Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4DOSERANCT00858780
Study Comparing The Effect On Disease Activity When Reducing Or Discontinuing Etanercept In Subjects With RA
A Phase 4 study testing Etanercept in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 16 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
This study involves Rheumatoid Arthritis patients in regular clinical setting who are already on etanercept treatment and are in remission or in a low disease activity (LDA) state, and is intended to identify parameters that can serve as guidance in clinical settings. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Etanercept
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 91 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2009to Jun 2012
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject has a current DAS28 equal to or less than 3.2.
- Subject is currently receiving treatment with etanercept, either 25 mg twice weekly or 50 mg once weekly, for a minimum of 14 months at baseline
- Subject is currently receiving oral, sc or intramuscular methotrexate once weekly, 7.5 mg/week to 25 mg/week and at a stable dose for a minimum of 4 months at baseline.
Who cannot join
- Subject has earlier had an attempt of discontinuing etanercept for reasons of remission or low disease activity state.
- Subject has received any disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, other than methotrexate, within one month before baseline.
- Subject has had a dose of prednisone (or equivalent) >7.5 mg/day or has received intra-articular, intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous corticosteroid within one month of baseline.
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 6 countries.
16 sites in 6 countries
Sweden5 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lund, 221 85
Pfizer Investigational Site
Malmö, SE-205 02
Pfizer Investigational Site
Stockholm, 14186
Pfizer Investigational Site
Stockholm, 17176
Pfizer Investigational Site
Uppsala, 751 85
Hungary3 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Gyula, 5701
Pfizer Investigational Site
Szombathely, 9700
Pfizer Investigational Site
Veszprém, 8200
Norway3 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Bergen, 5021
Pfizer Investigational Site
Lillehammer, 2609
Pfizer Investigational Site
Oslo, 0319
Denmark2 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Glostrup Municipality, DK-2600
Pfizer Investigational Site
Hellerup, 2900
Finland2 sites
Pfizer Investigational Site
Helsinki, FI-00029 HUS
Pfizer Investigational Site
Jyväskylä, Finland, 40620
About this study
Official title: Dose Reduction or Discontinuation of Etanercept in Methotrexate-Treated Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects Who Have Achieved a Stable Low Disease Activity-state (DOSERA)
This study involves Rheumatoid Arthritis patients in regular clinical setting who are already on etanercept treatment and are in remission or in a low disease activity (LDA) state, and is intended to identify parameters that can serve as guidance in clinical settings. This study will consider the clinical and radiographic course in subjects when etanercept treatment is tapered or discontinued, and analyze the subjects' experience of disease worsening and the predictive values of clinical parameters, serum biomarkers and imaging on the clinical and radiographic course in different treatment groups. The effect of re-treatment with etanercept at treatment failure will also be studied.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Etanercept, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EtanerceptDrug
50 mg etanercept once weekly + methotrexate
EtanerceptDrug
25mg etanercept once weekly + methotrexate
PlaceboDrug
Placebo comparator once weekly + methotrexate
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | 50mg once weekly + methotrexate Receives: Drug: Etanercept |
| 2 | Active comparator | 25mg once weekly + methotrexate Receives: Drug: Etanercept |
| 3 | Placebo comparator | once weekly + methotrexate Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participant Who Were Non-Failures
A participant was considered as non-failure if the calculated DAS28 <=3.2 at all visits or if the calculated DAS28 >3.2, the increase of calculated DAS28 from randomization (Week 0): was <0.6 at all visit or was >=0.6 but <1.2 on no more than 1 consecutive visit. Percentage of participants who were non-failures calculated based on DAS28 and disease progression as determined by investigator or participant.
Measured: Week 48
Secondary outcomes (21)
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
TTF (in weeks): (date of failure minus date of randomization) divided by 7. Date of failure was ordinary visit date or extra visit date in case of failure (extra visit was within 2 weeks from the date a participant experienced significant disease progression between visits and wanted to withdraw from Period 2), or date of withdrawal due to disease progression. Participants who did not have a treatment failure were censored at their last evaluation visit. Participants who withdrew from the study prematurely and did not have a treatment failure were censored on the date of their withdrawal.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0) up to date of failure, withdrawal due to disease progression or last evaluation visit (Week 48)
Percentage of Participants With Remission or Low Disease Activity (LDA)
Participants who had DAS28 less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 were considered in remission or LDA state.
