Cardiovascular DisorderPhase 3NCT00862251
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin (MK-0653A) Versus Rosuvastatin Versus Doubling Statin Dose in Participants With Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Mellitus (MK-0653A-133)(COMPLETED)
A Phase 3 study testing ezetimibe (+) simvastatin, simvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg and Rosuvastatin in people with Cardiovascular Disorder and Diabetes Mellitus, run by Organon and Co.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of switching to a combination tablet ezetimibe/simvastatin (10mg/20mg) versus rosuvastatin (10 mg) versus doubling the statin dose in those patients who have cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus not adequately controlled on simvastatin 20 mg or… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 79 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiovascular Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- ezetimibe (+) simvastatin, simvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg and Rosuvastatin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 808 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Apr 2009to Mar 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 79 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient has not taken common statins or ezetimibe within 6 weeks of study screening or patient is currently taking a daily dose of the following statins for 6 weeks prior to study screening: simvastatin, atorvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, ezetimibe, lovastatin, or ezetimibe + fluvastatin
- Patient is willing to go on a cholesterol and glucose lowering diet for the duration of the study
- Patient is willing to remain abstinent or use birth control for the duration of the study
- Patient has Diabetes Mellitus with cardiovascular disease
Who cannot join
- Patient has sensitivity to certain common statin drugs
- Patient is Asian and would not be able to start taking the higher doses of rosuvastatin necessary for the study design
- Patient consumes more than 2 alcoholic drinks per day
- Patient is pregnant or breast-feeding
- Patient has been treated with other investigational drugs within 30 days of first visit
- Patient is currently on prohibited doses of the following statin drugs: rosuvastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin, and pravastatin
Show all 16Show fewer
- Patient has congestive heart failure
- Patient has uncontrolled high blood pressure
- Patient has kidney disease
- Patient has uncontrolled endocrine or metabolic disease which are known to possibly increase blood lipoproteins
- Patient has diabetes mellitus that is not well controlled
- Patient is human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive
- Patient is currently taking medications that inhibit Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4)
- Patient is currently taking therapies that would increase the risk of muscle weakness
- Patient has been taking certain over- the-counter lipid-lowering agents within 6 weeks prior to visit 1
- Patient is currently taking psyllium or other fiber-based laxatives
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study of Patients With Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Mellitus Not Adequately Controlled With Simvastatin or Atorvastatin: Comparison of Switching to Combination Tablet Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Versus Switching to Rosuvastatin or Doubling the Statin Dose
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of switching to a combination tablet ezetimibe/simvastatin (10mg/20mg) versus rosuvastatin (10 mg) versus doubling the statin dose in those patients who have cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus not adequately controlled on simvastatin 20 mg or atorvastatin 10 mg.
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- ezetimibe (+) simvastatin, simvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg, Rosuvastatin, atorvastatin 10 mg or simvastatin 20 mg
- Keywords
- cardiovascular disorder
- Medical subject headings
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ezetimibe (+) simvastatinDrug
Also called Vytorin
ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg tablets, taken once daily for six weeks.
simvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 20 mgDrug
Also called Lipitor, Zocor
simvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg tablets, taken once daily for six weeks.
RosuvastatinDrug
Also called Crestor
rosuvastatin 10 mg tablets, taken once daily for six weeks.
atorvastatin 10 mg or simvastatin 20 mgDrug
Also called Lipitor, Zocor
All patients will take atorvastatin 10 mg tablets OR simvastatin 20 mg tablets, taken once daily in a 6-week screening/stabilization period prior to randomization.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ezetimibe/simvastatin | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: ezetimibe (+) simvastatin; Drug: atorvastatin 10 mg or simvastatin 20 mg |
| Doubling statin dose | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: simvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg; Drug: atorvastatin 10 mg or simvastatin 20 mg |
| Rosuvastatin | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Rosuvastatin; Drug: atorvastatin 10 mg or simvastatin 20 mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Statin (Simvastatin or Atorvastatin).
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Secondary outcomes (17)
In Participants Treated With Simvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Simvastatin
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
In Participants Treated With Atorvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Atorvastatin
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Switching Treatment to Rosuvastatin
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)
Measured: Week 6
In Participants Treated With Simvastatin at Baseline, Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)
Measured: Week 6
In Participants Treated With Atorvastatin at Baseline, Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)
Measured: Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I)
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B/Apo A-I Ratio
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2009
- Primary completionMar 2011
- Study completionMar 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiovascular DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 808 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Organon and Co
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Monitor, Study director, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00862251
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0653A-133
- Other IDs
- 2009_559
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 12 Mar 2009
- Last updated
- 16 May 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Le NA, Tomassini JE, Tershakovec AM, Neff DR, Wilson PW. Effect of Switching From Statin Monotherapy to Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Therapy Compared With Other Intensified Lipid-Lowering Strategies on Lipoprotein Subclasses in Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Oct 20;4(10):e001675. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001675.
PubMed 26486166Rosen JB, Jimenez JG, Pirags V, Vides H, Massaad R, Hanson ME, Brudi P, Triscari J. Consistency of effect of ezetimibe/simvastatin compared with intensified lipid-lowering treatment strategies in obese and non-obese diabetic subjects. Lipids Health Dis. 2013 Jul 16;12:103. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-12-103.
