AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4DOSERANCT00858780

Study Comparing The Effect On Disease Activity When Reducing Or Discontinuing Etanercept In Subjects With RA

A Phase 4 study testing Etanercept in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 16 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study involves Rheumatoid Arthritis patients in regular clinical setting who are already on etanercept treatment and are in remission or in a low disease activity (LDA) state, and is intended to identify parameters that can serve as guidance in clinical settings. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
Etanercept
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
91 participants
Where
16 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
Jan 2009to Jun 2012
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject has a current DAS28 equal to or less than 3.2.
  • Subject is currently receiving treatment with etanercept, either 25 mg twice weekly or 50 mg once weekly, for a minimum of 14 months at baseline
  • Subject is currently receiving oral, sc or intramuscular methotrexate once weekly, 7.5 mg/week to 25 mg/week and at a stable dose for a minimum of 4 months at baseline.

Who cannot join

  • Subject has earlier had an attempt of discontinuing etanercept for reasons of remission or low disease activity state.
  • Subject has received any disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, other than methotrexate, within one month before baseline.
  • Subject has had a dose of prednisone (or equivalent) >7.5 mg/day or has received intra-articular, intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous corticosteroid within one month of baseline.

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 6 countries.

16 sites in 6 countries

Sweden5 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Lund, 221 85

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Malmö, SE-205 02

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Stockholm, 14186

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Stockholm, 17176

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Uppsala, 751 85

Other trials in Sweden

Hungary3 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Gyula, 5701

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Szombathely, 9700

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Veszprém, 8200

Other trials in Hungary

Norway3 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Bergen, 5021

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Lillehammer, 2609

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Oslo, 0319

Other trials in Norway

Denmark2 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Glostrup Municipality, DK-2600

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Hellerup, 2900

Other trials in Denmark

Finland2 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Helsinki, FI-00029 HUS

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Jyväskylä, Finland, 40620

Other trials in Finland

Iceland1 site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Reykjavik, 108

Other trials in Iceland

About this study

Official title: Dose Reduction or Discontinuation of Etanercept in Methotrexate-Treated Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects Who Have Achieved a Stable Low Disease Activity-state (DOSERA)

This study involves Rheumatoid Arthritis patients in regular clinical setting who are already on etanercept treatment and are in remission or in a low disease activity (LDA) state, and is intended to identify parameters that can serve as guidance in clinical settings. This study will consider the clinical and radiographic course in subjects when etanercept treatment is tapered or discontinued, and analyze the subjects' experience of disease worsening and the predictive values of clinical parameters, serum biomarkers and imaging on the clinical and radiographic course in different treatment groups. The effect of re-treatment with etanercept at treatment failure will also be studied.

Being tested
Etanercept, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EtanerceptDrug

    50 mg etanercept once weekly + methotrexate

  • EtanerceptDrug

    25mg etanercept once weekly + methotrexate

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo comparator once weekly + methotrexate

Study groups in NCT00858780
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparator50mg once weekly + methotrexate
Receives: Drug: Etanercept
2Active comparator25mg once weekly + methotrexate
Receives: Drug: Etanercept
3Placebo comparatoronce weekly + methotrexate
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participant Who Were Non-Failures

    A participant was considered as non-failure if the calculated DAS28 <=3.2 at all visits or if the calculated DAS28 >3.2, the increase of calculated DAS28 from randomization (Week 0): was <0.6 at all visit or was >=0.6 but <1.2 on no more than 1 consecutive visit. Percentage of participants who were non-failures calculated based on DAS28 and disease progression as determined by investigator or participant.

    Measured: Week 48

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

    TTF (in weeks): (date of failure minus date of randomization) divided by 7. Date of failure was ordinary visit date or extra visit date in case of failure (extra visit was within 2 weeks from the date a participant experienced significant disease progression between visits and wanted to withdraw from Period 2), or date of withdrawal due to disease progression. Participants who did not have a treatment failure were censored at their last evaluation visit. Participants who withdrew from the study prematurely and did not have a treatment failure were censored on the date of their withdrawal.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0) up to date of failure, withdrawal due to disease progression or last evaluation visit (Week 48)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Remission or Low Disease Activity (LDA)

    Participants who had DAS28 less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 were considered in remission or LDA state.

