inclusion rate.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for In Vitro FertilizationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bart CJM Fauser
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Bart CJM Fauser, UMC Utrecht
- Investigators
- Nick S Macklon, Prof, PhD, Principal investigator, UMC Utrecht
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00866008
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MOSTrial
- Other IDs
- CCMO: NL18499.000.07(a), METC: 07/172
- Status last verified
- Jul 2013
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2009
- Last updated
- 22 Jul 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Baart EB, Martini E, Eijkemans MJ, Van Opstal D, Beckers NG, Verhoeff A, Macklon NS, Fauser BC. Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2007 Apr;22(4):980-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del484. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
PubMed 17204525
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jul 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Impact of the Heterogeneity of the Recruited Cohort of Follicles During Ovarian Hyperstimulation for IVF on Aneuploidy Rates of Generated Embryos.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00866008
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MOSTrial
- Conditions
- In Vitro Fertilization
- Keywords
- IVF, In vitro implantation, Preimplantation genetic screening, Aneuploidy
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Due to a very slow inclusion rate.
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bart CJM FauserUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2008
- Primary completion
- Jan 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background:
By limiting the number of embryos transferred to the uterus to only a single embryo, the risk of multiple gestation can be reduced. In order to improve the effectiveness of single embryo transfer, the ability to select the embryo with the highest potential to develop into a healthy child is of vital importance. While embryos rated as high quality by standardized morphological assessment are associated with higher implantation and pregnancy rates, it is still not possible to predict with certainty which embryo will implant and has the highest potential to develop into a healthy child. An increasing body of evidence indicates that the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in embryos is extremely high and good embryo morphology does not necessarily exclude an abnormal chromosomal constitution. Since aneuploidies are considered the main cause of embryonic wastage and loss, this phenomenon may be primarily responsible for the relatively poor pregnancy rates reported after IVF.
The introduction of fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) techniques for preimplantation genetic diagnosis has enabled screening of embryos for chromosomal aneuploidies before transfer. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) would be of special interest for couples that are thought to have a higher risk of developing chromosomally abnormal embryos, with the aim of improving their chances for an ongoing pregnancy after IVF. PGS is applied clinically in numerous IVF laboratories throughout the world, and high rates of chromosomal abnormalities have been reported in IVF derived embryos. However, a recent meta-analysis has shown that PGS is yet to have a significant impact on IVF outcomes. This may partly be explained by the fact that most aneuploidies observed at this stage originate during the first mitotic divisions of early preimplantation development, resulting in chromosomally mosaic embryos. If a chromosomally mosaic embryo is biopsied, this cell may not be representative for the remaining embryo.
The investigators' group recently completed the first prospectively designed, randomized trial, comparing embryo aneuploidy rates following two ovarian hyperstimulation regimes in a group of 111 IVF patients. Milder stimulation was associated with a reduction in the number of oocytes retrieved and embryos generated. However, the proportion of chromosomally normal embryos was significantly increased. These results showed for the first time a direct correlation between the ovarian stimulation protocol and the incidence of chromosome abnormalities in the embryo. The observation that mild stimulation in some patients still resulted in a high oocyte yield and concurring higher proportions of abnormal embryos, underscores the need for further development of minimal stimulation approaches.
Primary Objective:
To determine whether the administration of hCG during the late follicular phase, instead of continuing with a fixed dose FSH, results in a more homogeneous cohort of growing follicles and the development of only the most competent oocytes, leading to lower aneuploidy rates in resulting embryos.
Study design:
Prospectively randomized, clinical study in 110 women undergoing IVF treatment
Intervention:
Randomization to one of two ovarian stimulation protocols:
- Conventional regimen with a daily dose of 225 IU recombinant FSH and GnRH agonist long protocol co-treatment
- Mild ovarian stimulation regimen using the endogenous FSH production by starting treatment on day 5 of the menstrual cycle with 150 IU / d recFSH with GnRH antagonist co treatment starting on day 6. As soon as two follicles reach 12 mm, treatment is continued with 200 IU / d rec hCG.
