Heart FailurePhase 4NCT00847288
OptiVol® Care Pathway
A Phase 4 study testing Monthly Review Arm and Quarterly Review Arm in people with Heart Failure, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 108 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Medtronic, Inc. is sponsoring the OptiVol® Care Pathway Study, a prospective, randomized, multi-center, post-market clinical trial in the United States. The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare monthly versus quarterly review of Cardiac Compass® Trends with OptiVol for initiation of clinical action. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Monthly Review Arm and Quarterly Review Arm
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,682 participants
- Where
- 108 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2009to May 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject (or subject's legally authorized representative) is willing and able to sign and date written consent form and Authorization for Access to and Use of Health Information
- Subject is at least 18 years of age
- Subject is willing and able to comply with Clinical Investigation Plan
- Subject is willing and able to transmit data using Medtronic CareLink® Network
- Subject has market released right atrial (RA) (if applicable), right ventricular (RV), and left ventricular (LV) (if applicable) leads and one of the following generators implanted: Concerto® CRT-D - Model C154DWK, Virtuoso® DR ICD - Model D154AWG, Virtuoso® VR ICD - Model D154VWC, Consulta™ CRT-D - Model D224TRK, Secura™ DR ICD - Model D224DRG, Secura™ VR ICD - Model D224VRC, or any future market released Medtronic generator with wireless telemetry, Cardiac Compass with OptiVol Fluid Status Monitoring, and that is supported by the Medtronic CareLink Network
Who cannot join
- Subject is enrolled in a concurrent study with the exception of a study approved by the Medtronic Clinical Trial Leader prior to enrollment
- Subject has life expectancy of less than 1 year
Trial locations and contacts
108 sites in 1 country.
108 sites in 1 country
United States108 sites
Study site
Akron, Ohio
Study site
Alhambra, California
Study site
Anchorage, Alaska
Study site
Ashland, Kentucky
Study site
Augusta, Georgia
Study site
Austin, Texas
Study site
Bangor, Maine
Study site
Bend, Oregon
Study site
Berkeley, California
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama
Study site
Bloomington, Indiana
Study site
Boston, Massachusetts
Study site
Boulder, Colorado
Study site
Brandenton, Florida
Study site
Bridgewater, New Jersey
Study site
Buffalo, New York
Study site
Burbank, California
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Chula Vista, California
Study site
Clearwater, Florida
Study site
Cleveland, Ohio
Study site
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Study site
Columbia, Missouri
Study site
Columbia, South Carolina
Study site
Columbus, Georgia
Study site
Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Study site
Corpus Christi, Texas
Study site
Davenport, Iowa
Study site
Daytona Beach, Florida
Study site
Des Moines, Iowa
Study site
Detroit, Michigan, 48236
Study site
Doylestown, Pennsylvania
Study site
Durham, North Carolina
Study site
Fayetteville, New York
Study site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Study site
Fort Smith, Arkansas
Study site
Gainesville, Florida
Study site
Galloway, New Jersey
Study site
Garden City, New York, 11530
Study site
Gastonia, North Carolina
Study site
Germantown, Tennessee
Study site
Glen Burnie, Maryland
Study site
Grand Blanc, Michigan
Study site
Grand Rapids, Michigan
Study site
Greensboro, North Carolina
Study site
Greenwood, South Carolina
Study site
Inverness, Florida
Study site
Jacksonville, Florida
Study site
Johnson City, Tennessee
Study site
Jupiter, Florida
Study site
Kankakee, Illinois
Study site
Kansas City, Missouri
Study site
Kettering, Ohio
Study site
La Jolla, California
Study site
Lancaster, Pennsylvania
Study site
Larkspur, California
Study site
Lexington, Kentucky
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas
Study site
Louisville, Kentucky
Study site
Lynchburg, Virginia
Study site
Madison, Wisconsin
Study site
McAllen, Texas
Study site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38120
Study site
Mesa, Arizona
Study site
Miami, Florida
Study site
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Study site
Minot, North Dakota
Study site
Mobile, Alabama
Study site
Muncie, Indiana
Study site
Munster, Indiana
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee
Study site
Newark, New Jersey, 07105
Study site
Oak Lawn, Illinois
Study site
Ocean City, New Jersey, 07712