    Measured: Baseline (Week -8), Week -4, Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48

  3. Percentage of Visits During Which Participants Were in Remission or Low Disease Activity State

    Participants who had DAS28 <=3.2 were considered in remission or LDA state. Percentage of visits during which a participant was in remission or LDA state was calculated as number of visits in which participant was in remission or LDA divided by total number of visits multiplied by 100.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0) up to Week 48

  4. Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) at Randomization

    DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and painful joints (PJC) using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 <=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS28 >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity and less than (<) 2.6=remission.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0)

  5. Change From Randomization in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48

    DAS28 calculated from SJC and PJC using the 28 joints count, the ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 <=3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity and <2.6=remission.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48

  6. Change From Randomization in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48

    Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. A negative value in change from randomization indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48

  7. Change From Randomization in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48

    Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1. A negative value in change from randomization indicates an improvement.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48

  8. Change From Randomization in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48

    PGA of disease activity was measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with 0 mm = no disease activity and 100 mm = extreme disease activity.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48

  9. Change From Randomization in Participant Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48

    Participants assessed the overall activity of their rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no disease activity and 100 mm = extreme disease activity.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48

  10. Participant General Health Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Randomization

    Participants answered "in general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?" Participants responded by using a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = extremely bad.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0)

  11. Change From Randomization in Participant General Health Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48

    Participants answered "in general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?" Participants responded by using a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = extremely bad.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48

  12. Participant Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Randomization

    Participants indicated the amount of pain experience during the last 2-3 days by marking a vertical line on 100 mm VAS. Intensity of pain range: 0 = no pain to 100 = pain as bad as it could be.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0)

  13. Change From Randomization in Participant Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48

    Participants indicated the amount of pain experience during the last 2-3 days by marking a vertical line on 100 mm VAS. Intensity of pain range: 0 = no pain to 100 = pain as bad as it could be.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48

  14. Change From Randomization in Morning Stiffness Duration at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48

    Duration of morning stiffness: Time elapsed when participant woke up in morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes. The duration of morning stiffness was determined by asking the following questions: 1) Over the last 2 days, when did you wake in the morning? 2) Over the last 2 days, when were you able to resume your normal activities without stiffness? Increase in stiffness duration from randomization represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48

  15. Change From Randomization in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48

    ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeter per hour (mm/hour). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48

  16. Change From Randomization in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48

    The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. Normal range of CRP is <10 milligram per liter (mg/L). A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48

  17. Change From Randomization in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48

    mTSS = sum of erosion and Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) scores for 44 joints (16 per hand and 6 per foot). mTSS scores ranged from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst possible total score). Change: scores at observation minus score at randomization. An increase in mTSS from randomization represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 48

  18. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings at Randomization

    MRI of hand/wrist of dominant hand scored for signs of synovitis (S-score), bone edema(O-score), bone erosions (E-score) as per outcome measures in RA clinical trials (OMERACT). S-score:0(normal)-3(severe) for distal radioulnar,radiocarpal,intercarpal-carpometacarpal,second-fifth metacarpophalangeal joints, total score(TS)0-21, higher score(HS)=severe synovitis. O-score:0(no volume increment)-3(100% volume increment) in 23 hand/wrist joints, TS 0-69, HS=more edema. E-score:0(no volume occupied by erosion)-10(100% volume occupied by erosion) in 23 hand/wrist joints, TS 0-230, HS=more erosion.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0)

  19. Change From Randomization in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings (S-Score) at Week 12

    MRI of hand/wrist of dominant hand was scored for signs of synovitis (S-score), bone edema (O-score), and bone erosions (E-score) as per OMERACT. S-score: 0 (normal) to 3 (severe) for each of distal radioulnar, radiocarpal, intercarpal-carpometacarpal, second to fifth metacarpophalangeal joints; total score 0 to 21, higher score=severe synovitis.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 12

  20. Change From Randomization in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings (O-Score, E-Score) at Week 12

    MRI of hand/wrist of dominant hand was scored for signs of synovitis (S-score), bone edema (O-score), and bone erosions (E-score) as per OMERACT. O-score: 0 (no volume increment) to 3 (100% volume increment) in 23 hand/wrist joints; total score 0 to 69, higher scores=more edema. E-score: 0 (no volume occupied by erosion) to 10 (100% volume occupied by erosion) in 23 hand/wrist joints; total score 0 to 230, higher scores=more erosion.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 12

  21. Percentage of Participants in Treatment Failure for Each Potentially Predictor Variable at Randomization

    Percentage of participants who were treatment failure over 48 weeks as per potentially predictor variables (at randomization) are reported: number of swollen joints/tender joints, DAS28, PGA, PtGA, participant general health VAS, participant pain VAS, clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), ESR (mm/hour), plasma CRP (mg/L), sensitive serum CRP (mg/L), anti- cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti CCP, units/mL), cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP, units/liter), S-score, O-score, E-score, Joint space narrowing score, erosion score, and mTSS.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0) up to Week 48

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Mar 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2009
  3. Primary completionJun 2012
  4. Study completionJun 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
91 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00858780
Sponsor's protocol ID
0881K1-4500
Other IDs
B1801016
Acronym
DOSERA
Status last verified
Aug 2013
First submitted
6 Mar 2009
Last updated
11 Sep 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • van Vollenhoven RF, Ostergaard M, Leirisalo-Repo M, Uhlig T, Jansson M, Larsson E, Brock F, Franck-Larsson K. Full dose, reduced dose or discontinuation of etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):52-8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205726. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

    PubMed 25873634

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Etanercept in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 16 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in Sweden, Hungary, Norway, Denmark, Finland and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Aug 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participant Who Were Non-Failures (time frame: Week 48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00858780, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2013; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in