PubMed 23866306Rosen JB, Jimenez JG, Pirags V, Vides H, Hanson ME, Massaad R, McPeters G, Brudi P, Triscari J. A comparison of efficacy and safety of an ezetimibe/simvastatin combination compared with other intensified lipid-lowering treatment strategies in diabetic patients with symptomatic cardiovascular disease. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2013 May;10(3):277-86. doi: 10.1177/1479164112465212. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
PubMed 23288881Jimenez JG, Rosen JB, Pirags V, Massaad R, Hanson ME, Brudi P, Triscari J. The efficacy and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin combination compared with intensified lipid-lowering treatment strategies in diabetic subjects with and without metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Jun;15(6):513-22. doi: 10.1111/dom.12059. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
PubMed 23279632
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study of Patients With Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Mellitus Not Adequately Controlled With Simvastatin or Atorvastatin: Comparison of Switching to Combination Tablet Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Versus Switching to Rosuvastatin or Doubling the Statin Dose
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00862251
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0653A-133
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- cardiovascular disorder
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 808 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Organon and CoIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2009
- Primary completion
- Mar 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Mar 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of switching to a combination tablet ezetimibe/simvastatin (10mg/20mg) versus rosuvastatin (10 mg) versus doubling the statin dose in those patients who have cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus not adequately controlled on simvastatin 20 mg or atorvastatin 10 mg.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ezetimibe/simvastatin | Experimental | Drug: ezetimibe (+) simvastatin, Drug: atorvastatin 10 mg or simvastatin 20 mg |
| Doubling statin dose | Active comparator | Drug: simvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg, Drug: atorvastatin 10 mg or simvastatin 20 mg |
| Rosuvastatin | Active comparator | Drug: Rosuvastatin, Drug: atorvastatin 10 mg or simvastatin 20 mg |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 79 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient has not taken common statins or ezetimibe within 6 weeks of study screening or patient is currently taking a daily dose of the following statins for 6 weeks prior to study screening: simvastatin, atorvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, ezetimibe, lovastatin, or ezetimibe + fluvastatin
- Patient is willing to go on a cholesterol and glucose lowering diet for the duration of the study
- Patient is willing to remain abstinent or use birth control for the duration of the study
- Patient has Diabetes Mellitus with cardiovascular disease
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Patient has sensitivity to certain common statin drugs
- Patient is Asian and would not be able to start taking the higher doses of rosuvastatin necessary for the study design
- Patient consumes more than 2 alcoholic drinks per day
- Patient is pregnant or breast-feeding
- Patient has been treated with other investigational drugs within 30 days of first visit
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ezetimibe (+) simvastatinAlso: Vytorinezetimibe/simvastatin 10/20 mg tablets, taken once daily for six weeks. | Drug | Ezetimibe/simvastatin |
| simvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 20 mgAlso: Lipitor, Zocorsimvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg tablets, taken once daily for six weeks. | Drug | Doubling statin dose |
| RosuvastatinAlso: Crestorrosuvastatin 10 mg tablets, taken once daily for six weeks. | Drug | Rosuvastatin |
| atorvastatin 10 mg or simvastatin 20 mgAlso: Lipitor, ZocorAll patients will take atorvastatin 10 mg tablets OR simvastatin 20 mg tablets, taken once daily in a 6-week screening/stabilization period prior to randomization. | Drug | Doubling statin dose, Ezetimibe/simvastatin, Rosuvastatin |
Primary outcome
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Statin (Simvastatin or Atorvastatin).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
17 secondary outcomes
In Participants Treated With Simvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Simvastatin
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
In Participants Treated With Atorvastatin at Baseline, Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Atorvastatin
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Switching Treatment to Rosuvastatin
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)
Time frame: Week 6
In Participants Treated With Simvastatin at Baseline, Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)
Time frame: Week 6
In Participants Treated With Atorvastatin at Baseline, Number of Participants Who Reached the Target LDL-Cholesterol Level of < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)
Time frame: Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C/HDL-C Ratio
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in TC/HDL-C Ratio
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo A-I)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B/Apo A-I Ratio
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 May 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26486166Le NA, Tomassini JE, Tershakovec AM, Neff DR, Wilson PW. Effect of Switching From Statin Monotherapy to Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Combination Therapy Compared With Other Intensified Lipid-Lowering Strategies on Lipoprotein Subclasses in Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Cardiovascular Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Oct 20;4(10):e001675. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001675.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23866306Rosen JB, Jimenez JG, Pirags V, Vides H, Massaad R, Hanson ME, Brudi P, Triscari J. Consistency of effect of ezetimibe/simvastatin compared with intensified lipid-lowering treatment strategies in obese and non-obese diabetic subjects. Lipids Health Dis. 2013 Jul 16;12:103. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-12-103.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23288881Rosen JB, Jimenez JG, Pirags V, Vides H, Hanson ME, Massaad R, McPeters G, Brudi P, Triscari J. A comparison of efficacy and safety of an ezetimibe/simvastatin combination compared with other intensified lipid-lowering treatment strategies in diabetic patients with symptomatic cardiovascular disease. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2013 May;10(3):277-86. doi: 10.1177/1479164112465212. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23279632Jimenez JG, Rosen JB, Pirags V, Massaad R, Hanson ME, Brudi P, Triscari J. The efficacy and safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin combination compared with intensified lipid-lowering treatment strategies in diabetic subjects with and without metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Jun;15(6):513-22. doi: 10.1111/dom.12059. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cardiovascular Disorder
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
ENDOTHELION Study Group: Effect of Bosentan in NAION Patients
Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Monitor study director
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing ezetimibe (+) simvastatin, simvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 20 mg and Rosuvastatin in people with Cardiovascular Disorder and Diabetes Mellitus, run by Organon and Co.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Mar 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) After Switching to Treatment With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin vs Doubling the Dose of Statin (Simvastatin or Atorvastatin). (time frame: Baseline and Week 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00862251, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2024.