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Study site
Omaha, Nebraska
Study site
Orlando, Florida
Study site
Petosky, Michigan
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Study site
Poland, Ohio, 44514
Study site
Pomona, California, 91767
Study site
Rancho Mirage, California
Study site
Reno, Nevada
Study site
Riverside, California
Study site
Rockford, Illinois
Study site
Rockville, Maryland
Study site
Saint Cloud, Minnesota
Study site
Saint Joseph, Missouri
Study site
Salisbury, Maryland
Study site
San Antonio, Texas
Study site
San Francisco, California, 94115
Study site
Shreveport, Louisiana
Study site
Spartanburg, South Carolina
Study site
Spokane, Washington
Study site
Springfield, Missouri
Study site
St Louis, Missouri
Study site
Sterling Heights, Michigan
Study site
Steubenville, Ohio
Study site
Terre Haute, Indiana
Study site
Toledo, Ohio
Study site
Torrance, California
Study site
Trinity, Florida
Study site
Tyler, Texas
Study site
Voorhees Township, New Jersey
Study site
West Columbia, South Carolina
Study site
Wilmington, North Carolina
Study site
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania
About this study
Medtronic, Inc. is sponsoring the OptiVol® Care Pathway Study, a prospective, randomized, multi-center, post-market clinical trial in the United States. The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare monthly versus quarterly review of Cardiac Compass® Trends with OptiVol for initiation of clinical action. It is hypothesized that monthly review of Cardiac Compass Trends with OptiVol will shorten time to clinical action as compared to quarterly review.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Being tested
- Monthly Review Arm, Quarterly Review Arm
- Keywords
- Heart Failure, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD), Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Defibrillator (CRT D), OptiVol®
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Monthly Review ArmOther
Monthly review of Cardiac Compass Trends with OptiVol. This intervention is related to disease management.
Quarterly Review ArmOther
Quarterly review of Cardiac Compass Trends with OptiVol. This intervention is related to disease management.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly Review Arm | Experimental | Patients enrolled at centers that are assigned to the monthly review arm will have their device data reviewed monthly Receives: Other: Monthly Review Arm |
| Quarterly Review Arm | Active comparator | Patients enrolled at centers that are assigned to the quarterly review arm will have their device data reviewed every 3 months Receives: Other: Quarterly Review Arm |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Compare the Time to Initiation of Clinical Action Prompted by an OptiVol Threshold Crossing Between Monthly and Quarterly Review of Cardiac Compass Trends With OptiVol
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (3)
Compare Changes in Subject Self-care Over Time in the Monthly Review Arm vs. Quarterly Review Arm
There are 3 summary scale scores for the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) form: self-care maintenance score (Section A), management score (Section B), and confidence score (Section C). Each scale score is standardized to a 0 to 100 range, with 0 indicating the worst and 100 indicating the best performance for each scale score.
Here, changes in each scale score between 6 month follow-up and baseline and between 12 month follow-up and baseline are the secondary outcome measures. Specifically, change at 6 (or 12) month follow-up is calculated as a scale score at 6 (or 12) month follow-up subtracts that at baseline. These changes range from -100 to 100 with 0 indicating no change at all, -100 indicating maximum decrease and 100 indicating maximum increase that is possible from baseline for a self-care scale score.
Measured: 1 year
Identify Patient Groups Who Are More Likely to Have Clinical Actions Triggered by Monthly Rather Than Quarterly Reviews
The binary outcome of having clinical actions taken (Yes/No) is recorded within one month interval for the monthly review group, and within three months interval for the quarterly review group. To make the endpoints of both groups comparable, data from monthly review group are converted as they were collected quarterly. For example, the month 1, 2 and 3 visits of monthly review group are combined as one visit. If there is at least one action taken in any of these three monthly visits, the action taken variable for the combined visit will be recorded as 'yes'. Unscheduled visits in both groups are lumped to the next quarterly time point.