Measured: Baseline (Week -8), Week -4, Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Percentage of Visits During Which Participants Were in Remission or Low Disease Activity State
Participants who had DAS28 <=3.2 were considered in remission or LDA state. Percentage of visits during which a participant was in remission or LDA state was calculated as number of visits in which participant was in remission or LDA divided by total number of visits multiplied by 100.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0) up to Week 48
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) at Randomization
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and painful joints (PJC) using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 <=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS28 >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity and less than (<) 2.6=remission.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0)
Change From Randomization in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
DAS28 calculated from SJC and PJC using the 28 joints count, the ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 <=3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity and <2.6=remission.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. A negative value in change from randomization indicates an improvement.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1. A negative value in change from randomization indicates an improvement.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
PGA of disease activity was measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with 0 mm = no disease activity and 100 mm = extreme disease activity.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in Participant Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Participants assessed the overall activity of their rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no disease activity and 100 mm = extreme disease activity.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Participant General Health Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Randomization
Participants answered "in general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?" Participants responded by using a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = extremely bad.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0)
Change From Randomization in Participant General Health Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Participants answered "in general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?" Participants responded by using a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = extremely bad.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Participant Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Randomization
Participants indicated the amount of pain experience during the last 2-3 days by marking a vertical line on 100 mm VAS. Intensity of pain range: 0 = no pain to 100 = pain as bad as it could be.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0)
Change From Randomization in Participant Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Participants indicated the amount of pain experience during the last 2-3 days by marking a vertical line on 100 mm VAS. Intensity of pain range: 0 = no pain to 100 = pain as bad as it could be.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in Morning Stiffness Duration at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Duration of morning stiffness: Time elapsed when participant woke up in morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes. The duration of morning stiffness was determined by asking the following questions: 1) Over the last 2 days, when did you wake in the morning? 2) Over the last 2 days, when were you able to resume your normal activities without stiffness? Increase in stiffness duration from randomization represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeter per hour (mm/hour). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. Normal range of CRP is <10 milligram per liter (mg/L). A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48
mTSS = sum of erosion and Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) scores for 44 joints (16 per hand and 6 per foot). mTSS scores ranged from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst possible total score). Change: scores at observation minus score at randomization. An increase in mTSS from randomization represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 48
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings at Randomization
MRI of hand/wrist of dominant hand scored for signs of synovitis (S-score), bone edema(O-score), bone erosions (E-score) as per outcome measures in RA clinical trials (OMERACT). S-score:0(normal)-3(severe) for distal radioulnar,radiocarpal,intercarpal-carpometacarpal,second-fifth metacarpophalangeal joints, total score(TS)0-21, higher score(HS)=severe synovitis. O-score:0(no volume increment)-3(100% volume increment) in 23 hand/wrist joints, TS 0-69, HS=more edema. E-score:0(no volume occupied by erosion)-10(100% volume occupied by erosion) in 23 hand/wrist joints, TS 0-230, HS=more erosion.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0)
Change From Randomization in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings (S-Score) at Week 12
MRI of hand/wrist of dominant hand was scored for signs of synovitis (S-score), bone edema (O-score), and bone erosions (E-score) as per OMERACT. S-score: 0 (normal) to 3 (severe) for each of distal radioulnar, radiocarpal, intercarpal-carpometacarpal, second to fifth metacarpophalangeal joints; total score 0 to 21, higher score=severe synovitis.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 12
Change From Randomization in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings (O-Score, E-Score) at Week 12
MRI of hand/wrist of dominant hand was scored for signs of synovitis (S-score), bone edema (O-score), and bone erosions (E-score) as per OMERACT. O-score: 0 (no volume increment) to 3 (100% volume increment) in 23 hand/wrist joints; total score 0 to 69, higher scores=more edema. E-score: 0 (no volume occupied by erosion) to 10 (100% volume occupied by erosion) in 23 hand/wrist joints; total score 0 to 230, higher scores=more erosion.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0), Week 12
Percentage of Participants in Treatment Failure for Each Potentially Predictor Variable at Randomization
Percentage of participants who were treatment failure over 48 weeks as per potentially predictor variables (at randomization) are reported: number of swollen joints/tender joints, DAS28, PGA, PtGA, participant general health VAS, participant pain VAS, clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), ESR (mm/hour), plasma CRP (mg/L), sensitive serum CRP (mg/L), anti- cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti CCP, units/mL), cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP, units/liter), S-score, O-score, E-score, Joint space narrowing score, erosion score, and mTSS.