In both arms, oocyte pick up, insemination and embryo culture will be performed according to standard procedures. On day 3, all suitable embryos will be biopsied and one or two blastomeres removed, depending on the number of cells within the embryo.
FISH analysis will be performed for 10 chromosomes (1, 7, 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y). Only chromosomally normal embryos will be transferred and cryopreserved. Embryos diagnosed as aneuploid or mosaic will be investigated for their implantation and developmental potential, by transferring them to an in vitro implantation model. After an extended culture period, implantation behaviour will be assessed and the entire embryo is reanalysed to detect the proportion of chromosomally abnormal cells. The implantation behaviour will be correlated to the type of abnormality and the chromosome(s) involved.
Primary outcome parameters:
Ovarian response, as assessed by the number of oocytes obtained and the proportion of chromosomally abnormal embryos per patient.
Secondary outcome parameters:
Number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rates and proportion of morphologically high quality embryos on day 3.
Serum estradiol, LH, progesterone, androgen and hCG levels on cycle day 3 and day of hCG.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: Ovarian stimulationConventional regimen with a daily dose of 225 IU recombinant FSH and GnRH agonist long protocol co-treatment. |
| 2 | Experimental | Drug: Ovarian stimulationMild ovarian stimulation regimen using the endogenous FSH production by starting treatment on day 5 of the menstrual cycle with 150 IU / d recFSH with GnRH antagonist co treatment starting on day 6. As soon as two follicles reach 12 mm, treatment is continued with 200 IU / d rec hCG. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 37 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Female age ≤ 37 years
- BMI 18-29 kg/m2
- Regular cycle (25-35 days)
- Standard indication for IVF
- No major uterine abnormalities
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Indication for IVF male factor with a total motile sperm count < 20x106
- ICSI or andrological indication
- Known abnormal (male or female) karyotype
- Oocyte donation
- One previous IVF treatment not resulting in embryo transfer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ovarian stimulationAlso: Follitropine (Puregon), Ganirelix (Orgalutran), Triptoreline (Decapeptyl)1. Conventional regimen with a daily dose of 225 IU recombinant FSH and GnRH agonist long protocol co-treatment 2. Mild ovarian stimulation regimen using the endogenous FSH production by starting treatment on day 5 of the menstrual cycle with 150 IU / d recFSH with GnRH antagonist co treatment starting on day 6. As soon as two follicles reach 12 mm, treatment is continued with 200 IU / d rec hCG. | Drug | 1, 2 |
Primary outcome
Proportion of chromosomally abnormal and mosaic day 3 embryos per patient based on PGS analysis.
Time frame: 2 years
1 secondary outcome
Number of oocytes retrieved.
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Due to a very slow inclusion rate.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jul 2013.
- Background: PubMed 17204525Baart EB, Martini E, Eijkemans MJ, Van Opstal D, Beckers NG, Verhoeff A, Macklon NS, Fauser BC. Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2007 Apr;22(4):980-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del484. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
Related trials for In Vitro Fertilization
RecruitingObservational study
International Pilot Study for Dual Non-invasive Assesment of Embryo Development
Infertility
RecruitingPhase 2
Ubiquinone vs. Ubiquinol Supplementation
IVF
Recruiting
Trigger Timing in Ovarian Stimulations
IVF Outcome
Active, not recruiting
Automation of the In Vitro Fertilization Laboratory
Infertility, ART
RecruitingPhase 4
Study of G-CSF for DOR in Patients Undergoing IVF
Diminished Ovarian Reserve, IVF
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nick S Macklon, Prof, PhD principal investigator
UMC Utrecht
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Ovarian stimulation in people with In Vitro Fertilization, run by Bart CJM Fauser at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Due to a very slow inclusion rate.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of chromosomally abnormal and mosaic day 3 embryos per patient based on PGS analysis. (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00866008, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2013.