Measured: 1 year
Compare the Time to Initiation of Clinical Action With or Without an OptiVol Threshold Crossing Between Monthly and Quarterly Review of Cardiac Compass Trends With OptiVol
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Feb 2009 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2009
- Primary completionMar 2011
- Study completionMay 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,682 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Wilson Tang, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00847288
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OptiVol® Care Pathway
- Status last verified
- Apr 2013
- First submitted
- 13 Feb 2009
- Last updated
- 3 May 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 May 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- OptiVol® Care Pathway
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00847288
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OptiVol® Care Pathway
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Keywords
- Heart Failure, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD), Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Defibrillator (CRT D), OptiVol®
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,682 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2009
- Primary completion
- Mar 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Feb 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 May 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Medtronic, Inc. is sponsoring the OptiVol® Care Pathway Study, a prospective, randomized, multi-center, post-market clinical trial in the United States. The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare monthly versus quarterly review of Cardiac Compass® Trends with OptiVol for initiation of clinical action. It is hypothesized that monthly review of Cardiac Compass Trends with OptiVol will shorten time to clinical action as compared to quarterly review.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly Review Arm | Experimental | Other: Monthly Review ArmPatients enrolled at centers that are assigned to the monthly review arm will have their device data reviewed monthly |
| Quarterly Review Arm | Active comparator | Other: Quarterly Review ArmPatients enrolled at centers that are assigned to the quarterly review arm will have their device data reviewed every 3 months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subject (or subject's legally authorized representative) is willing and able to sign and date written consent form and Authorization for Access to and Use of Health Information
- Subject is at least 18 years of age
- Subject is willing and able to comply with Clinical Investigation Plan
- Subject is willing and able to transmit data using Medtronic CareLink® Network
- Subject has market released right atrial (RA) (if applicable), right ventricular (RV), and left ventricular (LV) (if applicable) leads and one of the following generators implanted: Concerto® CRT-D - Model C154DWK, Virtuoso® DR ICD - Model D154AWG, Virtuoso® VR ICD - Model D154VWC, Consulta™ CRT-D - Model D224TRK, Secura™ DR ICD - Model D224DRG, Secura™ VR ICD - Model D224VRC, or any future market released Medtronic generator with wireless telemetry, Cardiac Compass with OptiVol Fluid Status Monitoring, and that is supported by the Medtronic CareLink Network
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Subject is enrolled in a concurrent study with the exception of a study approved by the Medtronic Clinical Trial Leader prior to enrollment
- Subject has life expectancy of less than 1 year
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly Review ArmMonthly review of Cardiac Compass Trends with OptiVol. This intervention is related to disease management. | Other | Monthly Review Arm |
| Quarterly Review ArmQuarterly review of Cardiac Compass Trends with OptiVol. This intervention is related to disease management. | Other | Quarterly Review Arm |
Primary outcome
Compare the Time to Initiation of Clinical Action Prompted by an OptiVol Threshold Crossing Between Monthly and Quarterly Review of Cardiac Compass Trends With OptiVol
Time frame: 1 year
3 secondary outcomes
Compare Changes in Subject Self-care Over Time in the Monthly Review Arm vs. Quarterly Review Arm
Time frame: 1 year
Identify Patient Groups Who Are More Likely to Have Clinical Actions Triggered by Monthly Rather Than Quarterly Reviews
Time frame: 1 year
Compare the Time to Initiation of Clinical Action With or Without an OptiVol Threshold Crossing Between Monthly and Quarterly Review of Cardiac Compass Trends With OptiVol
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 May 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Heart Failure
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Multi-Scale Analysis of Phenotypes in Heart Failure (MAP-HEART)
Heart Failure
Active, not recruitingObservational study
REdo Transcatheter Aortic VALVE Implantation for the Management of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Failure
Aortic Valve Stenosis
RecruitingPhase 3
Optimal Diuretic Therapies for Acute Heart Failure With Volume Overload
Acute Heart Failure
Recruiting
Renal Denervation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Hypertension
Atrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal), Hypertension
Recruiting
Laser Acupuncture for Fatigue in Hemodialysis Patients
ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease), Dialysis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wilson Tang, MD principal investigator
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic
108 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Monthly Review Arm and Quarterly Review Arm in people with Heart Failure, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 108 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 108 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 May 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Compare the Time to Initiation of Clinical Action Prompted by an OptiVol Threshold Crossing Between Monthly and Quarterly Review of Cardiac Compass Trends With OptiVol (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2013.