Measured: Randomization (Week 0) up to Week 48
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2009
- Primary completionJun 2012
- Study completionJun 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 91 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00858780
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0881K1-4500
- Other IDs
- B1801016
- Acronym
- DOSERA
- Status last verified
- Aug 2013
- First submitted
- 6 Mar 2009
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
van Vollenhoven RF, Ostergaard M, Leirisalo-Repo M, Uhlig T, Jansson M, Larsson E, Brock F, Franck-Larsson K. Full dose, reduced dose or discontinuation of etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):52-8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205726. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
PubMed 25873634
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Dose Reduction or Discontinuation of Etanercept in Methotrexate-Treated Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects Who Have Achieved a Stable Low Disease Activity-state (DOSERA)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00858780
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DOSERA / 0881K1-4500
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 91 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2009
- Primary completion
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Mar 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Aug 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study involves Rheumatoid Arthritis patients in regular clinical setting who are already on etanercept treatment and are in remission or in a low disease activity (LDA) state, and is intended to identify parameters that can serve as guidance in clinical settings. This study will consider the clinical and radiographic course in subjects when etanercept treatment is tapered or discontinued, and analyze the subjects' experience of disease worsening and the predictive values of clinical parameters, serum biomarkers and imaging on the clinical and radiographic course in different treatment groups. The effect of re-treatment with etanercept at treatment failure will also be studied.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Drug: Etanercept50mg once weekly + methotrexate |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: Etanercept25mg once weekly + methotrexate |
| 3 | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placeboonce weekly + methotrexate |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subject has a current DAS28 equal to or less than 3.2.
- Subject is currently receiving treatment with etanercept, either 25 mg twice weekly or 50 mg once weekly, for a minimum of 14 months at baseline
- Subject is currently receiving oral, sc or intramuscular methotrexate once weekly, 7.5 mg/week to 25 mg/week and at a stable dose for a minimum of 4 months at baseline.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subject has earlier had an attempt of discontinuing etanercept for reasons of remission or low disease activity state.
- Subject has received any disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, other than methotrexate, within one month before baseline.
- Subject has had a dose of prednisone (or equivalent) >7.5 mg/day or has received intra-articular, intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous corticosteroid within one month of baseline.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Etanercept50 mg etanercept once weekly + methotrexate | Drug | 1 |
| Etanercept25mg etanercept once weekly + methotrexate | Drug | 2 |
| PlaceboPlacebo comparator once weekly + methotrexate | Drug | 3 |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participant Who Were Non-Failures
Time frame: Week 48
A participant was considered as non-failure if the calculated DAS28 <=3.2 at all visits or if the calculated DAS28 >3.2, the increase of calculated DAS28 from randomization (Week 0): was <0.6 at all visit or was >=0.6 but <1.2 on no more than 1 consecutive visit. Percentage of participants who were non-failures calculated based on DAS28 and disease progression as determined by investigator or participant.
21 secondary outcomes
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0) up to date of failure, withdrawal due to disease progression or last evaluation visit (Week 48)
Percentage of Participants With Remission or Low Disease Activity (LDA)
Time frame: Baseline (Week -8), Week -4, Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Percentage of Visits During Which Participants Were in Remission or Low Disease Activity State
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0) up to Week 48
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) at Randomization
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0)
Change From Randomization in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in Participant Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Participant General Health Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Randomization
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0)
Change From Randomization in Participant General Health Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Participant Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Randomization
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0)
Change From Randomization in Participant Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in Morning Stiffness Duration at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Change From Randomization in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0), Week 48
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings at Randomization
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0)
Change From Randomization in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings (S-Score) at Week 12
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0), Week 12
Change From Randomization in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings (O-Score, E-Score) at Week 12
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0), Week 12
Percentage of Participants in Treatment Failure for Each Potentially Predictor Variable at Randomization
Time frame: Randomization (Week 0) up to Week 48
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25873634van Vollenhoven RF, Ostergaard M, Leirisalo-Repo M, Uhlig T, Jansson M, Larsson E, Brock F, Franck-Larsson K. Full dose, reduced dose or discontinuation of etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):52-8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205726. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Frequency and Complications of Major Orthopedic Procedures in Medicare Beneficiaries
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 2
COVID-19 Booster and IIV Schedule in Immunocompromised Hosts
COVID 19, Influenza
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of MK-8690 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (MK-8690-004)
Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of Airway, Blood and/or Urine Specimens From Subjects for Research Studies
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Smoking
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
16 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Etanercept in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Pfizer at 16 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in Sweden, Hungary, Norway, Denmark, Finland and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Aug 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participant Who Were Non-Failures (time frame: Week 48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00858780, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2013; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.